<![CDATA[I Thought He Missed It, Too]]>In fact, for a while, CBS listed the game as a tie on the ticker.

http://cle.scout.com/2/907541.html

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/7625/i-thought-he-missed-it-tooRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 10:33:17 GMTFri, 09 Oct 2009 20:10:33 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:35:18 GMT]]>just to clarify the nfl network videos that go with the story say field goals cant be challenged if they go over the top of the posts, hence no challenge from mangini/booth

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122745https://brownsboard.com/post/122745Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:35:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:54:02 GMT]]>17421782.jpg

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122689https://brownsboard.com/post/122689Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:54:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:35:20 GMT]]>TIE? What makes you think that we wouldn't have won it? Hailmary plays are DA's specialty.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122686https://brownsboard.com/post/122686Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:35:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:37:07 GMT]]>Call Congress! We need a full blown investigation! Give us our tie dammit, give us our tie! *shakes fist in anger*

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122685https://brownsboard.com/post/122685Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:37:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:20:39 GMT]]>

@roach said:

Who is going to watch while me and Russ carry the 100 lb grille?

Have fun. Leave the Hag behind.

Even 2 years later, Skippy still hasn't figured out how to help carry the grill?

It's probably for the best though...his drunk ass would drop the thing.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122604https://brownsboard.com/post/122604Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:20:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:13:41 GMT]]>

@roach said:

Who is going to watch while me and Russ carry the 100 lb grille?

Well, certainly not my dad ... he's obviously blind as a bat and would view you two as two hot chicks carrying a keg of beer.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122571https://brownsboard.com/post/122571Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:13:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:55:37 GMT]]>

@atenears said:

My dad was the referee that signaled the field goal was 'good' ... I'm so ashamed that I'm moving to Tampa so people stop making fun of me.

Who is going to watch while me and Russ carry the 100 lb grille?

Have fun. Leave the Hag behind.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122537https://brownsboard.com/post/122537Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:55:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Sat, 10 Oct 2009 04:12:01 GMT]]>Wow. The article suggests it might be the camera angle. Ugh, if you know anything about geometry, you can tell by the angles between the posts and the hash marks down the middle of the filed that the camera is dead in the middle of the two posts - so you're seeing the real thing and the FG kick is unquestionably wide.

I'm surprised that the fans in the end zone didn't revolt!

By the way, I always wondered why the NFL put two refs under the posts to determine if the FG is good. Have you ever been in that position watching someone kick FG's? It's one of the worst angles possible to make a call.

I agree that if they can use technology in tennis to ensure the ball is in, they can figure something out for the NFL, and one day, they will.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122532https://brownsboard.com/post/122532Sat, 10 Oct 2009 04:12:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:24:31 GMT]]>

@.mz said:

I'm fine with the L. I'm not looking for wins this year specifically, I'm looking for improvement. Better for our draft position if the kick was good. Which it didn't appear to be.

Same here.

Besides, let's save all of the wide-rights for this week in Buffalo.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122483https://brownsboard.com/post/122483Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:24:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:04:54 GMT]]>My dad was the referee that signaled the field goal was 'good' ... I'm so ashamed that I'm moving to Tampa so people stop making fun of me.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122478https://brownsboard.com/post/122478Sat, 10 Oct 2009 01:04:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:52:18 GMT]]>Same here...big time cheering we tied then it was announced good...i proclaimed it looked no good then just assumed it was a bad angle on film...lol

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122476https://brownsboard.com/post/122476Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:52:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:31:19 GMT]]>The best you will get from the NFL is "sorry".

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122468https://brownsboard.com/post/122468Sat, 10 Oct 2009 00:31:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:24:32 GMT]]>

@nigeltufnel said:

Probably a dumb question, but could the league review this and proclaim a tie? Or is it a "what's done is done" thing?

I too thought he missed it when I was watching live and was surprised when the refs raised their hands.

I think it's been to long to try to make the NFL over turn the call.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122400https://brownsboard.com/post/122400Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:24:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:23:02 GMT]]>Probably a dumb question, but could the league review this and proclaim a tie? Or is it a "what's done is done" thing?

I too thought he missed it when I was watching live and was surprised when the refs raised their hands.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122399https://brownsboard.com/post/122399Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:23:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:33:32 GMT]]>I find it pretty laughable that they DIDNT review it.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122373https://brownsboard.com/post/122373Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:33:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:23:42 GMT]]>

@brownindian said:

me 2. I thought we had gone for a draw but was surprised to see

that it went in.

Did it? 🤔

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122359https://brownsboard.com/post/122359Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:23:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:20:44 GMT]]>

@atenears said:

It's that a new rule that you can challenge field goals (Dawson rule?)

Wonder why if it was even close, why we wouldn't have challenged it.

I thought it was no good, but was at the opposite end of the stadium. The video I just watched made it look like it wasn't really even that close.

You can challange a FG (Dawson rule if you will that went into effect last year).

In OT all reviews must come from the booth. It's the same rules as inside 2 minutes in the 4th QTR (i.e. no coaches challanges in OT). On top of that, if this was the 4th QTR inside 2 minutes (instead of inside 2 mintues in OT), it couldn't be challanged by the coach.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122355https://brownsboard.com/post/122355Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:20:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:13:55 GMT]]>Pushed it right.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122352https://brownsboard.com/post/122352Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:13:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:10:29 GMT]]>AdaM

excellent idea.

Let's take the guesswork out of the judges hands.

Win or lose I would feel better if it wasn't just someones opinion.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122351https://brownsboard.com/post/122351Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:10:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:01:07 GMT]]>After a bunch of pause/plays on that NFL highlight link above, it sure looks to me like it went just outside the top, not over the top, of the goalpost. Might have even barely clipped it.

Oh well, game's over.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122341https://brownsboard.com/post/122341Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:01:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:51:36 GMT]]>They could solve this VERY easilly....

All they need to do is put a half inch wide reflective strip from top of the inside goalpost, down across the cross bar and up the other side.

Put a chip in the ball, if the chip doesn't break the plain of the reflective strip, or laser system or what have you, its no good.

You wouldn't even need ref's to have a say in it.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122331https://brownsboard.com/post/122331Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:51:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:39:48 GMT]]>

@atenears said:

It's that a new rule that you can challenge field goals (Dawson rule?)

Wonder why if it was even close, why we wouldn't have challenged it.

I thought it was no good, but was at the opposite end of the stadium. The video I just watched made it look like it wasn't really even that close.

I believe it is only challengeable if the ball strikes the goal posts and bounces around. Here it was apparently a pure judgment call on whether the ball "would have been" inside the goal posts IF the posts had extended higher.

Again, my point is: why not just extend the height of the posts? I mean, won't they be straight if you make them taller? Will they bend or snap under their weight?

What is preventing the extension of the posts?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122322https://brownsboard.com/post/122322Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:39:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:39:16 GMT]]>

@the-gipper said:

This reminds me of the Karliss kick in "The Drive" game, which I would swear from the video was no good. And from the video here I would swear this kick was no good.

Are these video angles this deceiving?

Was there another video angle of this kick perhaps from the far end of the field? I know they have umpteen cameras taking these shots, why couldn't we see another angle like we get for any other on field play? Does the league suppress these shots once the refs make a call?

Perhaps they should lengthen the goal posts. The Karliss kick, this kick and many others could benefit from taller goal posts.

I was thinking the same thing.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122321https://brownsboard.com/post/122321Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:39:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I Thought He Missed It, Too on Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:36:23 GMT]]>This reminds me of the Karliss kick in "The Drive" game, which I would swear from the video was no good. And from the video here I would swear this kick was no good.

Are these video angles this deceiving?

Was there another video angle of this kick perhaps from the far end of the field? I know they have umpteen cameras taking these shots, why couldn't we see another angle like we get for any other on field play? Does the league suppress these shots once the refs make a call?

Perhaps they should lengthen the goal posts. The Karliss kick, this kick and many others could benefit from taller goal posts.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/122316https://brownsboard.com/post/122316Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:36:23 GMT