<![CDATA[Paranormal Activity]]>I don't think I can give you as insightful view as Steve. But a quick synopsis.

Not bad. Hand held camera, blair witch like (but not all the over the top camera movement), pretty straight forward shooting. Acting is par at best. But to take it at face value; it was entertaining, a great movie for the production cost. Not as scary has all the hype, but still had me on my seat. At some points I was like "yea right". Which I hate to see in a movie. The chick in the movie is pretty hot. So all in all it's worth a DVD rental but not a theatre trip.

C+

Steve let me know when you see this movie, your reviews are pretty much the shit, I'll delete this one.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/8105/paranormal-activityRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 16:33:08 GMTFri, 23 Oct 2009 12:42:38 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Paranormal Activity on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:29:47 GMT]]>

@the-gipper said:

Right, and they didn't even show off enough of the chicks big tits which is what they needed to do. I can't say she was a bad actress, but those boobs needed better exposure.

I concur. Let's see them titties.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/132990https://brownsboard.com/post/132990Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:29:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Paranormal Activity on Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:28:58 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Remember they aren't in competition with only other low rent productions.

And that is the marketing genius behind it. I saw it free, so I am not complaining. I would be a little ticked if I paid for it. Still better then Paul Blart Mall Cop.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/132989https://brownsboard.com/post/132989Sun, 01 Nov 2009 15:28:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Paranormal Activity on Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:17:09 GMT]]>Right, and they didn't even show off enough of the chicks big tits which is what they needed to do. I can't say she was a bad actress, but those boobs needed better exposure.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/132478https://brownsboard.com/post/132478Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:17:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Paranormal Activity on Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:58:29 GMT]]>

@kosar_for_president said:

Come on Steve give credit were it's due. It was made for $15,000. I know it is bad and overhyped, but for that budget you can't even make a back alley porn. Give it a bit of credit for being the underdog. And you got to admit this at least, it wasn't bad staring at that chicks knockers 1/2 the time.

Credit?

Turd script

Bad sound

crap camerawork

Not frightening at all

terrible acting

I've seen better in "back alley porn."

So what did the 15 grand pay for?

Remember they aren't in competition with only other low rent productions.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/131723https://brownsboard.com/post/131723Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:58:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Paranormal Activity on Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:11:07 GMT]]>I think the "in" thing now is to say how scared you got while watching it. For me, it was just ok. Might be worth a dollar rental at red box.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/131634https://brownsboard.com/post/131634Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:11:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Paranormal Activity on Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:21:13 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Wow.

Saw it last week but have yet to write it up.

IMO

Hands down the biggest piece of shit to come down the pike in a decade.

Stunningly bad.

WSS

Come on Steve give credit were it's due. It was made for $15,000. I know it is bad and overhyped, but for that budget you can't even make a back alley porn. Give it a bit of credit for being the underdog. And you got to admit this at least, it wasn't bad staring at that chicks knockers 1/2 the time.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/131431https://brownsboard.com/post/131431Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:21:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Paranormal Activity on Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:18:20 GMT]]>

@kosar_for_president said:

I don't think I can give you as insightful view as Steve. But a quick synopsis.

Not bad. Hand held camera, blair witch like (but not all the over the top camera movement), pretty straight forward shooting. Acting is par at best. But to take it at face value; it was entertaining, a great movie for the production cost. Not as scary has all the hype, but still had me on my seat. At some points I was like "yea right". Which I hate to see in a movie. The chick in the movie is pretty hot. So all in all it's worth a DVD rental but not a theatre trip.

C+

Steve let me know when you see this movie, your reviews are pretty much the shit, I'll delete this one.

Wow.

Saw it last week but have yet to write it up.

IMO

Hands down the biggest piece of shit to come down the pike in a decade.

Stunningly bad.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/131294https://brownsboard.com/post/131294Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:18:20 GMT