<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Defense-"Bring it every play"]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I have been thinking of this after observing our games this year, where we tend to wear down on defense , especially after halftime because we seem to rush 3 at least once every series &amp; it leads to long drives buy our opponents, then we go "3 &amp; out" &amp; they're right back on the field. Why not rush AT LEAST 5 guys EVERY defensive play? Sound silly?..Here's my logic....</p>
<p>
1) IF we get burned for a long TD, it would most likely be quick...NOT 3 or 4 minutes=less continual time on field</p>
<p>
2) More sacks</p>
<p>
3) Possibility of more turnovers through "hurrying" their offense</p>
<p>
4) The opponents OL can't beat the "H" out of each of our 3 linemen..they'll be spread thinner</p>
<p>
5) Holding the opponent to fewer yards/plays before punts=better field position for us</p>

<p>
I would love to see us play D with that kind of aggressiveness &amp; believe that the more aggressive approach would also give an opposing QB a lot less time to explore our weaknesses. I don't think it can be argued that our D has looked a whole lot better WHEN it plays aggressively. It's when we go back to the 3 man line that we defeat what we had accomplished earlier in a series. Look at how aggressive our special teams are &amp; their results have been pretty darned good.</p>

<p>
My mindset has always been..."We can hold our heads up, win or lose, as long as we played aggressively". You can't give teams all day to MAKE a mistake...the good teams FORCE mistakes!</p>
<p>
Ok, now it's time to call me a fool, but before you do, what's our record now &amp; what would we have to lose by trying this?</p>
<p>
Mike</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/8134/defense-bring-it-every-play</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 02:49:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/8134.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:39:30 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Defense-"Bring it every play" on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:39:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>That last game was where i gave up on Mcdonald...he does a few things OK...but he is not a starter</p>

<p>
thats a big hole on that side of the ball i expect him to get burned more often in the future..unless they roll more help his way</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/130877</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/130877</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DestinFunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:39:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Defense-"Bring it every play" on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:28:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/canton-mike" aria-label="Profile: canton-mike">@<bdi>canton-mike</bdi></a> <a href="/post/130842">said</a>:</p>I have been thinking of this after observing our games this year, where we tend to wear down on defense , especially after halftime because we seem to rush 3 at least once every series &amp; it leads to long drives buy our opponents, then we go "3 &amp; out" &amp; they're right back on the field. Why not rush AT LEAST 5 guys EVERY defensive play? Sound silly?..Here's my logic....<p>
1) IF we get burned for a long TD, it would most likely be quick...NOT 3 or 4 minutes=less continual time on field</p>
<p>
2) More sacks</p>
<p>
3) Possibility of more turnovers through "hurrying" their offense</p>
<p>
4) The opponents OL can't beat the "H" out of each of our 3 linemen..they'll be spread thinner</p>
<p>
5) Holding the opponent to fewer yards/plays before punts=better field position for us</p>

<p>
I would love to see us play D with that kind of aggressiveness &amp; believe that the more aggressive approach would also give an opposing QB a lot less time to explore our weaknesses. I don't think it can be argued that our D has looked a whole lot better WHEN it plays aggressively. It's when we go back to the 3 man line that we defeat what we had accomplished earlier in a series. Look at how aggressive our special teams are &amp; their results have been pretty darned good.</p>

<p>
My mindset has always been..."We can hold our heads up, win or lose, as long as we played aggressively". You can't give teams all day to MAKE a mistake...the good teams FORCE mistakes!</p>
<p>
Ok, now it's time to call me a fool, but before you do, what's our record now &amp; what would we have to lose by trying this?</p>
<p>
Mike</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
Really good stuff Mike.  I think it would help our DBs considerably if we pressure Rodgers the way some other teams have been able to do.  </p>

<p>
Another thing I NEED to see is Mike Adams STARTING in our secondary.  I don't MIND if a guy like that makes a mistake because he brings it every play - all that he has.  </p>

<p>
I know it's a bottomline business where some will saythere's no points for moral victories.  That said, once you've watched a couple 60 minute games where you didn't have anything to cheer vrs taking a team that's doing better than you on the season into OT - I'll take the game where I had plays to applaud.  And why?  This is the stage of transition where we are at right now.  I think we had a couple weeks where we built some momentum before we got the flu and an officiating crew that did soem hocus pocus with first down chains.</p>

<p>
<i><b>- Tom F.</b></i></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/130869</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/130869</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flugel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:28:17 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>