<![CDATA[The Bengals are owning.]]>what do they have that the Browns need? They are up 27-0 against the Bears and its not even half.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/8163/the-bengals-are-owning.RSS for NodeFri, 02 Oct 2026 09:37:08 GMTSun, 25 Oct 2009 21:23:57 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to The Bengals are owning. on Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:55:34 GMT]]>The organization stuck with Marvin Lewis through some really bad years and now it looks to be paying off. I thought they would bounce back well after last week's loss but I had no idea they'd do this well. At 5-2 they are tied with the Steelers. The rest of the AFC North is pretty competitive and entertaining this year. Too bad we weren't invited to the party.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/131197https://brownsboard.com/post/131197Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:55:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The Bengals are owning. on Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:35:01 GMT]]>They have a running game (cendric benson), 3 capable WR who are fast and have hands, and a pro bowl QB (most importantly)

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/131189https://brownsboard.com/post/131189Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:35:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The Bengals are owning. on Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:09:43 GMT]]>

@mario said:

Bengals have been to more Superbowls then the browns.....

Yep, so has basically the entire NFL. But other then trying to be witty what does that really prove? Collinsworth and Bommer were playing the last time the Bengals made it to the SuperBowl.....which has nothing to do with the current Bengals.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/131152https://brownsboard.com/post/131152Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:09:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The Bengals are owning. on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:56:33 GMT]]>Bengals have been to more Superbowls then the browns.....

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/131149https://brownsboard.com/post/131149Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:56:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The Bengals are owning. on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:44:13 GMT]]>

@theclevelandsound said:

The game (31-3 at half) and the AFC North.

So? What have the Bengals done to make the Browns follow their "plan"? Sorry but you can't use the Bengals as a franchise to model.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/131067https://brownsboard.com/post/131067Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:44:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The Bengals are owning. on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:41:02 GMT]]>

@kbndawg said:

Sorry what exactly are the Bengals "owning".?

The game (31-3 at half) and the AFC North.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/131063https://brownsboard.com/post/131063Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:41:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The Bengals are owning. on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:38:36 GMT]]>Conrats to the five time in a row Suber Bowl champs. The Bengals are diffently a dynasty.

Sorry what exactly are the Bengals "owning".?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/131060https://brownsboard.com/post/131060Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:38:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The Bengals are owning. on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:32:46 GMT]]>They don't have DA, Mangini or Quinn

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/131052https://brownsboard.com/post/131052Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:32:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The Bengals are owning. on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:25:23 GMT]]>1) They got talent(this always helps)

2) Heart(this is what you need to win games)

3) Motivation(Very powerful stuff)

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/131050https://brownsboard.com/post/131050Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:25:23 GMT