<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Stat Guru not favorable to Anderson]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2...romo-moves-up/" rel="external nofollow">http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2...romo-moves-up/</a></p>


<p>
An interesting article that builds off of what a lot of statistical analysts have been saying the past few years in that passing yards per attempt is the one major statistic to look at when judging QB's. As a statistician, I think it's great that people are trying to improve the QB rating system.</p>
<p>
The actual website is <a href="http://www.nflstatanalysis.net/" rel="external nofollow">http://www.nflstatanalysis.net/</a> and there's an interesting breakdown of why Romo is "better" than Favre - despite what the NFL passer ratings say. <a href="http://www.nflstatanalysis.net/2009/...gh-week-7.html" rel="external nofollow">http://www.nflstatanalysis.net/2009/...gh-week-7.html</a></p>
<p>
Someday, as Browns' fans, we won't have to look at rankings like this and see our players all the way at the bottom.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/8282/stat-guru-not-favorable-to-anderson</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 10:03:51 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/8282.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:09:07 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Stat Guru not favorable to Anderson on Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:16:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/bag-o-browns" aria-label="Profile: bag-o-browns">@<bdi>bag-o-browns</bdi></a> <a href="/post/132674">said</a>:</p>I thought this Mark Twain/Benjamin Disraeli quote applied to when people start bring up statistics left and right. (plus a little info afterward to see where he was coming from) 
<p>
Lies, damned lies, and statistics</p>

<p>
"Lies, damned lies, and statistics" is part of a phrase attributed to the 19th Century British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, among others, and later popularized in the United States by, among others, Mark Twain: "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." The statement refers to the persuasive power of numbers, the use of statistics to bolster weak arguments, and the tendency of people to disparage statistics that do not support their positions. The phrase is not found in Disraeli's works nor is it known within his lifetime and for years afterward</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
So does that make the attribution a lie, a damned lie, or a guess?  <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f606.png?v=2a192e496db" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--laughing" title=":laughing:" alt="😆" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/132802</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/132802</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kshutchins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:16:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Stat Guru not favorable to Anderson on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:24:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I thought this Mark Twain/Benjamin Disraeli quote applied to when people start bring up statistics left and right. (plus a little info afterward to see where he was coming from) </p>

<p>
Lies, damned lies, and statistics</p>

<p>
"Lies, damned lies, and statistics" is part of a phrase attributed to the 19th Century British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, among others, and later popularized in the United States by, among others, Mark Twain: "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." The statement refers to the persuasive power of numbers, the use of statistics to bolster weak arguments, and the tendency of people to disparage statistics that do not support their positions. The phrase is not found in Disraeli's works nor is it known within his lifetime and for years afterward</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/132674</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/132674</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bag O'Browns]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:24:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Stat Guru not favorable to Anderson on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:03:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>"Stats are like a bikini, what they reveal is suggestive, but what they hide is vital." Kathy</p>
<p>
*************************************************</p>
<p>
  Kathy's on a roll this morning... TGIF ! ROF,L !</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/132670</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/132670</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:03:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Stat Guru not favorable to Anderson on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:05:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/medicineman" aria-label="Profile: medicineman">@<bdi>medicineman</bdi></a> <a href="/post/132654">said</a>:</p>We don't need anybody to tell us we suck now</blockquote>

<p>
I know.  Who needs proof when the bottom line is so obvious?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/132659</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/132659</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kshutchins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:05:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Stat Guru not favorable to Anderson on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:01:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>We don't need anybody to tell us we suck now</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/132654</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/132654</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[medicineman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:01:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Stat Guru not favorable to Anderson on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:59:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/kshutchins" aria-label="Profile: kshutchins">@<bdi>kshutchins</bdi></a> <a href="/post/132651">said</a>:</p>There are a number of variations on this quote but I think they're right on the money:<p>
"Stats are like a bikini, what they reveal is suggestive, but what they hide is vital."</p>

<p>
There's a place for stats but they're not the entire picture.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
great quote.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/132652</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/132652</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Pumpkin Eater]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:59:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Stat Guru not favorable to Anderson on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:57:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/bkosar74" aria-label="Profile: bkosar74">@<bdi>bkosar74</bdi></a> <a href="/post/132647">said</a>:</p>I just laughed so hard I puked in my mouth.  Although, I don't completely agree.  I think there's value to this.  Belichick is a big stat analysis guy./</blockquote>


<p>
There are a number of variations on this quote but I think they're right on the money:</p>
<p>
"Stats are like a bikini, what they reveal is suggestive, but what they hide is vital."</p>

<p>
There's a place for stats but they're not the entire picture.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/132651</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/132651</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kshutchins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:57:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Stat Guru not favorable to Anderson on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:46:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/kshutchins" aria-label="Profile: kshutchins">@<bdi>kshutchins</bdi></a> <a href="/post/132641">said</a>:</p>This is what happens when baseball fans get interested in football. <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=2a192e496db" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:" alt="🙂" /></blockquote>


<p>
I just laughed so hard I puked in my mouth.  Although, I don't completely agree.  I think there's value to this.  Belichick is a big stat analysis guy./</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/132647</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/132647</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[bkosar74]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:46:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Stat Guru not favorable to Anderson on Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:37:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/bkosar74" aria-label="Profile: bkosar74">@<bdi>bkosar74</bdi></a> <a href="/post/132629">said</a>:</p>
<a href="http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2...romo-moves-up/" rel="external nofollow">http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2...romo-moves-up/</a>

<p>
An interesting article that builds off of what a lot of statistical analysts have been saying the past few years in that passing yards per attempt is the one major statistic to look at when judging QB's. As a statistician, I think it's great that people are trying to improve the QB rating system.</p>
<p>
The actual website is <a href="http://www.nflstatanalysis.net/" rel="external nofollow">http://www.nflstatanalysis.net/</a> and there's an interesting breakdown of why Romo is "better" than Favre - despite what the NFL passer ratings say. <a href="http://www.nflstatanalysis.net/2009/...gh-week-7.html" rel="external nofollow">http://www.nflstatanalysis.net/2009/...gh-week-7.html</a></p>
<p>
Someday, as Browns' fans, we won't have to look at rankings like this and see our players all the way at the bottom.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
This is what happens when baseball fans get interested in football. <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=2a192e496db" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:" alt="🙂" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/132641</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/132641</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[kshutchins]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:37:49 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>