<![CDATA[Why didn't we go for 2?]]>I'm still wondering if anyone has a good reason why we would not go for the 2 point conversion when the Detroit offense had been running up and down the field. At least we would have had a chance in OT.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/8799/why-didn-t-we-go-for-2RSS for NodeFri, 02 Oct 2026 03:14:44 GMTSun, 22 Nov 2009 23:26:03 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Why didn't we go for 2? on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:47:07 GMT]]>Actually I deserved MUCH worse than that! I'm out of country and listening to the game via radio and the signal was going in and out. But I will take my 50 lashes for not keep up with the math. LOL

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/139320https://brownsboard.com/post/139320Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:47:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why didn't we go for 2? on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:46:46 GMT]]>

@ballpeen said:

LOL....don't be so blunt the next time 😉

LOL, sorry didnt mean to sound like an ass.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/139319https://brownsboard.com/post/139319Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:46:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why didn't we go for 2? on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:35:17 GMT]]>

nmills said:

we did and converted it

LOL....don't be so blunt the next time 😉

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/139315https://brownsboard.com/post/139315Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:35:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why didn't we go for 2? on Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:27:35 GMT]]>

@spisatus said:

I'm still wondering if anyone has a good reason why we would not go for the 2 point conversion when the Detroit offense had been running up and down the field. At least we would have had a chance in OT.

we did and converted it

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/139308https://brownsboard.com/post/139308Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:27:35 GMT