<![CDATA[Consensus Top 6 picks updated]]>http://dcprosportsreport.com/files/mockdraftdatabase/nfl.html

Jimmy Clausen remains the top projected pick leader for the second straight week. But that is it. The rest of the Top 6 have changed.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/8931/consensus-top-6-picks-updatedRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 11:00:18 GMTTue, 01 Dec 2009 19:39:06 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Consensus Top 6 picks updated on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:08:51 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Well let us hope we're bad enough to have the first pick and some sucker with more spare picks than brains is in love with Clausen.

WSS

OK, but I wouldn't want to go too far down. If the Browns have the #1 overall, go ahead and pick King Kong Suh. If they have #2 or #3 go for Berry. The team needs a defensive playmaker as much as it needs an offensive one.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/141181https://brownsboard.com/post/141181Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:08:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Consensus Top 6 picks updated on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:45:17 GMT]]>Well let us hope we're bad enough to have the first pick and some sucker with more spare picks than brains is in love with Clausen.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/141174https://brownsboard.com/post/141174Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:45:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Consensus Top 6 picks updated on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:37:30 GMT]]>I agree Suh or berry is likely. I don't think it is a lock that we have the first pick. I don't know if I would mind if they took Russell Okung. Him and Thomas on the ends with Mack at Center would Shore up Line for years to come. I think I would use the rest of the picks I have on D after that

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/141173https://brownsboard.com/post/141173Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:37:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Consensus Top 6 picks updated on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:19:34 GMT]]>

@dawgtracker said:

If Oakland had waited a year they probably could have had Suh instead of a great player like Seymour going downhill. And that might be exactly what BB was thinking. When the pats have been most successful their d line has been able to put pressure on. Suh is that guy. I hope we pick ahead of new england. Brady, please prove to everyone that you can be a good QB in the next six weeks.

Berry will not get picked with the #1 overall- Suh is another story.

Regarding the Pats- Dem Saints showed Father Time is catching up to them. Prediction? One and done in the playoffs.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/141085https://brownsboard.com/post/141085Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:19:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Consensus Top 6 picks updated on Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:33:47 GMT]]>

@the-gipper said:

I don't think we are going to be adding another Notre Dame QB. As I have said, we need help up the middle. Draft Ndamakong Suh, DT or Eric Berry Safety.

I totally agree, I want us to take either of them with our first pick. I also do not think any QB in this draft class is worth where we will be picking.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/141072https://brownsboard.com/post/141072Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:33:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Consensus Top 6 picks updated on Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:42:18 GMT]]>If Oakland had waited a year they probably could have had Suh instead of a great player like Seymour going downhill. And that might be exactly what BB was thinking. When the pats have been most successful their d line has been able to put pressure on. Suh is that guy. I hope we pick ahead of new england. Brady, please prove to everyone that you can be a good QB in the next six weeks.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/140986https://brownsboard.com/post/140986Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:42:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Consensus Top 6 picks updated on Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:26:17 GMT]]>I don't think we are going to be adding another Notre Dame QB. As I have said, we need help up the middle. Draft Ndamakong Suh, DT or Eric Berry Safety.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/140980https://brownsboard.com/post/140980Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:26:17 GMT