<![CDATA[Browns put in claim for Mark Bradley]]>We put in a claim for the ex-Chief Mark Bradley. You know, the receiver whose Kansas City career we basically ended last week. We were beat out by the Bucs, however. This tells me two things:

1). We're looking to improve our WR corps. I think Mangini and Co. finally realized that MoMass, Robo, Stuckey, Furrey and Cribbs aren't cutting it.

2). We're desperate as hell. Mark Bradley was a middle of the road WR at best. He's got 92 catches for 1,283 yards and 9 touchdowns since coming into the NFL in 2005. He's hardly what you would call an impact WR.

I think this draft/offseason is going to be WR heavy, as much as I hate to admit it.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/9426/browns-put-in-claim-for-mark-bradleyRSS for NodeFri, 02 Oct 2026 07:33:37 GMTThu, 24 Dec 2009 00:08:59 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Browns put in claim for Mark Bradley on Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:07:05 GMT]]>Tampa Bay Mark Bradley WR Acquired From Waivers

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/147136https://brownsboard.com/post/147136Thu, 24 Dec 2009 20:07:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns put in claim for Mark Bradley on Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:45:43 GMT]]>bradley made a nice catch there at the end to tie it.

consistency could've helped.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/147070https://brownsboard.com/post/147070Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:45:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns put in claim for Mark Bradley on Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:44:50 GMT]]>The team has to keep looking for someone hoping to get a target for DA that can spark the offense and make manweeni look like a genie...we arent going to run over the raiders like we did the chiefs...😉

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/147011https://brownsboard.com/post/147011Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:44:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns put in claim for Mark Bradley on Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:28:10 GMT]]>I don't know Tim....it could be we just seek better players no matter where they fall.

If you can pluck someone from the wire, do it.

When you aren't that good, it isn't that hard to find a player worse than the one you just signed.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/147001https://brownsboard.com/post/147001Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:28:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns put in claim for Mark Bradley on Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:22:22 GMT]]>

@peterbell said:

You never know..maybe some scout on the Browns had the hots for him..I like the fact Mangini and Co are working continuously to find more depth and not sitting on their hands and playing it out..

That is true. They're still looking at this season, instead of chalking it up to failure and moving on. I do like that.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/146997https://brownsboard.com/post/146997Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:22:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns put in claim for Mark Bradley on Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:14:51 GMT]]>You never know..maybe some scout on the Browns had the hots for him..I like the fact Mangini and Co are working continuously to find more depth and not sitting on their hands and playing it out..

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/146995https://brownsboard.com/post/146995Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:14:51 GMT