<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I think Holmgren likes DA better]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, it's a slow day ... but I think DA fits in better with what Holmgren &amp; Mangini want in regards to team chemistry.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/9737/i-think-holmgren-likes-da-better</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 06:48:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/9737.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:31:51 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:45:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/flugel" aria-label="Profile: flugel">@<bdi>flugel</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151428">said</a>:</p>LOL!  Skippy, have you ever even stepped foot on Corvalis?  Comeon folks!  Loverboy was DA's homecoming princess in Timberline boots in lie of high heels.  That's a hometown crush thing all the way if you've been here long enough to see the evolution of it all. Believe it or not, there's a few remaining DA fans that provide some valuable contributions here.  One of his fans really improved and brought some level headedness to some coversations in spite of his screen name (Drunk Not Stupid). He was actually a good sport during alot of the ball busting and exchanges. OSUSev seemed like he was a big fan of DA's because of 2007 as were some others.  
<p>
The ONLY similarites I see between Atenears and Loverboy is the Jerry Springer entertainment value.  They're both the type of wise guy that scared substitute teachers out of the teaching profession all together.  BQ never had our backs folks regardless of what we thought about DA.  Neither did SQUAT with the first offense and we had to win AROUND each guy in 09.  Besides, it's not like any of us are getting paid for our opinion of the starting QB (or lackthereof) here. Therefore, I never understood why people that couldn't bare to read the world according to Loverboy (Lums) couldn't just utilize the ignore feature instead of hammering the mods (not just Atenears).  </p>

<p>
Folks, nobody got their balls busted more than Loverboy before Quinn looked worse than a rookie in season #3.  It was okay to sling mud at him as long as he didn't return it?  Come on!  The "him or me" stuff should have never been started because some of those thinking that never stopped throwing gas on the fire at their end either.  We don't need a 2nd Civil War over these 2 QBs folks based on people's opinions of them.  If one read the openning post of this thread - it was all about sense of humor.  Nobody with more than 2 brain cells under the dome seriously believes either DA or BQ is the answer.  All the wishful thinking in the world and homerism doesn't replace Quinn's 32% and 37% completions rates in his final 2 outings.  That ain't EARNING the job by wonderful performance.  The RIGHT Qbs don't have to be sayign in their 3rd season - I'll be better when those around me are better.  If they're right, they MAKE those around them better.  There IS a difference.</p>

<p>
BECAUSE we've been moving forward - it's nice to see dedicated board members returning or at least feeling like they can post on both boards.  PLEASE don't come here with cyber bullets loaded at all those that don't buy into Brady Quinn as the future.  If you're gonna post on both boards consistently, look at the example set by Alo.  His only agenda is to add expertise and share really good info for us to discuss.  Last year he completed knocked my socks off with all his pre-draft goodies and he looks to be doign the same thing again this year.  At least bring a sense of humor about the current QB debate - don't be a Plexico Burress with a loaded gun.</p>
<p>
<i><b>- Tom F. </b></i></p>
</blockquote>


<p>
I have a bellybutton.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151542</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151542</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Couch Pulls Out]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 22:45:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:00:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/atenears" aria-label="Profile: atenears">@<bdi>atenears</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151401">said</a>:</p>How much do you want to wager that I am not Lumbergh?</blockquote>

<p>
LOL!  Skippy, have you ever even stepped foot on Corvalis?  Comeon folks!  Loverboy was DA's homecoming princess in Timberline boots in lie of high heels.  That's a hometown crush thing all the way if you've been here long enough to see the evolution of it all. Believe it or not, there's a few remaining DA fans that provide some valuable contributions here.  One of his fans really improved and brought some level headedness to some coversations in spite of his screen name (Drunk Not Stupid). He was actually a good sport during alot of the ball busting and exchanges. OSUSev seemed like he was a big fan of DA's because of 2007 as were some others.  </p>

<p>
The ONLY similarites I see between Atenears and Loverboy is the Jerry Springer entertainment value.  They're both the type of wise guy that scared substitute teachers out of the teaching profession all together.  BQ never had our backs folks regardless of what we thought about DA.  Neither did SQUAT with the first offense and we had to win AROUND each guy in 09.  Besides, it's not like any of us are getting paid for our opinion of the starting QB (or lackthereof) here. Therefore, I never understood why people that couldn't bare to read the world according to Loverboy (Lums) couldn't just utilize the ignore feature instead of hammering the mods (not just Atenears).  </p>

<p>
Folks, nobody got their balls busted more than Loverboy before Quinn looked worse than a rookie in season #3.  It was okay to sling mud at him as long as he didn't return it?  Come on!  The "him or me" stuff should have never been started because some of those thinking that never stopped throwing gas on the fire at their end either.  We don't need a 2nd Civil War over these 2 QBs folks based on people's opinions of them.  If one read the openning post of this thread - it was all about sense of humor.  Nobody with more than 2 brain cells under the dome seriously believes either DA or BQ is the answer.  All the wishful thinking in the world and homerism doesn't replace Quinn's 32% and 37% completions rates in his final 2 outings.  That ain't EARNING the job by wonderful performance.  The RIGHT Qbs don't have to be sayign in their 3rd season - I'll be better when those around me are better.  If they're right, they MAKE those around them better.  There IS a difference.</p>

<p>
BECAUSE we've been moving forward - it's nice to see dedicated board members returning or at least feeling like they can post on both boards.  PLEASE don't come here with cyber bullets loaded at all those that don't buy into Brady Quinn as the future.  If you're gonna post on both boards consistently, look at the example set by Alo.  His only agenda is to add expertise and share really good info for us to discuss.  Last year he completed knocked my socks off with all his pre-draft goodies and he looks to be doign the same thing again this year.  At least bring a sense of humor about the current QB debate - don't be a Plexico Burress with a loaded gun.</p>
<p>
<i><b>- Tom F. </b></i></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151428</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151428</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flugel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:00:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:09:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/yosemitejam" aria-label="Profile: yosemitejam">@<bdi>yosemitejam</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151398">said</a>:</p>has it been disclosed exactly what type of injury bq has?? last i heard he had a 'foot' injury..anybody seen anything more specific??</blockquote>
<p>
Mid-foot sprain, per Cleveland.com</p>

<p>
<a href="http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2009/12/cleveland_browns_have_right_ma.html" rel="external nofollow">http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/...e_right_ma.html</a></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151413</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151413</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[trodgers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:09:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:06:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/atenears" aria-label="Profile: atenears">@<bdi>atenears</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151408">said</a>:</p>What happened to your Syracuse name?</blockquote>
<p>
Diehard knows what I am talking about.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151411</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151411</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoss]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:06:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:05:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/choco" aria-label="Profile: choco">@<bdi>choco</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151396">said</a>:</p>and here you are....still.</blockquote>
<p>
ahem....</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151410</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151410</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[choco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:05:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:04:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/hoss" aria-label="Profile: hoss">@<bdi>hoss</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151404">said</a>:</p>I can't post under the original, "Syracuse"  
<p>
xxxxing hypocrite.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
What happened to your Syracuse name?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151408</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151408</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ATENEARS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:04:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:48:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/atenears" aria-label="Profile: atenears">@<bdi>atenears</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151401">said</a>:</p>How much do you want to wager that I am not Lumbergh? 
<p>
Let's have a mutal investigation funded by us both, but the loser of this argument pays an additional $5,000.</p>

<p>
How about it? </p>

<p>
Talk about strange behavior ... If maybe some of you could remove this thought from your fucking head, you might be able to cope with things around here.</p>

<p>
Pony up ... do who wants the deal? $5,000 + we split the cost an independent investigation.</p>

<p>
Who's willing to roll $5K?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
W T F are you talking about, and who are you referring to?  Me?  I never said two words about Lumburgh.</p>

<p>
Jesus dude, you really are strange.  An investigation?  </p>

<p>
Get a life dude.  </p>

<p>
NOBODY CARES ANYMORE................</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151405</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151405</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoss]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:48:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:57:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/diehardbrownsfan" aria-label="Profile: diehardbrownsfan">@<bdi>diehardbrownsfan</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151399">said</a>:</p>And yet you come back under an "assumed" name?</blockquote>
<p>
I can't post under the original, "Syracuse"  </p>

<p>
xxxxing hypocrite.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151404</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151404</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoss]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:57:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:48:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/razor1414" aria-label="Profile: razor1414">@<bdi>razor1414</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151129">said</a>:</p>Da sucks Bq sucks,  its truly sad that this arguement is still going on this long.  If you watched the games this year the proof was on the field.  they are both terrible.  and enough with these threads up on DA's jock or Bq's jock.  Watch a game or 2.  THEY BOTH PLAYED TERRIBLE.  GET OVER IT.    NO WONDER SO MANY PEOPLE LEFT THIS JOINT.</blockquote>
<p>
no doubt razor..no disrespect to the thread starter but these qb conversations are gettin stale...there are only so many ways to verbalize how both these qb's suck canal water and i believe we have covered the majority...lets put the nightmare behind us and look to the future.. a future that hopefully includes neither of these underachievers</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151402</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151402</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[yosemitejam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:48:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:48:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/fairhooker11" aria-label="Profile: fairhooker11">@<bdi>fairhooker11</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151320">said</a>:</p>Then you were /are  "Lumbergh"?    <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f635.png?v=2a192e496db" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--dizzy_face" title=":dizzy_face:" alt="😵" />
</blockquote>


<p>
How much do you want to wager that I am not Lumbergh? </p>

<p>
Let's have a mutal investigation funded by us both, but the loser of this argument pays an additional $5,000.</p>

<p>
How about it? </p>

<p>
Talk about strange behavior ... If maybe some of you could remove this thought from your fucking head, you might be able to cope with things around here.</p>

<p>
Pony up ... do who wants the deal? $5,000 + we split the cost an independent investigation.</p>

<p>
Who's willing to roll $5K?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151401</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151401</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ATENEARS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:48:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:41:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/hoss" aria-label="Profile: hoss">@<bdi>hoss</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151386">said</a>:</p>That's not why they left, Stan.  They left because of <b>your strange behavior</b>.  Kind of like this post of yours.  Why do you want to draw members back here?  These are the very members you wanted to leave, yet you want to see how many you can draw back?  You miss them.  They made this board, didn't they?  No need to answer that, you already have.</blockquote>

<p>
And yet you come back under an "assumed" name?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151399</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151399</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DieHardBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:41:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:41:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/flugel" aria-label="Profile: flugel">@<bdi>flugel</bdi></a> <a href="/post/150987">said</a>:</p>God bless ya!  He hasn't missed a handoff yet while Quinn hasn't missed an Injured Reserve list in 2 consecutive years.  We've got competitive accuracies working everywhere but tossing the pigskin.<p>
<i><b>- Tom F. </b></i></p>
</blockquote>


<p>
has it been disclosed exactly what type of injury bq has?? last i heard he had a 'foot' injury..anybody seen anything more specific??</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151398</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151398</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[yosemitejam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:41:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:37:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>and here you are....still.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151396</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151396</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[choco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:37:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:14:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/atenears" aria-label="Profile: atenears">@<bdi>atenears</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151295">said</a>:</p>Well, I like putting up these Pro DA  threads as a heat check to see how many members I can still draw back here <b>to tell me the reason they left was because of all the QB debates.</b>
</blockquote>
<p>
That's not why they left, Stan.  They left because of your strange behavior.  Kind of like this post of yours.  Why do you want to draw members back here?  These are the very members you wanted to leave, yet you want to see how many you can draw back?  You miss them.  They made this board, didn't they?  No need to answer that, you already have.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151386</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151386</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Hoss]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:14:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:02:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/hoorta" aria-label="Profile: hoorta">@<bdi>hoorta</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151351">said</a>:</p>Ya know this is going to go on until one or the other is traded\cut. And that will be before the draft. Holmgren is smart enough to realize this qb war has gone on far too long.</blockquote>

<p>
It's not just that Hoorta, as I said in an earlier post; It doesn't matter if one or both are traded/cut, there will always be this little teenage star-struck fantasy groping. The only way these QB debates stop is if people stop showing their teeny-bopper love and crying when their guy is pissed on, or better yet stop getting offended when their guy doesn't cause the same pitter-patter in others hearts.</p>

<p>
I've said it a million times, this love for one QB so over the top that one HATES the competeting QB is flat out gay-love. All prospects are Cleveland Browns and if one can't support either/any at that position ... go root for Buffalo.</p>

<p>
Throw any two QB names out here, any two QB prospects and the same members and non-disgruntled-members of this site will still get their panties in a bunch over one or the other. </p>

<p>
It's not the QB's it's the girly-man inside the poster. homo's.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151381</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151381</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ATENEARS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:02:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 05:41:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/atenears" aria-label="Profile: atenears">@<bdi>atenears</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151295">said</a>:</p>Ever watch an NBA shooting guard take a 'Heat check' shot to see if he is still on or not? 
<p>
Well, I like putting up these Pro DA  threads as a heat check to see how many members I can still draw back here to tell me the reason they left was because of all the QB debates. With each disgruntled little individual you can check the threads they participate in most and it is always these same QB threads that they denounce.</p>

<p>
too easy ...</p>
</blockquote>


<p>
Ya know this is going to go on until one or the other is traded\cut. And that will be before the draft. Holmgren is smart enough to realize this qb war has gone on far too long.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151351</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151351</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 05:41:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 05:38:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/fairhooker11" aria-label="Profile: fairhooker11">@<bdi>fairhooker11</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151320">said</a>:</p>Then you were /are  "Lumbergh"?    <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f635.png?v=2a192e496db" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--dizzy_face" title=":dizzy_face:" alt="😵" /></blockquote>


<p>
No, Atenears is NOT Lumburgh. <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=2a192e496db" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:" alt="🙂" />   Really. </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151349</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151349</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 05:38:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 03:23:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/atenears" aria-label="Profile: atenears">@<bdi>atenears</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151295">said</a>:</p>Ever watch an NBA shooting guard take a 'Heat check' shot to see if he is still on or not? 
<p>
Well, I like putting up these Pro DA  threads as a heat check to see how many members I can still draw back here to tell me the reason they left was because of all the QB debates. With each disgruntled little individual you can check the threads they participate in most and it is always these same QB threads that they denounce.</p>

<p>
too easy ...</p>
</blockquote>


<p>
Well, I can't say I didn't see through your shenanigans. It wasn't hard... though I am hard pressed to say what good you did to the board besides spawning needless argument and hate. But at least now I can accuse you of trolling without having people jump down my throat. <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f644.png?v=2a192e496db" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--face_with_rolling_eyes" title=":face_with_rolling_eyes:" alt="🙄" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151331</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151331</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DeadWombat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 03:23:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 02:09:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/atenears" aria-label="Profile: atenears">@<bdi>atenears</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151295">said</a>:</p>Ever watch an NBA shooting guard take a 'Heat check' shot to see if he is still on or not? 
<p>
Well, I like putting up these Pro DA  threads as a heat check to see how many members I can still draw back here to tell me the reason they left was because of all the QB debates. With each disgruntled little individual you can check the threads they participate in most and it is always these same QB threads that they denounce.</p>

<p>
too easy ...</p>
</blockquote>


<p>
Then you were /are  "Lumbergh"?    <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f635.png?v=2a192e496db" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--dizzy_face" title=":dizzy_face:" alt="😵" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151320</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151320</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[FairHooker11]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 02:09:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:30:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>How about no one knows what's going to happen with the QB situation...</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151304</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151304</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Carolina Brownie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 00:30:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:35:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Ever watch an NBA shooting guard take a 'Heat check' shot to see if he is still on or not? </p>

<p>
Well, I like putting up these Pro DA  threads as a heat check to see how many members I can still draw back here to tell me the reason they left was because of all the QB debates. With each disgruntled little individual you can check the threads they participate in most and it is always these same QB threads that they denounce.</p>

<p>
too easy ...</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151295</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151295</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ATENEARS]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:35:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:27:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/razor1414" aria-label="Profile: razor1414">@<bdi>razor1414</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151129">said</a>:</p>Da sucks Bq sucks,  its truly sad that this arguement is still going on this long.  If you watched the games this year the proof was on the field.  they are both terrible.  and enough with these threads up on DA's jock or Bq's jock.  Watch a game or 2.  THEY BOTH PLAYED TERRIBLE.  GET OVER IT.    NO WONDER SO MANY PEOPLE LEFT THIS JOINT.</blockquote>

<p>
its obviously that time of the month</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151289</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151289</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[steel88]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:27:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sat, 09 Jan 2010 21:28:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/razor1414" aria-label="Profile: razor1414">@<bdi>razor1414</bdi></a> <a href="/post/151129">said</a>:</p>Da sucks Bq sucks,  its truly sad that this arguement is still going on this long.  If you watched the games this year the proof was on the field.  they are both terrible.  and enough with these threads up on DA's jock or Bq's jock.  Watch a game or 2.  THEY BOTH PLAYED TERRIBLE.  GET OVER IT.    NO WONDER SO MANY PEOPLE LEFT THIS JOINT.</blockquote>

<p>
Thanks for staying!</p>
<p>
<i><b>- Tom F.</b></i></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151243</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151243</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flugel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 21:28:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I think Holmgren likes DA better on Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:41:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Da sucks Bq sucks,  its truly sad that this arguement is still going on this long.  If you watched the games this year the proof was on the field.  they are both terrible.  and enough with these threads up on DA's jock or Bq's jock.  Watch a game or 2.  THEY BOTH PLAYED TERRIBLE.  GET OVER IT.    NO WONDER SO MANY PEOPLE LEFT THIS JOINT.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/151129</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/151129</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[razor1414]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:41:07 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>