Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Cleveland Browns' possible pick Joe Haden runs disappointing 4.57 in 40

Cleveland Browns' possible pick Joe Haden runs disappointing 4.57 in 40

The Browns Board
24 17 2.0k
  • C clebron wrote on
    #21

    Leon Hall ran a slow 40 (i think 4.6), he's working out pretty well for Cincy

    oh and to op, I highly doubt you run faster than a 4.5

  • C clebron

    Leon Hall ran a slow 40 (i think 4.6), he's working out pretty well for Cincy

    oh and to op, I highly doubt you run faster than a 4.5

    ThaakT Thaak wrote on
    #22

    @clebron said:

    Leon Hall ran a slow 40 (i think 4.6), he's working out pretty well for Cincy

    oh and to op, I highly doubt you run faster than a 4.5

    Yes, because Lord knows, anyone who posts on an internet message board can't be athletic or fast.

  • ThaakT Thaak

    @clebron said:

    Leon Hall ran a slow 40 (i think 4.6), he's working out pretty well for Cincy

    oh and to op, I highly doubt you run faster than a 4.5

    Yes, because Lord knows, anyone who posts on an internet message board can't be athletic or fast.

    C clebron wrote on
    #23

    @thaak said:

    Yes, because Lord knows, anyone who posts on an internet message board can't be athletic or fast.
    I was "clocked" at 4.6 in highschool and was an all-state OLB, when it came time to run electronically timed 40 for college camps I ran a 4.9

    My point was that a 4.6 is fast enough to play CB in the nfl, but the widespread mistakes in hand timing makes us think otherwise

    I wasn't calling the OP a liar, just likely misinformed

  • C clebron

    @thaak said:

    Yes, because Lord knows, anyone who posts on an internet message board can't be athletic or fast.
    I was "clocked" at 4.6 in highschool and was an all-state OLB, when it came time to run electronically timed 40 for college camps I ran a 4.9

    My point was that a 4.6 is fast enough to play CB in the nfl, but the widespread mistakes in hand timing makes us think otherwise

    I wasn't calling the OP a liar, just likely misinformed

    ThaakT Thaak wrote on
    #24

    @clebron said:

    I was "clocked" at 4.6 in highschool and was an all-state OLB, when it came time to run electronically timed 40 for college camps I ran a 4.9

    My point was that a 4.6 is fast enough to play CB in the nfl, but the widespread mistakes in hand timing makes us think otherwise

    I wasn't calling the OP a liar, just likely misinformed

    Ok, fair point. Different timing systems may create different results, usually the difference, in one form or another, is based on human error.

    But a 4.6 40 translates roughly to a 10.5 100 yard dash, which was good for 3rd or 4th place in most of the track meets I was involved in. I was not a sprinter, so I never ran that fast. But I bet I could have gotten a 4.7 or 4.9 40, but would beat most of the 4.2’s for the first 5 or 10 yards. I have incredibly fast initial twitch muscles.

Log in to reply