Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Anatomy of A Play

Anatomy of A Play

The Browns Board
24 13 4.0k
  • H Hoss wrote on
    #21

    That is some badass work right there, Earl. Very nice. If you've done more of these on this board I would love to see them. Again, outstanding work my man.

  • H Hoss

    That is some badass work right there, Earl. Very nice. If you've done more of these on this board I would love to see them. Again, outstanding work my man.

    E Earl34 wrote on
    #22

    @hoss said:

    That is some badass work right there, Earl. Very nice. If you've done more of these on this board I would love to see them. Again, outstanding work my man.

    Thanks Hoss...If you go to search, you will find the other three that I've done. I only started to do this after the New Orleans game. I wanted to do some offense and some defense but defense is harder because the TV view is pretty poor.

  • E Earl34 wrote on
    #23

    Here you go...

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php...l=anatomy++play

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php...l=anatomy++play

    http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php...l=anatomy++play

  • Tim Couch Pulls OutT Tim Couch Pulls Out

    @earl34 said:

    I agree Tim. Can't replace a good TE for a young QB.

    Another point in this personnel grouping is that with the game on the line, they went to their best grouping. Sure, we'd love to use 4 speedy WRs but we don't have that many good WRs. They felt best about two WRs and two TEs. I think they're trying to use whatever talent they have most effectively.

    Can you imagine our options if Vickers could actually catch?

    I wonder if that's why they brought Hillis in in the first place. Hillis as a receiving fullback, and blocking for Hardesty? That's a pretty impressive backfield. And you can split either one out as a viable WR.

    I actually did something similar to that on Madden (yeah, I know it's not realistic). I had Hillis as a deep back and John Kuhn blocking for him. It's no backfield to laugh at for sure.

    I just don't want to see Hillis get screwed out of carries next season.

    S samoth wrote on
    #24

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    I wonder if that's why they brought Hillis in in the first place. Hillis as a receiving fullback, and blocking for Hardesty? That's a pretty impressive backfield. And you can split either one out as a viable WR.

    I actually did something similar to that on Madden (yeah, I know it's not realistic). I had Hillis as a deep back and John Kuhn blocking for him. It's no backfield to laugh at for sure.

    I just don't want to see Hillis get screwed out of carries next season.

    I wouldn't worry about that. With the way Hillis has played, Hardesty would have to really turn it on to take any significant playing time from him.

Log in to reply