Getting Back To Our Roots
-
The dawgpound was a very cool thing back in the day.
Of course, Hanford Dixon was NUMBER ONE DRAFT PICK,
and Minnifield was a rock solid cover corner signed the the Browns as a FA.
How many cb's have the Browns drafted in the first round since 99?
One, Hayden. Get another rock solid cb, and if they start playing and barking like
Dixon and Minnifield... it will be cool again.
But Rich - your mantras are older than the history you keep whining about.
Being a student of football history is one thing.
Being a wild and crazy rambling incoherent man is another. But, at least you are
a good bit entertaining. That isn't the case with your stupimese twin. @@
For the first time, I see the Browns drafting very, very intelligently the last two years...
and I see some serious intensity of play. There are still some serious weaknesses...
and whether or not you consider Colt one of them, the others are critical.
Your negativity is kinda sick, Rich. Here's an idea:
Why don't you and your other stupidmese twin create a mock draft?
That way you can show us how much you would be "correctamundo" !
That's my challenge. Accept it,
or BUILD A FREAKIN BRIDGE about the Browns history way back in the day, compared to now.

The dawgpound was a very cool thing back in the day.
Of course, Hanford Dixon was NUMBER ONE DRAFT PICK,
and Minnifield was a rock solid cover corner signed the the Browns as a FA.
How many cb's have the Browns drafted in the first round since 99?
One, Hayden. Get another rock solid cb, and if they start playing and barking like
Dixon and Minnifield... it will be cool again.
But Rich - your mantras are older than the history you keep whining about.
Being a student of football history is one thing.
Being a wild and crazy rambling incoherent man is another. But, at least you are
a good bit entertaining. That isn't the case with your stupimese twin. @@
For the first time, I see the Browns drafting very, very intelligently the last two years...
and I see some serious intensity of play. There are still some serious weaknesses...
and whether or not you consider Colt one of them, the others are critical.
Your negativity is kinda sick, Rich. Here's an idea:
Why don't you and your other stupidmese twin create a mock draft?
That way you can show us how much you would be "correctamundo" !
That's my challenge. Accept it,
or BUILD A FREAKIN BRIDGE about the Browns history way back in the day, compared to now.

Your negativity is dismally dismaying and demoralizing Cal. You see I been getting it right for 11 years and you been getting it all wrong as exemplified in your sophomoric post. I BEING POSITIVE keep saying what we need to do to get it right and start winning and you counter with keep doing the wrong to keep losing.............FUNNY PART IS YOU CALL ME NEGATIVE FOR SAYING HOW TO WIN AND YOU KEEP SAYING YOU ARE POSITIVE FOR WANTING TO KEEP DOIING THE THINGS THAT KEEP US LOSERS
sorry, cal, i am positive and a winner, and you are negative and a loser
and the track record is completely 100% on my side
as far as mock drafts cal, history is my side, I made these calls through the years for our one pick, Ben, Julio, Peterson, Urlacher, among others. Further, a mock draft is too hard to go past two rounds because of the dynamics of the board, But you do what you do Cal, keep wanting plow horses to win championships and ignoring what does win championships and that is proven
-
The dawgpound was a very cool thing back in the day.
Of course, Hanford Dixon was NUMBER ONE DRAFT PICK,
and Minnifield was a rock solid cover corner signed the the Browns as a FA.
How many cb's have the Browns drafted in the first round since 99?
One, Hayden. Get another rock solid cb, and if they start playing and barking like
Dixon and Minnifield... it will be cool again.
But Rich - your mantras are older than the history you keep whining about.
Being a student of football history is one thing.
Being a wild and crazy rambling incoherent man is another. But, at least you are
a good bit entertaining. That isn't the case with your stupimese twin. @@
For the first time, I see the Browns drafting very, very intelligently the last two years...
and I see some serious intensity of play. There are still some serious weaknesses...
and whether or not you consider Colt one of them, the others are critical.
Your negativity is kinda sick, Rich. Here's an idea:
Why don't you and your other stupidmese twin create a mock draft?
That way you can show us how much you would be "correctamundo" !
That's my challenge. Accept it,
or BUILD A FREAKIN BRIDGE about the Browns history way back in the day, compared to now.

Your negativity is dismally dismaying and demoralizing Cal. You see I been getting it right for 11 years and you been getting it all wrong as exemplified in your sophomoric post. I BEING POSITIVE keep saying what we need to do to get it right and start winning and you counter with keep doing the wrong to keep losing.............FUNNY PART IS YOU CALL ME NEGATIVE FOR SAYING HOW TO WIN AND YOU KEEP SAYING YOU ARE POSITIVE FOR WANTING TO KEEP DOIING THE THINGS THAT KEEP US LOSERS
sorry, cal, i am positive and a winner, and you are negative and a loser
and the track record is completely 100% on my side
as far as mock drafts cal, history is my side, I made these calls through the years for our one pick, Ben, Julio, Peterson, Urlacher, among others. Further, a mock draft is too hard to go past two rounds because of the dynamics of the board, But you do what you do Cal, keep wanting plow horses to win championships and ignoring what does win championships and that is proven
Your negativity is dismally dismaying and demoralizing Cal. You see I been getting it right for 11 years and you been getting it all wrong as exemplified in your sophomoric post. I BEING POSITIVE keep saying what we need to do to get it right and start winning and you counter with keep doing the wrong to keep losing.............FUNNY PART IS YOU CALL ME NEGATIVE FOR SAYING HOW TO WIN AND YOU KEEP SAYING YOU ARE POSITIVE FOR WANTING TO KEEP DOIING THE THINGS THAT KEEP US LOSERS
sorry, cal, i am positive and a winner, and you are negative and a loser
and the track record is completely 100% on my side
as far as mock drafts cal, history is my side, I made these calls through the years for our one pick, Ben, Julio, Peterson, Urlacher, among others. Further, a mock draft is too hard to go past two rounds because of the dynamics of the board, But you do what you do Cal, keep wanting plow horses to win championships and ignoring what does win championships and that is proven
And Julio,Urlacher and Peterson have 0 Superbowl rings...yeah Ben got two on the backs of his Defense...even a blind rapist gets a nugget once in awhile...again as usual...YOU ARE DEAD WRONG!
-
@king-ghoolie-lives said:
Don't disrespect your Father.
*****************
Needs to stop. It is going to ruin the board completely.
-
@king-ghoolie-lives said:
Don't disrespect your Father.
*****************
Needs to stop. It is going to ruin the board completely.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login