Skip to content

Channing Crowder unlikely to re-sign

The Browns Board
28 8 1.5k
  • ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Great post, JD. About the guys you've mentioned:

    • Cushing played ILB one game this year when Rey was hurt & didn't look good. May not be good enough sifting through the trash to play inside.
    • Worrell Williams actually reminds me of D'Qwell Jackson a little bit. He's 5'10 3/4", 242 lbs., and probably is maxed out physically. If we draft him, he's more likely to serve as DQ's backup.
    • Brinkley is a poor man's Maualuga. Great size, but not very good at recognizing plays. That knee injury also stripped him of some of his speed & athleticism.
    Here are a few more names to consider:
    • Zack Follett, Cal - only measured in at 6'1", 231 lbs. today, but he was very productive as an OLB in Cal's 3-4 (10.5 sacks, 23 TFL's). He'll likely move inside in the pro's, as evidenced by his playing ILB at the Senior Bowl practices (he's struggled thus far).
    • Frantz Joseph, Florida Atlantic - looked great in the bowl game I watched. Goes 6'2", 235, and reportedly runs a 40 in the low 4.7's. May need a year or two to develop, but he could end up being a solid 3-4 ILB.
  • J JewDago wrote on last edited by
    #22

    i saw williams listed at 250; that's what made me think he wouldn't be a d'qwell clone and would be a good complement to him. with him being a bit smaller, i'm less enthused.

    follett and joseph both seem extremely small for the 3-4. though they can add weight and strength, it'd be great to find someone who's a bit more ready to fit the system. however, if we pick guys who are somewhat undersized, it's good to know we have viable options.

    brinkley really makes me wish we'd gone to a one-gap system. though he lost a bit of his athletic ability, i just want to see him shoot the A gap and destroy people, which i'm sure he will when he gets drafted by either baltimore or pittsburgh. he seems the kind of monster those teams go after.

  • ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
    #23

    Yeah, Follett and Joseph will need a year to develop. Scott Wright's comment about Follett from the Senior Bowl weigh-in was "Looks like he needs to hit the weights."

    But as you said, it's a function of having a draft with 1-2 top 3-4 ILB prospects, then a couple Day Two developmental guys. I wouldn't be surprised if people start talking about Clay Matthews as a 3-4 ILB (he looked good playing linebacker today).

    One thing we've missed: Clint Sintim is said to be versatile enough to play inside or out, though his best fit is likely outside. Anyway, mocks increasingly have him off the board before our second pick.

  • J JewDago wrote on last edited by
    #24

    especially with denver and green bay going to the 3-4, sintim will be gone in the late first for sure. 22-25 seems about the range for him, i think.

    however, there could always be a position run at 3-4 OLB with a bunch of teams freaking out and all trading into position to get the specific player they want, which, with all the 3-4 OLBs in this draft, seems probable.

  • ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Just clicking.....no matter what we do in FA, I still don't think it should change the top of your draft very much.

    If Crabtree was there, I don't see how it could be a wrong pick...same with Curry....same with Smith....I myself favor Andre Smith...I have never felt you can go wrong with a stud O-line....Smith and Thomas would make it stud.

    Now before people start telling me why we won't do that, save the time...i know we won't do that....just saying we should. 😉

    Now to the real message...we need picks...the ideal IMO is to finally trade down a bit....and the way this draft is shaping up, we might be in a good spot for that to happen. Someone always falls in love with some player...and 5 is a good place for a team to try to move if the guy they like is still on the board...someone is going to be sitting there at 5 that someone feels they have to have.

    Dropping 10 slots to pick up 2-3 picks works for me. We not only need quality, but we are in a position where we need some quantity as well. I think we might be able to pick up some quantity without sacrificing too much in the way of quality....it is a pretty deep draft down through 120 or so.

  • Just clicking.....no matter what we do in FA, I still don't think it should change the top of your draft very much.

    If Crabtree was there, I don't see how it could be a wrong pick...same with Curry....same with Smith....I myself favor Andre Smith...I have never felt you can go wrong with a stud O-line....Smith and Thomas would make it stud.

    Now before people start telling me why we won't do that, save the time...i know we won't do that....just saying we should. 😉

    Now to the real message...we need picks...the ideal IMO is to finally trade down a bit....and the way this draft is shaping up, we might be in a good spot for that to happen. Someone always falls in love with some player...and 5 is a good place for a team to try to move if the guy they like is still on the board...someone is going to be sitting there at 5 that someone feels they have to have.

    Dropping 10 slots to pick up 2-3 picks works for me. We not only need quality, but we are in a position where we need some quantity as well. I think we might be able to pick up some quantity without sacrificing too much in the way of quality....it is a pretty deep draft down through 120 or so.

    ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @ballpeen said:

    Just clicking.....no matter what we do in FA, I still don't think it should change the top of your draft very much.

    I think it could. If we give Channing Crowder a 5 year, $25M deal, it may be hard to justify taking another ILB in Aaron Curry at 5. Sure, he'd be BPA, but it'd be hard to draft a 3rd ILB when we may not even have a legit OLB on our roster.

  • especially with denver and green bay going to the 3-4, sintim will be gone in the late first for sure. 22-25 seems about the range for him, i think.

    however, there could always be a position run at 3-4 OLB with a bunch of teams freaking out and all trading into position to get the specific player they want, which, with all the 3-4 OLBs in this draft, seems probable.

    ? Aloysius wrote on last edited by
    #27

    @jewdago said:

    especially with denver and green bay going to the 3-4, sintim will be gone in the late first for sure. 22-25 seems about the range for him, i think.

    however, there could always be a position run at 3-4 OLB with a bunch of teams freaking out and all trading into position to get the specific player they want, which, with all the 3-4 OLBs in this draft, seems probable.

    I agree. The Patriots could be in the market for another OLB (depending on what they think of Crable). More importantly, the Ravens will be looking at rush backers if they lose Suggs; teams likely will try to trade up ahead of them to get the guy they have highest ranked.

    EDIT: The Dolphins are also in the market for another OLB.

    Just read that the Browns' representatives at the Senior Bowl spoke to Cal's Zack Follett. Though it doesn't guarantee anything (our scouts were all over Buster Davis a few years ago), Follett is someone to put on the list of ILB options. Could be a guy we pick up in the 4th Round.

  • @ballpeen said:

    Just clicking.....no matter what we do in FA, I still don't think it should change the top of your draft very much.

    I think it could. If we give Channing Crowder a 5 year, $25M deal, it may be hard to justify taking another ILB in Aaron Curry at 5. Sure, he'd be BPA, but it'd be hard to draft a 3rd ILB when we may not even have a legit OLB on our roster.

    ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by ballpeen
    #28

    Aloysius said:

    I think it could. If we give Channing Crowder a 5 year, $25M deal, it may be hard to justify taking another ILB in Aaron Curry at 5. Sure, he'd be BPA, but it'd be hard to draft a 3rd ILB when we may not even have a legit OLB on our roster.

    I do understand the point and understand the reality is it can change your approach....but for me anyway, the first pick needs to be viewed with long term lenses v looking at the next season, at least when you are a team like us who isn't a player away from possibly grabbing the brass ring.

    Over the course of 10 years, Curry could hardly be viewed as a poor or unwise pick though I do agree it might not be the best pick to help us win a few more games next season if we pick up a backer or two in FA.