Pettine satisfied with our effort
-
right now, opponent wr's are getting open with injuries, and just like the Buffalo players were saying,
although Mud thinks he knows better than them... (okay, that's just a payback, Mud)....
this defense does not work, and it isn't the number of times last year vs this year, it's that
Kruger is ever asked to go back into pass coverage, he is not that quick, depending.
Pettine/Oneil are misusing all the players on defense - that is why this defense is ranked
so badly.
This defense does NOT WORK, Mud. You can keep supporting it, and pettine and oneil, but the facts that
matter are, look at where the defense is this year. It's miscommunication city. If you won't put that on the coaches,
then fine, but you don't have to get all uppity and have a conniption fit over it. You didn't comment on the
comments by Buffalo dline players... talk about ignoring facts....
The Browns defense is not the players. It's the scheme and the coaches - players are frustrated,
and it is causing a lot of confusion on the field.
It is not on Kruger - he had eleven SACKS last year. 36 tackles, 17 assists.
Marcell Darius of the Bills had 36 tackles, 13 assists, and 10 sacks last year.
It doesn't matter how many times he dropped back last yr vs this year. it's that this defense does
not work, and the more they complicate it, the more it doesn't work. It's the freaking defense,
unless you think Marcell Darius is also a "bum".
Oneil and Pettine's defense has to go. And Mud, that is a fact, jack.
right now, opponent wr's are getting open with injuries, and just like the Buffalo players were saying,
although Mud thinks he knows better than them... (okay, that's just a payback, Mud)....
this defense does not work, and it isn't the number of times last year vs this year, it's that
Kruger is ever asked to go back into pass coverage, he is not that quick, depending.
Pettine/Oneil are misusing all the players on defense - that is why this defense is ranked
so badly.
This defense does NOT WORK, Mud. You can keep supporting it, and pettine and oneil, but the facts that
matter are, look at where the defense is this year. It's miscommunication city. If you won't put that on the coaches,
then fine, but you don't have to get all uppity and have a conniption fit over it. You didn't comment on the
comments by Buffalo dline players... talk about ignoring facts....
Chip Kelly is a racist or at least that is what ex-Eagle Shady Mccoy insinuated after he was sent packing.
-
And, Mud,
the difference you noted with the number of times...
read on.
It's when and where.
Unless you think Mario Williams is also a bum.
Sounds to me like they have the same problem as the Browns.
What I said.
-
And, Mud,
the difference you noted with the number of times...
read on.
It's when and where.
Unless you think Mario Williams is also a bum.
Sounds to me like they have the same problem as the Browns.
What I said.
And, Mud,
the difference you noted with the number of times...
read on.
That was written October 2nd, 3 games into the season
-
so...that makes it a false story? It is what it is...
maybe it was written in blue font, not black font,
so the article is fake?
good grief, losing is driving people to near nervous breakdowns or something.
-
So your defense of Pettine is that we don't have 22 Randy Moss' running around?
Pettine doesn't need me to defend him. My point is some players play hard all the time, some most of the time and some when they want to regardless of coaching and success is often times predicated on how good you are.
Pettine doesn't need me to defend him. My point is some players play hard all the time, some most of the time and some when they want to regardless of coaching and success is often times predicated on how good you are.
You're right, because defending him would be futile.
-
And, Mud,
the difference you noted with the number of times...
read on.
It's when and where.
Unless you think Mario Williams is also a bum.
Sounds to me like they have the same problem as the Browns.
What I said.
And, Mud,
the difference you noted with the number of times...
read on.
It's when and where.
Unless you think Mario Williams is also a bum.
Sounds to me like they have the same problem as the Browns.
What I said.
Buffalo and Cleveland are 2 different situations and Rexy and Pettine are different coaches.....maybe from the same tree, but not the same D...
The biggest issue is that Buffalo was a 4-3 and Rexy switched em to a 3-4 and they are struggling.....that is a huge change that did not happen here...
So...instead of ignoring my questions and just giving me Rexy link after Rexy link.....why not answer what Ive been asking alll along ....
Who is Pettine miss using?....How is he miss using them?....What is different this year, that he wasnt doing last year?.....and can you give my ANY examples or numbers to support that?
Ive asked this 20 times.....and, so far, no one has been able to answer.........
-
Well....would you look at that....Kruger posts ANOTHER game of all goose eggs....no tackles, no assists and no sacks....thats 2 games in a row and #6 out of 13.......
and he got his wish.....no coverage duty(which was his excuse for sucking)....just rush rush rush all day long...
But, but but.....the OTHER guys, who DID have to cover and play the run too ended up with 5 sacks and a bunch of tackles...
Armonty played 1/2 the snaps and had as many tackles in this one game as Kruger has had in the last 6 games.....
But, it's the scheme.....not Kruger......
-
Cue Triumph the Insult Comic Dog:
Kruger is a great pass rusher.. for me to poop on!
-
Well....would you look at that....Kruger posts ANOTHER game of all goose eggs....no tackles, no assists and no sacks....thats 2 games in a row and #6 out of 13.......
and he got his wish.....no coverage duty(which was his excuse for sucking)....just rush rush rush all day long...
But, but but.....the OTHER guys, who DID have to cover and play the run too ended up with 5 sacks and a bunch of tackles...
Armonty played 1/2 the snaps and had as many tackles in this one game as Kruger has had in the last 6 games.....
But, it's the scheme.....not Kruger......
Well....would you look at that....Kruger posts ANOTHER game of all goose eggs....no tackles, no assists and no sacks....thats 2 games in a row and #6 out of 13.......
and he got his wish.....no coverage duty(which was his excuse for sucking)....just rush rush rush all day long...
But, but but.....the OTHER guys, who DID have to cover and play the run too ended up with 5 sacks and a bunch of tackles...
Armonty played 1/2 the snaps and had as many tackles in this one game as Kruger has had in the last 6 games.....
But, it's the scheme.....not Kruger......
If O'Neil would just use Kruger the right way.
-
just like sheard. he's really ripping it up.
(love the guy btw).
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login