NFL 2017 Schedule Release
-
Which is a big concern...playing below expectation instead of above expectation?.....you'd hope the staff would find a way to win a few, instead of new ways to lose em......
Yes plus a no good reoccurring BROWNS problem losing yet another QB early and scrambling the rest of the season to patch that big hole.
-
Which is a big concern...playing below expectation instead of above expectation?.....you'd hope the staff would find a way to win a few, instead of new ways to lose em......
Yes plus a no good reoccurring BROWNS problem losing yet another QB early and scrambling the rest of the season to patch that big hole.
Yes plus a no good reoccurring BROWNS problem losing yet another QB early and scrambling the rest of the season to patch that big hole.
but the REAL problem is that nothing was done to patch the massive holes in front of the QB....nothing.....
and there really wasnt a good QB to protect anyway....was there?....lets be honest now....
we've gone 3 straight seasons where we've had 5 different starters.....last year was nothing new...
-
Yes plus a no good reoccurring BROWNS problem losing yet another QB early and scrambling the rest of the season to patch that big hole.
but the REAL problem is that nothing was done to patch the massive holes in front of the QB....nothing.....
and there really wasnt a good QB to protect anyway....was there?....lets be honest now....
we've gone 3 straight seasons where we've had 5 different starters.....last year was nothing new...
but the REAL problem is that nothing was done to patch the massive holes in front of the QB....nothing.....
and there really wasnt a good QB to protect anyway....was there?....lets be honest now....
we've gone 3 straight seasons where we've had 5 different starters.....last year was nothing new...
am I confused here or are you just not making sense but didn't we just add two linemen in f.a
-
but the REAL problem is that nothing was done to patch the massive holes in front of the QB....nothing.....
and there really wasnt a good QB to protect anyway....was there?....lets be honest now....
we've gone 3 straight seasons where we've had 5 different starters.....last year was nothing new...
am I confused here or are you just not making sense but didn't we just add two linemen in f.a
am I confused here or are you just not making sense but didn't we just add two linemen in f.a
The discussion is our battered QB's from last year.....and unless Im confused, we signed no OL last year(even though we lost 2 good ones)....
So...yeah...we just signed 2.....RGIII says thanks for nothing....
-
Yes plus a no good reoccurring BROWNS problem losing yet another QB early and scrambling the rest of the season to patch that big hole.
but the REAL problem is that nothing was done to patch the massive holes in front of the QB....nothing.....
and there really wasnt a good QB to protect anyway....was there?....lets be honest now....
we've gone 3 straight seasons where we've had 5 different starters.....last year was nothing new...
but the REAL problem is that nothing was done to patch the massive holes in front of the QB....nothing.....
and there really wasnt a good QB to protect anyway....was there?....lets be honest now....
we've gone 3 straight seasons where we've had 5 different starters.....last year was nothing new...
Yeah a reoccurring problem made worse by your Plan A going down without a real Plan B, C, D.
I've always believed start with the OL, DL (or maybe vice versa) and then plug in your skilled player guys but a lot of that depends on years of successful team building.
-
but the REAL problem is that nothing was done to patch the massive holes in front of the QB....nothing.....
and there really wasnt a good QB to protect anyway....was there?....lets be honest now....
we've gone 3 straight seasons where we've had 5 different starters.....last year was nothing new...
Yeah a reoccurring problem made worse by your Plan A going down without a real Plan B, C, D.
I've always believed start with the OL, DL (or maybe vice versa) and then plug in your skilled player guys but a lot of that depends on years of successful team building.
Yeah a reoccurring problem made worse by your Plan A going down without a real Plan B, C, D.
I've always believed start with the OL, DL (or maybe vice versa) and then plug in your skilled player guys but a lot of that depends on years of successful team building.
Right...agreed....and my point wasnt that the QB injuries didnt hurt us....they did.....but that is a convenient fall back excuse, when so many many other issues prevented us from winning.....and just a small piece of the ugliness that was 2016 and preventable with a couple signings(ala this year).(except last year)....
-
Yes plus a no good reoccurring BROWNS problem losing yet another QB early and scrambling the rest of the season to patch that big hole.
but the REAL problem is that nothing was done to patch the massive holes in front of the QB....nothing.....
and there really wasnt a good QB to protect anyway....was there?....lets be honest now....
we've gone 3 straight seasons where we've had 5 different starters.....last year was nothing new...
but the REAL problem is that nothing was done to patch the massive holes in front of the QB....nothing.....
and there really wasnt a good QB to protect anyway....was there?....lets be honest now....
we've gone 3 straight seasons where we've had 5 different starters.....last year was nothing new...
And yet..with all that... the offense performed better than the defense!!
-
Are we the only team without a primetime game? Or do they call the London game a "primetime" game?
-
Are we the only team without a primetime game? Or do they call the London game a "primetime" game?
Are we the only team without a primetime game? Or do they call the London game a "primetime" game?
They may regret that decision. Even if they do, they can always "flex" a game into prime time later in the season.
Edit: I could see this coming year being a bit like 1985. Browns have bad previous year...but the rest of the division is really not up to par. (the 2017 AFC North really isn't). They bring a rookie QB in halfway through the season, and go 8-8....which is good enough to win the division.
There you go....that is a Zombo special prediction for you.
-
Are we the only team without a primetime game? Or do they call the London game a "primetime" game?
Or do they call the London game a "primetime" game?
It will be... in London... but then they all are.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Or do they call the London game a "primetime" game?
It will be... in London... but then they all are.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login