What do all these double-digit, Week One losers have in common?
-
Folks have criticized OUR "high priced" OL for the sacks by Peeburgh, but I maintain a number of them were on our rookie QB not getting rid of the ball. As far as the OL goes, regardless of talent, they must gel as a cohesive unit. Their play will improve throughout the season as well as Kiser's. There is a lot to look forward to with our young Browns.
Mike
Folks have criticized OUR "high priced" OL for the sacks by Peeburgh, but I maintain a number of them were on our rookie QB not getting rid of the ball. As far as the OL goes, regardless of talent, they must gel as a cohesive unit. Their play will improve throughout the season as well as Kiser's. There is a lot to look forward to with our young Browns.
Mike
I agree Mike. And our D showed out to be as real as we thought they might be from preseason. 14 points total given up and all without Garrett in the rotation and Shelton back in after a lot of preseason out.
-
Not a comment on his playing ability, but this is his 11th pro season. It would be nice to not have to scramble for a LT when he does pack them up.
Got ya... but given other needs so long as a healthy Joe says, "I'm good for one more", then drafting a LT heir early is not going to compete IMO.
Also have to consider Coleman's development. His college tape showed me starting LT potential. And so far at RT he's been OK...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login