The 2020 Rules Changes Thread
-
The onside proposal made some sense, but it did seem a bit easy. Maybe 4th and 20-25 would have evened the odds. The other factor is the goofy refs. Throw a flag, automatic first down. You don't see many flags thrown on the team receiving the ball on a onside kick. They are usually on the kicking team, now the offensive team. Now the burden favors the kicking team even further. I am tired of refs changing games.
-
The onside proposal made some sense, but it did seem a bit easy. Maybe 4th and 20-25 would have evened the odds. The other factor is the goofy refs. Throw a flag, automatic first down. You don't see many flags thrown on the team receiving the ball on a onside kick. They are usually on the kicking team, now the offensive team. Now the burden favors the kicking team even further. I am tired of refs changing games.
The onside proposal made some sense,
Not to me it didn't.
Does baseball give the losing team 4 or 5 outs because they're getting beat? Does basketball turn into Make It, Take It because a team is losing?
Why bother watching the whole game? Just tune in at the end when the 'silliness' that'll decide the game takes place.
-
The onside proposal made some sense,
Not to me it didn't.
Does baseball give the losing team 4 or 5 outs because they're getting beat? Does basketball turn into Make It, Take It because a team is losing?
Why bother watching the whole game? Just tune in at the end when the 'silliness' that'll decide the game takes place.
Not to me it didn't.
Does baseball give the losing team 4 or 5 outs because they're getting beat? Does basketball turn into Make It, Take It because a team is losing?
Why bother watching the whole game? Just tune in at the end when the 'silliness' that'll decide the game takes place.
You mean like not calling an obvious PI that kept N.O. out of the Superbowl?
-
Not to me it didn't.
Does baseball give the losing team 4 or 5 outs because they're getting beat? Does basketball turn into Make It, Take It because a team is losing?
Why bother watching the whole game? Just tune in at the end when the 'silliness' that'll decide the game takes place.
You mean like not calling an obvious PI that kept N.O. out of the Superbowl?
You mean like not calling an obvious PI that kept N.O. out of the Superbowl?
Well, yes but no. That's a total screw up. I'm talking about purposely making rules to screw the team that's worked hard and done the right things all game long, just to give the losing team more chances to screw the opponent.
How 'bout we do this? The team captains walk out to the middle of the field, the ref tosses the coin, the home team calls it in the air, the winner of the toss is the winner of the game. Done. We can all get the hell out-a-here. (don't make me post Woody Allen again)
-
You mean like not calling an obvious PI that kept N.O. out of the Superbowl?
Well, yes but no. That's a total screw up. I'm talking about purposely making rules to screw the team that's worked hard and done the right things all game long, just to give the losing team more chances to screw the opponent.
How 'bout we do this? The team captains walk out to the middle of the field, the ref tosses the coin, the home team calls it in the air, the winner of the toss is the winner of the game. Done. We can all get the hell out-a-here. (don't make me post Woody Allen again)
Well, yes but no. That's a total screw up. I'm talking about purposely making rules to screw the team that's worked hard and done the right things all game long, just to give the losing team more chances to screw the opponent.
How 'bout we do this? The team captains walk out to the middle of the field, the ref tosses the coin, the home team calls it in the air, the winner of the toss is the winner of the game. Done. We can all get the hell out-a-here. (don't make me post Woody Allen again)
The Browns would find a way to lose 9 tosses.?
-
You mean like not calling an obvious PI that kept N.O. out of the Superbowl?
Well, yes but no. That's a total screw up. I'm talking about purposely making rules to screw the team that's worked hard and done the right things all game long, just to give the losing team more chances to screw the opponent.
How 'bout we do this? The team captains walk out to the middle of the field, the ref tosses the coin, the home team calls it in the air, the winner of the toss is the winner of the game. Done. We can all get the hell out-a-here. (don't make me post Woody Allen again)
That's a total screw up. I'm talking about purposely making rules to screw the team that's worked hard and done the right things all game long
They purposely made non-calls at the end of a game not reviewable. That screwed a team which had worked hard and done the right things all game long.
So, they need to change rules.
-
Under the new CBa... which rules might have gotten media confused for the 2020* season? these 2 links might be the best 2 explanations to follow for 2020?
Rule Changes
Roster size
edit-- The cancelled London game with Jacksonville...becomes a home game... In* Jacksonville...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login