Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. The "It's-later-than-you-think" 2021 Mock Draft Thread

The "It's-later-than-you-think" 2021 Mock Draft Thread

The Browns Board
324 23 11.2k 1
  • L LondonBrown

    @tour2ma said:

    Playing with gum's sim find... this time wheelin' n dealin'.

    Trading is "easy" with the "trade meter" evaluating your offers. All trades are user initiated, but if you try to trade with a team who is not interested the meter sits there empty.

    image.png.57fd08b60c2c7f5ff48fdcd77cc5ffc2.png

    And the results...

    image.png.4b0d7ab3c1b01ea673b188ad2916fff1.png

    There’s just not enough room on the roster for all these is there?

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on
    #321

    @londonbrown said:

    There’s just not enough room on the roster for all these is there?

    Details... details... 😉

    "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
  • L LondonBrown

    @tour2ma said:

    Playing with gum's sim find... this time wheelin' n dealin'.

    Trading is "easy" with the "trade meter" evaluating your offers. All trades are user initiated, but if you try to trade with a team who is not interested the meter sits there empty.

    image.png.57fd08b60c2c7f5ff48fdcd77cc5ffc2.png

    And the results...

    image.png.4b0d7ab3c1b01ea673b188ad2916fff1.png

    There’s just not enough room on the roster for all these is there?

    S SdBacker80 wrote on
    #322

    @londonbrown said:

    There’s just not enough room on the roster for all these is there?

    Well I’ll help...cut Wilson and give Moses a try...but rinse and repeat a couple years later  probably 

  • S SdBacker80

    @londonbrown said:

    There’s just not enough room on the roster for all these is there?

    Well I’ll help...cut Wilson and give Moses a try...but rinse and repeat a couple years later  probably 

    T TexasAg1969 wrote on
    #323

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Well I’ll help...cut Wilson and give Moses a try...but rinse and repeat a couple years later  probably 

    👍
  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    @tour2ma said:

    I think PFF's OL grading is pretty good... at least that was my experience when once-upon-a-time I graded our OL. And, yes, Glasgow is a building block. Really liked him when a scouted him a few drafts ago.

    Your QB question is a good one.

    My answer is: Yes... until a better one comes along. Goes with my philosophy of you always need to be looking for your next QB. Only the intensity (and price you are willing to pay) vary.

    It's why you take a Day 3 QB (or sign a UDFA) close to every year. There's almost always a "dark-horse" out there who has a shot. It's how NE came across TB12. It's like panning for gold.

    It's why a Philly spends a 2nd on a Hurts when they have a Wentz.

    Even explains a team taking two QBs in the same draft (WSH 2012... RG3 and Cousins).

    Exactly.  So I guess my point ends up coming back around on itself.

    I don't believe Lock is their "long term" answer at this point.  And outside of center, Denver's oline is pretty good.   However I think it would be stupid for them to end up taking the 3rd or 4th QB in this draft (possibly Fields) because that really doesn't strike me as a winning strategy.   At which point when Lawrence is picked #1, teams will have to basically convince themselves they love the next guy.   How many times have we see this in the last decade alone? Gabbert, Bortles, Weeden, Manziel, Lynch, etc etc.  

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on
    #324

    @tiamat63 said:

    Exactly.  So I guess my point ends up coming back around on itself.

    I don't believe Lock is their "long term" answer at this point.  And outside of center, Denver's oline is pretty good.   However I think it would be stupid for them to end up taking the 3rd or 4th QB in this draft (possibly Fields) 

    Yo... @the-gipper

    😂
Log in to reply