Skip to content

Quinn vs. Anderson

The Browns Board
24 15 2.0k
  • Savage gave BQ the stupidest contract in NFL history. There's no way he should get a huge bonus just for playing 70% of the snaps. Why not make the contract incentive based on real performance milestones? Just more idiocy from Sewage.

  • DA had 3 years to prove himself. he failed and ranked last in the NFL 2 outa those 3 years.

    forget about him already. give BQ extended time, and move on from there. DA shoulda been traded after he lost the qb competition in the beginning of the season. this is why you don't have 2 starting QBs on one team. people are always clammoring for the one on the bench.

    @alendor said:

    DA had 3 years to prove himself. he failed and ranked last in the NFL 2 outa those 3 years.

    forget about him already. give BQ extended time, and move on from there. DA shoulda been traded after he lost the qb competition in the beginning of the season. this is why you don't have 2 starting QBs on one team. people are always clammoring for the one on the bench.

    I see where ur going with this, but Quinn was going to the starter of the Browns regardless of the so called "qb competition' , mangina knew he had to start Quinn this season or the cleveland fans would be rioting

  • drafting a new qb into this team won't change the outcome, he'll just be destroyed by a lousy offense and line. we saw quinn shine against detroit, that means with protection, a running game, decent play calling, and recievers who can get open he can play well. our problem is our personnel is so underskilled they only perform against the dregs of the league.

    add in a running back, some recievers, a line, and hopefully some less Retarded play calling on offense, he should be enough for us to get by next year, and look for a qb the following, unless he really improves.

  • drafting a new qb into this team won't change the outcome, he'll just be destroyed by a lousy offense and line. we saw quinn shine against detroit, that means with protection, a running game, decent play calling, and recievers who can get open he can play well. our problem is our personnel is so underskilled they only perform against the dregs of the league.

    add in a running back, some recievers, a line, and hopefully some less Retarded play calling on offense, he should be enough for us to get by next year, and look for a qb the following, unless he really improves.

    @alendor said:

    drafting a new qb into this team won't change the outcome, he'll just be destroyed by a lousy offense and line. we saw quinn shine against detroit, that means with protection, a running game, decent play calling, and recievers who can get open he can play well. our problem is our personnel is so underskilled they only perform against the dregs of the league.

    add in a running back, some recievers, a line, and hopefully some less Retarded play calling on offense, he should be enough for us to get by next year, and look for a qb the following, unless he really improves.

    But why do you think that the personnel that can only perform against other shitty teams does not include Quinn? Because the only two good games of his career have come against shitty pass defenses.

    Clearly Quinn is to be included in players that suck and can only play good against shitty defenses.

    There's no way to avoid the obvious.