Ultimatum Time
-
Lums has disappeared for now, so apparently you guys got your wish. He will be watched closely and posts that are out of hand completely will be deleted if he does come back. I think it coincides with the QB thing being basically decided and his boy losing as much as the complaints about him. You guys snapped right before all of this was just about over with and the regular season is here with Quinn QBing. Lums would have become virtually obsolete sans a few anti Quinn attacks here and there.
Inspecta is taking a break for a day or two. He needs to understand that we don't need him ambulance chasing constantly and then telling us how to moderate the board--- like all the freaking time. As Zombo said, he can go start his own board and put himself in charge. When he comes back, he'll be coming at all us mods etc because that's what he does. He loves to argue and try to get his way, so be it. Inspecta is not hated around here by no means, but he needs to chill out on telling us how to run this board. Trying to secretly PM people and openly post about gathering and going somewhere else is fine, but deal with the consequences. A day or two spanking ain't all that bad.
Keep in mind this is the same guy who chased Lums around these boards more than anybody times ten and loved the attention he got from it. He used to do the same with others that have been banned for taking on the Admin on a continuous basis and lost. It is what it is. Lums is not shit you guys, there have been way worse posters on these and other boards, not even close. I've deleted his stuff in the past but I really didn't think it was this big an issue to be honest. Apparently it is, so things will be cooled down somewhat.
It's just about time for real football with the QB thing being settled, so the board will be fine as it is most of the time with great posting. BTW, Lums is real people, but there are those that are not going to believe it regardless. I don't even think this issue is whether he is real or not, but that he was tolerated to the detriment of some.
-
I don't think Lumberg left. Why are people saying that? He was saying bye to mz the pussy because of the utlimatum.
-
Lums has disappeared for now, so apparently you guys got your wish. He will be watched closely and posts that are out of hand completely will be deleted if he does come back. I think it coincides with the QB thing being basically decided and his boy losing as much as the complaints about him. You guys snapped right before all of this was just about over with and the regular season is here with Quinn QBing. Lums would have become virtually obsolete sans a few anti Quinn attacks here and there.
Inspecta is taking a break for a day or two. He needs to understand that we don't need him ambulance chasing constantly and then telling us how to moderate the board--- like all the freaking time. As Zombo said, he can go start his own board and put himself in charge. When he comes back, he'll be coming at all us mods etc because that's what he does. He loves to argue and try to get his way, so be it. Inspecta is not hated around here by no means, but he needs to chill out on telling us how to run this board. Trying to secretly PM people and openly post about gathering and going somewhere else is fine, but deal with the consequences. A day or two spanking ain't all that bad.
Keep in mind this is the same guy who chased Lums around these boards more than anybody times ten and loved the attention he got from it. He used to do the same with others that have been banned for taking on the Admin on a continuous basis and lost. It is what it is. Lums is not shit you guys, there have been way worse posters on these and other boards, not even close. I've deleted his stuff in the past but I really didn't think it was this big an issue to be honest. Apparently it is, so things will be cooled down somewhat.
It's just about time for real football with the QB thing being settled, so the board will be fine as it is most of the time with great posting. BTW, Lums is real people, but there are those that are not going to believe it regardless. I don't even think this issue is whether he is real or not, but that he was tolerated to the detriment of some.
-
@jadbf said:
SO am I next for the ban list? Cool.I personally believe "Lumbergh" hasn't posted lately because those controlling him have actually gotten a bit embarassed by all the attention these threads have garnered and were suprised by the reaction of posters who aren't normall considered whiners or trouble makers like me.
Now will anyone ever admit to actually creating the Lumbergh character? ofcourse not. Because that would take guts. And the same people who used "Lumbergh" as an excuse to be able to act like a dick to members they don't like with out having to use thier real IDs actually are gutless.
So Lumbergh will be allowed to fade into obscurity and all the gutless folks will have their precious "reputations" still intact.
Me? If I am not banned I'll miss the Lumbergh character. It gave me something to do when I was bored.
Darn, he's making us look like fools. Quick Zippy put on the Lumbergh costume again ... Riff grab the funny props, we have to put on a good show this time ...
Or ... we could all just stop smoking so much God-damn weed.
-
@jadbf said:
LOL I believe I predicted this response....quite funny actually.And who's head Lum is in is up for vast debate.
You and Inspecta are great at knowing what everyone's response is going to be. Seriously, you should pat yourself on the back ... no wait, come back with a dig on me coaching baseball, just after Inspecta plays his Ghoolie & Rich card ... as if
-
@jadbf said:
SO am I next for the ban list? Cool.I personally believe "Lumbergh" hasn't posted lately because those controlling him have actually gotten a bit embarassed by all the attention these threads have garnered and were suprised by the reaction of posters who aren't normall considered whiners or trouble makers like me.
Now will anyone ever admit to actually creating the Lumbergh character? ofcourse not. Because that would take guts. And the same people who used "Lumbergh" as an excuse to be able to act like a dick to members they don't like with out having to use thier real IDs actually are gutless.
So Lumbergh will be allowed to fade into obscurity and all the gutless folks will have their precious "reputations" still intact.
Me? If I am not banned I'll miss the Lumbergh character. It gave me something to do when I was bored.
Darn, he's making us look like fools. Quick Zippy put on the Lumbergh costume again ... Riff grab the funny props, we have to put on a good show this time ...
Or ... we could all just stop smoking so much God-damn weed.
-
@jadbf said:
Interesting. I've never once made any statement about who I believe are the gutless wimps posing as Lums, only that SOMEONE is.you have a guilty conscience there Stan?
Yeah, silly me, it's all in my head ...
(literally ... )
-
@jadbf said:
Interesting. I've never once made any statement about who I believe are the gutless wimps posing as Lums, only that SOMEONE is.you have a guilty conscience there Stan?
Yeah, silly me, it's all in my head ...
(literally ... )
-
@jadbf said:
Maybe I could start a really important thread about the letter I got from Browns management...No, that's boring ... start one about a funny poll you seen on ESPN this morning, it's hard to live without those knee-slappers. In fact, our membership base increases by .03 members just after those types of threads are created.
Scratch that, the increase was do to our Mods creating fictious screen names ... my bad.
-
Browns football is, like, the greatest thing out there. There is NOTHING I enjoy more in life than sitting on the sofa getting ready to watch the game. And living/growing up where I do/did, I am/was like the only Browns fan I knew, so it was pretty much me reading box scores/articles/whatever after the games and hoping we'd get a little blurb or highlight on ESPN I could rally around...I didn't have other Browns fans to commiserate and talk shit with.
That's why a place like this, in theory, is great. We come from all over the globe and can talk about our favorite thing with other folks who also find it to be their favorite thing. Great, right? Who better to complain to about a shitty coaching decision or play than someone who feels as passionately about it as you do? Who better to talk about the upcoming draft than with people who care about who the Browns might pick than someone who is as excited about it as you are? Who better to exalt in the joys of winning (well, if that ever happens...) than someone who cares about it as much as you do?
Well, this place isn't that. It is a place currently being overrun by someone who doesn't give a shit about OUR team. Whether it is a real person or not at this point doesn't even concern me. The fact is that "thing" is ruining this community and everyone knows it. I originally signed up and joined this place because I truly found it to be the best place to talk browns football with like-minded fans. This is, sadly, no longer the case.
I can get Browns news elsewhere. And there would be a great deal of folks I'd miss chatting with if I were to no longer visit. But, you know what? If the powers that be decide to not banish the Lumbergh person/character/puppet/alter ego/whatever, you can go ahead and delete my account. The choice is in your hands, but please take action one way or another. Call me a pussy, a fag, whatever. I don't care. I'm taking a stand for a place that used to be great and has now become a childish pit of suckitude. I have plenty of other places where I can waste my time without being pulled around by marionette strings/having every single conversation destroyed by one asshole/puppet. I think many of us have had enough.
Mike
mz. said:
If the powers that be decide to not banish the Lumbergh person/character/puppet/alter ego/whatever, you can go ahead and delete my account. The choice is in your hands, but please take action one way or another.Mike
mz the pussy, would you like for us to Delete your account now? Please advise, we would like to put this 'ultimatum' behind us and move on.
-
mz. said:
If the powers that be decide to not banish the Lumbergh person/character/puppet/alter ego/whatever, you can go ahead and delete my account. The choice is in your hands, but please take action one way or another.Mike
mz the pussy, would you like for us to Delete your account now? Please advise, we would like to put this 'ultimatum' behind us and move on.
-
@shepwrite said:
It just gets really suspicious when someone like Inspecta (a Browns fan) gets banned... and a hatah like whatsisname is deemed too valuable to dismiss. Sorry. It's just very, very odd.The former says, "We will ban people." The latter says, "But not those who are consistently insulting, worthless, repetitious, and not really fans of the Browns... just the ones who annoy us personally."
what? when/why did inspecta get banned? is this confirmed?
-
Shep, I believe there is a difference that when you walk in McDonalds, and a loud mouth is in there saying, "Try the Big Mac, it's way better than the Double Cheeses Burger" ... as opposed to a guy sniding, "Go to Burger King, the management of this place sucks!"
Somewhere in that anaology you might find why a guy like Inspecta might get banned more-so and over a guy like Lums.
Not to mention the Burger King supporter using McDonalds letterhead and mail system to rally customers away from the establishment, opens a burger joint up next door but can't compete, supports a rival who also couldn't compete, advertises his new place on McDonalds billboard and can't understand why it is removed and reverts back to dissing the management again.
Ironically, the guy is allowed to continue to visit Mcdonalds daily, only being askecd to leave without a scene every now and then ... but yet this management is so bad for not removing the guy who likes Big Mac's better.
Yes, it's very, very odd that if the guy likes Burger King so much, that he waste his time at Mcdonlads.
-
So basically the guy causing a disturbance daily to the customers of said McDonalds, by always screaming in the lobby for you to try the big mac, like a Kevin Coleman case, is allowed to remain in the restaraunt w/ no reprcussions ever.
But the customer who comes in every day to said McDonalds, buys off the full menu, but get's fed up w/ McDonalds allowing the maniac in the lobby to constantly and suggests to those in line that if they don't like it, they have Burger King across the street, is the guy McDonalds throws out of the store?
Let me let you in on a little secret.......McDonalds would have already thrown the guy making the disturbance in lobby out of the store and warned him of a perminant ban from McDonalds if he didn't stop causing the disturbance. Thus preventing the customers in line from even considering a trip to Burger King.
-
Shep, I believe there is a difference that when you walk in McDonalds, and a loud mouth is in there saying, "Try the Big Mac, it's way better than the Double Cheeses Burger" ... as opposed to a guy sniding, "Go to Burger King, the management of this place sucks!"
Somewhere in that anaology you might find why a guy like Inspecta might get banned more-so and over a guy like Lums.
Not to mention the Burger King supporter using McDonalds letterhead and mail system to rally customers away from the establishment, opens a burger joint up next door but can't compete, supports a rival who also couldn't compete, advertises his new place on McDonalds billboard and can't understand why it is removed and reverts back to dissing the management again.
Ironically, the guy is allowed to continue to visit Mcdonalds daily, only being askecd to leave without a scene every now and then ... but yet this management is so bad for not removing the guy who likes Big Mac's better.
Yes, it's very, very odd that if the guy likes Burger King so much, that he waste his time at Mcdonlads.
-
@jadbf said:
Right, it's different because he personally insults you as the management, but people insulting the rest of the members of the board are just fine as long as the genuflect in your direction now and then.Because to make your annalogy correct it's more.
"you people are stupid McDonald's Fags for eating here. I can't believe Fags like you don't understand how good Burger King is"
Wrong, more like "you people are stupid McDonald wimpy burger lovers. I can't believe Fags like you don't understand how good the Big Mac is here at McDonalds"
I happen to like both the Big Mac and the Double cheese burger ... I'm just pissed that both make me fat.
-
So basically the guy causing a disturbance daily to the customers of said McDonalds, by always screaming in the lobby for you to try the big mac, like a Kevin Coleman case, is allowed to remain in the restaraunt w/ no reprcussions ever.
But the customer who comes in every day to said McDonalds, buys off the full menu, but get's fed up w/ McDonalds allowing the maniac in the lobby to constantly and suggests to those in line that if they don't like it, they have Burger King across the street, is the guy McDonalds throws out of the store?
Let me let you in on a little secret.......McDonalds would have already thrown the guy making the disturbance in lobby out of the store and warned him of a perminant ban from McDonalds if he didn't stop causing the disturbance. Thus preventing the customers in line from even considering a trip to Burger King.
Masters said:
So basically the guy causing a disturbance daily to the customers of said McDonalds, by always screaming in the lobby for you to try the big mac, like a Kevin Coleman case, is allowed to remain in the restaraunt w/ no reprcussions ever.But the customer who comes in every day to said McDonalds, buys off the full menu, but get's fed up w/ McDonalds allowing the maniac in the lobby to constantly and suggests to those in line that if they don't like it, they have Burger King across the street, is the guy McDonalds throws out of the store?
Let me let you in on a little secret.......McDonalds would have already thrown the guy making the disturbance in lobby out of the store and warned him of a perminant ban from McDonalds if he didn't stop causing the disturbance. Thus preventing the customers in line from even considering a trip to Burger King.
You nailed it ... So, hows Burger King? I bet they have no such loud mouths, so why you still here?
-
Bottom line is if you don't like it here. Leave. Don't be a pussy and act all put out by one poster. mz the pussy will be the first one to try and get anyone banned if it offends him. Don't let the door hit you in the ass.
-
@jadbf said:
Actually you are 100% correct! I stand corrected.But it still means you prefer to have members who insult other members over having members who EVER question your management style.
That's a cool policy.
I like members who hammer people on their ass, into the street, and then step on their fucking head.
I hate pussy, whiney members who bitch and moan about everything. I make an effort to try to drive these people away. I could care less where the hell the go, as long as they do.
We serve wine in a fucking paper cup here, because we don't want you ordering it. Our mugs aren't frosted because we don't give a shit. If you want a shot, drink out of the fucking bottle.
this is a fucking Browns board ... quit being queer.
-
Masters said:
So basically the guy causing a disturbance daily to the customers of said McDonalds, by always screaming in the lobby for you to try the big mac, like a Kevin Coleman case, is allowed to remain in the restaraunt w/ no reprcussions ever.But the customer who comes in every day to said McDonalds, buys off the full menu, but get's fed up w/ McDonalds allowing the maniac in the lobby to constantly and suggests to those in line that if they don't like it, they have Burger King across the street, is the guy McDonalds throws out of the store?
Let me let you in on a little secret.......McDonalds would have already thrown the guy making the disturbance in lobby out of the store and warned him of a perminant ban from McDonalds if he didn't stop causing the disturbance. Thus preventing the customers in line from even considering a trip to Burger King.
You nailed it ... So, hows Burger King? I bet they have no such loud mouths, so why you still here?
.jpg.a1a2b9a0c33008fdaf4097d8fe2cfd64.jpg "Riffer X"){kind=avatar}
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login