Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Bill would give president emergency control of Internet

Bill would give president emergency control of Internet

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
18 Posts 9 Posters 1.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 9k Posts
    • 2k Reputation
    ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
    #6

    I agree Dan.

    All partisanship aside...our freedoms are being attacked one by one.

    We need a total wildcard candidate....like a Ron Paul to be elected (am not saying he is or was the guy...just an example)

    The problem is too many people feel like they would be wasting a vote...dems afraid a rep will be elected and the other way around....when in reality we are wasting our votes on people who really don't give a damn about America and the American way.

    This is beginning to make movies like Rollerball, Running Man, and Soilent Green and several others look a little more than simply si fi flicks. In all of those you saw newscasts and I remember thinking it will never be like that....well....here we are.

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Mr. T Mr. TM
      • 7k Posts
      • 184 Reputation
      Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on last edited by
      #7

      Here we go again, The obama machine wanting total control over every aspect of our lives.

      This would be a good way to stop everyday people from sharing information. I dont want government controled media.

      We dont live in Russia or N Korea.

      Our history has shown how we have gone to war and un-seated many dictators, so why do we want to become one?

      Head or Gut?
      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Chicopee John C
        • 2k Posts
        • 104 Reputation
        C Chicopee John wrote on last edited by
        #8

        @danamal said:

        The patriot act was squeezed in during the worst fear this country had seen since pearl harbor. Doesnt make it right and im not blaming any party but you arent going to close pandoras box.

        I agree with you, Danamal.

        Apparently, things are only going to get worse. Ironically, most people will likely support such attacks on our Constitution. It is like a piece of Swiss Cheese as it is.

        "God is great. Beer is good. People are crazy."
        P 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
          • 39k Posts
          • 9k Reputation
          W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
          #9

          I don't mind anything at all about the Patriot act.

          And if and when we have an administration who, shall we say, trusts Al Queda less than the current one, then that internet control will be a handy tool.

          WSS

          www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • choco chocoC
            • 4k Posts
            • 352 Reputation
            chocoC choco wrote on last edited by
            #10

            welcome to the boards, Mr. Jong Ill.

            no problem with a repressive gov't removing your rights under the guise of "protection"? never thought that'd come from you...

            W P 2 Replies Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • chocoC choco

              welcome to the boards, Mr. Jong Ill.

              no problem with a repressive gov't removing your rights under the guise of "protection"? never thought that'd come from you...

              Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
              • 39k Posts
              • 9k Reputation
              W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
              #11

              @choco said:

              welcome to the boards, Mr. Jong Ill.

              no problem with a repressive gov't removing your rights under the guise of "protection"? never thought that'd come from you...

              First of all Choc. we've given up most of what some may call "freedoms" for less worthy reasons than national securuitty IMO.

              If you have the time make me a list of "constitutionally guaranteed" freedoms that haven't been corrupted since the bill of rights came to be.

              And even though I'm at odds with the Obama administration on many issues I do NOT believe the guy is Hiltle, Il, Pol Pot or Castro.

              (Well maybe Castro..... 😉 )

              WSS

              www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • nobuo N
                • 148 Posts
                • 0 Reputation
                N nobuo wrote on last edited by
                #12

                Unless there's an extremely specific clause that states EXACTLY when the gov't can control it and for how long, etc, they'll just declare an emergency and control it any time they want. That's why the bills they write are 1,000 pages long and super vague. So they can do crap like that.

                General Motors was essentially taken over by the gov't and Obama said it will be run by a board who will make all the decisions EXCEPT "in the case of an emergency" where the gov't will be able to make the decisions. All he has to do to take it over completely is cry "Emergency!" and it's his.

                Prior to the Patriot Act, there wasn't a means that would allow us to seize information about terrorists. We could do it for people laundering money, smuggling drugs, people inciting conspiracies, etc, but not for terrorists trying to destroy our country. It was a good move.

                @herman-m said:

                I think it would be a good thing, we could then move forward with change. No opposition to have to deal with. We wouldnt have to deal with all the hecklers at town hall meetings it would be a civil place. And if they dont agree then we should have people like town hall hecklers go take some mandatory classes on how to behave as a citizen.

                Yeah, lets just violate the 1st Amendment and make it so people can't do anything but write a yes or a no down on a card at the town hall meetings. If they write anything else, they're arrested. If they whisper to their neighbor, they're handcuffed and flogged. If they talk out during the meeting at all, they're tear gassed and thrown in prison for 3 months. I do hope you're being sarcastic.

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • C Chicopee John

                  @danamal said:

                  The patriot act was squeezed in during the worst fear this country had seen since pearl harbor. Doesnt make it right and im not blaming any party but you arent going to close pandoras box.

                  I agree with you, Danamal.

                  Apparently, things are only going to get worse. Ironically, most people will likely support such attacks on our Constitution. It is like a piece of Swiss Cheese as it is.

                  Pumpkin Eater P
                  • 4k Posts
                  • 297 Reputation
                  P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  @chicopee-john said:

                  I agree with you, Danamal.

                  Apparently, things are only going to get worse. Ironically, most people will likely support such attacks on our Constitution. It is like a piece of Swiss Cheese as it is.

                  "They that would give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

                  :neutral_face:
                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • chocoC choco

                    welcome to the boards, Mr. Jong Ill.

                    no problem with a repressive gov't removing your rights under the guise of "protection"? never thought that'd come from you...

                    Pumpkin Eater P
                    • 4k Posts
                    • 297 Reputation
                    P Pumpkin Eater wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    @choco said:

                    welcome to the boards, Mr. Jong Ill.

                    no problem with a repressive gov't removing your rights under the guise of "protection"? never thought that'd come from you...

                    It's ok if it offers them protection. But to give a poor man prescription medication would be the work of the devil.

                    :neutral_face:
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • N nobuo

                      Unless there's an extremely specific clause that states EXACTLY when the gov't can control it and for how long, etc, they'll just declare an emergency and control it any time they want. That's why the bills they write are 1,000 pages long and super vague. So they can do crap like that.

                      General Motors was essentially taken over by the gov't and Obama said it will be run by a board who will make all the decisions EXCEPT "in the case of an emergency" where the gov't will be able to make the decisions. All he has to do to take it over completely is cry "Emergency!" and it's his.

                      Prior to the Patriot Act, there wasn't a means that would allow us to seize information about terrorists. We could do it for people laundering money, smuggling drugs, people inciting conspiracies, etc, but not for terrorists trying to destroy our country. It was a good move.

                      @herman-m said:

                      I think it would be a good thing, we could then move forward with change. No opposition to have to deal with. We wouldnt have to deal with all the hecklers at town hall meetings it would be a civil place. And if they dont agree then we should have people like town hall hecklers go take some mandatory classes on how to behave as a citizen.

                      Yeah, lets just violate the 1st Amendment and make it so people can't do anything but write a yes or a no down on a card at the town hall meetings. If they write anything else, they're arrested. If they whisper to their neighbor, they're handcuffed and flogged. If they talk out during the meeting at all, they're tear gassed and thrown in prison for 3 months. I do hope you're being sarcastic.

                      Chicopee John C
                      • 2k Posts
                      • 104 Reputation
                      C Chicopee John wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      @nobuo said:

                      Yeah, lets just violate the 1st Amendment and make it so people can't do anything but write a yes or a no down on a card at the town hall meetings. If they write anything else, they're arrested. If they whisper to their neighbor, they're handcuffed and flogged. If they talk out during the meeting at all, they're tear gassed and thrown in prison for 3 months. I do hope you're being sarcastic.

                      Better yet, why not simply engrave a number or other comparable mark right into our foreheads?

                      "God is great. Beer is good. People are crazy."
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • P Pumpkin Eater

                        @chicopee-john said:

                        I agree with you, Danamal.

                        Apparently, things are only going to get worse. Ironically, most people will likely support such attacks on our Constitution. It is like a piece of Swiss Cheese as it is.

                        "They that would give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

                        Chicopee John C
                        • 2k Posts
                        • 104 Reputation
                        C Chicopee John wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        @pumpkin-eater said:

                        "They that would give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."

                        I know, Pumpkin. This makes a great bumpersticker.

                        "God is great. Beer is good. People are crazy."
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
                          • 3k Posts
                          • 197 Reputation
                          Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          If anything, all this bill really does is prove how much more hip & cool this administration is compared to the last. Wiretapping phones?? ppsssssshhhh! Who uses a landline phone anymore?

                          If you want to shove the Bill of Rights up anyone's ass these days, start with their face(book).

                          Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • Mr. T Mr. TM
                            • 7k Posts
                            • 184 Reputation
                            Mr. TM Mr. T wrote on last edited by Mr. T
                            #18

                            And some think, True or false

                            One of the primary investors of facebook.com has ties to the CIA. 🥷

                            http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=7706...&topic=7877

                            Head or Gut?
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply

                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                            Register Login
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            Theme
                            • System
                            • Light
                            • Dark
                            The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                            The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Forums
                            • Recent
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Donate