Skip to content

Newsome

Political Discussion
13 5 254
  • From what I had heard no one really likes Newsome. 

    But the post-recall election rules are pretty stupid, so Dems had to vote for Newsome to keep a Rep out of office. 

    If anything they just need to rewrite the rules for how that election would work. 

  • From what I had heard no one really likes Newsome. 

    But the post-recall election rules are pretty stupid, so Dems had to vote for Newsome to keep a Rep out of office. 

    If anything they just need to rewrite the rules for how that election would work. 

    @mld-woody said:

    From what I had heard no one really likes Newsome. 

    But the post-recall election rules are pretty stupid, so Dems had to vote for Newsome to keep a Rep out of office. 

    If anything they just need to rewrite the rules for how that election would work. 

    I think you are right. As for the third point I have to I think that will never happen. It worked just the way the Democrat party wanted it to work. And would probably work the same way even if there were a Conservative Republican in that office.

    WSS

  • image.png.982f76461931ee3b0dbf2b461c1e645c.png

    image.png.9fc6fcf613a0bea320993f080e34abff.png

    Perfectly normal for one sides numbers too drop 350k in a matter of seconds - SSDD.

    Here's the live clip.

  • Did anyone expect a fair election?

    not me.

  • Oh Christ... Here we go again

  • @mld-woody said:

    From what I had heard no one really likes Newsome. 

    But the post-recall election rules are pretty stupid, so Dems had to vote for Newsome to keep a Rep out of office. 

    If anything they just need to rewrite the rules for how that election would work. 

    I think you are right. As for the third point I have to I think that will never happen. It worked just the way the Democrat party wanted it to work. And would probably work the same way even if there were a Conservative Republican in that office.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    I think you are right. As for the third point I have to I think that will never happen. It worked just the way the Democrat party wanted it to work. And would probably work the same way even if there were a Conservative Republican in that office.

    WSS

    I don't care what party benefits from it. It's just a bad system. Any system where someone can get elected with a tiny minority of the vote is flawed. 

  • @westside-steve said:

    I think you are right. As for the third point I have to I think that will never happen. It worked just the way the Democrat party wanted it to work. And would probably work the same way even if there were a Conservative Republican in that office.

    WSS

    I don't care what party benefits from it. It's just a bad system. Any system where someone can get elected with a tiny minority of the vote is flawed. 

    @mld-woody said:

    I don't care what party benefits from it. It's just a bad system. Any system where someone can get elected with a tiny minority of the vote is flawed. 

    I didn't say it wasn't a bad system I just said that since both parties stand to benefit it probably won't change.

    WSS

  • We have an exposed, flawed voting system.

    You cannot trust what’s happening right now…..  think midterms, viruses….

  • @mld-woody said:

    I don't care what party benefits from it. It's just a bad system. Any system where someone can get elected with a tiny minority of the vote is flawed. 

    I didn't say it wasn't a bad system I just said that since both parties stand to benefit it probably won't change.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    I didn't say it wasn't a bad system I just said that since both parties stand to benefit it probably won't change.

    WSS

    Fair point

  • We have an exposed, flawed voting system.

    You cannot trust what’s happening right now…..  think midterms, viruses….

    @hammertime said:

    We have an exposed, flawed voting system.

    You cannot trust what’s happening right now…..  think midterms, viruses….

    Unless your guy wins, right?