the browns plan at QB going forward.
-
Sorry Z I worked in Laboratory Medicine for 40 years. 60% < 70% against the Bears is your outlier... 45% is definitely < 70%. You can call it whatever you like- I'll call that a trend.
OK, great- Baker goes back to his 70% completion percentage against the Chargers, you can come back here Sunday evening and tell me- and everyone else "TOLD YA SO".... I'll bet you a six pack of Joe Thomas Great Lakes he won't.
So you admit you're a "Lab Rat" ?
So you admit you're a "Lab Rat" ?
Hospitals don't keep rats in their labs anymore.
I will say the level of sophistication between the 1970s and now is stunning. I've been retired going on 5 years, and my wife took me on a tour of their core lab that services multiple hospitals. Unless it's some weird specialty test it's hands off. You just put a bar coded tube on a rack and it's off to grand prix land. Follows a track around the lab and stops at the instruments that know what tests to run on it.
FWIW, my specialty was Transfusion Medicine (Blood Banking). In Dayton's Reference Lab. When hospitals had a problem they couldn't solve, they'd send it to us. QC on products we were sending out to the hospitals. And dealing with folks with super rare blood types. In our line of work, AB negative 1:167 is as common as dirt. We had one guy with a very uncommon flavor of Rh negative blood- and with some other funky antibodies, he was a 1:50,000 character. Like only seven other known folks in the country who could safely donate blood for him.
-
Either way it is bound to be a close game, and was bound to be so before the baker news.
My feeling is if Stefanski plays Baker, then he is good to go. If he plays a obviously injured player and has ignored a poor weeks worth of observation during practice, then Stefanski needs to be fired. Stefanski is always talking about putting the players, and thus the team, in to the best position to succeed. If starting Keenum is the best thig to do, he will, or should do that. At minimum make a change in the 2nd qtr.
I am with Z on this one. If he is starting, he will be fine. As to winning the game, I'll stay out of that one because this has always been a losable game. If we lose and Baker is obviously sailing the ball time and time again, it isn't on baker. it's on a coach who can't make a hard decision.
I have been a solid supporter of Stefanski, and still am, but last week I did see some goofy calls that seemed ego based that weren't sound football decisions. I don't have a vast array of stats and data to support this statement, but after years of watching football if seems to me that not getting 3 points early in a game come back to hurt you more often than gaining an extra 4 helps.
How many times have we missed a field goals at some point in a game and we end up to lose by 1-2 points and we blame the kicker for the loss? Had we tried to kick the field goal on that first drive and missed, how many people would have been bitching and moaning all game long about how that was going to end up costing us the game?
-
So you admit you're a "Lab Rat" ?
Hospitals don't keep rats in their labs anymore.
I will say the level of sophistication between the 1970s and now is stunning. I've been retired going on 5 years, and my wife took me on a tour of their core lab that services multiple hospitals. Unless it's some weird specialty test it's hands off. You just put a bar coded tube on a rack and it's off to grand prix land. Follows a track around the lab and stops at the instruments that know what tests to run on it.
FWIW, my specialty was Transfusion Medicine (Blood Banking). In Dayton's Reference Lab. When hospitals had a problem they couldn't solve, they'd send it to us. QC on products we were sending out to the hospitals. And dealing with folks with super rare blood types. In our line of work, AB negative 1:167 is as common as dirt. We had one guy with a very uncommon flavor of Rh negative blood- and with some other funky antibodies, he was a 1:50,000 character. Like only seven other known folks in the country who could safely donate blood for him.
Hospitals don't keep rats in their labs anymore.
I will say the level of sophistication between the 1970s and now is stunning. I've been retired going on 5 years, and my wife took me on a tour of their core lab that services multiple hospitals. Unless it's some weird specialty test it's hands off. You just put a bar coded tube on a rack and it's off to grand prix land. Follows a track around the lab and stops at the instruments that know what tests to run on it.
FWIW, my specialty was Transfusion Medicine (Blood Banking). In Dayton's Reference Lab. When hospitals had a problem they couldn't solve, they'd send it to us. QC on products we were sending out to the hospitals. And dealing with folks with super rare blood types. In our line of work, AB negative 1:167 is as common as dirt. We had one guy with a very uncommon flavor of Rh negative blood- and with some other funky antibodies, he was a 1:50,000 character. Like only seven other known folks in the country who could safely donate blood for him.
Yeah... I still can't get an honest answer to what exactly my blood type is... I have some unusual things like running an abnormal high red blood cell count.. So every couple of months or so.. I have to go to phlebotomy and "Let blood" as it were.. it's the only thing thats worked so far to stabilize my blood..
-
Hospitals don't keep rats in their labs anymore.
I will say the level of sophistication between the 1970s and now is stunning. I've been retired going on 5 years, and my wife took me on a tour of their core lab that services multiple hospitals. Unless it's some weird specialty test it's hands off. You just put a bar coded tube on a rack and it's off to grand prix land. Follows a track around the lab and stops at the instruments that know what tests to run on it.
FWIW, my specialty was Transfusion Medicine (Blood Banking). In Dayton's Reference Lab. When hospitals had a problem they couldn't solve, they'd send it to us. QC on products we were sending out to the hospitals. And dealing with folks with super rare blood types. In our line of work, AB negative 1:167 is as common as dirt. We had one guy with a very uncommon flavor of Rh negative blood- and with some other funky antibodies, he was a 1:50,000 character. Like only seven other known folks in the country who could safely donate blood for him.
Yeah... I still can't get an honest answer to what exactly my blood type is... I have some unusual things like running an abnormal high red blood cell count.. So every couple of months or so.. I have to go to phlebotomy and "Let blood" as it were.. it's the only thing thats worked so far to stabilize my blood..
Yeah... I still can't get an honest answer to what exactly my blood type is... I have some unusual things like running an abnormal high red blood cell count.. So every couple of months or so.. I have to go to phlebotomy and "Let blood" as it were.. it's the only thing thats worked so far to stabilize my blood..
Nickers I'll take this to PM, not today though. I have a long road trip to pick up my wife at her brother's house.
-
Zombo said:
Oh, I can find example after example of you talking about how important Billings was, and me telling you to chill on that guy.
You were an arrogant fuck then too, acting like you needed to explain defenses to me.
I was telling you that Billings was just a guy long before we found a better guy.
Z
Billings position was/is important.
You telling me to "chill" on him is more of an understanding that Richardson and Jackson wouldn't get it done alone.
McDowell coming out of nowhere was damn near a minor miracle. Again, him taking that much time off just doesn't happen.
So I place my belief in proven NFL players of Billings caliber until they demonstrate they Can't be effective. That's hardly arrogant, that's actually pragmatic.
Billings position was/is important.
You telling me to "chill" on him is more of an understanding that Richardson and Jackson wouldn't get it done alone.
McDowell coming out of nowhere was damn near a minor miracle. Again, him taking that much time off just doesn't happen.
So I place my belief in proven NFL players of Billings caliber until they demonstrate they Can't be effective. That's hardly arrogant, that's actually pragmatic.
Don't mind Zombo, he's a piece of shit he doesn't understand football.
-
Billings position was/is important.
You telling me to "chill" on him is more of an understanding that Richardson and Jackson wouldn't get it done alone.
McDowell coming out of nowhere was damn near a minor miracle. Again, him taking that much time off just doesn't happen.
So I place my belief in proven NFL players of Billings caliber until they demonstrate they Can't be effective. That's hardly arrogant, that's actually pragmatic.
Don't mind Zombo, he's a piece of shit he doesn't understand football.
Don't mind Zombo, he's a piece of shit he doesn't understand football.
That hasn't been my experience. He's always been rather good with me.
-
Billings position was/is important.
You telling me to "chill" on him is more of an understanding that Richardson and Jackson wouldn't get it done alone.
McDowell coming out of nowhere was damn near a minor miracle. Again, him taking that much time off just doesn't happen.
So I place my belief in proven NFL players of Billings caliber until they demonstrate they Can't be effective. That's hardly arrogant, that's actually pragmatic.
Don't mind Zombo, he's a piece of shit he doesn't understand football.
Don't mind Zombo, he's a piece of shit he doesn't understand football.
Insults and hot takes are pretty played out here. If you have something with substance on why Andrew Billings is an asset to the team that would be much more interesting to read. Or maybe try to be funny or something? There’s a variety of ways to add positive value here.
The shit stirring stick is easy to find. It’s the one that smells like shit.
-
i don't think baker is going to be the guy going forward, if he was berry would have signed him already. so what should we do?
1. baker is not worth 40 mil a year.. berry knows it.
2. this QB draft class sucks not really anyone of note. Maybe they draft a developmental QB?
3. free agents pretty much all older guys and retreds..... except for Mitch Trubisky.
that is my vote let baker play his 5th year while grooming trubisky as a backup plan if things dont go well as well as drafting a Developmental QB in next years draft.
i don't think baker is going to be the guy going forward, if he was berry would have signed him already. so what should we do?
1. baker is not worth 40 mil a year.. berry knows it.
2. this QB draft class sucks not really anyone of note. Maybe they draft a developmental QB?
3. free agents pretty much all older guys and retreds..... except for Mitch Trubisky.
that is my vote let baker play his 5th year while grooming trubisky as a backup plan if things dont go well as well as drafting a Developmental QB in next years draft.
How about that fresh off an 11-5 season punctuated with a playoff win AT PITTSBURGH?
Having said that, I do realize we have some guys in here that really miss the caliber of football and QBing we had leading us to 0-16 football the year before Baker arrived. The Browns were also 1-15 the year before that. Continuing the inability to win, the Browns started Baker's rookie year 0-1-1 with a 14 point deficit to the Jets before Baker got his first action. Adding all that up into a Pre-Baker trend, that's 1-32-1 football looking ready to go 1-33-1 if they don't put Baker in that Jets game. After Baker came in, the Browns erased the deficit to win. All of a sudden, there was FREE beer in Cleveland! In fact, as soon as Baker took the field the Browns went 7-7 while he set a rookie record for throwing 27 TD passes (this later got bettered by Herbert who had 2 more starts than Baker).
I think 100% of us would agree that Baker's performance and decision making was AWFUL last week. No need to race to pretend that's been the rule instead of the exception to it. I'm more worried about who is going to be playing Left Tackle against the next 2 opponents.
-
Zombo said:
This is Baker's team.
He is the unquestioned leader, and he's not coming out.
You guys are nuts. And I will remind you all of this week.
Z
OK, I've (sort of) changed my mind. Not that I don't believe you Z- but I'll believe Alex VanPelt who actually played the game at QB. According to his "expert" opinion- that type of injury isn't that big of a deal. And as we all observed, Baker had a truly shitty game. One thing he did mention- Baker was holding onto the ball way too long. Only one of his three sacks were the fault of the o-line. So throw it away before you get hit or take a sack.
-
An argument can be made that a healthy Herbert is better than a healthy Baker.
For whatever reason my mind randomly came back to this post last night. I was attempting to understand ways to convey Herbert's improvement as a passer and that he should be taken more seriously; while also expressing concern for Baker and hoping he improves from season 1 to season 2 in Stefs offense. Then I realized I can do an apples to apples breakdown of a connected throw for a TD vs Baker missing the TD on similar offensive designs working against similar defensive designs.
I'm just posting this now as a reminder to myself to get busy on this when I'm done with my day.
Appreciate the reminder.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login