Skip to content

Myles Garrett- "Refs need to get some new glasses"

The Browns Board
27 12 998
  • @calfoxwc said:

    and another thing. The Bengals beat the ratbirds. During the game, Burrow got head slapped/helmet slapped bigtime.....

    no call.

    the nfl has their favorite teams. probably about $$$$$. But it has to stop, it's ruining the game and their credibility.

    "don't call too many holding penalties, I'll just let the referees pick and choose which ones they feel like calling"

    Did you see that McDowell got a 3k fine for his "Roughing the Passer" penalty....  I thought the damn call to even penalize that hit was BS, let alone a fine...

    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #18

    @hx214 said:

    Did you see that McDowell got a 3k fine for his "Roughing the Passer" penalty....  I thought the damn call to even penalize that hit was BS, let alone a fine...

    he got FINED for that?

    something is really wrong in the NFL referee rooms.

  • Anybody see the Falcons' kicker on the GW FG?

    Yep, took his helmet off right in the middle of the field, NO PENALTY?

    So that proves my point above...Rudd remains the only player ever to be penalized for it.

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @bob806 said:

    Anybody see the Falcons' kicker on the GW FG?

    Yep, took his helmet off right in the middle of the field, NO PENALTY?

    So that proves my point above...Rudd remains the only player ever to be penalized for it.

    Well... when Rudd did it the game was not over.... so there's that.

    And as you said above "game-wining" which carries alon with it "game over".

    Don't you hate it, Bob, when facts get in the way?

    Pretty common 'round here albeit in another section... the section 8 section to be precise. 😁

  • @bob806 said:

    Anybody see the Falcons' kicker on the GW FG?

    Yep, took his helmet off right in the middle of the field, NO PENALTY?

    So that proves my point above...Rudd remains the only player ever to be penalized for it.

    Well... when Rudd did it the game was not over.... so there's that.

    And as you said above "game-wining" which carries alon with it "game over".

    Don't you hate it, Bob, when facts get in the way?

    Pretty common 'round here albeit in another section... the section 8 section to be precise. 😁

    Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @tour2ma said:

    Well... when Rudd did it the game was not over.... so there's that.

    And as you said above "game-wining" which carries alon with it "game over".

    Don't you hate it, Bob, when facts get in the way?

    Pretty common 'round here albeit in another section... the section 8 section to be precise. 😁

    Incorrect sir, the play did not result in a sack as Rudd thought, it continued and the clock ran out on that play.

    They had an untimed down to kick the GW FG. 

  • @hx214 said:

    Did you see that McDowell got a 3k fine for his "Roughing the Passer" penalty....  I thought the damn call to even penalize that hit was BS, let alone a fine...

    he got FINED for that?

    something is really wrong in the NFL referee rooms.

    jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by jrb12711
    #21

    @calfoxwc said:

    he got FINED for that?

    something is really wrong in the NFL referee rooms.

    To be totally fair, he was fined not for the egregiously bad one, but this one which was just bad (as in IMO also a bad call): https://brownswire.usatoday.com/2021/10/23/questionable-malik-mcdowell-penalty-from-week-6-leads-to-a-fine-as-well/

    Still though, for the league (and refs) to not only penalize that but also say "it was so bad you lose money" is so damn whack. It boggles the mind, really.

  • jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
    #22

    08As dumb as it sounds, this game could come down to holding penalties. If Myles draws SOME of the valid holding calls this week and puts Pittsburgh really behind the sticks, that's going to be very difficult for them to overcome. Conversely, if WE get called for holding trying to run the ball extensively, the same can be said for us. I'm not pleased with the penalties our team has committed this year and we have to clean it up. 

  • 08As dumb as it sounds, this game could come down to holding penalties. If Myles draws SOME of the valid holding calls this week and puts Pittsburgh really behind the sticks, that's going to be very difficult for them to overcome. Conversely, if WE get called for holding trying to run the ball extensively, the same can be said for us. I'm not pleased with the penalties our team has committed this year and we have to clean it up. 

    S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @jiggins7919 said:

    08As dumb as it sounds, this game could come down to holding penalties. If Myles draws SOME of the valid holding calls this week and puts Pittsburgh really behind the sticks, that's going to be very difficult for them to overcome. Conversely, if WE get called for holding trying to run the ball extensively, the same can be said for us. I'm not pleased with the penalties our team has committed this year and we have to clean it up. 

    I’ll take just take it called evenly. 
     

    If Myles is grabbed and no call then Watt should be grabbed with no call.  If we “hold” on our offensive line then they “hold” on the WR screen plays they love to run. 

  • @tour2ma said:

    Well... when Rudd did it the game was not over.... so there's that.

    And as you said above "game-wining" which carries alon with it "game over".

    Don't you hate it, Bob, when facts get in the way?

    Pretty common 'round here albeit in another section... the section 8 section to be precise. 😁

    Incorrect sir, the play did not result in a sack as Rudd thought, it continued and the clock ran out on that play.

    They had an untimed down to kick the GW FG. 

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #24

    @bob806 said:

    Incorrect sir, the play did not result in a sack as Rudd thought, it continued and the clock ran out on that play.

    They had an untimed down to kick the GW FG. 

    I eagerly await your next reply... 😉 come what may

  • @tour2ma said:

    Well... when Rudd did it the game was not over.... so there's that.

    And as you said above "game-wining" which carries alon with it "game over".

    Don't you hate it, Bob, when facts get in the way?

    Pretty common 'round here albeit in another section... the section 8 section to be precise. 😁

    Incorrect sir, the play did not result in a sack as Rudd thought, it continued and the clock ran out on that play.

    They had an untimed down to kick the GW FG. 

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #25

    @bob806 said:

    Incorrect sir, the play did not result in a sack as Rudd thought, it continued and the clock ran out on that play.

    They had an untimed down to kick the GW FG.

    Accurraate account (there's video), but nonetheless the game was not over when helmet was removed during the play continuing after time expired. On-going plays at 00:00 go to completion.

    So not seeing my "wrong here".

    May I offer you a draw? 😉

  • gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #26

    Here we go again ?... Making news over here on the Browns Board ?... https://brownswire.usatoday.com/2021/10/26/browns-one-of-the-most-penalized-teams-in-the-nfl-in-2021/

    Power ✊ to the little peep-le

  • @bob806 said:

    Incorrect sir, the play did not result in a sack as Rudd thought, it continued and the clock ran out on that play.

    They had an untimed down to kick the GW FG.

    Accurraate account (there's video), but nonetheless the game was not over when helmet was removed during the play continuing after time expired. On-going plays at 00:00 go to completion.

    So not seeing my "wrong here".

    May I offer you a draw? 😉

    Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by
    #27

    @tour2ma said:

    Accurraate account (there's video), but nonetheless the game was not over when helmet was removed during the play continuing after time expired. On-going plays at 00:00 go to completion.

    So not seeing my "wrong here".

    May I offer you a draw? 😉

    Ill take the draw, & won't deny Rudd was a dumb***