Crazy Democrats
-
While the lefties obsess over Marjorie Taylor Greene. Hey she's not alone.
https://nypost.com/2014/12/28/hey-gq-cant-find-any-crazy-democrats-heres-some/
But I guess everybody can vote for who they want to. Well kind of.
WSS
-
2019, though it had its ups and downs, was markedly better than 2020 and 2021.Maybe it was the country, er, the world exploiting an emergency to usher in communism.
-
Sure, some stupidity on that list, but nothing compared to Jewish space lasers.
It reads like Republicans being mad at GQ of all things so they made their own list in frustration.
-
Sure, some stupidity on that list, but nothing compared to Jewish space lasers.
It reads like Republicans being mad at GQ of all things so they made their own list in frustration.
Sure, some stupidity on that list, but nothing compared to Jewish space lasers.
It reads like Republicans being mad at GQ of all things so they made their own list in frustration.
Yeah lasers def nuts.
I really just sounds like a counter to the liberal media and people like you.
?
But the Guam tipping over was one of yours.
WSS
-
Sure, some stupidity on that list, but nothing compared to Jewish space lasers.
It reads like Republicans being mad at GQ of all things so they made their own list in frustration.
Yeah lasers def nuts.
I really just sounds like a counter to the liberal media and people like you.
?
But the Guam tipping over was one of yours.
WSS
Yeah lasers def nuts.
I really just sounds like a counter to the liberal media and people like you.
?
But the Guam tipping over was one of yours.
WSS
See Guam tipping over is idiotic and would have been much better on this list. That's why the list just reads like a conservative outlet getting mad at GQ of all places.
If you're going to make this list you need real stupid shit on there. Instead it looks like they just went after big names and then tried to find something dumb to back into.
Both sides have morons, they could have done better.
I don't see anything on there that compares to Q nutjob MTG
and, once again, not "one of mine". But at this point you're either illiterate or doing it to annoy me. Oh well.
-
Yeah lasers def nuts.
I really just sounds like a counter to the liberal media and people like you.
?
But the Guam tipping over was one of yours.
WSS
See Guam tipping over is idiotic and would have been much better on this list. That's why the list just reads like a conservative outlet getting mad at GQ of all places.
If you're going to make this list you need real stupid shit on there. Instead it looks like they just went after big names and then tried to find something dumb to back into.
Both sides have morons, they could have done better.
I don't see anything on there that compares to Q nutjob MTG
and, once again, not "one of mine". But at this point you're either illiterate or doing it to annoy me. Oh well.
See Guam tipping over is idiotic and would have been much better on this list. That's why the list just reads like a conservative outlet getting mad at GQ of all places.
If you're going to make this list you need real stupid shit on there. Instead it looks like they just went after big names and then tried to find something dumb to back into.
Both sides have morons, they could have done better.
I don't see anything on there that compares to Q nutjob MTG
and, once again, not "one of mine". But at this point you're either illiterate or doing it to annoy me. Oh well.
Well maybe because you obsess about Q. That sure there are plenty of morons on both sides. That's what you get when you let idiots vote. That of course, and Joe Biden. One thing I'm curious about and even though I would never dream to suggest that the liberal media would ever be guilty of slanted reporting but has anyone ever seen the entire quote about the space lasers? Not just paraphrase with something like space lasers or Jewish and quotation marks? Not calling anybody a liar just curious because I've never actually seen it.
WSS
-
See Guam tipping over is idiotic and would have been much better on this list. That's why the list just reads like a conservative outlet getting mad at GQ of all places.
If you're going to make this list you need real stupid shit on there. Instead it looks like they just went after big names and then tried to find something dumb to back into.
Both sides have morons, they could have done better.
I don't see anything on there that compares to Q nutjob MTG
and, once again, not "one of mine". But at this point you're either illiterate or doing it to annoy me. Oh well.
Well maybe because you obsess about Q. That sure there are plenty of morons on both sides. That's what you get when you let idiots vote. That of course, and Joe Biden. One thing I'm curious about and even though I would never dream to suggest that the liberal media would ever be guilty of slanted reporting but has anyone ever seen the entire quote about the space lasers? Not just paraphrase with something like space lasers or Jewish and quotation marks? Not calling anybody a liar just curious because I've never actually seen it.
WSS
Well maybe because you obsess about Q. That sure there are plenty of morons on both sides. That's what you get when you let idiots vote. That of course, and Joe Biden. One thing I'm curious about and even though I would never dream to suggest that the liberal media would ever be guilty of slanted reporting but has anyone ever seen the entire quote about the space lasers? Not just paraphrase with something like space lasers or Jewish and quotation marks? Not calling anybody a liar just curious because I've never actually seen it.
WSS
It's GQ man... do we really care about what they write?
Here's her Facebook post
-
A cold read of that post really falls way way short of the accusations. Personally I have spent just about 0 time looking into the coincidences going on with bankers politicians and swindlers in California. Regardless of what she believes because I've never really heard her say it, there are a lot of coincidences if any of this is true. Phrases referring to 'just putting this out there for research' or 'but I don't know anything about that' when referring to people who said they saw blue light Is a far cry from her actually saying the Jews started the fires with laser beams from space. That's one of my problems with left wing reporting and left wing citizens willing to believe everything that the left wing media writes. I would bet you'd feel the same way if somebody maybe on the blaze or Fox wrote equally inaccurate paraphrase articles.
So there's that; scream away little buddy
WSS
Just for an accuracy check that link was from the 1st article that popped up.
-
A cold read of that post really falls way way short of the accusations. Personally I have spent just about 0 time looking into the coincidences going on with bankers politicians and swindlers in California. Regardless of what she believes because I've never really heard her say it, there are a lot of coincidences if any of this is true. Phrases referring to 'just putting this out there for research' or 'but I don't know anything about that' when referring to people who said they saw blue light Is a far cry from her actually saying the Jews started the fires with laser beams from space. That's one of my problems with left wing reporting and left wing citizens willing to believe everything that the left wing media writes. I would bet you'd feel the same way if somebody maybe on the blaze or Fox wrote equally inaccurate paraphrase articles.
So there's that; scream away little buddy
WSS
Just for an accuracy check that link was from the 1st article that popped up.
A cold read of that post really falls way way short of the accusations. Personally I have spent just about 0 time looking into the coincidences going on with bankers politicians and swindlers in California. Regardless of what she believes because I've never really heard her say it, there are a lot of coincidences if any of this is true. Phrases referring to 'just putting this out there for research' or 'but I don't know anything about that' when referring to people who said they saw blue light Is a far cry from her actually saying the Jews started the fires with laser beams from space. That's one of my problems with left wing reporting and left wing citizens willing to believe everything that the left wing media writes. I would bet you'd feel the same way if somebody maybe on the blaze or Fox wrote equally inaccurate paraphrase articles.
So there's that; scream away little buddy
WSS
Just for an accuracy check that link was from the 1st article that popped up.
No one is screaming. But if it makes you feel more correct to say I am, then knock yourself out. Create your own reality
Likewise, if you're at the point where you want to defend MTGs conspiracies, then go for it. It is a shame that we're at that point as a country, but oh well.
-
A cold read of that post really falls way way short of the accusations. Personally I have spent just about 0 time looking into the coincidences going on with bankers politicians and swindlers in California. Regardless of what she believes because I've never really heard her say it, there are a lot of coincidences if any of this is true. Phrases referring to 'just putting this out there for research' or 'but I don't know anything about that' when referring to people who said they saw blue light Is a far cry from her actually saying the Jews started the fires with laser beams from space. That's one of my problems with left wing reporting and left wing citizens willing to believe everything that the left wing media writes. I would bet you'd feel the same way if somebody maybe on the blaze or Fox wrote equally inaccurate paraphrase articles.
So there's that; scream away little buddy
WSS
Just for an accuracy check that link was from the 1st article that popped up.
No one is screaming. But if it makes you feel more correct to say I am, then knock yourself out. Create your own reality
Likewise, if you're at the point where you want to defend MTGs conspiracies, then go for it. It is a shame that we're at that point as a country, but oh well.
No one is screaming. But if it makes you feel more correct to say I am, then knock yourself out. Create your own reality
Likewise, if you're at the point where you want to defend MTGs conspiracies, then go for it. It is a shame that we're at that point as a country, but oh well.
You are the first guy to pitch a b**** if anybody ever makes a claim that isn't 100% factually accurate and completely detailed. And I would defend anyone who was accused of saying something they never actually said even if it was Biden. PS nice way to change the subject from shoddy reporting to whining about the word screaming.
WSS
-
No one is screaming. But if it makes you feel more correct to say I am, then knock yourself out. Create your own reality
Likewise, if you're at the point where you want to defend MTGs conspiracies, then go for it. It is a shame that we're at that point as a country, but oh well.
You are the first guy to pitch a b**** if anybody ever makes a claim that isn't 100% factually accurate and completely detailed. And I would defend anyone who was accused of saying something they never actually said even if it was Biden. PS nice way to change the subject from shoddy reporting to whining about the word screaming.
WSS
You are the first guy to pitch a b**** if anybody ever makes a claim that isn't 100% factually accurate and completely detailed. And I would defend anyone who was accused of saying something they never actually said even if it was Biden. PS nice way to change the subject from shoddy reporting to whining about the word screaming.
WSS
If you don't want it brought up then don't try it on your end. If you didn't constantly claim the other side is "screaming" (or whatever your hyperbolic verb of choice) then there'd be no reason to bring it up.
Yes, when you make a claim that has a number attached to it you should generally source that data. That's common sense and a very base level ask for back and forth on here.
Again, if you want to defend MTGs conspiracy theory statements then go ahead. I won't stop you.
-
You are the first guy to pitch a b**** if anybody ever makes a claim that isn't 100% factually accurate and completely detailed. And I would defend anyone who was accused of saying something they never actually said even if it was Biden. PS nice way to change the subject from shoddy reporting to whining about the word screaming.
WSS
If you don't want it brought up then don't try it on your end. If you didn't constantly claim the other side is "screaming" (or whatever your hyperbolic verb of choice) then there'd be no reason to bring it up.
Yes, when you make a claim that has a number attached to it you should generally source that data. That's common sense and a very base level ask for back and forth on here.
Again, if you want to defend MTGs conspiracy theory statements then go ahead. I won't stop you.
If you don't want it brought up then don't try it on your end. If you didn't constantly claim the other side is "screaming" (or whatever your hyperbolic verb of choice) then there'd be no reason to bring it up.
Yes, when you make a claim that has a number attached to it you should generally source that data. That's common sense and a very base level ask for back and forth on here.
Again, if you want to defend MTGs conspiracy theory statements then go ahead. I won't stop you.
That's a p**** ass defense Woody and you know it.
I know you and some of the other lefties don't care whatsoever about accurate reporting. Hyperbole has nothing to do with the fact that you support fake news.
Now that you've been beaten and even the Liberals know it though they might not admit it isn't it time for you to crawl back into your hole?
WSS
-
well Woody, is you want to defend not being able to name even one good/great thing
that your ObaMao commie and hidin biden ever did for America....
go ahead, we won't stop you.
-
If you don't want it brought up then don't try it on your end. If you didn't constantly claim the other side is "screaming" (or whatever your hyperbolic verb of choice) then there'd be no reason to bring it up.
Yes, when you make a claim that has a number attached to it you should generally source that data. That's common sense and a very base level ask for back and forth on here.
Again, if you want to defend MTGs conspiracy theory statements then go ahead. I won't stop you.
That's a p**** ass defense Woody and you know it.
I know you and some of the other lefties don't care whatsoever about accurate reporting. Hyperbole has nothing to do with the fact that you support fake news.
Now that you've been beaten and even the Liberals know it though they might not admit it isn't it time for you to crawl back into your hole?
WSS
That's a p**** ass defense Woody and you know it.
I know you and some of the other lefties don't care whatsoever about accurate reporting. Hyperbole has nothing to do with the fact that you support fake news.
Now that you've been beaten and even the Liberals know it though they might not admit it isn't it time for you to crawl back into your hole?
WSS
I'm not going to play chess with a pigeon, man. Claim you victory as you knock over pieces and shit all over the board. Say I'm "screaming" and "angry". Mount a defense for conspiracy theories. Do whatever you have to do to feel like you've won. If your version of victory is dragging something so far into the mud that it isn't worth the other guy's time then so be it.
And as always, go take the last word.
Peace
-
That's a p**** ass defense Woody and you know it.
I know you and some of the other lefties don't care whatsoever about accurate reporting. Hyperbole has nothing to do with the fact that you support fake news.
Now that you've been beaten and even the Liberals know it though they might not admit it isn't it time for you to crawl back into your hole?
WSS
I'm not going to play chess with a pigeon, man. Claim you victory as you knock over pieces and shit all over the board. Say I'm "screaming" and "angry". Mount a defense for conspiracy theories. Do whatever you have to do to feel like you've won. If your version of victory is dragging something so far into the mud that it isn't worth the other guy's time then so be it.
And as always, go take the last word.
Peace
I'm not going to play chess with a pigeon, man. Claim you victory as you knock over pieces and shit all over the board. Say I'm "screaming" and "angry". Mount a defense for conspiracy theories. Do whatever you have to do to feel like you've won. If your version of victory is dragging something so far into the mud that it isn't worth the other guy's time then so be it.
And as always, go take the last word.
Peace
Make it two.
Blow me.
WSS
-
Woodpecker's "MO" (mouth off)
-
still proud of your CNN woodpecker?
https://www.theblaze.com/news/cnn-producer-child-sex-allegations
CNN staffer charged with enticing mothers and underage daughters to engage in unlawful sexual activity; FBI calls allegations 'deeply disturbing'
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login

