Official Browns at Packers Game Thread
-
Jesus, our CBs are painted on Green Bay's receivers and Rodgers still puts the ball right where he needs to over and over.
It's like he's good or something.
Not on the Td. Wide open
Not on the Td. Wide open
Because they all-out blitzed, which you've been asking for all season long.
-
You wanted him to challenge receivers, turns out you're facing one of the best in the NFL at the point of contact. That's what you draw when you challenge receivers and pressure.
At this point you're just bitching now.
You don’t have a rookie covering Adams 1 on 1. That will never work
You don’t have a rookie covering Adams 1 on 1. That will never work
Sending an all out blitz and leaving a rookie practice squad player on the best WR/QB combo in the league is just beyond stupid.
You make the call, your defense has to adjust per formation. This is the issue with facing a team like GB, they move Davonte all over the formation to get away from your best DB's. This has been a theme for the entirety of the time that Rodgers has been throwing to DA. Running Adams at the #3 gives him favorable matchups if he doesn't draw some type of bracket.
-
Offense has been moving well all game long, but have left four points on the field.
-
Where is Chubb?
-
You don’t have a rookie covering Adams 1 on 1. That will never work
Sending an all out blitz and leaving a rookie practice squad player on the best WR/QB combo in the league is just beyond stupid.
You make the call, your defense has to adjust per formation. This is the issue with facing a team like GB, they move Davonte all over the formation to get away from your best DB's. This has been a theme for the entirety of the time that Rodgers has been throwing to DA. Running Adams at the #3 gives him favorable matchups if he doesn't draw some type of bracket.
You make the call, your defense has to adjust per formation. This is the issue with facing a team like GB, they move Davonte all over the formation to get away from your best DB's. This has been a theme for the entirety of the time that Rodgers has been throwing to DA. Running Adams at the #3 gives him favorable matchups if he doesn't draw some type of bracket.
Why not have Ward cover him no matter he lines up
"And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve." -
That little under on levels was still high. Baker needs to settle down.
-
My butthole was puckered, I totally thought Higgins was going to get the ball stripped trying to fight for a touchdown ?
And just like that, Browns are a converted two-pointer from tying the game.
-
hey a TD
-
You make the call, your defense has to adjust per formation. This is the issue with facing a team like GB, they move Davonte all over the formation to get away from your best DB's. This has been a theme for the entirety of the time that Rodgers has been throwing to DA. Running Adams at the #3 gives him favorable matchups if he doesn't draw some type of bracket.
Why not have Ward cover him no matter he lines up
Why not have Ward cover him no matter he lines up
So you'd have Rookie lacounte out on the perimeter playing CB against Lazard with even more space to get beat?
-
If we had a decent kicker, we by tied
-
Why not have Ward cover him no matter he lines up
So you'd have Rookie lacounte out on the perimeter playing CB against Lazard with even more space to get beat?
So you'd have Rookie lacounte out on the perimeter playing CB against Lazard with even more space to get beat?
I’d rather have ward on adams
"And they don't really know even what they're talkin' about And I can't imagine what empty heads can achieve." -
Why not have Ward cover him no matter he lines up
So you'd have Rookie lacounte out on the perimeter playing CB against Lazard with even more space to get beat?
-
You don’t have a rookie covering Adams 1 on 1. That will never work
Sending an all out blitz and leaving a rookie practice squad player on the best WR/QB combo in the league is just beyond stupid.
You make the call, your defense has to adjust per formation. This is the issue with facing a team like GB, they move Davonte all over the formation to get away from your best DB's. This has been a theme for the entirety of the time that Rodgers has been throwing to DA. Running Adams at the #3 gives him favorable matchups if he doesn't draw some type of bracket.
You make the call, your defense has to adjust per formation. This is the issue with facing a team like GB, they move Davonte all over the formation to get away from your best DB's. This has been a theme for the entirety of the time that Rodgers has been throwing to DA. Running Adams at the #3 gives him favorable matchups if he doesn't draw some type of bracket.
And I get that. But the browns can also scheme against what they know is coming. And no matter how you slice it, that scheme is fucking stupid.
-
More space. Adams had the entire middle of the field all to himself
-
simpler playbook worked well.. Baker is still better on the move..
Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends -
simpler playbook worked well.. Baker is still better on the move..
Because from the pocket, he's not very good.
-
I’d rather have ward on adams
And I get that. But the browns can also scheme against what they know is coming. And no matter how you slice it, that scheme is fucking stupid.
Oh, so you knew Davante was going to be playing at the #3 and not #1, Z or the slot? Somehow you knew that before the Browns made the call and before the Packers even broke the huddle? What if they ended up getting a motion to that #3 as well?
Neither of you are thinking this through. There are counters to that, but those counters aren't having Lecounte in man-zero. Just so happens that's what Green Bay caught us in that down. Chances you see it again are slim to none.
-
I’d rather have ward on adams
And I get that. But the browns can also scheme against what they know is coming. And no matter how you slice it, that scheme is fucking stupid.
Oh, so you knew Davante was going to be playing at the #3 and not #1, Z or the slot? Somehow you knew that before the Browns made the call and before the Packers even broke the huddle? What if they ended up getting a motion to that #3 as well?
Neither of you are thinking this through. There are counters to that, but those counters aren't having Lecounte in man-zero. Just so happens that's what Green Bay caught us in that down. Chances you see it again are slim to none.
Oh, so you knew Davante was going to be playing at the #3 and not #1, Z or the slot? Somehow you knew that before the Browns made the call and before the Packers even broke the huddle? What if they ended up getting a motion to that #3 as well?
Neither of you are thinking this through. There are counters to that, but those counters aren't having Lecounte in man-zero. Just so happens that's what Green Bay caught us in that down. Chances you see it again are slim to none.
Which is why I’m telling you that running the blitz and being in man zero in the first place was stupid. Also, yeah maybe I don’t know that but I’m not a defensive coordinator who gets paid millions of dollars to spend weeks not putting practice squad players against a top 3 WR in the league.
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login