This could be bad news
-
biden and co just want to ride the wave of lies and hateful rhetoric to more power, more authority, more wealth, more control.
It's history - some governments get the idea to take everything over.
That includes every person n the country. Manipulated, censored, threatened, and
politically selective enforcement of "laws".
A very good read:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/08/11/why_america_is_in_real_danger_143929.html#!
Why America Is in Real Danger
-
YouTube permanently bans conservative host Dan Bongino
https://www.theblaze.com/news/youtube-permanently-bans-dan-bongino-but-he-already-left
College students in UK get trigger warning about George Orwell's iconic '1984' — a novel that features 'thought police' and censorship as a primary theme
https://www.theblaze.com/news/college-trigger-warning-george-orwell-1984
-
Ruth Bader Ginsburg died in mid September 2020 and Amy C. Barrett was confirmed by a Republican majority in the Senate by the end of October; GOP rushed the nomination through to get it done before the November election that year. Whether you like it or not, Biden is the President and the Democrats have the majority in the Senate, so the GOP and conservatives can't really complain if Biden and the Senate Democrats push through a liberal Supreme Court justice pick before the midterm elections. They have the Constitutional prerogative to do so if they wish, and it'll only take 51 votes to get it done (or a 50/50 split, with Harris being the tie-breaker).
That's why elections matter and it pays to be the winner.
-
A further thought: it used to take a 60 vote supermajority for a Supreme Court Justice to be confirmed by the Senate. This was changed in 2017, when the then GOP majority used the "nuclear option" to make it a simple majority vote to push through Neil Goursch's nomination.
So if Biden and the Democrats push through a woke liberal justice nominee with just a simple majority, everyone can go ahead and thank Cocaine Mitch for pulling the trigger on the nuclear option. Everyone reaps what they sow eventually.
-
A further thought: it used to take a 60 vote supermajority for a Supreme Court Justice to be confirmed by the Senate. This was changed in 2017, when the then GOP majority used the "nuclear option" to make it a simple majority vote to push through Neil Goursch's nomination.
So if Biden and the Democrats push through a woke liberal justice nominee with just a simple majority, everyone can go ahead and thank Cocaine Mitch for pulling the trigger on the nuclear option. Everyone reaps what they sow eventually.
A further thought: it used to take a 60 vote supermajority for a Supreme Court Justice to be confirmed by the Senate. This was changed in 2017, when the then GOP majority used the "nuclear option" to make it a simple majority vote to push through Neil Goursch's nomination.
So if Biden and the Democrats push through a woke liberal justice nominee with just a simple majority, everyone can go ahead and thank Cocaine Mitch for pulling the trigger on the nuclear option. Everyone reaps what they sow eventually.
I said that when they ran through the nuclear option; that's going to come back and bite somebody in the ass.
WSS
-
Fishin' in this ole rabbit hole is still good these days. Caught two Bass............Tards.???
You're not fishing. You been spouting the 'were going to get Trump' for years now, and never have you been correct.
You're not fishing. You been spouting the 'were going to get Trump' for years now, and never have you been correct.
Even the blind pig finds an acorn now and then.? Sooner or later I get the acorn courtesy of the orange loser.?
️
-
You're not fishing. You been spouting the 'were going to get Trump' for years now, and never have you been correct.
Even the blind pig finds an acorn now and then.? Sooner or later I get the acorn courtesy of the orange loser.?
️
Even the blind pig finds an acorn now and then.? Sooner or later I get the acorn courtesy of the orange loser.?
️
In other words There's Hope for you yet?
Doesn't seem like a good bet but what the hell
WSS
-
You're not fishing. You been spouting the 'were going to get Trump' for years now, and never have you been correct.
Even the blind pig finds an acorn now and then.? Sooner or later I get the acorn courtesy of the orange loser.?
️
Even the blind pig finds an acorn now and then.? Sooner or later I get the acorn courtesy of the orange loser.?
️
Orange man much better than demented socialist.
-
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around.
WSS
-
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around.
WSS
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around.
WSS
This was Dementia Joe’s criteria for selecting his VP…and we both know how that worked out.
-
You're not fishing. You been spouting the 'were going to get Trump' for years now, and never have you been correct.
Even the blind pig finds an acorn now and then.? Sooner or later I get the acorn courtesy of the orange loser.?
️
Even the blind pig finds an acorn now and then.? Sooner or later I get the acorn courtesy of the orange loser.?
️
I'm glad that Trump continues to live in your head.
-
Even the blind pig finds an acorn now and then.? Sooner or later I get the acorn courtesy of the orange loser.?
️
In other words There's Hope for you yet?
Doesn't seem like a good bet but what the hell
WSS
In other words There's Hope for you yet?
Doesn't seem like a good bet but what the hell
WSS
Doubt it. Not promising for someone who thinks of himself as a blind pig.
-
Good to see racism still alive and well on the Browns Board
-
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around.
WSS
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around.
WSS
I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex. You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications.
-
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around.
WSS
I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex. You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications.
I’d hope the highest the court in the land would represent the people that they preside over. And that would include race and sex. You aren’t being put before Congress as a nominee with qualifications.
You are joking right? Since there really is no qualification required.
WSS
-
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
You know who you are and you know how you would react if it were the other way around.
WSS
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
WSS
That would be both Reagan and Trump who first voiced the woman criteria.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/trump-supreme-court-woman-nominee-2020/index.html
How's that foot taste Steve?
-
But only a black woman. That is racists. Typical of you liberals.
-
Black is fine, woman is fine - but the left will nominate a puppet lefty that will vote however the left tells her to.
Major problem.
activist crap - the left justices break their promises every vote.
-
We should hope the president of either party would have fairness and a rational view of the constitution in mind when selecting a Supreme Court nomination. If you're number one criteria is skin color or sex....
WSS
That would be both Reagan and Trump who first voiced the woman criteria.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/trump-supreme-court-woman-nominee-2020/index.html
How's that foot taste Steve?
That would be both Reagan and Trump who first voiced the woman criteria.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/trump-supreme-court-woman-nominee-2020/index.html
How's that foot taste Steve?
I don't like either of those pledges. Especially if they were compounded by selecting the color. I know it's tough for you to understand because Trump hatred is your only Criterion. I think it's a stupid idea to narrow your search to in the case of a woman approximately 40% of the attorneys, if you guys think you need to be an attorney which you don't, and the further minimize that by requiring a negro. And by Bacon's rule another negro would make too many of them on a nine-member court but that's a stupid criteria too.
Imagine if stefanski said he was going to draft the best white cornerback.
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
