Cleveland BROWNS Rookie WR David Bell signs his 4 year $4.9M contact.
-
What role are we seeing for him? Landry's modest-speed/separation, sure-handed?
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Good. With the roster as it is, we kinda' need him to hit the ground running and be a reliable target in year 1.
Good. With the roster as it is, we kinda' need him to hit the ground running and be a reliable target in year 1.
Thoughts on the super-massive's images?
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
What role are we seeing for him? Landry's modest-speed/separation, sure-handed?
Not quite-as-strong Michael Thomas.
That classic boundary X, but with the feet and hip sink to play all over the formation. Kid really has the look of another mid round gem, who just wasn't the speed merchant so GMs tend to overlook him.
-
Thoughts on the super-massive's images?
I set it as my office desktop at work yesterday.
I haven't gone down the rabbit holes on it yet......so....right now I'm a little confused. The one they released a couple of years ago in M87 had a bright region and the rest not as bright. And the reason given was that the brighter area was where the material was moving towards us and the less bright areas were of the material not heading towards us. The material is spiraling around it like water in a bath tub. But the picture of Sagittarius A star has multiple bright areas with less bright in between. - Perhaps some of it is just more dense with material that's superheated compared to other areas. Cool pic though.
BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE -
Thoughts on the super-massive's images?
I set it as my office desktop at work yesterday.
I haven't gone down the rabbit holes on it yet......so....right now I'm a little confused. The one they released a couple of years ago in M87 had a bright region and the rest not as bright. And the reason given was that the brighter area was where the material was moving towards us and the less bright areas were of the material not heading towards us. The material is spiraling around it like water in a bath tub. But the picture of Sagittarius A star has multiple bright areas with less bright in between. - Perhaps some of it is just more dense with material that's superheated compared to other areas. Cool pic though.
I set it as my office desktop at work yesterday.
I haven't gone down the rabbit holes on it yet......so....right now I'm a little confused. The one they released a couple of years ago in M87 had a bright region and the rest not as bright. And the reason given was that the brighter area was where the material was moving towards us and the less bright areas were of the material not heading towards us. The material is spiraling around it like water in a bath tub. But the picture of Sagittarius A star has multiple bright areas with less bright in between. - Perhaps some of it is just more dense with material that's superheated compared to other areas. Cool pic though.
I won't comment on Black Holes, other than there's convincing evidence that a super massive (millions of stars worth) one resides in the center of our Galaxy. But I will comment if it's clear your way- starting at about 10:30 PM EDT until around 2AM (mid eclipse around midnight) there's a total eclipse of the Moon Sunday night stretching into early Monday morning, if you're into that sort of thing.
-
I set it as my office desktop at work yesterday.
I haven't gone down the rabbit holes on it yet......so....right now I'm a little confused. The one they released a couple of years ago in M87 had a bright region and the rest not as bright. And the reason given was that the brighter area was where the material was moving towards us and the less bright areas were of the material not heading towards us. The material is spiraling around it like water in a bath tub. But the picture of Sagittarius A star has multiple bright areas with less bright in between. - Perhaps some of it is just more dense with material that's superheated compared to other areas. Cool pic though.
I won't comment on Black Holes, other than there's convincing evidence that a super massive (millions of stars worth) one resides in the center of our Galaxy. But I will comment if it's clear your way- starting at about 10:30 PM EDT until around 2AM (mid eclipse around midnight) there's a total eclipse of the Moon Sunday night stretching into early Monday morning, if you're into that sort of thing.
I won't comment on Black Holes, other than there's convincing evidence that a super massive (millions of stars worth) one resides in the center of our Galaxy. But I will comment if it's clear your way- starting at about 10:30 PM EDT until around 2AM (mid eclipse around midnight) there's a total eclipse of the Moon Sunday night stretching into early Monday morning, if you're into that sort of thing.
I posted an article confirming it's existence over in the Barber Shop.
-
Does this pick remind anyone else of the Robiski pick? Not a real fast receiver but more NFL ready. And then last year we went with Schwartz who was the fast guy but less NFL ready.
BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE -
Does this pick remind anyone else of the Robiski pick? Not a real fast receiver but more NFL ready. And then last year we went with Schwartz who was the fast guy but less NFL ready.
Does this pick remind anyone else of the Robiski pick? Not a real fast receiver but more NFL ready. And then last year we went with Schwartz who was the fast guy but less NFL ready.
I surely hope he's better than Brian Robiskie.
-
-
Does this pick remind anyone else of the Robiski pick? Not a real fast receiver but more NFL ready. And then last year we went with Schwartz who was the fast guy but less NFL ready.
Does this pick remind anyone else of the Robiski pick?
As much as I loved Robo at tOSU.... god, I sure hope not.
-
I set it as my office desktop at work yesterday.
I haven't gone down the rabbit holes on it yet......so....right now I'm a little confused. The one they released a couple of years ago in M87 had a bright region and the rest not as bright. And the reason given was that the brighter area was where the material was moving towards us and the less bright areas were of the material not heading towards us. The material is spiraling around it like water in a bath tub. But the picture of Sagittarius A star has multiple bright areas with less bright in between. - Perhaps some of it is just more dense with material that's superheated compared to other areas. Cool pic though.
I won't comment on Black Holes, other than there's convincing evidence that a super massive (millions of stars worth) one resides in the center of our Galaxy. But I will comment if it's clear your way- starting at about 10:30 PM EDT until around 2AM (mid eclipse around midnight) there's a total eclipse of the Moon Sunday night stretching into early Monday morning, if you're into that sort of thing.
I won't comment on Black Holes, other than there's convincing evidence that a super massive (millions of stars worth) one resides in the center of our Galaxy. But I will comment if it's clear your way- starting at about 10:30 PM EDT until around 2AM (mid eclipse around midnight) there's a total eclipse of the Moon Sunday night stretching into early Monday morning, if you're into that sort of thing.
I'm real interested in what the new James Webb Telescope will yield
Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~ -
Does this pick remind anyone else of the Robiski pick? Not a real fast receiver but more NFL ready. And then last year we went with Schwartz who was the fast guy but less NFL ready.
Does this pick remind anyone else of the Robiski pick? Not a real fast receiver but more NFL ready. And then last year we went with Schwartz who was the fast guy but less NFL ready.
I've put no work into this type of questioning? ?
But, Sticking with the 3rd round WR draft theme..
Bell has the looks & tude of Steve Smith sr. (pick#89).. and than it stops there...
While watching Bell's game-tape/(pick #99) this former foe came to mind.. and hoping he has the same career as pick #92 in 1998
Yeah, I said it... He'll fight & get open, for a ball like Hines Ward 2.0 🥷 now you can..( Boooooooooo me! )
-
Does this pick remind anyone else of the Robiski pick? Not a real fast receiver but more NFL ready. And then last year we went with Schwartz who was the fast guy but less NFL ready.
Does this pick remind anyone else of the Robiski pick? Not a real fast receiver but more NFL ready. And then last year we went with Schwartz who was the fast guy but less NFL ready.
I don’t remember Robiski getting behind coverage like Bell did at Purdue and I don’t recall Robiski getting separation at any level college or Pro.
It was brought up by me and others on here last year at this time. Schwartz was not ready for a full NFL route tree yet at times the Browns seemingly called on him to do things he’s still Very green and ill equipped to do.
-
Does this pick remind anyone else of the Robiski pick? Not a real fast receiver but more NFL ready. And then last year we went with Schwartz who was the fast guy but less NFL ready.
I don’t remember Robiski getting behind coverage like Bell did at Purdue and I don’t recall Robiski getting separation at any level college or Pro.
It was brought up by me and others on here last year at this time. Schwartz was not ready for a full NFL route tree yet at times the Browns seemingly called on him to do things he’s still Very green and ill equipped to do.
I don’t remember Robiski getting behind coverage like Bell did at Purdue and I don’t recall Robiski getting separation at any level college or Pro.
Agreed... Robiske was a project who really was a gamble... Not really bad but not really great...... He was just meager in an 'ok' sort of way... Maybe I'm being too nice...
Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~ -
I don’t remember Robiski getting behind coverage like Bell did at Purdue and I don’t recall Robiski getting separation at any level college or Pro.
Agreed... Robiske was a project who really was a gamble... Not really bad but not really great...... He was just meager in an 'ok' sort of way... Maybe I'm being too nice...
Agreed... Robiske was a project who really was a gamble... Not really bad but not really great...... He was just meager in an 'ok' sort of way... Maybe I'm being too nice...
I’d say he had some polish in his game. He ran very good routes at OSU and he had very good hands. But If you can’t separate though you better be able to pluck the ball out of the air with coverage on you.
-
I don’t remember Robiski getting behind coverage like Bell did at Purdue and I don’t recall Robiski getting separation at any level college or Pro.
Agreed... Robiske was a project who really was a gamble... Not really bad but not really great...... He was just meager in an 'ok' sort of way... Maybe I'm being too nice...
-
I read somewhere where Watson is inviting a bunch of the offense to work out with him in the Bahamas. (He's just gonna love Christmas in Cleveland)
It would be a good thing to start getting everybody acquainted asap. Throw the ball around, start to get familiar with everyone's speed, quickness, moves, etc. (and afterwards, everybody gets laid)
-
I won't comment on Black Holes, other than there's convincing evidence that a super massive (millions of stars worth) one resides in the center of our Galaxy. But I will comment if it's clear your way- starting at about 10:30 PM EDT until around 2AM (mid eclipse around midnight) there's a total eclipse of the Moon Sunday night stretching into early Monday morning, if you're into that sort of thing.
I'm real interested in what the new James Webb Telescope will yield
I'm real interested in what the new James Webb Telescope will yield
Speaking of targets. ?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login