Durham
-
I’d prefer execution but we should start with prosecution.
I’d prefer execution but we should start with prosecution.
MAGA-hang 'em high I say like the good ole days. Then on to prosecution. That way no one worries about getting the cart before the horse when all ya need is a horse. ??
-
I’d prefer execution but we should start with prosecution.
MAGA-hang 'em high I say like the good ole days. Then on to prosecution. That way no one worries about getting the cart before the horse when all ya need is a horse. ??
MAGA-hang 'em high I say like the good ole days. Then on to prosecution. That way no one worries about getting the cart before the horse when all ya need is a horse. ??
Consider :
"Q" or not, the allegory applies.
-
MAGA-hang 'em high I say like the good ole days. Then on to prosecution. That way no one worries about getting the cart before the horse when all ya need is a horse. ??
Consider :
"Q" or not, the allegory applies.
-
At the end of the day Garland is corrupt. Nothing we can do about it except hold out till after the midterms. And to be completely honest no matter which way these things shook out I would really rather have a completely honest and objective justice department and not just a flack for Pelosi and the left wing lunatics.
WSS
-
At the end of the day Garland is corrupt. Nothing we can do about it except hold out till after the midterms. And to be completely honest no matter which way these things shook out I would really rather have a completely honest and objective justice department and not just a flack for Pelosi and the left wing lunatics.
WSS
At the end of the day Garland is corrupt. Nothing we can do about it except hold out till after the midterms. And to be completely honest no matter which way these things shook out I would really rather have a completely honest and objective justice department and not just a flack for Pelosi and the left wing lunatics.
WSS
TRUE. It's dangerous though. The FBI is also corrupt up on high. and clapper and brennan at the CIA.
The term "deep state" refers to these corrupt sob's who have way, way too much power over the years, and
have the "keep that power" agenda. (peter strock, lisa page. etc etc etc etc etc etc)
-
-
ok it was shown that Danchenko was paid by the FBI from March 2017 til 2020.
the court convenes in October -i bet Danchenko gets the nod (like that of jeffrey epstien got from mueller back in 2008)
and he walks free . at worst gets deported why? the fbi wins anyway
-
ok it was shown that Danchenko was paid by the FBI from March 2017 til 2020.
the court convenes in October -i bet Danchenko gets the nod (like that of jeffrey epstien got from mueller back in 2008)
and he walks free . at worst gets deported why? the fbi wins anyway
ok it was shown that Danchenko was paid by the FBI from March 2017 til 2020.
the court convenes in October -i bet Danchenko gets the nod (like that of jeffrey epstien got from mueller back in 2008)
and he walks free . at worst gets deported why? the fbi wins anyway
With Garland as attorney general what the hell is the difference?
WSS
-
Durham Inquiry Appears to Wind Down as Grand Jury Expires - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Now Mr. Durham appears to be winding down his three-year inquiry without anything close to the results Mr. Trump was seeking. The grand jury that Mr. Durham has recently used to hear evidence has expired, and while he could convene another, there are currently no plans to do so, three people familiar with the matter said.
Mr. Durham and his team are working to complete a final report by the end of the year, they said, and one of the lead prosecutors on his team is leaving for a job with a prominent law firm.
Over the course of his inquiry, Mr. Durham has developed cases against two people accused of lying to the F.B.I. in relation to outside efforts to investigate purported Trump-Russia ties, but he has not charged any conspiracy or put any high-level officials on trial. The recent developments suggest that the chances of any more indictments are remote.
-
Durham Inquiry Appears to Wind Down as Grand Jury Expires - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Now Mr. Durham appears to be winding down his three-year inquiry without anything close to the results Mr. Trump was seeking. The grand jury that Mr. Durham has recently used to hear evidence has expired, and while he could convene another, there are currently no plans to do so, three people familiar with the matter said.
Mr. Durham and his team are working to complete a final report by the end of the year, they said, and one of the lead prosecutors on his team is leaving for a job with a prominent law firm.
Over the course of his inquiry, Mr. Durham has developed cases against two people accused of lying to the F.B.I. in relation to outside efforts to investigate purported Trump-Russia ties, but he has not charged any conspiracy or put any high-level officials on trial. The recent developments suggest that the chances of any more indictments are remote.
Durham Inquiry Appears to Wind Down as Grand Jury Expires - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Now Mr. Durham appears to be winding down his three-year inquiry without anything close to the results Mr. Trump was seeking. The grand jury that Mr. Durham has recently used to hear evidence has expired, and while he could convene another, there are currently no plans to do so, three people familiar with the matter said.
Mr. Durham and his team are working to complete a final report by the end of the year, they said, and one of the lead prosecutors on his team is leaving for a job with a prominent law firm.
Over the course of his inquiry, Mr. Durham has developed cases against two people accused of lying to the F.B.I. in relation to outside efforts to investigate purported Trump-Russia ties, but he has not charged any conspiracy or put any high-level officials on trial. The recent developments suggest that the chances of any more indictments are remote.
Haha.. NY Times.
I bet you never miss an episode of The View.
-
Durham Inquiry Appears to Wind Down as Grand Jury Expires - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Now Mr. Durham appears to be winding down his three-year inquiry without anything close to the results Mr. Trump was seeking. The grand jury that Mr. Durham has recently used to hear evidence has expired, and while he could convene another, there are currently no plans to do so, three people familiar with the matter said.
Mr. Durham and his team are working to complete a final report by the end of the year, they said, and one of the lead prosecutors on his team is leaving for a job with a prominent law firm.
Over the course of his inquiry, Mr. Durham has developed cases against two people accused of lying to the F.B.I. in relation to outside efforts to investigate purported Trump-Russia ties, but he has not charged any conspiracy or put any high-level officials on trial. The recent developments suggest that the chances of any more indictments are remote.
Haha.. NY Times.
I bet you never miss an episode of The View.
Haha.. NY Times.
I bet you never miss an episode of The View.
I know you guys get your news from blogs and Russia propagandists (see Tucker).
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/
New York Times
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Newspaper
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITY
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login