Skip to content

Story time . . . Swamp draining ( . . . )

Political Discussion
11.1k 40 277.9k 1
  • image.thumb.png.84001a508c7c81a057aa059550ba5755.png

    Ya know, the Pilgrims brought Dandelions with them because they knew of it's health benefits,

    May have posted it before, but it's something like 97% - 98% effective at killing Cancer cells in 48 Hrs.

    Haven't read the full article on this, but I would think it could work against the shot spikes as well.

    Ironic that Roundup, which causes Cancer, is used to kill this "weed". 

    EDIT :

    Image

  • May be an image of text that says 'THE INF INFOGRAPHICS SHOW i Image Credit: Department mageCredit.USDepartmentofDeiene fDefense eл6e L Kem S S S S E 田 T ST 1688 688 UFO HOTSPOT OVER UKRAINE Kyiv's Main Astronomical Observatory has published a paper detailing the recent high number of UFO sightings over Ukraine. The objects, completely black, emit no radiation and absorb all radiation falling on them. They are traveling too fast to be seen by the naked eye or run-of-the-mill cameras, with estimated speeds up upto to miles per second (15 km/s). Despite the war, scientists insist their nature is not clear.'

  • image.thumb.png.84001a508c7c81a057aa059550ba5755.png

    Ya know, the Pilgrims brought Dandelions with them because they knew of it's health benefits,

    May have posted it before, but it's something like 97% - 98% effective at killing Cancer cells in 48 Hrs.

    Haven't read the full article on this, but I would think it could work against the shot spikes as well.

    Ironic that Roundup, which causes Cancer, is used to kill this "weed". 

    EDIT :

    Image

    @jafbf said:

    image.thumb.png.84001a508c7c81a057aa059550ba5755.png

    Ya know, the Pilgrims brought Dandelions with them because they knew of it's health benefits,

    May have posted it before, but it's something like 97% - 98% effective at killing Cancer cells in 48 Hrs.

    Haven't read the full article on this, but I would think it could work against the shot spikes as well.

    Ironic that Roundup, which causes Cancer, is used to kill this "weed". 

    EDIT :

    Image

    Dandelion root is not a proven cancer cure - Full Fact

  • image.png.a512348653a188966bfd051e3e7968ca.png

    Image

  • image.thumb.png.a897880f1d7add06e7832995d790e1ca.png

  • image.png.49ab6dad3c7de5bd9dc0a0d90570cb0d.png

    https://www.rsbnetwork.com/video/watch-live-president-donald-j-trumps-save-america-rally-in-youngstown-oh-9-6-22/

    There were some interesting bits in the last Rally - really needed a transcript though to point them out.

    Supposedly some more bits tomorrow.

  • @jafbf said:

    image.thumb.png.a897880f1d7add06e7832995d790e1ca.png

    Half the Qanon conspiracy theories they throw out there are nonsense. Not a good look for Trump.

  • @jafbf said:

    image.thumb.png.a897880f1d7add06e7832995d790e1ca.png

    Half the Qanon conspiracy theories they throw out there are nonsense. Not a good look for Trump.

    @fy56 said:

    Half the Qanon conspiracy theories they throw out there are nonsense. Not a good look for Trump.

    I'm not thinking it's a theory :

    image.thumb.png.7b8afd30b4b1cb2b08ec1a8e32574d3c.png

    image.thumb.png.33c749acc1cbc1d453f8d506d62c11e5.png

    WTF ?

    Theory   .   .   .   need to look into some things   .   .   .  

  • @fy56 said:

    Half the Qanon conspiracy theories they throw out there are nonsense. Not a good look for Trump.

    I'm not thinking it's a theory :

    image.thumb.png.7b8afd30b4b1cb2b08ec1a8e32574d3c.png

    image.thumb.png.33c749acc1cbc1d453f8d506d62c11e5.png

    WTF ?

    Theory   .   .   .   need to look into some things   .   .   .  

    @jafbf said:

    I'm not thinking it's a theory :

    image.thumb.png.7b8afd30b4b1cb2b08ec1a8e32574d3c.png

    image.thumb.png.33c749acc1cbc1d453f8d506d62c11e5.png

    WTF ?

    Theory   .   .   .   need to look into some things   .   .   .  

    What I'm saying is that QAnon made a lot of claims and developed theories that were not true and debunked. Thats not saying everything they say is BS, but they're not credible enough for Trump to be wearing a Q pin. Bad look IMO.

    Author Walter Kirn has described Q as an innovator among conspiracy theorists by enthralling readers with "clues" rather than presenting claims directly: "The audience for internet narratives doesn't want to read, it wants to write. It doesn't want answers provided, it wants to search for them."[139] But the messages in Q's posts often hinged on specific predictions that turned out to be false, such as:[140]

    • Hillary Clinton was about to be arrested and would attempt to flee the country.[d]
    • John Podesta would be arrested on November 3, 2017, and public riots would be organized to try and prevent the arrest of other public officials.[69]
    • A major event involving the Department of Defense would take place on February 1, 2018.
    • People targeted by Trump would commit suicide en masse on February 10, 2018.
    • There would be a car bombing in London around February 16, 2018.
    • A "smoking gun" video of Hillary Clinton would emerge in March 2018.
    • Something major would happen in Chongqing on April 10, 2018.
    • There would be a "bombshell" revelation about North Korea in May 2018.
    • The Trump military parade would "never be forgotten".[e]
    • The Five Eyes "won't be around much longer".
    • Mark Zuckerberg was going to leave Facebook and flee the United States.[f]
    • Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey would be forced to resign "next" (in the context of the prediction of Zuckerberg's resignation).[g]
    • Pope Francis would have a "terrible May" in 2018.

    On multiple occasions, Q has dismissed these incorrect predictions as deliberate, claiming that "disinformation is necessary".[142][143][144] This has led Australian psychologist Stephan Lewandowsky to emphasize the "self-sealing" quality of the conspiracy theory, highlighting its anonymous purveyor's use of plausible deniability and noting that evidence against it "can become evidence of [its] validity in the minds of believers".[141] The numerous false, unsubstantiated claims Q has posted include:

  • @jafbf said:

    I'm not thinking it's a theory :

    image.thumb.png.7b8afd30b4b1cb2b08ec1a8e32574d3c.png

    image.thumb.png.33c749acc1cbc1d453f8d506d62c11e5.png

    WTF ?

    Theory   .   .   .   need to look into some things   .   .   .  

    What I'm saying is that QAnon made a lot of claims and developed theories that were not true and debunked. Thats not saying everything they say is BS, but they're not credible enough for Trump to be wearing a Q pin. Bad look IMO.

    Author Walter Kirn has described Q as an innovator among conspiracy theorists by enthralling readers with "clues" rather than presenting claims directly: "The audience for internet narratives doesn't want to read, it wants to write. It doesn't want answers provided, it wants to search for them."[139] But the messages in Q's posts often hinged on specific predictions that turned out to be false, such as:[140]

    • Hillary Clinton was about to be arrested and would attempt to flee the country.[d]
    • John Podesta would be arrested on November 3, 2017, and public riots would be organized to try and prevent the arrest of other public officials.[69]
    • A major event involving the Department of Defense would take place on February 1, 2018.
    • People targeted by Trump would commit suicide en masse on February 10, 2018.
    • There would be a car bombing in London around February 16, 2018.
    • A "smoking gun" video of Hillary Clinton would emerge in March 2018.
    • Something major would happen in Chongqing on April 10, 2018.
    • There would be a "bombshell" revelation about North Korea in May 2018.
    • The Trump military parade would "never be forgotten".[e]
    • The Five Eyes "won't be around much longer".
    • Mark Zuckerberg was going to leave Facebook and flee the United States.[f]
    • Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey would be forced to resign "next" (in the context of the prediction of Zuckerberg's resignation).[g]
    • Pope Francis would have a "terrible May" in 2018.

    On multiple occasions, Q has dismissed these incorrect predictions as deliberate, claiming that "disinformation is necessary".[142][143][144] This has led Australian psychologist Stephan Lewandowsky to emphasize the "self-sealing" quality of the conspiracy theory, highlighting its anonymous purveyor's use of plausible deniability and noting that evidence against it "can become evidence of [its] validity in the minds of believers".[141] The numerous false, unsubstantiated claims Q has posted include:

    @fy56 said:

    What I'm saying is that QAnon made a lot of claims and developed theories that were not true and debunked. Thats not saying everything they say is BS, but they're not credible enough for Trump to be wearing a Q pin. Bad look IMO.

    Author Walter Kirn has described Q as an innovator among conspiracy theorists by enthralling readers with "clues" rather than presenting claims directly: "The audience for internet narratives doesn't want to read, it wants to write. It doesn't want answers provided, it wants to search for them."[139] But the messages in Q's posts often hinged on specific predictions that turned out to be false, such as:[140]

    • Hillary Clinton was about to be arrested and would attempt to flee the country.[d]
    • John Podesta would be arrested on November 3, 2017, and public riots would be organized to try and prevent the arrest of other public officials.[69]
    • A major event involving the Department of Defense would take place on February 1, 2018.
    • People targeted by Trump would commit suicide en masse on February 10, 2018.
    • There would be a car bombing in London around February 16, 2018.
    • A "smoking gun" video of Hillary Clinton would emerge in March 2018.
    • Something major would happen in Chongqing on April 10, 2018.
    • There would be a "bombshell" revelation about North Korea in May 2018.
    • The Trump military parade would "never be forgotten".[e]
    • The Five Eyes "won't be around much longer".
    • Mark Zuckerberg was going to leave Facebook and flee the United States.[f]
    • Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey would be forced to resign "next" (in the context of the prediction of Zuckerberg's resignation).[g]
    • Pope Francis would have a "terrible May" in 2018.

    On multiple occasions, Q has dismissed these incorrect predictions as deliberate, claiming that "disinformation is necessary".[142][143][144] This has led Australian psychologist Stephan Lewandowsky to emphasize the "self-sealing" quality of the conspiracy theory, highlighting its anonymous purveyor's use of plausible deniability and noting that evidence against it "can become evidence of [its] validity in the minds of believers".[141] The numerous false, unsubstantiated claims Q has posted include:

    I've touched upon this a few times in the past, been awhile, and there are some new Eyes.

    When these started coming out, everyone was thinking they were related too current events/times.

    Some were (maybe coincidentally), but as time passed it became more evident that these were "loading the Clock" for future events.

    By "loading the Clock" I mean they are unlocked by time deltas / phrases / etc. by certain people.

    Pretty difficult to debunk items that haven't occurred yet.

    Will they all come to transpire ?

    No idea, I'm not on the Team (only a handful), and I haven't followed it that closely for some time.

    Let me clear one or two of the above items up :

    image.png.9f0c1c57492bf4120d669cfe7ae52302.png

    These are not dates, as originally thought by many, they are sections of the Law of War manual (revised by Trump's Team early on) :

    image.png.df4676a3a8aaf88a1d27a5bb80be37df.png

    For this too make sense, you need to recognize that DC is a foreign territory, and that it is a captured operation under foreign control (has been for some time).

    These events have not yet happened.

    Pretty much none of the dates of what was "debunked" matter, as they have not been assigned/decoded.

    This is getting too long, I'll post an event which looks like it was just triggered in my next post.

  • image.png.2af853b77d4d5a7a197eff72f41bf212.png

    image.png.6e555a4465b13e2ecaca1cc0f76ff261.png

    Date on the Watch - 19

    Time - 4:49

    Coincidence ?

    Could be, but they can pick my Lottery ticket anytime they want.

    There's more on this one, but it'll get too long for no real benefit.

  • Before it's gone, here's the flag clip from Saturday :

  • Here's a few bits I've found on the Flag.

    image.thumb.png.a4b33f471e12ab6e95b116ed154f7698.png

    image.thumb.png.9a4a2f70403c4e736337a36118c04fce.png

    Just passing on what I've seen around, have some other theories myself but nothing solid.

  • image.png.3a2e2b5b082e4da37887bcb81b5cd99c.png

    This goes along with the "Law of War Manual".

    Interesting that this happens with the Queen's death.

  • @fy56 said:

    What I'm saying is that QAnon made a lot of claims and developed theories that were not true and debunked. Thats not saying everything they say is BS, but they're not credible enough for Trump to be wearing a Q pin. Bad look IMO.

    Author Walter Kirn has described Q as an innovator among conspiracy theorists by enthralling readers with "clues" rather than presenting claims directly: "The audience for internet narratives doesn't want to read, it wants to write. It doesn't want answers provided, it wants to search for them."[139] But the messages in Q's posts often hinged on specific predictions that turned out to be false, such as:[140]

    • Hillary Clinton was about to be arrested and would attempt to flee the country.[d]
    • John Podesta would be arrested on November 3, 2017, and public riots would be organized to try and prevent the arrest of other public officials.[69]
    • A major event involving the Department of Defense would take place on February 1, 2018.
    • People targeted by Trump would commit suicide en masse on February 10, 2018.
    • There would be a car bombing in London around February 16, 2018.
    • A "smoking gun" video of Hillary Clinton would emerge in March 2018.
    • Something major would happen in Chongqing on April 10, 2018.
    • There would be a "bombshell" revelation about North Korea in May 2018.
    • The Trump military parade would "never be forgotten".[e]
    • The Five Eyes "won't be around much longer".
    • Mark Zuckerberg was going to leave Facebook and flee the United States.[f]
    • Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey would be forced to resign "next" (in the context of the prediction of Zuckerberg's resignation).[g]
    • Pope Francis would have a "terrible May" in 2018.

    On multiple occasions, Q has dismissed these incorrect predictions as deliberate, claiming that "disinformation is necessary".[142][143][144] This has led Australian psychologist Stephan Lewandowsky to emphasize the "self-sealing" quality of the conspiracy theory, highlighting its anonymous purveyor's use of plausible deniability and noting that evidence against it "can become evidence of [its] validity in the minds of believers".[141] The numerous false, unsubstantiated claims Q has posted include:

    I've touched upon this a few times in the past, been awhile, and there are some new Eyes.

    When these started coming out, everyone was thinking they were related too current events/times.

    Some were (maybe coincidentally), but as time passed it became more evident that these were "loading the Clock" for future events.

    By "loading the Clock" I mean they are unlocked by time deltas / phrases / etc. by certain people.

    Pretty difficult to debunk items that haven't occurred yet.

    Will they all come to transpire ?

    No idea, I'm not on the Team (only a handful), and I haven't followed it that closely for some time.

    Let me clear one or two of the above items up :

    image.png.9f0c1c57492bf4120d669cfe7ae52302.png

    These are not dates, as originally thought by many, they are sections of the Law of War manual (revised by Trump's Team early on) :

    image.png.df4676a3a8aaf88a1d27a5bb80be37df.png

    For this too make sense, you need to recognize that DC is a foreign territory, and that it is a captured operation under foreign control (has been for some time).

    These events have not yet happened.

    Pretty much none of the dates of what was "debunked" matter, as they have not been assigned/decoded.

    This is getting too long, I'll post an event which looks like it was just triggered in my next post.

    @jafbf said:

    I've touched upon this a few times in the past, been awhile, and there are some new Eyes.

    When these started coming out, everyone was thinking they were related too current events/times.

    Some were (maybe coincidentally), but as time passed it became more evident that these were "loading the Clock" for future events.

    By "loading the Clock" I mean they are unlocked by time deltas / phrases / etc. by certain people.

    Pretty difficult to debunk items that haven't occurred yet.

    Will they all come to transpire ?

    No idea, I'm not on the Team (only a handful), and I haven't followed it that closely for some time.

    Let me clear one or two of the above items up :

    image.png.9f0c1c57492bf4120d669cfe7ae52302.png

    These are not dates, as originally thought by many, they are sections of the Law of War manual (revised by Trump's Team early on) :

    image.png.df4676a3a8aaf88a1d27a5bb80be37df.png

    For this too make sense, you need to recognize that DC is a foreign territory, and that it is a captured operation under foreign control (has been for some time).

    These events have not yet happened.

    Pretty much none of the dates of what was "debunked" matter, as they have not been assigned/decoded.

    This is getting too long, I'll post an event which looks like it was just triggered in my next post.

    At this point the only thing I will say is that I'm rooting for you to be right.

  • @jafbf said:

    I've touched upon this a few times in the past, been awhile, and there are some new Eyes.

    When these started coming out, everyone was thinking they were related too current events/times.

    Some were (maybe coincidentally), but as time passed it became more evident that these were "loading the Clock" for future events.

    By "loading the Clock" I mean they are unlocked by time deltas / phrases / etc. by certain people.

    Pretty difficult to debunk items that haven't occurred yet.

    Will they all come to transpire ?

    No idea, I'm not on the Team (only a handful), and I haven't followed it that closely for some time.

    Let me clear one or two of the above items up :

    image.png.9f0c1c57492bf4120d669cfe7ae52302.png

    These are not dates, as originally thought by many, they are sections of the Law of War manual (revised by Trump's Team early on) :

    image.png.df4676a3a8aaf88a1d27a5bb80be37df.png

    For this too make sense, you need to recognize that DC is a foreign territory, and that it is a captured operation under foreign control (has been for some time).

    These events have not yet happened.

    Pretty much none of the dates of what was "debunked" matter, as they have not been assigned/decoded.

    This is getting too long, I'll post an event which looks like it was just triggered in my next post.

    At this point the only thing I will say is that I'm rooting for you to be right.

    @fy56 said:

    At this point the only thing I will say is that I'm rooting for you to be right.

    Good to see there are still a few open minds around.

    As nuts as it's been the last few years, it's probably not deserved, but is appreciated.

    One of the reasons I've set myself to "Walk the Plank" so too speak if we don't see something significant by EOY.