Durham
-
I know you guys get your news from blogs and Russia propagandists (see Tucker).
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/new-york-times/
New York Times
Bias Rating: LEFT-CENTER
Factual Reporting: HIGH
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Newspaper
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: HIGH CREDIBILITYHaha...
Why do you insist on opening a can of worms? I can start by posting the NY Times top 10 lies, but i won't. You can do that yourself.
Haha...
Why do you insist on opening a can of worms? I can start by posting the NY Times top 10 lies, but i won't. You can do that yourself.
I'm sure you got the list from a blog. Haha
Every source makes mistakes. The sources that take accountability for those mistake have high credibility. But you keep reading those blogs. They tell you what you want to hear after all.
Failed Fact Checks
A factual search shows the New York Times has made false claims in reporting but always makes corrections to those stories as soon as new information is available. Further, failed fact checks occurred on Op-Ed pages and not straight news reporting.
- “We have a host of issues associated with high B.M.I.s. But correlation doesn’t prove causation, and there’s a significant body of research showing that weight stigma and weight cycling can explain most if not all of the associations we see between higher weights and poor health outcomes.” – MOSTLY FALSE
- A political map circulated by Sarah Palin’s PAC incited Rep. Gabby Giffords’ shooting – FALSE
- “How Scientists Got Climate Change So Wrong” – Low Scientific Credibility
Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on wording and story selection that moderately favors the left. They are considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well-respected journalists/editors. The failed fact checks were on Op-Eds and not straight news reporting. (5/18/2016) Update (M. Huitsing 04/19/2022)
-
Durham Inquiry Appears to Wind Down as Grand Jury Expires - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Now Mr. Durham appears to be winding down his three-year inquiry without anything close to the results Mr. Trump was seeking. The grand jury that Mr. Durham has recently used to hear evidence has expired, and while he could convene another, there are currently no plans to do so, three people familiar with the matter said.
Mr. Durham and his team are working to complete a final report by the end of the year, they said, and one of the lead prosecutors on his team is leaving for a job with a prominent law firm.
Over the course of his inquiry, Mr. Durham has developed cases against two people accused of lying to the F.B.I. in relation to outside efforts to investigate purported Trump-Russia ties, but he has not charged any conspiracy or put any high-level officials on trial. The recent developments suggest that the chances of any more indictments are remote.
Durham Inquiry Appears to Wind Down as Grand Jury Expires - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Now Mr. Durham appears to be winding down his three-year inquiry without anything close to the results Mr. Trump was seeking. The grand jury that Mr. Durham has recently used to hear evidence has expired, and while he could convene another, there are currently no plans to do so, three people familiar with the matter said.
Mr. Durham and his team are working to complete a final report by the end of the year, they said, and one of the lead prosecutors on his team is leaving for a job with a prominent law firm.
Over the course of his inquiry, Mr. Durham has developed cases against two people accused of lying to the F.B.I. in relation to outside efforts to investigate purported Trump-Russia ties, but he has not charged any conspiracy or put any high-level officials on trial. The recent developments suggest that the chances of any more indictments are remote.
Who said it was going to be in D.C. ?
This is RICO minimum . . . and may not even processed through a Federal Court.
-
Im with Gorka on this
AND this "BOMBSHELL" shoulda coulda woulda been more effective 3 years ago
it coulda shoulda wouldve been found out back then as well...
-
Slipped through the cracks a bit, but the Durham / Danchenko trial started yesterday.
Some twists & turns coming out.
https://technofog.substack.com/p/day-1-of-the-igor-danchenko-trial
-
-
Who cares? The fix is in.
WSS
-
Who cares? The fix is in.
WSS
Who cares? The fix is in.
WSS
The exposure / facts are what is really what's important here.
Joe Sixpack doesn't know WTF is going on, this is yet another rehash too expose the facts.
Tiny steps.
Is this the ultimate solution ?
A DC jury against DC Swamp creatures . . . seriously ?
Laugh all you want, I expect the majority of these too be handled through (Military) Tribunals . . . on the light side it's Sedition, on the heavy side it's far beyond Treason.
What these people have done is so far beyond aiding/abetting the Enemy - Treason is too tame a term for what they have done.
< 3 Months . . .
-
-
To only the cult member's surprise....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/18/igor-danchenko-john-durham-verdict/
A jury on Tuesday found Igor Danchenko — a private researcher who was a primary source for a 2016 dossier of allegations about former president Donald Trump’s ties to Russia — not guilty of lying to the FBI about where he got his information. The verdict in federal court in Alexandria, Va., is another blow for special counsel John Durham, who has now lost both cases that have gone to trial as part of his nearly 3½-year investigation. Durham, who was asked by Attorney General William P. Barr in 2019 to review the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign in 2016, is sure to face renewed pressure to wrap up his work following the verdict.
-
To only the cult member's surprise....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/18/igor-danchenko-john-durham-verdict/
A jury on Tuesday found Igor Danchenko — a private researcher who was a primary source for a 2016 dossier of allegations about former president Donald Trump’s ties to Russia — not guilty of lying to the FBI about where he got his information. The verdict in federal court in Alexandria, Va., is another blow for special counsel John Durham, who has now lost both cases that have gone to trial as part of his nearly 3½-year investigation. Durham, who was asked by Attorney General William P. Barr in 2019 to review the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign in 2016, is sure to face renewed pressure to wrap up his work following the verdict.
To only the cult member's surprise....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/18/igor-danchenko-john-durham-verdict/
A jury on Tuesday found Igor Danchenko — a private researcher who was a primary source for a 2016 dossier of allegations about former president Donald Trump’s ties to Russia — not guilty of lying to the FBI about where he got his information. The verdict in federal court in Alexandria, Va., is another blow for special counsel John Durham, who has now lost both cases that have gone to trial as part of his nearly 3½-year investigation. Durham, who was asked by Attorney General William P. Barr in 2019 to review the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign in 2016, is sure to face renewed pressure to wrap up his work following the verdict.
?
-
To only the cult member's surprise....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/18/igor-danchenko-john-durham-verdict/
A jury on Tuesday found Igor Danchenko — a private researcher who was a primary source for a 2016 dossier of allegations about former president Donald Trump’s ties to Russia — not guilty of lying to the FBI about where he got his information. The verdict in federal court in Alexandria, Va., is another blow for special counsel John Durham, who has now lost both cases that have gone to trial as part of his nearly 3½-year investigation. Durham, who was asked by Attorney General William P. Barr in 2019 to review the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign in 2016, is sure to face renewed pressure to wrap up his work following the verdict.
To only the cult member's surprise....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/18/igor-danchenko-john-durham-verdict/
A jury on Tuesday found Igor Danchenko — a private researcher who was a primary source for a 2016 dossier of allegations about former president Donald Trump’s ties to Russia — not guilty of lying to the FBI about where he got his information. The verdict in federal court in Alexandria, Va., is another blow for special counsel John Durham, who has now lost both cases that have gone to trial as part of his nearly 3½-year investigation. Durham, who was asked by Attorney General William P. Barr in 2019 to review the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign in 2016, is sure to face renewed pressure to wrap up his work following the verdict.
-
To only the cult member's surprise....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/18/igor-danchenko-john-durham-verdict/
A jury on Tuesday found Igor Danchenko — a private researcher who was a primary source for a 2016 dossier of allegations about former president Donald Trump’s ties to Russia — not guilty of lying to the FBI about where he got his information. The verdict in federal court in Alexandria, Va., is another blow for special counsel John Durham, who has now lost both cases that have gone to trial as part of his nearly 3½-year investigation. Durham, who was asked by Attorney General William P. Barr in 2019 to review the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign in 2016, is sure to face renewed pressure to wrap up his work following the verdict.
To only the cult member's surprise....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/18/igor-danchenko-john-durham-verdict/
A jury on Tuesday found Igor Danchenko — a private researcher who was a primary source for a 2016 dossier of allegations about former president Donald Trump’s ties to Russia — not guilty of lying to the FBI about where he got his information. The verdict in federal court in Alexandria, Va., is another blow for special counsel John Durham, who has now lost both cases that have gone to trial as part of his nearly 3½-year investigation. Durham, who was asked by Attorney General William P. Barr in 2019 to review the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign in 2016, is sure to face renewed pressure to wrap up his work following the verdict.
The exposure / facts are what is really what's important here.
Joe Sixpack doesn't know WTF is going on, this is yet another rehash too expose the facts.
Tiny steps.
Is this the ultimate solution ?
A DC jury against DC Swamp creatures . . . seriously ?
Laugh all you want, I expect the majority of these too be handled through (Military) Tribunals . . . on the light side it's Sedition, on the heavy side it's far beyond Treason.
What these people have done is so far beyond aiding/abetting the Enemy - Treason is too tame a term for what they have done.
< 3 Months . . .
Guilty AF (lower/mid level), but a DC (Magic Wheel) Jury verdict against the Swamp ?
FYI - Magic Wheel is a software program that selects Jurors most likely too return the verdict desired.
Not a new thing - just another example of how corrupted our Justice System has become.
Did I not state this in a previous post (DC Swamp Jury) ?
This just further demonstrates that "The Military is the only way".
What is really being demonstrated in these Cases is that the Justice System is as broken as the other Branches of Government.Hence - "The Military is the only way" . . . i.e., Military Tribunals are the only way too Justice (I've said this from the beginning).
Worse possible outcome for the DS, but - play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Swift, no nonsense Trials with expeditious judgements, whether that be Prison or Execution - swift and final.
"These People are Stupid" . . .
These things take time, and so far, they continue too fall into the traps set for them.
Gonna take longer than folk want (self included too a degree), but the path is set and the verdict is final.
We've won, folks just don't know it yet (witness a few obvious victories these last few months).
We have too walk the path before we realize we're out of the fire.
Tag me as a Mad Man, has it yet made a difference ?
I'm just trying too to help folk, maybe have them look at things a bit differently.
Yea, I may be doing it incorrectly, but we are what we are - I can only show the water, it's up too others too decide too drink.
BS ?
Have ya'll noted the rapidity and number of "Whistle Blowers" over the last few months ?Death/lifelong Prison sentences is a pretty good motivator if you have any chance of saving your hide.
Things are going too change, and it's going too be amazingly quick when it happens.
If I knew when, the enemy would know when . . . and they (as well as we) will be caught by surprise when it happens.
-
-
Cult member cannot refute claim backed up by evidence. How did they respond?
a. Meme
b. Ad hominem attack
c. Link to rightwing nutjob "source"
d. #whataboutism
e. combination of a, b, c, or d
-
Cult member cannot refute claim backed up by evidence. How did they respond?
a. Meme
b. Ad hominem attack
c. Link to rightwing nutjob "source"
d. #whataboutism
e. combination of a, b, c, or d
Cult member cannot refute claim backed up by evidence. How did they respond?
a. Meme
b. Ad hominem attack
c. Link to rightwing nutjob "source"
d. #whataboutism
e. combination of a, b, c, or d
Groomer member cannot refute claim backed up by evidence. How did they respond?
a.Cry
b. Change sex
c. Link to CRT, DRAG QUEEN nutjob "source"
d. Severe TDS
e. combination of a, b, c, or d
Your Hatred of your country. Sad.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login