Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. 4th and Scrum

4th and Scrum

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
20 Posts 9 Posters 1.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C calfoxwc

    The Eagles got low and had all the leverage, but they also drove the Chiefs off the los with serious power.

    Their tackles can pinch in and force first downs.

    Jordan Mailata 6'8", 364 lbs. LT
    Landon Dickerson 6'6", 332 lbs
    Jason Kelce 6'3", 295 lbs
    Isaac Seumalo 6'4", 303 lbs
    Lane Johnson 6'6', 325 lbs.

    Interesting to note that the Eagles pay big for their oline guys:

    https://thelibertyline.com/2022/05/13/eagles-offensive-line-off-the-charts/

    What a great matchup. A great game - interesting and close. The battle in the trenches was amazing to watch.

    I think Mr. TE Kelce and Mahomes made for the difference. Kelce broke Gronk's playoff TD catch record in the first quarter. and Mahomes - is just amazing.

    Flugel FlugelF Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 11k Posts
    • 6k Reputation
    FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @calfoxwc said:

    The Eagles got low and had all the leverage, but they also drove the Chiefs off the los with serious power.

    Their tackles can pinch in and force first downs.

    Jordan Mailata 6'8", 364 lbs. LT
    Landon Dickerson 6'6", 332 lbs
    Jason Kelce 6'3", 295 lbs
    Isaac Seumalo 6'4", 303 lbs
    Lane Johnson 6'6', 325 lbs.

    Interesting to note that the Eagles pay big for their oline guys:

    https://thelibertyline.com/2022/05/13/eagles-offensive-line-off-the-charts/

    What a great matchup. A great game - interesting and close. The battle in the trenches was amazing to watch.

    I think Mr. TE Kelce and Mahomes made for the difference. Kelce broke Gronk's playoff TD catch record in the first quarter. and Mahomes - is just amazing.

    Jordan Mailata grew up playing rugby; so I wonder if he had some input on the short yardage rugby scrum.  That was pretty fun to watch.

    I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
    1 Reply Last reply
    👍
    Quote Reply
    • SdBacker80 S Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 5k Posts
      • 2k Reputation
      S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by SdBacker80
      #9

      even without the personnel advantage  it is a highly successful play.


      https://sports.sites.yale.edu/success-short-yardage-play-types-fourth-down

      credit to Yale Here

      FlugelF 1 Reply Last reply
      👍
      Quote Reply
      • S SdBacker80

        even without the personnel advantage  it is a highly successful play.


        https://sports.sites.yale.edu/success-short-yardage-play-types-fourth-down

        credit to Yale Here

        Flugel FlugelF Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 11k Posts
        • 6k Reputation
        FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by Flugel
        #10

        @sdbacker80 said:

        even without the personnel advantage  it is a highly successful play.


        https://sports.sites.yale.edu/success-short-yardage-play-types-fourth-down

        credit to Yale Here

        The idea base of this whole thing is based on the Wedge Block; and I'm not talking about the kick-off return wedge that they no longer allow.  I'm talking about a very short yardage conversion where every offensive player on the LOS (steps inward toward Center and forward simultaneously) with the Center at the apex with both Guards almost glued to his hips and both tackles almost glue to both Guards hips all in 1 motion. Basically everybody is down-blocking toward Center on both sides of the Center. An even easier alternative is just to shorten the splits between offensive players upfront down to an inch or 2 between each player along the LOS/line of scrimmage. The key is to fire out as 1 cohesive unit not allowing any defenders to get beat any OL to their inside. It's been a very effective tool for a QB sneak/handoff to the FB.  The rugby scrum is like a next generation evolution of this concept.

        The ONLY thing I wish the NFL would return to is disallowing 2 or 3 guys behind the QB pushing him forward for additional yardage.  That used to be a penalty; and it still should be IMO.  I hope they continue to allow the scrum.   If you watched the SB replays of how Philly perfected the pad height leverage superiority with those scrums; it was a thing of beauty.  They got underneath the DL/blitzers which removed the defensive base at the point of attack.  That's exactly what you want.

        Here's a link on Wedge Blocking as it pertains to the Oline.  Believe it or not, it's origin is from youth football but there's a segment in there that talks about the main purpose of it and how to execute it at the LOS. http://www.y-coach.com/wedge.html

        I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
        S 1 Reply Last reply
        👍
        Quote Reply
        • FlugelF Flugel

          @sdbacker80 said:

          even without the personnel advantage  it is a highly successful play.


          https://sports.sites.yale.edu/success-short-yardage-play-types-fourth-down

          credit to Yale Here

          The idea base of this whole thing is based on the Wedge Block; and I'm not talking about the kick-off return wedge that they no longer allow.  I'm talking about a very short yardage conversion where every offensive player on the LOS (steps inward toward Center and forward simultaneously) with the Center at the apex with both Guards almost glued to his hips and both tackles almost glue to both Guards hips all in 1 motion. Basically everybody is down-blocking toward Center on both sides of the Center. An even easier alternative is just to shorten the splits between offensive players upfront down to an inch or 2 between each player along the LOS/line of scrimmage. The key is to fire out as 1 cohesive unit not allowing any defenders to get beat any OL to their inside. It's been a very effective tool for a QB sneak/handoff to the FB.  The rugby scrum is like a next generation evolution of this concept.

          The ONLY thing I wish the NFL would return to is disallowing 2 or 3 guys behind the QB pushing him forward for additional yardage.  That used to be a penalty; and it still should be IMO.  I hope they continue to allow the scrum.   If you watched the SB replays of how Philly perfected the pad height leverage superiority with those scrums; it was a thing of beauty.  They got underneath the DL/blitzers which removed the defensive base at the point of attack.  That's exactly what you want.

          Here's a link on Wedge Blocking as it pertains to the Oline.  Believe it or not, it's origin is from youth football but there's a segment in there that talks about the main purpose of it and how to execute it at the LOS. http://www.y-coach.com/wedge.html

          SdBacker80 S Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 5k Posts
          • 2k Reputation
          S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
          #11

          @flugel said:

          The idea base of this whole thing is based on the Wedge Block; and I'm not talking about the kick-off return wedge that they no longer allow.  I'm talking about a very short yardage conversion where every offensive player on the LOS (steps inward toward Center and forward simultaneously) with the Center at the apex with both Guards almost glued to his hips and both tackles almost glue to both Guards hips all in 1 motion. Basically everybody is down-blocking toward Center on both sides of the Center. An even easier alternative is just to shorten the splits between offensive players upfront down to an inch or 2 between each player along the LOS/line of scrimmage. The key is to fire out as 1 cohesive unit not allowing any defenders to get beat any OL to their inside. It's been a very effective tool for a QB sneak/handoff to the FB.  The rugby scrum is like a next generation evolution of this concept.

          The ONLY thing I wish the NFL would return to is disallowing 2 or 3 guys behind the QB pushing him forward for additional yardage.  That used to be a penalty; and it still should be IMO.  I hope they continue to allow the scrum.   If you watched the SB replays of how Philly perfected the pad height leverage superiority with those scrums; it was a thing of beauty.  They got underneath the DL/blitzers which removed the defensive base at the point of attack.  That's exactly what you want.

          Here's a link on Wedge Blocking as it pertains to the Oline.  Believe it or not, it's origin is from youth football but there's a segment in there that talks about the main purpose of it and how to execute it at the LOS. http://www.y-coach.com/wedge.html

          I dunno…3rd and 1 or 4th and 1…you’ve had positive plays leading up to that point and you have earned the right to line up a punish the defense.  
           
          And the guy or two or three behind are 1,2,3 less men you have to account for in a blocking scheme or split out wide.  So the defense has a number advantage at the point of attack.   

          OrionO FlugelF 2 Replies Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • S SdBacker80

            @flugel said:

            The idea base of this whole thing is based on the Wedge Block; and I'm not talking about the kick-off return wedge that they no longer allow.  I'm talking about a very short yardage conversion where every offensive player on the LOS (steps inward toward Center and forward simultaneously) with the Center at the apex with both Guards almost glued to his hips and both tackles almost glue to both Guards hips all in 1 motion. Basically everybody is down-blocking toward Center on both sides of the Center. An even easier alternative is just to shorten the splits between offensive players upfront down to an inch or 2 between each player along the LOS/line of scrimmage. The key is to fire out as 1 cohesive unit not allowing any defenders to get beat any OL to their inside. It's been a very effective tool for a QB sneak/handoff to the FB.  The rugby scrum is like a next generation evolution of this concept.

            The ONLY thing I wish the NFL would return to is disallowing 2 or 3 guys behind the QB pushing him forward for additional yardage.  That used to be a penalty; and it still should be IMO.  I hope they continue to allow the scrum.   If you watched the SB replays of how Philly perfected the pad height leverage superiority with those scrums; it was a thing of beauty.  They got underneath the DL/blitzers which removed the defensive base at the point of attack.  That's exactly what you want.

            Here's a link on Wedge Blocking as it pertains to the Oline.  Believe it or not, it's origin is from youth football but there's a segment in there that talks about the main purpose of it and how to execute it at the LOS. http://www.y-coach.com/wedge.html

            I dunno…3rd and 1 or 4th and 1…you’ve had positive plays leading up to that point and you have earned the right to line up a punish the defense.  
             
            And the guy or two or three behind are 1,2,3 less men you have to account for in a blocking scheme or split out wide.  So the defense has a number advantage at the point of attack.   

            Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 9k Posts
            • 4k Reputation
            OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
            #12

            @sdbacker80 said:

            the guy or two or three behind are 1,2,3 less men you have to account for in a blocking scheme

            But you're only trying to go straight ahead a couple of yards so you really don't care what the defenders on the edges are doing.  

            And why wouldn't I just send in a couple of DT's to line up behind the QB to help shove the pile forward?    -  It just seems so primitive.

            BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
            C 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • OrionO Orion

              @sdbacker80 said:

              the guy or two or three behind are 1,2,3 less men you have to account for in a blocking scheme

              But you're only trying to go straight ahead a couple of yards so you really don't care what the defenders on the edges are doing.  

              And why wouldn't I just send in a couple of DT's to line up behind the QB to help shove the pile forward?    -  It just seems so primitive.

              calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
              • 64k Posts
              • 8k Reputation
              C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
              #13

              @orion said:

              But you're only trying to go straight ahead a couple of yards so you really don't care what the defenders on the edges are doing.  

              And why wouldn't I just send in a couple of DT's to line up behind the QB to help shove the pile forward?    -  It just seems so primitive.

              say, how about keeping a few 340 lb liinebackers on your roster to push the NT forwards against the two big guys pushing the qb forward? stalemate !

              OrionO 1 Reply Last reply
              😂
              Quote Reply
              • S SdBacker80

                @flugel said:

                The idea base of this whole thing is based on the Wedge Block; and I'm not talking about the kick-off return wedge that they no longer allow.  I'm talking about a very short yardage conversion where every offensive player on the LOS (steps inward toward Center and forward simultaneously) with the Center at the apex with both Guards almost glued to his hips and both tackles almost glue to both Guards hips all in 1 motion. Basically everybody is down-blocking toward Center on both sides of the Center. An even easier alternative is just to shorten the splits between offensive players upfront down to an inch or 2 between each player along the LOS/line of scrimmage. The key is to fire out as 1 cohesive unit not allowing any defenders to get beat any OL to their inside. It's been a very effective tool for a QB sneak/handoff to the FB.  The rugby scrum is like a next generation evolution of this concept.

                The ONLY thing I wish the NFL would return to is disallowing 2 or 3 guys behind the QB pushing him forward for additional yardage.  That used to be a penalty; and it still should be IMO.  I hope they continue to allow the scrum.   If you watched the SB replays of how Philly perfected the pad height leverage superiority with those scrums; it was a thing of beauty.  They got underneath the DL/blitzers which removed the defensive base at the point of attack.  That's exactly what you want.

                Here's a link on Wedge Blocking as it pertains to the Oline.  Believe it or not, it's origin is from youth football but there's a segment in there that talks about the main purpose of it and how to execute it at the LOS. http://www.y-coach.com/wedge.html

                I dunno…3rd and 1 or 4th and 1…you’ve had positive plays leading up to that point and you have earned the right to line up a punish the defense.  
                 
                And the guy or two or three behind are 1,2,3 less men you have to account for in a blocking scheme or split out wide.  So the defense has a number advantage at the point of attack.   

                Flugel FlugelF Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 11k Posts
                • 6k Reputation
                FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
                #14

                @sdbacker80 said:

                I dunno…3rd and 1 or 4th and 1…you’ve had positive plays leading up to that point and you have earned the right to line up a punish the defense.  
                 
                And the guy or two or three behind are 1,2,3 less men you have to account for in a blocking scheme or split out wide.  So the defense has a number advantage at the point of attack.   

                And that's a good point.  That said, I'd rather use that than overthrow the WR 40 yards downfield on 4th and 1 like the Browns did.  The scrum was used like a modern day wedge block on the LOS where Kelsey was the apex of it; and his OGs were right next to him with the tackles right next to them. And do you know how they handled the numbers?  They fired off the ball with a much lower pad height than all those DL and other defenders loading the box.  When you get off the ball first at a lower pad height - you're going to have the superior base and leverage to win the battle.  I didn't see Chiefs' defenders knifing through those scrums.  Keep in mind, the Eagles only used it when they needed to convert a short yardage situation.

                I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
                S 1 Reply Last reply
                👍
                Quote Reply
                • FlugelF Flugel

                  @sdbacker80 said:

                  I dunno…3rd and 1 or 4th and 1…you’ve had positive plays leading up to that point and you have earned the right to line up a punish the defense.  
                   
                  And the guy or two or three behind are 1,2,3 less men you have to account for in a blocking scheme or split out wide.  So the defense has a number advantage at the point of attack.   

                  And that's a good point.  That said, I'd rather use that than overthrow the WR 40 yards downfield on 4th and 1 like the Browns did.  The scrum was used like a modern day wedge block on the LOS where Kelsey was the apex of it; and his OGs were right next to him with the tackles right next to them. And do you know how they handled the numbers?  They fired off the ball with a much lower pad height than all those DL and other defenders loading the box.  When you get off the ball first at a lower pad height - you're going to have the superior base and leverage to win the battle.  I didn't see Chiefs' defenders knifing through those scrums.  Keep in mind, the Eagles only used it when they needed to convert a short yardage situation.

                  SdBacker80 S Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 5k Posts
                  • 2k Reputation
                  S SdBacker80 wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  @flugel said:

                  And that's a good point.  That said, I'd rather use that than overthrow the WR 40 yards downfield on 4th and 1 like the Browns did.  The scrum was used like a modern day wedge block on the LOS where Kelsey was the apex of it; and his OGs were right next to him with the tackles right next to them. And do you know how they handled the numbers?  They fired off the ball with a much lower pad height than all those DL and other defenders loading the box.  When you get off the ball first at a lower pad height - you're going to have the superior base and leverage to win the battle.  I didn't see Chiefs' defenders knifing through those scrums.  Keep in mind, the Eagles only used it when they needed to convert a short yardage situation.

                  YES yes yes on staying away from the  Stefanski approach of doing what they aren’t expecting and throwing a 40 yard pass on 4th and short. 

                  I believe the Eagles call it the “two cheek sneak”.  They did false start on one and I think that is common because of the need (key) to fire off the ball in unison which you mentioned earlier AND i don’t think it is the safest play  (in regard to player health)to run for the offense too.  
                   

                  FlugelF 1 Reply Last reply
                  👍 ❤
                  Quote Reply
                  • gumby73 gumby73G Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 11k Posts
                    • 4k Reputation
                    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by gumby73
                    #16

                    I've heard some rumbling that makes some sense..

                    For similar safety reasons. The safety committee stopped freaks from jumping clean over centers to block FG's. Included not using a players body part to springboard upward..

                    Add the wording...nor forward.. 

                    edit 2-17--- https://www.the33rdteam.com/category/analysis/quarterback-push-could-be-outlawed-by-nfl-next-season/

                    Also, GameDay Roster active lists need to increase

                    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • C calfoxwc

                      @orion said:

                      But you're only trying to go straight ahead a couple of yards so you really don't care what the defenders on the edges are doing.  

                      And why wouldn't I just send in a couple of DT's to line up behind the QB to help shove the pile forward?    -  It just seems so primitive.

                      say, how about keeping a few 340 lb liinebackers on your roster to push the NT forwards against the two big guys pushing the qb forward? stalemate !

                      Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 9k Posts
                      • 4k Reputation
                      OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      @calfoxwc said:

                      say, how about keeping a few 340 lb liinebackers on your roster to push the NT forwards against the two big guys pushing the qb forward? stalemate !

                      Well, you have to combat that scrum somehow right.  It's like a tug of war.  You need more big fat guys on the rope.

                      BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • S SdBacker80

                        @flugel said:

                        And that's a good point.  That said, I'd rather use that than overthrow the WR 40 yards downfield on 4th and 1 like the Browns did.  The scrum was used like a modern day wedge block on the LOS where Kelsey was the apex of it; and his OGs were right next to him with the tackles right next to them. And do you know how they handled the numbers?  They fired off the ball with a much lower pad height than all those DL and other defenders loading the box.  When you get off the ball first at a lower pad height - you're going to have the superior base and leverage to win the battle.  I didn't see Chiefs' defenders knifing through those scrums.  Keep in mind, the Eagles only used it when they needed to convert a short yardage situation.

                        YES yes yes on staying away from the  Stefanski approach of doing what they aren’t expecting and throwing a 40 yard pass on 4th and short. 

                        I believe the Eagles call it the “two cheek sneak”.  They did false start on one and I think that is common because of the need (key) to fire off the ball in unison which you mentioned earlier AND i don’t think it is the safest play  (in regard to player health)to run for the offense too.  
                         

                        Flugel FlugelF Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 11k Posts
                        • 6k Reputation
                        FlugelF Flugel wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        @sdbacker80 said:

                        YES yes yes on staying away from the  Stefanski approach of doing what they aren’t expecting and throwing a 40 yard pass on 4th and short. 

                        I believe the Eagles call it the “two cheek sneak”.  They did false start on one and I think that is common because of the need (key) to fire off the ball in unison which you mentioned earlier AND i don’t think it is the safest play  (in regard to player health)to run for the offense too.  
                         

                        Valid concern.  Short yard conversions in general can go really wrong if everyone on the OL isn't firing out together with ideal pad heights. Like anything, the more you practice it - the more you can get it to go the way you want it to despite how infrequently you may use it during the game.  For example, Philly only used their scrum a handful of times pretty much all for the same situation.  You could tell they put considerable practice reps into it when we noticed how frequently they converted/scored.  

                        I welcome the only Defensive Coordinator to earn a Superbowl Ring in New Orleans while understanding Revenge of the Nerds is a sequel. "Come get some!"
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • ballpeen ballpeenB Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 9k Posts
                          • 2k Reputation
                          ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          Maybe they should just go back to no pushing.  In the ice bowl game, you see #30 Donny Anderson follow Starr on his sneak.  It looks like he is signaling TD but the reality is he was showing the refs he wasn't pushing Bart Starr.

                          If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
                          OrionO 1 Reply Last reply
                          👍
                          Quote Reply
                          • ballpeenB ballpeen

                            Maybe they should just go back to no pushing.  In the ice bowl game, you see #30 Donny Anderson follow Starr on his sneak.  It looks like he is signaling TD but the reality is he was showing the refs he wasn't pushing Bart Starr.

                            Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 9k Posts
                            • 4k Reputation
                            OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            @ballpeen said:

                            Maybe they should just go back to no pushing. 

                            That's a way to legislate against it.

                            BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply

                            Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                            Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                            With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                            Register Login
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            Theme
                            • System
                            • Light
                            • Dark
                            The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                            The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Forums
                            • Recent
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Donate