Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. DA definitely has better rapport with Braylon Edwards

DA definitely has better rapport with Braylon Edwards

The Browns Board
53 17 3.0k
  • ATENEARSA ATENEARS

    Masters said:

    If people are going to rip Quinn for his play, than do it for the times he made bad throws into coverage or the fumble where he lost the grip on the ball. Save it for those that are his bad plays. I mean seriously, there actually are bad plays to pick from if you want to go on with this childish DA/BQ game.

    Ok, to be fair, we will only dwell on the plays that resulted in a turn-over.

    wait ...

    @atenears said:

    Ok, to be fair, we will only dwell on the plays that resulted in a turn-over.

    wait ...

    So tell us Stan, do you and Lum fight over which nutsack each of you gets, or do you two take turns and alternate on them?

  • LumberghL Lumbergh

    @atenears said:

    Ok, to be fair, we will only dwell on the plays that resulted in a turn-over.

    wait ...

    BWAAAAHAHAHAHA

    masterbater, you put that one on a tee for ATENEARS

    I haven't laughed that hard since Quinn pulled the garo yepremian

    🙄

    @lumbergh said:

    I haven't laughed that hard since Quinn pulled the garo yepremian

    Way to ape Florio's (PFT) joke a full 24 hrs after I already pointed it out.

    Leno starts back up tonight, if you need to reload your joke cache.

    Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula

  • @jadbf said:

    And you're in the stands and not even on the sideline of a highschool team because you're such a good judge of these things.

    Yep your word is gold.

    I guess I should have waited until the OBR report came out to tell me what I know about football.

  • @jadbf said:

    Guess not.

    as i said. I'm man enough to admit when I was wrong.

    I was wrong on this one.

    First time this year.......

    It's sticky gay reason to apologize though big guy. Have you ever seen some of these reporters for the OBR? Do you know why the original site was called 'Browns-The Next Generation'? ... because they are Star Trex geeks, yet a few of you here can't think until you read what they tell you to think.

    You made comments about me knowing nothing because I don't reside on the sidelines on Friday nights ... that's bullshit, in the context that you don't know what you are talking about until the Browns comic book hits the shelf.

    fag

  • @jadbf said:

    BTW don't think I don't appreciate that I've gotten so far into your head that you had to go back and find this little gem to "prove that dang JADBF wrong". Kudos Stan! You really got me that time!

    Wow, you got me there. I went back a whole 22 hours into the archives to pull this one from the front page. I guess a more recent game would have been better to counter huh?

    I'm sure I'm not the only one who found it funny that you stretched this counter of a statement I made into three pages just yesterday, but rolled over like a little bitch as soon as "a well respected poster" made the same comment and view.

    Here's an idea, why don't you quit being a fucking parrot and start having an idea on your own that someone else can counter. seriously, what have you stood for since Sundays game? You tossed up 30-40 posts to counter others stating that Quinn sucked, but when held to making a statement you agree he sucked. You rant that I don't know what I'm talking about on a particular play because i'm not a high school coach and had 20 beers in me, yet become JJ's bitch the second he agrees with me.

    Why don't you take a few days off, you bring absolutly nothing to the table here, but the town parrot role.

  • wow...grudge posting....in anger....because someone called you out on your bullshit.

    im...so...surprised....

    but thanks for continuing to prove my point a couple weeks ago.....but i suppose having fun with the trolls is what you like to do....because your obviously good at it, know how to find your mark, and execute with surgical precision when trying to make yourself look the fool.

    nice one!!

  • 82OZZIE828 82OZZIE82

    Your stud WR has to have more than 1 catch for 2yds if you're gonna have any chance of success. Edwards had 1 catch on a tipped ball no less, and a nice td reception that was reversed previously. Quinn was dumping and dinking all day. hope this is not a sign of things to come.

    @82ozzie82 said:

    Your stud WR has to have more than 1 catch for 2yds if you're gonna have any chance of success. Edwards had 1 catch on a tipped ball no less, and a nice td reception that was reversed previously. Quinn was dumping and dinking all day. hope this is not a sign of things to come.

    No way....2 years of playing together in-game...I can't believe you actually came to this conclusion..

    You sir must be a genius !

  • No Shep, that was because BE dropped passes.

    Wait, BE had his hands on a ball Sunday that got away from him too. That can't be it.

    I'm stumped.

  • G Greythan

    No Shep, that was because BE dropped passes.

    Wait, BE had his hands on a ball Sunday that got away from him too. That can't be it.

    I'm stumped.

    @greythan said:

    No Shep, that was because BE dropped passes.

    Wait, BE had his hands on a ball Sunday that got away from him too. That can't be it.

    I'm stumped.

    All bullshit aside, BE's drop against Dallas last year in the opener was the staple of the season.

  • Agreed Stan.

    However, he's dropped a catchable ball already this year. Point being, he's been a constant. DA still got benched because the staff feels Quinn gives them a better chance to win.

    Get on board.

  • G Greythan

    Agreed Stan.

    However, he's dropped a catchable ball already this year. Point being, he's been a constant. DA still got benched because the staff feels Quinn gives them a better chance to win.

    Get on board.

    @greythan said:

    Agreed Stan.

    However, he's dropped a catchable ball already this year. Point being, he's been a constant. DA still got benched because the staff feels Quinn gives them a better chance to win.

    Get on board.

    I disagree, Quinn got the nod because DA didn't do enough positives to hold the position.

    There is a difference ... and it's no reason to celebrate.

  • ATENEARSA ATENEARS

    @greythan said:

    Agreed Stan.

    However, he's dropped a catchable ball already this year. Point being, he's been a constant. DA still got benched because the staff feels Quinn gives them a better chance to win.

    Get on board.

    I disagree, Quinn got the nod because DA didn't do enough positives to hold the position.

    There is a difference ... and it's no reason to celebrate.

    @atenears said:

    I disagree, Quinn got the nod because DA didn't do enough positives to hold the position.

    There is a difference ... and it's no reason to celebrate.

    I agree.

    BQ should have already Waxed DA in this competition if he was a elite level QB...and his salary is headed that way if he gets 70% of the snaps.

    BQ needs to pick it up....plain and simple. Maybe he will this week.

    Aaron Rodgers did pretty good when he got his shot....no reason BQ can't do the same....assuming he is a elite level qb.

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
  • I disagree, Quinn got the nod because DA didn't do enough positives to hold the position.

    There is a difference ... and it's no reason to celebrate.

    Semantics.

    The fact remains: the staff feels DA is not as good as Quinn. Spin that however you want. DA should be history in your mind if you think Quinn sucks. If you are convinced at this point that Quinn is a lost cause, then you are in the camp that believes we're in the QB market this coming off season. We may very well be.

    Either way, you better hope Quinn matures quickly and shows some upside. I know that's what I'm hoping for.

  • G Greythan
    I disagree, Quinn got the nod because DA didn't do enough positives to hold the position.

    There is a difference ... and it's no reason to celebrate.

    Semantics.

    The fact remains: the staff feels DA is not as good as Quinn. Spin that however you want. DA should be history in your mind if you think Quinn sucks. If you are convinced at this point that Quinn is a lost cause, then you are in the camp that believes we're in the QB market this coming off season. We may very well be.

    Either way, you better hope Quinn matures quickly and shows some upside. I know that's what I'm hoping for.

    @greythan said:

    Semantics.

    The fact remains: the staff feels DA is not as good as Quinn. Spin that however you want. DA should be history in your mind if you think Quinn sucks. If you are convinced at this point that Quinn is a lost cause, then you are in the camp that believes we're in the QB market this coming off season. We may very well be.

    Either way, you better hope Quinn matures quickly and shows some upside. I know that's what I'm hoping for.

    Yes, I expect Quinn to be much better than DA. Maybe that is why I hold him to a higher standard; and along that line, his performance Sunday was no where near what I expected.

    I think we can work with DA, I still like many things about the kid. He fits my beliefs in a QB - no where near polished, but has those mechanical things that I like in a QB. I don't think many QB's are as mentally gifted as I would like. If Quinn is the higher pick, is the face of the franchise, highly touted, and determined the better guy, then I don't understand the excuses to prop up his mediocre game. If you like that type of play, and can stomach that type of play, then why hate DA when he has a comparable game?

    I don't like either play, the 4 INT's or a pair of fieldgoals through the meat of the game. I don't like DA when he plays like shit and I don't like Quinn when he plays like shit. I like DA when he was lights out in the early part of 2007 and have yet to like Quinn because he hasn't done anything.

    That's a position that needs to carry this team, either play on the edge or get out of the way. But to sit there and continue to dink and dunk down by 2 TD's late in the third quarter is lame, and sorry, but I'm going to call that shit out.

    Yes, I'd rather see an interception while having some balls and trying to make something happen.

  • I agree. BQ was touted as NFL ready with great leadership qualities and the "it" factor.

    This one game isn't enough to know if he has that or not, but it isn't looking good if you have to look one direction or another.

    The new offense isn't a big deal. it was probably more of an adjustment for DA. All summer long people was saying how the Daboll O was a hybrid of the O Quinn ran in college, so that can't be used as a reason Quinn might be struggling.

    Any struggle is simply the fact the guy might not be good enough.

    People need to keep their eye on the ball. Just watch the play and see if the guy honestly deserves elite money after 6-7 games...if he does...great, we are all happy. If not, we need to bench him so he doesn't get his 70%.

    I don't think anybody wants to not pay him if he deserves it. I also hope people don't want to pay him if he doesn't deserve it.

    This is no 2 year process with the guy. This is a 7 game deal. In 7 games Quinn will have enough opportunity to show he belongs...or deserves to remain at his current salary level...or even kicked to the curb if the current salary proves too generous.

    We can't keep throwing big money at players who produce little money results.

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
Log in to reply