Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. Wimpy paul ryan - the coward - on the Fox board of directors? that explains a lot...

Wimpy paul ryan - the coward - on the Fox board of directors? that explains a lot...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
12 Posts 4 Posters 898 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
    • 64k Posts
    • 8k Reputation
    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #1

    including having the likes of juan willaims, and jessica tralov etc etc. - brought on board to be

    "two sided".

    I don't need cnn type lairs for the left on Fox. Tucker gone, Bongino gone. why isn't tralov and williams gone?

    https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2023/04/25/fox-news-is-dead-and-tucker-carlson-is-already-living-large-with-a-job-offer-n1690059

    cccjwhC 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • C calfoxwc

      including having the likes of juan willaims, and jessica tralov etc etc. - brought on board to be

      "two sided".

      I don't need cnn type lairs for the left on Fox. Tucker gone, Bongino gone. why isn't tralov and williams gone?

      https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2023/04/25/fox-news-is-dead-and-tucker-carlson-is-already-living-large-with-a-job-offer-n1690059

      cccjwh cccjwhC Reacting Well Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 5k Posts
      • 627 Reputation
      cccjwhC cccjwh wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @calfoxwc said:

      including having the likes of juan willaims, and jessica tralov etc etc. - brought on board to be

      "two sided".

      I don't need cnn type lairs for the left on Fox. Tucker gone, Bongino gone. why isn't tralov and williams gone?

      https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2023/04/25/fox-news-is-dead-and-tucker-carlson-is-already-living-large-with-a-job-offer-n1690059

      • Overall, we rate PJ Media to be Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, as well as numerous failed fact checks.

      Detailed Report

      Questionable Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks
      Bias Rating: RIGHT
      Factual Reporting: MIXED
      Country: USA

      Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
      Media Type: Website
      Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
      MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

      https://www.nationalreview.com/news/decision-to-sack-tucker-carlson-came-straight-from-rupert-murdoch-report/

      The decision to fire Tucker Carlson from his ratings juggernaut show on Fox News reportedly came straight from Rupert Murdoch.

      The exact reasons for the anchor’s exit have not been officially confirmed by Fox, but sources have told various outlets that there were several factors involved in the decision. Persons familiar with the situation told the Los Angeles Times that Murdoch, the Fox Corporation chairman, was concerned about Carlson’s coverage of the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, in which Carlson downplayed events as “mostly peaceful chaos” and promoted the notion that it was provoked by government agents.

      DieHardBrownsFan1D 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • cccjwhC cccjwh

        @calfoxwc said:

        including having the likes of juan willaims, and jessica tralov etc etc. - brought on board to be

        "two sided".

        I don't need cnn type lairs for the left on Fox. Tucker gone, Bongino gone. why isn't tralov and williams gone?

        https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2023/04/25/fox-news-is-dead-and-tucker-carlson-is-already-living-large-with-a-job-offer-n1690059

        • Overall, we rate PJ Media to be Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, as well as numerous failed fact checks.

        Detailed Report

        Questionable Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks
        Bias Rating: RIGHT
        Factual Reporting: MIXED
        Country: USA

        Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
        Media Type: Website
        Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
        MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

        https://www.nationalreview.com/news/decision-to-sack-tucker-carlson-came-straight-from-rupert-murdoch-report/

        The decision to fire Tucker Carlson from his ratings juggernaut show on Fox News reportedly came straight from Rupert Murdoch.

        The exact reasons for the anchor’s exit have not been officially confirmed by Fox, but sources have told various outlets that there were several factors involved in the decision. Persons familiar with the situation told the Los Angeles Times that Murdoch, the Fox Corporation chairman, was concerned about Carlson’s coverage of the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, in which Carlson downplayed events as “mostly peaceful chaos” and promoted the notion that it was provoked by government agents.

        DieHardBrownsFan1 DieHardBrownsFan1D One Year In Posting Machine Very Popular One Month Later Week One Done Dedicated Collaborator Conversation Starter Reacting Well First Post
        • 4k Posts
        • 3k Reputation
        DieHardBrownsFan1D DieHardBrownsFan1 wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @cccjwh said:

        • Overall, we rate PJ Media to be Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda and conspiracies, as well as numerous failed fact checks.

        Detailed Report

        Questionable Reasoning: Extreme Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks
        Bias Rating: RIGHT
        Factual Reporting: MIXED
        Country: USA

        Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
        Media Type: Website
        Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
        MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

        https://www.nationalreview.com/news/decision-to-sack-tucker-carlson-came-straight-from-rupert-murdoch-report/

        The decision to fire Tucker Carlson from his ratings juggernaut show on Fox News reportedly came straight from Rupert Murdoch.

        The exact reasons for the anchor’s exit have not been officially confirmed by Fox, but sources have told various outlets that there were several factors involved in the decision. Persons familiar with the situation told the Los Angeles Times that Murdoch, the Fox Corporation chairman, was concerned about Carlson’s coverage of the attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, in which Carlson downplayed events as “mostly peaceful chaos” and promoted the notion that it was provoked by government agents.

        Fat-woman GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
          • 64k Posts
          • 8k Reputation
          C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
          #4

          btw, ccc - where did you get that lefty appraisal about pjmedia ? no link?

          how convenient. I'm guessing "fact check" , which is a

          liberal run bunch of hooey?

          cccjwhC 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • C calfoxwc

            btw, ccc - where did you get that lefty appraisal about pjmedia ? no link?

            how convenient. I'm guessing "fact check" , which is a

            liberal run bunch of hooey?

            cccjwh cccjwhC Reacting Well Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 5k Posts
            • 627 Reputation
            cccjwhC cccjwh wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @calfoxwc said:

            btw, ccc - where did you get that lefty appraisal about pjmedia ? no link?

            how convenient. I'm guessing "fact check" , which is a

            liberal run bunch of hooey?

            That you never heard of a fact checker. Yeah that tracks.

            https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/pj-media/

            Failed Fact Checks

            • Do ‘Liberals’ at the University of Texas Want to Designate Masculinity a Mental Illness? – FALSE
            • Between 2008 and 2014, “criminal aliens accounted for 38 percent of all murder convictions in the five states of California, Texas, Arizona, Florida, and New York.” – FALSE
            • “During his first presidential campaign in 2008, Mr. Obama used a secret back channel to Tehran to assure the mullahs that he was a friend of the Islamic Republic and that they would be very happy with his policies.” – FALSE
            • Clinton sent Ambassador Stevens to Benghazi to Retrieve Stinger Missiles – UNPROVEN
            • No, 96% of Google news stories on Trump aren’t from left-wing outlets – FALSE
            • In January 2020, U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar advised Iran to attack Trump-branded hotels worldwide, thus committing treason. – FALSE
            •  
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
              • 64k Posts
              • 8k Reputation
              C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
              #6

              more crap thrown into a discussion:

              www.justfactsdaily.com.icohttps://www.justfactsdaily.com › media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest

              Media Bias Fact Check: Incompetent or Dishonest? - Just Facts

              As further evidence of its untrustworthiness, Media Bias Fact Check has declared that PolitiFact "is the gold standard for political fact checking." To the contrary, Just Facts has documented that PolitiFact has an extensive record of propagating falsehoods.
               
              cccjwhC 1 Reply Last reply
              👍
              Quote Reply
              • cccjwh cccjwhC Reacting Well Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 5k Posts
                • 627 Reputation
                cccjwhC cccjwh wrote on last edited by
                #7

                https://twitter.com/nandoodles/status/1651093391734611968?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1651093391734611968%7Ctwgr%5Eeeba8b5edf568ccf76d63d03df986b505ba2e664%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https://247sports.com/nfl/cleveland-browns/board/happy-sunshine-politics-forum-105290/

                It seems that great ratings don't mean shlt if nobody want to buy your ad time.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • C calfoxwc

                  more crap thrown into a discussion:

                  www.justfactsdaily.com.icohttps://www.justfactsdaily.com › media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest

                  Media Bias Fact Check: Incompetent or Dishonest? - Just Facts

                  As further evidence of its untrustworthiness, Media Bias Fact Check has declared that PolitiFact "is the gold standard for political fact checking." To the contrary, Just Facts has documented that PolitiFact has an extensive record of propagating falsehoods.
                   
                  cccjwh cccjwhC Reacting Well Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 5k Posts
                  • 627 Reputation
                  cccjwhC cccjwh wrote on last edited by cccjwh
                  #8

                  @calfoxwc said:

                  more crap thrown into a discussion:

                  www.justfactsdaily.com.icohttps://www.justfactsdaily.com › media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest

                  Media Bias Fact Check: Incompetent or Dishonest? - Just Facts

                  As further evidence of its untrustworthiness, Media Bias Fact Check has declared that PolitiFact "is the gold standard for political fact checking." To the contrary, Just Facts has documented that PolitiFact has an extensive record of propagating falsehoods.
                   

                  Their failed fact checks/misinformation has been noted and linked, baby cow. I'm sure you ignored it, like everything you don't agree with.

                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • cccjwhC cccjwh

                    @calfoxwc said:

                    more crap thrown into a discussion:

                    www.justfactsdaily.com.icohttps://www.justfactsdaily.com › media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest

                    Media Bias Fact Check: Incompetent or Dishonest? - Just Facts

                    As further evidence of its untrustworthiness, Media Bias Fact Check has declared that PolitiFact "is the gold standard for political fact checking." To the contrary, Just Facts has documented that PolitiFact has an extensive record of propagating falsehoods.
                     

                    Their failed fact checks/misinformation has been noted and linked, baby cow. I'm sure you ignored it, like everything you don't agree with.

                    calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                    • 64k Posts
                    • 8k Reputation
                    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @cccjwh said:

                    Their failed fact checks/misinformation has been noted and linked, baby cow. I'm sure you ignored it, like everything you don't agree with.

                    Actually, generally, i ignore you because all your posts are worthless and ignorant.

                    cccjwhC 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • C calfoxwc

                      @cccjwh said:

                      Their failed fact checks/misinformation has been noted and linked, baby cow. I'm sure you ignored it, like everything you don't agree with.

                      Actually, generally, i ignore you because all your posts are worthless and ignorant.

                      cccjwh cccjwhC Reacting Well Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 5k Posts
                      • 627 Reputation
                      cccjwhC cccjwh wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      @calfoxwc said:

                      Actually, generally, i ignore you because all your posts are worthless and ignorant.

                      I usually ignore yours because you post lies and misinformation. You are dishonest and won't admit when your information is false even after being proven it was not correct. Like most of the nut jobs here.

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      😂
                      Quote Reply
                      • FairHooker11 F Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                        • 4k Posts
                        • 2k Reputation
                        F FairHooker11 wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        It seems that great ratings don't mean shlt if nobody want to buy your ad time.

                        like these grifters?

                        brought to you by Pfizer.mp4
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        👍
                        Quote Reply
                        • cccjwhC cccjwh

                          @calfoxwc said:

                          Actually, generally, i ignore you because all your posts are worthless and ignorant.

                          I usually ignore yours because you post lies and misinformation. You are dishonest and won't admit when your information is false even after being proven it was not correct. Like most of the nut jobs here.

                          calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                          • 64k Posts
                          • 8k Reputation
                          C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          @cccjwh said:

                          I usually ignore yours because you post lies and misinformation. You are dishonest and won't admit when your information is false even after being proven it was not correct. Like most of the nut jobs here.

                          sure, hoorta.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply

                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                          Register Login
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          Theme
                          • System
                          • Light
                          • Dark
                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Forums
                          • Recent
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Donate