Durham report reveals conclusions of probe into Trump-Russia investigation
-
There's no doubt there's more than enough evidence to bring indictments, but corruption is the reason you won't see any, not innocence.
"No doubt", yet there aren't any indictments. Your feelings aren't evidence of corruption. That you have to use nut job's favorite excuses for no evidence? "They covered up the crimes so well that it like it there weren't any." It's assertion that is impossible to prove or disprove. Which makes it the assertion worthless.
The "Crime of Century". no indictments.
Investigate the massive voter fraud. Cheetos commission report - 23 state-wide.
The Trump campaign-commissioned report said analysts had “high confidence” there were only nine deceased voters in Fulton county, Georgia. The researchers also said they believed the “potential statewide exposure” of dead voters was 23, the newspaper said.
Hey, I'm sure there was 18,000 dead voters, the dems just brought them back to life when people followed up. ?
-
GOP investigates that came away with nothing. Pretty long list.
"No doubt", yet there aren't any indictments. Your feelings aren't evidence of corruption. That you have to use nut job's favorite excuses for no evidence? "They covered up the crimes so well that it like it there weren't any." It's assertion that is impossible to prove or disprove. Which makes it the assertion worthless.
The "Crime of Century". no indictments.
Investigate the massive voter fraud. Cheetos commission report - 23 state-wide.
The Trump campaign-commissioned report said analysts had “high confidence” there were only nine deceased voters in Fulton county, Georgia. The researchers also said they believed the “potential statewide exposure” of dead voters was 23, the newspaper said.
Hey, I'm sure there was 18,000 dead voters, the dems just brought them back to life when people followed up. ?
Ill ask you again. Do you even know what topic we're on?
We are on the Durham report. Try to keep on track.
-
GOP investigates that came away with nothing. Pretty long list.
"No doubt", yet there aren't any indictments. Your feelings aren't evidence of corruption. That you have to use nut job's favorite excuses for no evidence? "They covered up the crimes so well that it like it there weren't any." It's assertion that is impossible to prove or disprove. Which makes it the assertion worthless.
The "Crime of Century". no indictments.
Investigate the massive voter fraud. Cheetos commission report - 23 state-wide.
The Trump campaign-commissioned report said analysts had “high confidence” there were only nine deceased voters in Fulton county, Georgia. The researchers also said they believed the “potential statewide exposure” of dead voters was 23, the newspaper said.
Hey, I'm sure there was 18,000 dead voters, the dems just brought them back to life when people followed up. ?
Ill ask you again. Do you even know what topic we're on?
We are on the Durham report. Try to keep on track.
Ill ask you again. Do you even know what topic we're on?
We are on the Durham report. Try to keep on track.
A GOP investigates that came away with nothing = Durham report.
Kind like the Twitter investigations.
-
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney
-
A GOP investigates that came away with nothing = Durham report.
Kind like the Twitter investigations.
So then no.
The Durham report wasn't a GOP "investigates." The Durham report certainly came away with something.
Was there even a formal Twitter investigation? Post a link to the official rulings.
It is hilarious how you forgot who the biggest loser in investigations was. A bogus one conducted by demonrats involving Russian collusion that lasted 4 yrs. Remember?
-
Or the Mueller Report.
And then when The House subpoenaed Mueller because they didn't like his report. What a show that was.
The obsession these demonrats had with trying to get rid of Trump. Jeezus.
-
A GOP investigates that came away with nothing = Durham report.
Kind like the Twitter investigations.
So then no.
The Durham report wasn't a GOP "investigates." The Durham report certainly came away with something.
Was there even a formal Twitter investigation? Post a link to the official rulings.
It is hilarious how you forgot who the biggest loser in investigations was. A bogus one conducted by demonrats involving Russian collusion that lasted 4 yrs. Remember?
So then no.
The Durham report wasn't a GOP "investigates." The Durham report certainly came away with something.
Was there even a formal Twitter investigation? Post a link to the official rulings.
It is hilarious how you forgot who the biggest loser in investigations was. A bogus one conducted by demonrats involving Russian collusion that lasted 4 yrs. Remember?
You are joking right. Righty thinking.
GOP led investigation, appointed while a GOP was president, appoint by a GOP Deputy Attorney General. "Witch hunt!" - Cheetos cult
GOP led investigate, appointed while a GOP was president, appointed by a GOP Attorney General. "Not a GOP investigation" - Cheeto's cult
You nut jobs just repeat whatever your dear leader tells us. You are immune to hypocrisy and facts.
-
So then no.
The Durham report wasn't a GOP "investigates." The Durham report certainly came away with something.
Was there even a formal Twitter investigation? Post a link to the official rulings.
It is hilarious how you forgot who the biggest loser in investigations was. A bogus one conducted by demonrats involving Russian collusion that lasted 4 yrs. Remember?
You are joking right. Righty thinking.
GOP led investigation, appointed while a GOP was president, appoint by a GOP Deputy Attorney General. "Witch hunt!" - Cheetos cult
GOP led investigate, appointed while a GOP was president, appointed by a GOP Attorney General. "Not a GOP investigation" - Cheeto's cult
You nut jobs just repeat whatever your dear leader tells us. You are immune to hypocrisy and facts.
You are joking right. Righty thinking.
GOP led investigation, appointed while a GOP was president, appoint by a GOP Deputy Attorney General. "Witch hunt!" - Cheetos cult
GOP led investigate, appointed while a GOP was president, appointed by a GOP Attorney General. "Not a GOP investigation" - Cheeto's cult
You nut jobs just repeat whatever your dear leader tells us. You are immune to hypocrisy and facts.
Again it's not just hypocrisy it's not just facts it's the stunning realization that you guys are blind as to the reason that some people in the power structure hate Donald Trump. Has nothing to do with ideology which gets traded back and forth with every Administration but it's like country music artists at rock and roll bands usually agree that discos are evil. He's just the outsider and the power structure needs to prove to America that the voters are not now nor have they ever been in charge of anything.
WSS
-
So then no.
The Durham report wasn't a GOP "investigates." The Durham report certainly came away with something.
Was there even a formal Twitter investigation? Post a link to the official rulings.
It is hilarious how you forgot who the biggest loser in investigations was. A bogus one conducted by demonrats involving Russian collusion that lasted 4 yrs. Remember?
You are joking right. Righty thinking.
GOP led investigation, appointed while a GOP was president, appoint by a GOP Deputy Attorney General. "Witch hunt!" - Cheetos cult
GOP led investigate, appointed while a GOP was president, appointed by a GOP Attorney General. "Not a GOP investigation" - Cheeto's cult
You nut jobs just repeat whatever your dear leader tells us. You are immune to hypocrisy and facts.
You are joking right. Righty thinking.
GOP led investigation, appointed while a GOP was president, appoint by a GOP Deputy Attorney General. "Witch hunt!" - Cheetos cult
GOP led investigate, appointed while a GOP was president, appointed by a GOP Attorney General. "Not a GOP investigation" - Cheeto's cult
You nut jobs just repeat whatever your dear leader tells us. You are immune to hypocrisy and facts.
Who I listen to happens to be a liberal.
Alan Dershowitz concluded that the Durham report was damning. There was far more evidence to open up an investigation of Hillary Clinton, but the FBI saw the evidence "through the prism of bias against Donald Trump". For a government agency to take upon themselves "to do the right thing" and make sure that Trump was not going to be elected president is a dangerous precedent.
You are the epitome of one in denial.
Get your head out of your liberal ass.
-
So then no.
The Durham report wasn't a GOP "investigates." The Durham report certainly came away with something.
Was there even a formal Twitter investigation? Post a link to the official rulings.
It is hilarious how you forgot who the biggest loser in investigations was. A bogus one conducted by demonrats involving Russian collusion that lasted 4 yrs. Remember?
You are joking right. Righty thinking.
GOP led investigation, appointed while a GOP was president, appoint by a GOP Deputy Attorney General. "Witch hunt!" - Cheetos cult
GOP led investigate, appointed while a GOP was president, appointed by a GOP Attorney General. "Not a GOP investigation" - Cheeto's cult
You nut jobs just repeat whatever your dear leader tells us. You are immune to hypocrisy and facts.
You are joking right. Righty thinking.
GOP led investigation, appointed while a GOP was president, appoint by a GOP Deputy Attorney General. "Witch hunt!" - Cheetos cult
GOP led investigate, appointed while a GOP was president, appointed by a GOP Attorney General. "Not a GOP investigation" - Cheeto's cult
You nut jobs just repeat whatever your dear leader tells us. You are immune to hypocrisy and facts.
Part II
A GOP investigation, I'll give you that.
What you fail to grasp is that this investigation was called for and legitimate. You demonrat fuckers through a government agency attempted to oust a duly elected president, remember?
My initial claim that it was not a GOP solely because of Durhams reputation of neutrality. He wasn't hired by Republicans to go after Demonrats. He has been staunchly neutral and unbiased, investigating both Republicans and demonrats.
If only every politician possessed that quality.
Democratic Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy told CNN at the time that Durham had “a reputation of being apolitical and serious,” while Mark Meadows – then the Republican chairman of the hardline Freedom Caucus – called Durham an “outstanding choice.”
Durham, who became a lawyer in 1975, is known for having handled high-profile, sensitive investigations in both Democratic and Republican administrations during his decadeslong career with the Justice Department.
He was appointed by then-Attorney General Janet Reno in 1999 to investigate corruption surrounding the use of FBI informants in Boston, and later by then-Attorney General Michael Mukasey to investigate the CIA’s destruction of videotapes of detainee interrogations in 2008. Durham closed the latter probe without bringing any charges.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login