Skip to content

Manning vs Manning vs Quinn

The Browns Board
93 28 5.9k
  • Zombo said:

    and if Quinn continues to struggle through three or four games, then you try and salvage the season with the guy that has won some football games for you in the past.

    Why go back to Anderson? Salvage what? He couldn't do better than Quinn anyway.

    Since 2006 when Anderson first started, he has:

    Almost as many multiple INT games (8) as multi TD games (14).

    He has 46 TD and 40 Turnovers.

    His ratings have been 63.1, 82.5, 66.5

    1-13 vs playoff teams.

    3-9 in the AFCN

    Averaged 140 yards in 6 of 9 starts last season

    That is more an indictment of DA than a support for Quinn.

    If Quinn falls flat on his face and sucks the big one, I will not look back and say I was wrong about DA. Wrong about Quinn, but not about DA.

  • Zombo said:

    I don't like "giving" him anything. I want him to start playing better and winning games now .. and I fully expect him to.

    The difference between me and you guys is not how I view Quinn ... but how you view Anderson.

    I think, and I'm willing to bet Mangini thinks, that we have a pretty fair QB parked in the garage, and if Quinn continues to struggle through three or four games, then you try and salvage the season with the guy that has won some football games for you in the past.

    Mark Sanchez was in High school when we drafted Quinn and he won an NFL game Sunday, Flacco and Ryan were drafted after Quinn and they have playoff experience now ... I know Quinn can do it ... I am ready to see it. Soon.

    Zombo

    Quit being an idiot Z, DA never won shit for mangini, what makes you think he would even remotely consider going back to that even if quinn plays the next 3 games identical to the first? Never going to happen.

  • Zombo said:

    Flacco and Ryan were drafted after Quinn and they have playoff experience now ...

    They were drafted after DA, too. So was Sanchez.

  • Zombo said:

    and if Quinn continues to struggle through three or four games, then you try and salvage the season with the guy that has won some football games for you in the past.

    Why go back to Anderson? Salvage what? He couldn't do better than Quinn anyway.

    Since 2006 when Anderson first started, he has:

    Almost as many multiple INT games (8) as multi TD games (14).

    He has 46 TD and 40 Turnovers.

    His ratings have been 63.1, 82.5, 66.5

    1-13 vs playoff teams.

    3-9 in the AFCN

    Averaged 140 yards in 6 of 9 starts last season

    That is more an indictment of DA than a support for Quinn.

    If Quinn falls flat on his face and sucks the big one, I will not look back and say I was wrong about DA. Wrong about Quinn, but not about DA.

    @vegasdogg said:

    Why go back to Anderson? Salvage what? He couldn't do better than Quinn anyway.

    Since 2006 when Anderson first started, he has:

    Almost as many multiple INT games (8) as multi TD games (14).

    He has 46 TD and 40 Turnovers.

    His ratings have been 63.1, 82.5, 66.5

    1-13 vs playoff teams.

    3-9 in the AFCN

    Averaged 140 yards in 6 of 9 starts last season

    That is more an indictment of DA than a support for Quinn.

    If Quinn falls flat on his face and sucks the big one, I will not look back and say I was wrong about DA. Wrong about Quinn, but not about DA

    .

    You do realize that everyone of those examples above dwarfs Brady Quinns accomplishments right? I mean Brady has had equal multiple TD games as INT games (3-TD's to at least 4-Turnovers if you count the Garo Yepremian-like turnover), 0-fer vrs playoff teams (let alone Super Bowl Champs), 0-fer in AFCN, 1-3 as a starter, Averaged 128 yards in four starts ....

    I mean, you guys toss these stats around like 'Lookie, he's horrible!" while pimping a guy that would cream his pants and the entire Brady Nation if he could put up somewhere close to those numbers.

    9-9 in his last 18 starts and while most admit that an 8-8 season would be a dream season here this year under Brady, it ain't likely.

    I think what Zombo is trying to say, and has said, is quit bashing Anderson because in the process you are really bashing Brady Quinn as unfortunately the bar Anderson has put up is over Quinns expectation for at least another full year.

  • Zombo said:

    Because Mangini said the competition was "real close" and that he liked both QBs and because he said he'll play the QB that gives the best chance to win.

    If we keep losing and Quinn keeps playing badly, he will turn to Anderson, I'm surprised anyone would disagree with that.

    Zombo

    There's only been 1 game played. This argument is not valid yet. Absolutely no reason to be a negative nancy and try to predict future debacles to make yourself look good.

  • Zombo said:

    Yet shitcan him over that injury-filled mess last year in which no one on the offense played well?

    Zombo said:

    But it is still his responsibility to go out and win the football game and play much better than he did on Sunday.

    No excuses for DA in 08,

    So which is it, man. No excuses, or a shit load of excuses?

  • @vegasdogg said:

    Why go back to Anderson? Salvage what? He couldn't do better than Quinn anyway.

    Since 2006 when Anderson first started, he has:

    Almost as many multiple INT games (8) as multi TD games (14).

    He has 46 TD and 40 Turnovers.

    His ratings have been 63.1, 82.5, 66.5

    1-13 vs playoff teams.

    3-9 in the AFCN

    Averaged 140 yards in 6 of 9 starts last season

    That is more an indictment of DA than a support for Quinn.

    If Quinn falls flat on his face and sucks the big one, I will not look back and say I was wrong about DA. Wrong about Quinn, but not about DA

    .

    You do realize that everyone of those examples above dwarfs Brady Quinns accomplishments right? I mean Brady has had equal multiple TD games as INT games (3-TD's to at least 4-Turnovers if you count the Garo Yepremian-like turnover), 0-fer vrs playoff teams (let alone Super Bowl Champs), 0-fer in AFCN, 1-3 as a starter, Averaged 128 yards in four starts ....

    I mean, you guys toss these stats around like 'Lookie, he's horrible!" while pimping a guy that would cream his pants and the entire Brady Nation if he could put up somewhere close to those numbers.

    9-9 in his last 18 starts and while most admit that an 8-8 season would be a dream season here this year under Brady, it ain't likely.

    I think what Zombo is trying to say, and has said, is quit bashing Anderson because in the process you are really bashing Brady Quinn as unfortunately the bar Anderson has put up is over Quinns expectation for at least another full year.

    @atenears said:

    I think what Zombo is trying to say, and has said, is quit bashing Anderson because in the process you are really bashing Brady Quinn as unfortunately the bar Anderson has put up is over Quinns expectation for at least another full year.

    What you simpletons gloss over quite conveniently is DA has had 27 starts while Quinn has 4.

    They were both 1-3 after 4 starts.

  • @vegasdogg said:

    Why go back to Anderson? Salvage what? He couldn't do better than Quinn anyway.

    Since 2006 when Anderson first started, he has:

    Almost as many multiple INT games (8) as multi TD games (14).

    He has 46 TD and 40 Turnovers.

    His ratings have been 63.1, 82.5, 66.5

    1-13 vs playoff teams.

    3-9 in the AFCN

    Averaged 140 yards in 6 of 9 starts last season

    That is more an indictment of DA than a support for Quinn.

    If Quinn falls flat on his face and sucks the big one, I will not look back and say I was wrong about DA. Wrong about Quinn, but not about DA

    .

    You do realize that everyone of those examples above dwarfs Brady Quinns accomplishments right? I mean Brady has had equal multiple TD games as INT games (3-TD's to at least 4-Turnovers if you count the Garo Yepremian-like turnover), 0-fer vrs playoff teams (let alone Super Bowl Champs), 0-fer in AFCN, 1-3 as a starter, Averaged 128 yards in four starts ....

    I mean, you guys toss these stats around like 'Lookie, he's horrible!" while pimping a guy that would cream his pants and the entire Brady Nation if he could put up somewhere close to those numbers.

    9-9 in his last 18 starts and while most admit that an 8-8 season would be a dream season here this year under Brady, it ain't likely.

    I think what Zombo is trying to say, and has said, is quit bashing Anderson because in the process you are really bashing Brady Quinn as unfortunately the bar Anderson has put up is over Quinns expectation for at least another full year.

    @atenears said:

    You do realize that everyone of those examples above dwarfs Brady Quinns accomplishments right?

    My thoughts exactly.

    Hey Vegas if you want to say "He couldn't do any better than Quinn anyway" it's probably not best to follow it up with statistics that show how much better he is than Quinn.

  • @atenears said:

    You do realize that everyone of those examples above dwarfs Brady Quinns accomplishments right?

    My thoughts exactly.

    Hey Vegas if you want to say "He couldn't do any better than Quinn anyway" it's probably not best to follow it up with statistics that show how much better he is than Quinn.

    @lumbergh said:

    My thoughts exactly.

    You don't have an original thought, Dumbnuts. Funny, Atenears was just on the board a minute ago, and you weren't. Now you're on and he isn't.

    Stan, when are you going to stop being the fag and end the dumbass Dumbnuts game???????

    We've all known for quite some time now. It is getting wierd.

  • 22 Members: Eastlakeian, Vegasdogg, shepwrite, ATENEARS, berniekosarisgod, ballpeen, Masters, razor1414, mnofdichotomy, AustinDawg, mz the pussy., liver42, Solon16, Kennel Club, roach, Riffer X, Riceloft, BMWMK2, Gips, BrownIndian, AdaM, Legacy Fan

    Time is now: 17th September 2009 - 08:55 AM

    19 Members: JADBF, ClevelandFanForLife, roach, Vegasdogg, Nafreleets, The Gipper, car ramrod, mz the pussy., Legacy Fan, Dan in Florida, Thomas5737, Metcalf_FTW, liver42, Jason J, calfoxwc, DeadWombat, 585Dawg, Lumbergh, jackson52animal

    Time is now: 17th September 2009 - 08:52 AM

    Yeah, maybe we should keep the stupid charade going?

  • Yikes! Did you see that? both mine and Lumberghs names were real big in the above scenario ...

    (anyone else hear strange twilight show music playing in the background?)

  • @lumbergh said:

    My thoughts exactly.

    You don't have an original thought, Dumbnuts. Funny, Atenears was just on the board a minute ago, and you weren't. Now you're on and he isn't.

    Stan, when are you going to stop being the fag and end the dumbass Dumbnuts game???????

    We've all known for quite some time now. It is getting wierd.

    @vegasdogg said:

    Stan, when are you going to stop being the fag and end the dumbass Dumbnuts game???????

    Tomorrow, meet me here at 4:20 Pacific time.

  • @jadbf said:

    Guys, it's not about who is signed on when. You do realize there is such a thing as being able to be signed on at the same time to two accounts?

    Hey we've all known for some time now. But the fag has to take it into the regular season, and that is mental institution wierd. LOL.

  • 5 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 1 Anonymous Users)

    2 Members: Lumbergh, ATENEARS

    oh shit, how'd I do that?