Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. O'Reilly's on board

O'Reilly's on board

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
8 Posts 3 Posters 768 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • heckofajobbrownie H
    • 6k Posts
    • 47 Reputation
    H heckofajobbrownie wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Wow. I don't know how this happened, but he's now for a public option:

    Oโ€™REILLY: But you know, I want that, Ms. Owcharenko. I want that. I want, not for personally for me, but for working Americans, to have a option, that if they donโ€™t like their health insurance, if itโ€™s too expensive, they canโ€™t afford it, if the government can cobble together a cheaper insurance policy that gives the same benefits, I see that as a plus for the folks.

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
      • 64k Posts
      • 8k Reputation
      C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Let's put it this way. A public option as a solution to the problem of folks not having med health insurance is fine.

      Nobody wants to not have that problem fixed.

      The problem is, the Congress has many things in their Dem bill, that does NOT WASH with the alleged intention of simply

      solving the problem.

      A simple provision of a grant for those who cannot afford med insurance would solve it.

      But interfering with the private med insurance industry, to the point of one way or another, eliminating it,

      along with the ALWAYS rationing of health care, and the enormous cost of a government program, plus

      the INABILITY to sue the gov program for malpractice, AND the complete ABSENCE of tort reform as part of that package,

      AND the constant lies Obama tells about "his" package, which doesn't exist...

      ask O'Reilly if he's cool with all THAT.

      Nobody is, except for the power grabbing leftsists, including Sel... I mean Cha...; I mean Obama.@@

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • heckofajobbrownie H
        • 6k Posts
        • 47 Reputation
        H heckofajobbrownie wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Here's another fun article to read. It's about a guy named Wendell Potter, who used to be an exec at Cigna before realizing he didn't want to be in the business of finding ways to cut back on people's health care. I even got it from Fox Business so you won't dismiss it as liberal propaganda.

        Here's a graph:

        People are suspicious of a government takeover of the health-care system, he said. But they are not suspicious of the Wall Street takeover, even as premiums keep rising and more Americans find it impossible to afford insurance each year.

        "This is a tribute to the power of the insurance industry and special interests to manipulate public opinion," he said.

        Potter, who sat on industry boards, said he was involved with this manipulation, hiring PR firms to set up front groups to spread misleading messages. He says he still marvels at how ordinary people parrot these messages and complain about socialism.

        "They'll show up at town hall meetings, not realizing that they've become spokespeople for the insurance industry," he said. "More effective than I could ever be."

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
          • 3k Posts
          • 197 Reputation
          Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by Legacy Fan
          #4
          O'Reilly's on board

          Well, I'm sold. ๐Ÿ™„

          Let those who work for the public, testdrive the "public option" 1st. If it's good enough for them, I'll listen.

          I've posted this before (but it remained unaddressed - imagine that) but 47% of the nation has a chronic illness. The number 1 chronic illness is High Blood Pressure. A condition that is mitigated by diet & exercise in 99% of the cases. With new found health insurance this condition will be mitigated with medication. And this is supposed to lower over-all health costs?

          Come on, buddy.

          And I've treated patients on "the fairgrounds" that changed Potter's life (as per the article). We saw about 1200 to be exact, and that was just in the dental chair. And trust me, these people are in horrible shape. And are "covered" by Medicare. As in, they'd be unaffected by the public option.

          Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
          Legacy FanL 2 Replies Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • Legacy FanL Legacy Fan
            O'Reilly's on board

            Well, I'm sold. ๐Ÿ™„

            Let those who work for the public, testdrive the "public option" 1st. If it's good enough for them, I'll listen.

            I've posted this before (but it remained unaddressed - imagine that) but 47% of the nation has a chronic illness. The number 1 chronic illness is High Blood Pressure. A condition that is mitigated by diet & exercise in 99% of the cases. With new found health insurance this condition will be mitigated with medication. And this is supposed to lower over-all health costs?

            Come on, buddy.

            And I've treated patients on "the fairgrounds" that changed Potter's life (as per the article). We saw about 1200 to be exact, and that was just in the dental chair. And trust me, these people are in horrible shape. And are "covered" by Medicare. As in, they'd be unaffected by the public option.

            Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
            • 3k Posts
            • 197 Reputation
            Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @legacy-fan said:

            Well, I'm sold. ๐Ÿ™„

            Let those who work for the public, testdrive the "public option" 1st. If it's good enough for them, I'll listen.

            I've posted this before (but it remained unaddressed - imagine that) but 47% of the nation has a chronic illness. The number 1 chronic illness is High Blood Pressure. A condition that is mitigated by diet & exercise in 99% of the cases. With new found health insurance this condition will be mitigated with medication. And this is supposed to lower over-all health costs?

            Come on, buddy.

            And I've treated patients on "the fairgrounds" that changed Potter's life (as per the article). We saw about 1200 to be exact, and that was just in the dental chair. And trust me, these people are in horrible shape. And are "covered" by Medicare. As in, they'd be unaffected by the public option.

            *bump*

            Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Legacy FanL Legacy Fan
              O'Reilly's on board

              Well, I'm sold. ๐Ÿ™„

              Let those who work for the public, testdrive the "public option" 1st. If it's good enough for them, I'll listen.

              I've posted this before (but it remained unaddressed - imagine that) but 47% of the nation has a chronic illness. The number 1 chronic illness is High Blood Pressure. A condition that is mitigated by diet & exercise in 99% of the cases. With new found health insurance this condition will be mitigated with medication. And this is supposed to lower over-all health costs?

              Come on, buddy.

              And I've treated patients on "the fairgrounds" that changed Potter's life (as per the article). We saw about 1200 to be exact, and that was just in the dental chair. And trust me, these people are in horrible shape. And are "covered" by Medicare. As in, they'd be unaffected by the public option.

              Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
              • 3k Posts
              • 197 Reputation
              Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @legacy-fan said:

              Well, I'm sold. ๐Ÿ™„

              Let those who work for the public, testdrive the "public option" 1st. If it's good enough for them, I'll listen.

              I've posted this before (but it remained unaddressed - imagine that) but 47% of the nation has a chronic illness. The number 1 chronic illness is High Blood Pressure. A condition that is mitigated by diet & exercise in 99% of the cases. With new found health insurance this condition will be mitigated with medication. And this is supposed to lower over-all health costs?

              Come on, buddy.

              And I've treated patients on "the fairgrounds" that changed Potter's life (as per the article). We saw about 1200 to be exact, and that was just in the dental chair. And trust me, these people are in horrible shape. And are "covered" by Medicare. As in, they'd be unaffected by the public option.

              *bump*

              If you can find time while the sperm are re-loading from the both of the "Republican Base/Party is failing" threads.

              Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • heckofajobbrownie H
                • 6k Posts
                • 47 Reputation
                H heckofajobbrownie wrote on last edited by heckofajobbrownie
                #7

                Is this being bumped for me?

                If so, I don't see your logic on costs. You're talking about one specific illness. Nor is anyone saying that covering some 40 million new people isn't going to cost money. We've all seen the estimates.

                The idea is that you lower the rate of the growth in health care costs. I don't see how your example proves this either way. It may say something about how we over-medicate though.

                As for dental insurance in Medicare, you're right. It's odd that you don't get basic dental through Medicare.

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • Legacy Fan Legacy FanL
                  • 3k Posts
                  • 197 Reputation
                  Legacy FanL Legacy Fan wrote on last edited by Legacy Fan
                  #8

                  yeah - bumps were for you, the cheap-shot was for everyone in favor of increasing the governments role in our health care. ๐Ÿ˜†

                  My example was to point out that you cant lower the growth rate of costs by adding more costs. With any change in corporate insurance policies, the 1st talk at the watercoolers was what additionally would be covered. Medications, contacts, composite fillings in teeth opposed to metal/ amalgam. What I'm talking about is the notion that people will falsely believe they are getting something for nothing, and human nature tells us to see if we can get a little more. That's no way to lower costs. That's on the consumer end. Add the fact that we over-medicate (on both doctor & patient ends) will also increase costs.

                  And the people that came to the fairgrounds in Wise, VA came to the dental end of the property after they stood in line for physicals, High-blood pressure medicine, sniffles, coughs, aches, etc.

                  And while I dont intend this to be a cheap way to pat myself on the back (it is), after extracting teeth from one patient (I left 6 teeth in his head to paint the picture), and spending 10 minutes explaining to him how he can take better care of what he had still there, it flew right over his head and he said "When I come back next year, I want you guys to pull my other teeth." ๐Ÿ˜ฎ "Sir, the idea is to keep me out of your mouth."

                  Frustratingly satisfying. Eternal vigilance, I guess.

                  Dentistry doesnt have the market cornered on lack of patient education, especially on that end of the economic spectrum.

                  Sure, luck means a lot in football. Not having a good quarterback is bad luck. -Don Shula
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply

                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                  With your input, this post could be even better ๐Ÿ’—

                  Register Login
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  Theme
                  • System
                  • Light
                  • Dark
                  The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                  The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Forums
                  • Recent
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Donate