Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. T.Official ? - NFL WEEK 11 - PIT 10 (+1) -at- ★ CLE 13 Game #10 ? Nov. 19★ "7-3"

T.Official ?  - NFL WEEK 11 -  PIT 10 (+1) -at- ★ CLE 13  Game #10 ?  Nov. 19★ "7-3"

The Browns Board
322 34 6.9k 1

  • Gotta put PJ Walker in. This is unwatchable. Hate to say it, but it's the right thing. 

    tiamat63T 1 Reply

  • Is it their plan to catch every pass 3yds behind the LOS???

  • jiggins7919J jiggins7919

    Gotta put PJ Walker in. This is unwatchable. Hate to say it, but it's the right thing. 

    @jiggins7919 said:

    Gotta put PJ Walker in. This is unwatchable. Hate to say it, but it's the right thing. 

    So PJ would somehow be.... Less unwatchable? 

    Steelers defense adjusted.  The offense has adjustments, but needs the QB to be able to execute them. PJ had already shown he isn't that answer. 

    Korsou DawgK jiggins7919J 2 Replies

  • just a few plays of execution & focus on offense.. It ain't all on DTR

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends

  • This is histrically the squeelers best quarter

  • This is how the Steelers win every damn week. 

    ❤
  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    @jiggins7919 said:

    Gotta put PJ Walker in. This is unwatchable. Hate to say it, but it's the right thing. 

    So PJ would somehow be.... Less unwatchable? 

    Steelers defense adjusted.  The offense has adjustments, but needs the QB to be able to execute them. PJ had already shown he isn't that answer. 

    @tiamat63 said:

    So PJ would somehow be.... Less unwatchable? 

    Steelers defense adjusted.  The offense has adjustments, but needs the QB to be able to execute them. PJ had already shown he isn't that answer. 

    I'm not seeing the offensive adjustments though. Just short passes and runs that go backwards. 

    Agree on PJ

    tiamat63T 1 Reply
  • tiamat63T tiamat63

    @jiggins7919 said:

    Gotta put PJ Walker in. This is unwatchable. Hate to say it, but it's the right thing. 

    So PJ would somehow be.... Less unwatchable? 

    Steelers defense adjusted.  The offense has adjustments, but needs the QB to be able to execute them. PJ had already shown he isn't that answer. 

    @tiamat63 said:

    So PJ would somehow be.... Less unwatchable? 

    I know, man. I really don't want it, either. But...this isn't ok. We HAVE to be able to run a bit more of the play book, and I think Walker can do that. I could be wrong, hell...I really don't like watching him, but this is impossible. We're literally hoping our defense scores and squandered two drives starting in their territory. 

    Maybe there is no good option. I don't know. 

    bbedwardB 1 Reply

  • Jfc

  • Cmon, 3rd and 13 screen. 

  • Schwartz and the Dline being too aggressive against obvious screen calls. 

  • RgIIi is in the booth in washington.  He would be cheap!!

  • Korsou DawgK Korsou Dawg

    @tiamat63 said:

    So PJ would somehow be.... Less unwatchable? 

    Steelers defense adjusted.  The offense has adjustments, but needs the QB to be able to execute them. PJ had already shown he isn't that answer. 

    I'm not seeing the offensive adjustments though. Just short passes and runs that go backwards. 

    Agree on PJ

    @korsou-dawg said:

    I'm not seeing the offensive adjustments though. Just short passes and runs that go backwards. 

    Agree on PJ

    The point was there are available adjustments.  You don't have the QB who can make them happen. 

  • How the eff?! Where where the eff was everybody?! JFC. 

  • jiggins7919J jiggins7919

    @tiamat63 said:

    So PJ would somehow be.... Less unwatchable? 

    I know, man. I really don't want it, either. But...this isn't ok. We HAVE to be able to run a bit more of the play book, and I think Walker can do that. I could be wrong, hell...I really don't like watching him, but this is impossible. We're literally hoping our defense scores and squandered two drives starting in their territory. 

    Maybe there is no good option. I don't know. 

    @jiggins7919 said:

    I know, man. I really don't want it, either. But...this isn't ok. We HAVE to be able to run a bit more of the play book, and I think Walker can do that. I could be wrong, hell...I really don't like watching him, but this is impossible. We're literally hoping our defense scores and squandered two drives starting in their territory. 

    Maybe there is no good option. I don't know. 

    We can’t risk PJs turnover propensity, we need DTR to get a pep talk or something.

    jiggins7919J Korsou DawgK 2 Replies

  • Warren killin us

  • While this is a good ol' fashioned AFC Central type game, it's also super frustrating to watch. As I type this up 10-7, I have a bad feeling about my next post that will be after the game.

    👍

  • out LB need to play better

    "You see the Rams are still thinking that they are playing Tony Dorsett" -Jim Brown 1978
  • bbedwardB bbedward

    @jiggins7919 said:

    I know, man. I really don't want it, either. But...this isn't ok. We HAVE to be able to run a bit more of the play book, and I think Walker can do that. I could be wrong, hell...I really don't like watching him, but this is impossible. We're literally hoping our defense scores and squandered two drives starting in their territory. 

    Maybe there is no good option. I don't know. 

    We can’t risk PJs turnover propensity, we need DTR to get a pep talk or something.

    @bbedward said:

    We can’t risk PJs turnover propensity, we need DTR to get a pep talk or something.

    You're probably not wrong. But we're going to come from behind in this game if we win and DTR can't do that. I can promise you everything I own, there's absolutely no way DTR can lead us to victory against the Steelers in the 4th quarter. PJ at least has done it against other teams, despite being lucky. 

  • Warren is punking your butts.. FG or nothing please

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends
Log in to reply