Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Interesting - Steelers 09 draft picks Hood, Urbik and Shipley

Interesting - Steelers 09 draft picks Hood, Urbik and Shipley

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
9 Posts 6 Posters 1.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
    • 64k Posts
    • 8k Reputation
    C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
    #1

    The Steelers first round pick, Hood, DE, is third string, per their depth chart on yahoo.

    Their pick Urbik, OG, in the third round, is a backup OG, and Shipley, the 7th rnd pick ?, a center,

    is on the practice squad.

    I don't know what that means, but here's a few guesses:

    1. They all have to be on steriods for a year for before they can start... @@ LOL

    2. Their systems are so complicated, rookies on their lines can never be smart enough to start the first year...

    3. They have drafted so well, that they have tremendous depth, on the offensive and defensive lines for years, that

    it is hard for a rookie to ever play much.

    4. It takes time to teach rookies how to play dirty like Troy Pollybooboo...

    5. Or, Steelers rookies have to become acclimated to the stink of 3 riblets stadium.

    But seriously, Shipley on the practice squad? a center? when the Steelers needed a center? whatever.

    I think the last couple of Browns drafts brought some classy players here. Next year, a bigtime rb, cb, rt...

    We're on on track. There's just so many choices each year, and still some additions to make...

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Lumbergh LumberghL
      • 1k Posts
      • 2 Reputation
      LumberghL Lumbergh wrote on last edited by
      #2

      I like Cincy's chances vs PIT this Sunday.

      They aren't the same team without Polamalu

      BUNSofSTEEL08B 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
        • 64k Posts
        • 8k Reputation
        C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Yes. Back in the day, Chuck Noll, and of course, Cowher, they drafted talented players who LOVED football.

        The Browns have tended to draft flashy players in college, who look like stars on paper.

        But injuries, lack of attitude, and not loving the game has taken it's toll on the Browns and other teams.

        I am genuinely encouraged bigtime with Mangini and co.'s last draft, as well as the addition of Joe Thomas before.

        Mangini's drafting of *smart*, excellent character, (that's his first requirement), very talented players, who LOVE

        playing football... as a second requirement, is paying off now, and will pay off more so later.

        Mangini even said, if they don't pass the first requirements above, he won't consider them.

        I see a seriously different spark with these Browns because of it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • broncoinskinland B
          • 74 Posts
          • 0 Reputation
          B broncoinskinland wrote on last edited by broncoinskinland
          #4

          Gotta look at the positions too. End, Guard and Center all need size. Maybe they are bulking these guys up before turning them loose? I am not familiar with any of them so I can't say for certain, but thats a top of my head guess based on the positions...

          Edit: Hit NFL.com to check weights. They have the following listed FWIW, Hood at 300 for an end, Urbik 323 Guard and Shipley 298 Center. Shipley seems light, and I would like to see a bit more mass on a 3-4 DE, but Urbik should be fine.

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
            • 64k Posts
            • 8k Reputation
            C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I like Cincy's chances vs PIT this Sunday.

            They aren't the same team without Polamalu Lums

            ********************************************

            Oh, THAT is what he said?

            Hmm. If he keeps that up, I'll take him off ignore... 😳

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • LumberghL Lumbergh

              I like Cincy's chances vs PIT this Sunday.

              They aren't the same team without Polamalu

              BUNSofSTEEL08 BUNSofSTEEL08B
              • 2k Posts
              • 8 Reputation
              BUNSofSTEEL08B BUNSofSTEEL08 wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @lumbergh said:

              I like Cincy's chances vs PIT this Sunday.

              They aren't the same team without Polamalu

              wouldnt bet your House on it !

              Climbing the Stairway...To SEVEN !!
              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • BUNSofSTEEL08 BUNSofSTEEL08B
                • 2k Posts
                • 8 Reputation
                BUNSofSTEEL08B BUNSofSTEEL08 wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @brownshirt said:

                Why do stooler trolls drive nice cars and live in the projects? Cus you can sleeps in u car, but u can't drive u house.

                lol... I worked in Cleveland 2 yrs. You dont wanna Go there.

                Climbing the Stairway...To SEVEN !!
                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • mopaji mopajiM
                  • 1k Posts
                  • 0 Reputation
                  mopajiM mopaji wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  The reason they don't start rookies is because you really never should. They are a patient organization thats why when they let a 30 year old starter go in free agency they have another no-namer ready to take his place. That no-namer has been sitting for a couple of years learning and so is ready when his time comes.

                  In Cleveland, for some reason, we cannot wait to play an inexperienced bust of a draft pick. The fans and the organization run the team like it's a playstation game and that formula never works. We tend to put rookies and yong players in WAAAY before they are ready and end up ruining careers and seasons. It happens all the time here. That's why I love how Pittsburgh runs that team and that is why I hate them more everyday.

                  "Chances are, if you think Jay Leno is funny, I don't care for you as a person" - Peter Griffin
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • 4flat 4
                    • 5 Posts
                    • 0 Reputation
                    4 4flat wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    First post ...

                    I'm not sure you can analyze any draft after 2 games. I feel there are two reasons that the Raven's and the Steelers are at the top of the division right now; hitting well on #1 draft picks over the last 7-8 years, and having good fortune in finding their franchise quarterbacks. There is no doubt that the last regime left the Browns in a hole--bad personnel decisions were made that will take a few years to dig out from.

                    Anyhow, take the Steelers. They have every #1 pick since 2003 still on their roster, and hit homeruns (Polamula, Roth, Miller, and Holmes) on four of those picks. The jury is still out on the picks from the last two years (Timmons, Mendenhall, and Hood). The Ravens hit well on their defensive #1s (Suggs, Reed, Ngata), and the main reason for their current prosperity is Joe Flacco. They really missed on Kyle Boller in 2004, and struggled until they found their franchise QB. If we can be honest, the Browns only homerun has been Joe Thomas. Mack will be a staple on the line, but again, you can't judge until a few years down the road. Braylon Edwards had one fanatastic year, but .... Winslow, Faine and Greene are gone. Wimbley is more than solid, but not quite in the same league as the Polamulu or Reed picks (in terms of sheer defensive impact). Sadly, it's beginning to look like Quinn Boller v2007. (The other killer was the injury to LCB).

                    Hindsight 20/20: it would have been better not to have Quinn on the roster; then maybe the trade downs wouldn't have happened. The way Sanchez is looking, who wouldn't want him right now. They couldn't have drafted him with the two quarterbacks on the roster this year. Next year is the time to take a chance on a QB prospect in round 1. The Jets, Falcons, Ravens and Steelers have had success, why not the Browns.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply

                    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                    Register Login
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    Theme
                    • System
                    • Light
                    • Dark
                    The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                    The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Forums
                    • Recent
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Donate