Skip to content

Even the founder of the Weather Channel says Climate change/global warming is a HOAX!

Political Discussion
166 14 4.0k 1
  • @cccjwh said:

    When you are too stupid to understand them, sure. They don't prove anything to stupid people.

    The nimrods asked for proof. You gave them what? a 1\2 dozen graphs proving it isn't a hoax or scam, but they're never going to believe any proof staring them right in the face.  Right up there with Flat Earth crowd.  But you did miss something of note & importance ccc...   Average ocean temperature. Warmer water = more evaporation and more "juice" = more frequent and stronger hurricanes. Beryl is just the beginning.  

    Don't get me started on what will happen if the current warming trend continues and the Ross Ice Shelf in Antarctica collapses.  If you own any ocean front property, I'd suggest selling while you can.  

    Line graph showing changes in average global sea surface temperature from 1880 to 2023.

    @hoorta said:

    The nimrods asked for proof. You gave them what? a 1\2 dozen graphs proving it isn't a hoax or scam, but they're never going to believe any proof staring them right in the face.  Right up there with Flat Earth crowd.  But you did miss something of note & importance ccc...   Average ocean temperature. Warmer water = more evaporation and more "juice" = more frequent and stronger hurricanes. Beryl is just the beginning.  

    Don't get me started on what will happen if the current warming trend continues and the Ross Ice Shelf in Antarctica collapses.  If you own any ocean front property, I'd suggest selling while you can.  

    LIFESTYLE
    WON'T FLY
  • @cccjwh said:

    Oh nothing is going to change their minds. Stupid people are stupid because they can't admit when they are wrong, so they never learn from their mistakes. 

    It's cute how you bolded and commented those particular words Karen. As in the clear evidence of targeting a political opponent staring you in the face.

    @fy56 said:

    It's cute how you bolded and commented those particular words Karen. As in the clear evidence of targeting a political opponent staring you in the face.

    We're talking climate change here FY. I'll grant you even if CO2 emissions magically dropped to zero, (no way Jose) it would take a long time for them to return to preindustrial levels. But hey- thanks for clearing millions of acres of rainforest every year...   Or did you forget plants "breathe" Carbon dioxide?   Is this just a short term blip on the radar, or something that's an irreversible chain reaction?  You had better hope it's the former, or we're going to cook the planet in the next hundred years.  I've been interested in astronomy since I was a little kid, so look no farther than our sister planet Venus to see that the CO2 greenhouse effect isn't something climatologists made up.  

    Ah, believe whatever you want to about poor widdle Donie being targeted for his repeated criminal activity. Boo hoo. Running for president to stay out of jail. I'm not going to change your mind, and you sure as hell aren't going to change mine.  Just like some of the folks here thinking climate change is a hoax, 1\6 was a peaceful protest, and DJT can declassify documents just by thinking about them.  Alternate reality lives here.  ?

  • @fy56 said:

    It's cute how you bolded and commented those particular words Karen. As in the clear evidence of targeting a political opponent staring you in the face.

    We're talking climate change here FY. I'll grant you even if CO2 emissions magically dropped to zero, (no way Jose) it would take a long time for them to return to preindustrial levels. But hey- thanks for clearing millions of acres of rainforest every year...   Or did you forget plants "breathe" Carbon dioxide?   Is this just a short term blip on the radar, or something that's an irreversible chain reaction?  You had better hope it's the former, or we're going to cook the planet in the next hundred years.  I've been interested in astronomy since I was a little kid, so look no farther than our sister planet Venus to see that the CO2 greenhouse effect isn't something climatologists made up.  

    Ah, believe whatever you want to about poor widdle Donie being targeted for his repeated criminal activity. Boo hoo. Running for president to stay out of jail. I'm not going to change your mind, and you sure as hell aren't going to change mine.  Just like some of the folks here thinking climate change is a hoax, 1\6 was a peaceful protest, and DJT can declassify documents just by thinking about them.  Alternate reality lives here.  ?

    @hoorta said:

    We're talking climate change here FY. I'll grant you even if CO2 emissions magically dropped to zero, (no way Jose) it would take a long time for them to return to preindustrial levels. But hey- thanks for clearing millions of acres of rainforest every year...   Or did you forget plants "breathe" Carbon dioxide?   Is this just a short term blip on the radar, or something that's an irreversible chain reaction?  You had better hope it's the former, or we're going to cook the planet in the next hundred years.  I've been interested in astronomy since I was a little kid, so look no farther than our sister planet Venus to see that the CO2 greenhouse effect isn't something climatologists made up.  

    Ah, believe whatever you want to about poor widdle Donie being targeted for his repeated criminal activity. Boo hoo. Running for president to stay out of jail. I'm not going to change your mind, and you sure as hell aren't going to change mine.  Just like some of the folks here thinking climate change is a hoax, 1\6 was a peaceful protest, and DJT can declassify documents just by thinking about them.  Alternate reality lives here.  ?

    Drunk man lying on ground hi-res stock photography and images - Alamy

  • @fy56 said:

    It's cute how you bolded and commented those particular words Karen. As in the clear evidence of targeting a political opponent staring you in the face.

    We're talking climate change here FY. I'll grant you even if CO2 emissions magically dropped to zero, (no way Jose) it would take a long time for them to return to preindustrial levels. But hey- thanks for clearing millions of acres of rainforest every year...   Or did you forget plants "breathe" Carbon dioxide?   Is this just a short term blip on the radar, or something that's an irreversible chain reaction?  You had better hope it's the former, or we're going to cook the planet in the next hundred years.  I've been interested in astronomy since I was a little kid, so look no farther than our sister planet Venus to see that the CO2 greenhouse effect isn't something climatologists made up.  

    Ah, believe whatever you want to about poor widdle Donie being targeted for his repeated criminal activity. Boo hoo. Running for president to stay out of jail. I'm not going to change your mind, and you sure as hell aren't going to change mine.  Just like some of the folks here thinking climate change is a hoax, 1\6 was a peaceful protest, and DJT can declassify documents just by thinking about them.  Alternate reality lives here.  ?

    @hoorta said:

    I've been interested in astronomy since I was a little kid, so look no farther than our sister planet Venus to see that the CO2 greenhouse effect isn't something climatologists made up.  

    Did little green women drive around in their gas guzzlers during their industrial age as well?

  • @fy56 said:

    It's cute how you bolded and commented those particular words Karen. As in the clear evidence of targeting a political opponent staring you in the face.

    We're talking climate change here FY. I'll grant you even if CO2 emissions magically dropped to zero, (no way Jose) it would take a long time for them to return to preindustrial levels. But hey- thanks for clearing millions of acres of rainforest every year...   Or did you forget plants "breathe" Carbon dioxide?   Is this just a short term blip on the radar, or something that's an irreversible chain reaction?  You had better hope it's the former, or we're going to cook the planet in the next hundred years.  I've been interested in astronomy since I was a little kid, so look no farther than our sister planet Venus to see that the CO2 greenhouse effect isn't something climatologists made up.  

    Ah, believe whatever you want to about poor widdle Donie being targeted for his repeated criminal activity. Boo hoo. Running for president to stay out of jail. I'm not going to change your mind, and you sure as hell aren't going to change mine.  Just like some of the folks here thinking climate change is a hoax, 1\6 was a peaceful protest, and DJT can declassify documents just by thinking about them.  Alternate reality lives here.  ?

    @hoorta said:

    We're talking climate change here FY. I'll grant you even if CO2 emissions magically dropped to zero, (no way Jose) it would take a long time for them to return to preindustrial levels. But hey- thanks for clearing millions of acres of rainforest every year...   Or did you forget plants "breathe" Carbon dioxide?   Is this just a short term blip on the radar, or something that's an irreversible chain reaction?  You had better hope it's the former, or we're going to cook the planet in the next hundred years.  I've been interested in astronomy since I was a little kid, so look no farther than our sister planet Venus to see that the CO2 greenhouse effect isn't something climatologists made up.  

    Ah, believe whatever you want to about poor widdle Donie being targeted for his repeated criminal activity. Boo hoo. Running for president to stay out of jail. I'm not going to change your mind, and you sure as hell aren't going to change mine.  Just like some of the folks here thinking climate change is a hoax, 1\6 was a peaceful protest, and DJT can declassify documents just by thinking about them.  Alternate reality lives here.  ?

  • JaxJ Jax

    @hoorta said:

    I've been interested in astronomy since I was a little kid, so look no farther than our sister planet Venus to see that the CO2 greenhouse effect isn't something climatologists made up.  

    Did little green women drive around in their gas guzzlers during their industrial age as well?

    @jax said:

    Did little green women drive around in their gas guzzlers during their industrial age as well?

    Most of the dipshits don’t take into account the hottest decade in the short recorded period of temperature keeping was the 1930’s. Must’ve been the cow farts. 

  • @jax said:

    Did little green women drive around in their gas guzzlers during their industrial age as well?

    Most of the dipshits don’t take into account the hottest decade in the short recorded period of temperature keeping was the 1930’s. Must’ve been the cow farts. 

    @canton-dawg said:

    Most of the dipshits don’t take into account the hottest decade in the short recorded period of temperature keeping was the 1930’s. Must’ve been the cow farts. 

    Yeah, and talking about cutting down rain forest is a whole different issue.

    I think we all agree that is bad but don't tie into man made global warming. We can always plant more trees, it's about the species and life that live within only rain forests.

  • @jax said:

    Did little green women drive around in their gas guzzlers during their industrial age as well?

    Most of the dipshits don’t take into account the hottest decade in the short recorded period of temperature keeping was the 1930’s. Must’ve been the cow farts. 

    @canton-dawg said:

    Most of the dipshits don’t take into account the hottest decade in the short recorded period of temperature keeping was the 1930’s. Must’ve been the cow farts. 

    This isn't true, btw. Maybe for the US, but definitely not for the globe as a whole. 

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Most of the dipshits don’t take into account the hottest decade in the short recorded period of temperature keeping was the 1930’s. Must’ve been the cow farts. 

    This isn't true, btw. Maybe for the US, but definitely not for the globe as a whole. 

    @mld-woody said:

    This isn't true, btw. Maybe for the US, but definitely not for the globe as a whole. 

    Wasn't true about the ice caps melting or sea levels wiping out the coast.

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Most of the dipshits don’t take into account the hottest decade in the short recorded period of temperature keeping was the 1930’s. Must’ve been the cow farts. 

    This isn't true, btw. Maybe for the US, but definitely not for the globe as a whole. 

    @mld-woody said:

    This isn't true, btw. Maybe for the US, but definitely not for the globe as a whole. 

    Of course I was talking about the U.S. because I don’t think the meteorological data existed in other parts of the world. Hell they switched to “estimated satellite temperatures” to cover parts of the planet without actual thermometers.

    IMG_5756.jpeg

  • @fy56 said:

    It's cute how you bolded and commented those particular words Karen. As in the clear evidence of targeting a political opponent staring you in the face.

    We're talking climate change here FY. I'll grant you even if CO2 emissions magically dropped to zero, (no way Jose) it would take a long time for them to return to preindustrial levels. But hey- thanks for clearing millions of acres of rainforest every year...   Or did you forget plants "breathe" Carbon dioxide?   Is this just a short term blip on the radar, or something that's an irreversible chain reaction?  You had better hope it's the former, or we're going to cook the planet in the next hundred years.  I've been interested in astronomy since I was a little kid, so look no farther than our sister planet Venus to see that the CO2 greenhouse effect isn't something climatologists made up.  

    Ah, believe whatever you want to about poor widdle Donie being targeted for his repeated criminal activity. Boo hoo. Running for president to stay out of jail. I'm not going to change your mind, and you sure as hell aren't going to change mine.  Just like some of the folks here thinking climate change is a hoax, 1\6 was a peaceful protest, and DJT can declassify documents just by thinking about them.  Alternate reality lives here.  ?

  • @mld-woody said:

    This isn't true, btw. Maybe for the US, but definitely not for the globe as a whole. 

    Of course I was talking about the U.S. because I don’t think the meteorological data existed in other parts of the world. Hell they switched to “estimated satellite temperatures” to cover parts of the planet without actual thermometers.

    IMG_5756.jpeg

    @canton-dawg said:

    Of course I was talking about the U.S. because I don’t think the meteorological data existed in other parts of the world. Hell they switched to “estimated satellite temperatures” to cover parts of the planet without actual thermometers.

    IMG_5756.jpeg

    Ah, yes, American exceptionalism and all that. Not even Europe was... *looks at notes* ... taking the temperature......

    The funny thing about this being that a main cause of the high temps in the 30s, the dust bowl, was man made (over farming, poor land management, etc)

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Most of the dipshits don’t take into account the hottest decade in the short recorded period of temperature keeping was the 1930’s. Must’ve been the cow farts. 

    This isn't true, btw. Maybe for the US, but definitely not for the globe as a whole. 

    @mld-woody said:

    This isn't true, btw. Maybe for the US, but definitely not for the globe as a whole. 

    Since when did Cant care if something is true or not.

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Of course I was talking about the U.S. because I don’t think the meteorological data existed in other parts of the world. Hell they switched to “estimated satellite temperatures” to cover parts of the planet without actual thermometers.

    IMG_5756.jpeg

    Ah, yes, American exceptionalism and all that. Not even Europe was... *looks at notes* ... taking the temperature......

    The funny thing about this being that a main cause of the high temps in the 30s, the dust bowl, was man made (over farming, poor land management, etc)

    @mld-woody said:

    Ah, yes, American exceptionalism and all that. Not even Europe was... *looks at notes* ... taking the temperature......

    The funny thing about this being that a main cause of the high temps in the 30s, the dust bowl, was man made (over farming, poor land management, etc)

    And reading thermometers is a special skill after all. Not something that would be documented daily. Don't forget the rest the world uses Celsius; can we really trust those readings. 

    ?

  • @mld-woody said:

    Ah, yes, American exceptionalism and all that. Not even Europe was... *looks at notes* ... taking the temperature......

    The funny thing about this being that a main cause of the high temps in the 30s, the dust bowl, was man made (over farming, poor land management, etc)

    And reading thermometers is a special skill after all. Not something that would be documented daily. Don't forget the rest the world uses Celsius; can we really trust those readings. 

    ?

    @cccjwh said:

    And reading thermometers is a special skill after all. Not something that would be documented daily. Don't forget the rest the world uses Celsius; can we really trust those readings. 

    ?

    I’m sure there were plenty of pig farmers in New Guinea willing to take time during their day to record weather data. That’s why we used those circa 1930’s weather satellites. ???

  • @canton-dawg said:

    Of course I was talking about the U.S. because I don’t think the meteorological data existed in other parts of the world. Hell they switched to “estimated satellite temperatures” to cover parts of the planet without actual thermometers.

    IMG_5756.jpeg

    Ah, yes, American exceptionalism and all that. Not even Europe was... *looks at notes* ... taking the temperature......

    The funny thing about this being that a main cause of the high temps in the 30s, the dust bowl, was man made (over farming, poor land management, etc)

    @mld-woody said:

    The funny thing about this being that a main cause of the high temps in the 30s, the dust bowl, was man made (over farming, poor land management, etc)

    Yes, poor land management now caused man made global warming in the 30s.

    I thought global warming was co2 creating green house effects?

    Or is it anything? Damn cow farts! No wonder dinosaurs went extinct, big ass animals constantly farting creating global warming and melting ice caps!

  • @mld-woody said:

    Ah, yes, American exceptionalism and all that. Not even Europe was... *looks at notes* ... taking the temperature......

    The funny thing about this being that a main cause of the high temps in the 30s, the dust bowl, was man made (over farming, poor land management, etc)

    And reading thermometers is a special skill after all. Not something that would be documented daily. Don't forget the rest the world uses Celsius; can we really trust those readings. 

    ?

    @cccjwh said:

    And reading thermometers is a special skill after all. Not something that would be documented daily. Don't forget the rest the world uses Celsius; can we really trust those readings. 

    ?

    That's about as reliable a source and technique for tracking your man made global warming patterns of 1 degrees.

    +- 5 degrees error tolerance

  • JaxJ Jax

    @mld-woody said:

    The funny thing about this being that a main cause of the high temps in the 30s, the dust bowl, was man made (over farming, poor land management, etc)

    Yes, poor land management now caused man made global warming in the 30s.

    I thought global warming was co2 creating green house effects?

    Or is it anything? Damn cow farts! No wonder dinosaurs went extinct, big ass animals constantly farting creating global warming and melting ice caps!

    @jax said:

    Yes, poor land management now caused man made global warming in the 30s.

    I thought global warming was co2 creating green house effects?

    Or is it anything? Damn cow farts! No wonder dinosaurs went extinct, big ass animals constantly farting creating global warming and melting ice caps!

    You aren't bright. I'm sure you've been a step behind your whole life. I'm not going to attempt to correct that now. 

    Go back and re read the posts. Maybe you'll follow if you take your time. 

    Or, again, maybe you just oh so desperately want me to reply so you can have a friend...