Assassination attempt on Trump
-
Secret Service boss Cheatle:
“That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there’s a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn’t want to put somebody up on a sloped roof,” she told ABC News on Tuesday.
Unreal.
-
Secret Service boss Cheatle:
“That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there’s a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn’t want to put somebody up on a sloped roof,” she told ABC News on Tuesday.
Unreal.
Secret Service boss Cheatle:
“That building in particular has a sloped roof at its highest point. And so, you know, there’s a safety factor that would be considered there that we wouldn’t want to put somebody up on a sloped roof,” she told ABC News on Tuesday.
Unreal.
A “sloped roof” you say?
What will they think of next?
Much too dangerous to put any LEO’s on a sloped roof.
-
Holy fuck.
I'm not going to draw a conclusion from this, but holy fuck anyway.
Not everyone reacts the same in certain situations.
Maybe she knew something was coming like we all did, if you know what I mean.
-
DEI angle in this case shouldn't be outright dismissed. If you are trying to protect a 6'3" man, maybe a 5'3" woman shouldn't be tasked with being his human shield. Trump should have been physically removed from the situation instead of walked off under his own power, being allowed to talk into the mic, raising his fist in the air, putting his shoes on (bone spurs lol). Having women in the detail that weigh 100 lbs less than their VIP is not putting them in a position to be able to succeed if shit hits the fan. Since becoming the director, she implemented a diversity quota of 30% female agents in the USSS. The slow response is, in part, due to that systemic decision.
Here's his USSS detail for the RNC convention and you will see that female agents are conspicuously absent.
- the DEI angle quickly started as Cheatle being unqualified (I'm sure fueled by Musk's tweet). That's quickly died down as it has become apparent to any sane person she is qualified.
- the DEI angle is now focused on the SS agents in the area. If course, the majority of the agents around Trump on stage were male, and they let him poke his head up, pump his fist, etc. Then later, when Trump was at his vehicle, the entire inner circle of agents around him were male and they didn't stop him from poking his head out above all of them. There were majority men or entirely men in both situations and Trump wasn't physically moved anywhere immediately.
- you have no idea if the slow response was due to that systemic decision. None at all.
- the DEI angle is being added on to this story because it fits a conservative narrative. Of course the actual "conservatives" pulling the strings are pushing the anti DEI narrative (and anti trans, and anti CRT, and any other wedge issue) to distract voters from the shit they want, like corporate tax breaks, so the wealth gap can keep rising. It's just a cherry on top that alt right always online incels can pile on with memes because they hate women
the DEI angle quickly started as Cheatle being unqualified (I'm sure fueled by Musk's tweet). That's quickly died down as it has become apparent to any sane person she is qualified.
Funny, there must be a lot of insane people on the left who also are calling for her to be fired.
-
DEI angle in this case shouldn't be outright dismissed. If you are trying to protect a 6'3" man, maybe a 5'3" woman shouldn't be tasked with being his human shield. Trump should have been physically removed from the situation instead of walked off under his own power, being allowed to talk into the mic, raising his fist in the air, putting his shoes on (bone spurs lol). Having women in the detail that weigh 100 lbs less than their VIP is not putting them in a position to be able to succeed if shit hits the fan. Since becoming the director, she implemented a diversity quota of 30% female agents in the USSS. The slow response is, in part, due to that systemic decision.
Here's his USSS detail for the RNC convention and you will see that female agents are conspicuously absent.
- the DEI angle quickly started as Cheatle being unqualified (I'm sure fueled by Musk's tweet). That's quickly died down as it has become apparent to any sane person she is qualified.
- the DEI angle is now focused on the SS agents in the area. If course, the majority of the agents around Trump on stage were male, and they let him poke his head up, pump his fist, etc. Then later, when Trump was at his vehicle, the entire inner circle of agents around him were male and they didn't stop him from poking his head out above all of them. There were majority men or entirely men in both situations and Trump wasn't physically moved anywhere immediately.
- you have no idea if the slow response was due to that systemic decision. None at all.
- the DEI angle is being added on to this story because it fits a conservative narrative. Of course the actual "conservatives" pulling the strings are pushing the anti DEI narrative (and anti trans, and anti CRT, and any other wedge issue) to distract voters from the shit they want, like corporate tax breaks, so the wealth gap can keep rising. It's just a cherry on top that alt right always online incels can pile on with memes because they hate women
- the DEI angle quickly started as Cheatle being unqualified (I'm sure fueled by Musk's tweet). That's quickly died down as it has become apparent to any sane person she is qualified.
- the DEI angle is now focused on the SS agents in the area. If course, the majority of the agents around Trump on stage were male, and they let him poke his head up, pump his fist, etc. Then later, when Trump was at his vehicle, the entire inner circle of agents around him were male and they didn't stop him from poking his head out above all of them. There were majority men or entirely men in both situations and Trump wasn't physically moved anywhere immediately.
- you have no idea if the slow response was due to that systemic decision. None at all.
- the DEI angle is being added on to this story because it fits a conservative narrative. Of course the actual "conservatives" pulling the strings are pushing the anti DEI narrative (and anti trans, and anti CRT, and any other wedge issue) to distract voters from the shit they want, like corporate tax breaks, so the wealth gap can keep rising. It's just a cherry on top that alt right always online incels can pile on with memes because they hate women
Haha. here we go again. "Conservative narrative". The conservative narrative happens to be the truth you don't like hearing.
Didn't your more reliable sources report to you that the Secret Service boss explicitly stated that it was unsafe for SS agents to be atop sloped roof?
How about your own NY Times. Kudos to them for even reporting that the frantic calls for a guy on the roof was ignored, even going as far as to post a video of the liberal democrat on the "dangerously sloped" roof .
This from the Post, but the NY Times posted the same video.
-
-
If the threat (someone on the roof) was known minutes before the shooting why didn't the secret service take Trump off the stage out of the line of sight?
If the threat (someone on the roof) was known minutes before the shooting why didn't the secret service take Trump off the stage out of the line of sight?
Another great point. If they couldn't get clearance to shoot the sniper, why not at least get Trump to safety instead of leaving him out to dry while they figured the threat?
-
I really hate reading this shit. I really do.
For the fact that I don't want to believe it was a conspiracy.
Here we have a situation regarding the trajectory of the bullet. If it came from the roof, the trajectory would have been downward. The shot allegedly came from inside the building.
BUT...if you look closely, it is very slightly downward. If the building is 20ft. high combined with Trumps height and the height of the stage and the distance between Trump and the building, the trajectory can be calculated.
-
Something very suspicious.
-
Just news breaking - the Secret Service KNEW of a threat well before Trump took the stage.
This whole fiasco REEKS of conspiracy theories.
but as schumer said, the cia has many ways to get you.....
and...
Dir. Clapper says a response to the Intelligence Committee in March was 'clearly erroneous.'. Top Spy Says NSA Spying Answer 'Erroneous'. The director of National Intelligence apologized in June .. -
Brennan denied knowing anything about the dossier months later in front of Congress, and made those denials under oath and under the promise of the penalty of perjury should he be caught lying again. Nunes is reportedly also investigating whether Brennan perjured himself. Other investigative journalists
-
-
or for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism, and Assistant to the President.
-
February 9, 2015. When the CIA got caught spying on Senate staffers working on the 6,000 page torture report, John Brennan, who heads the agency, denied the transgression. "As far as the ...
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login

