Skip to content

Sam Bradford Cleveland 2010

The Browns Board
79 38 5.5k
  • ...

  • I like Pike!

    So next draft we need a safety, qb, rt, rg in the first 4 rounds.

    whoopie we're screwed!

  • Screw that. I think we should just build up our defense cuz we will never have a good qb. I'm drinking that Berry koolaid

  • no if we take a QB in round one were screwed next year as well.... first round we need either a play maker in the secondary either mays or berry.... I prefer berry, but either works for me..... or an athletic LB like a Brandon Spikes from UF. Im tired of sitting in mediocrity, and adding a new QB to the mix wont help just yet.

  • Sorry guys, but Bradford is probably the best choice for the Cleveland Browns. His "skills" translate well into this offense. His release is much better than Quinns(which IMO is part of Brady's problems).

    He has questions about his noggin, but alot of QB's have that question.

    We need the man if we are going to win a Super Bowl in the next 3-5 years. It may take 7 years to completely rebuild this teams talent.

  • I like Jake Lockers skill set, but I think he needs one more year of college before going to the NFL.

  • bradford may not come out i don't think he is a senior, we need a stud RB or Berry

  • They have got to go with an impact player on offense next draft. Maybe it's Bradford, but it has to be someone who can come in and start. This is an offensive league. Yeah, I know that "defense wins championships". But right now I'd just like to see a TD. If you can score points, you've got a chance. They proved that two years ago, when they went 10-6.

  • They have got to go with an impact player on offense next draft. Maybe it's Bradford, but it has to be someone who can come in and start. This is an offensive league. Yeah, I know that "defense wins championships". But right now I'd just like to see a TD. If you can score points, you've got a chance. They proved that two years ago, when they went 10-6.

    @mayster-chief said:

    They have got to go with an impact player on offense next draft. Maybe it's Bradford, but it has to be someone who can come in and start. This is an offensive league. Yeah, I know that "defense wins championships". But right now I'd just like to see a TD. If you can score points, you've got a chance. They proved that two years ago, when they went 10-6.

    Wishfull thinking

  • I like Pike!

    So next draft we need a safety, qb, rt, rg in the first 4 rounds.

    whoopie we're screwed!

    @tobalaz said:

    I like Pike!

    So next draft we need a safety, qb, rt, rg in the first 4 rounds.

    whoopie we're screwed!

    I'm a Cincinnati Grad and I've watched Tony Pike the last two years. This guy can play in the NFL. I'd love to see him in an orange helmet.

  • Unless you have the coaching and front office behind building a winner no one can help. Mark Sanchez would be a failure in this organization.

  • Haven't seen a QB in this upcoming class that really impresses me as far as NFL starting potential goes.

    Jake Locker is an interesting topic, but I haven't seen NFL QB from him yet.

    The kid at Ole Miss, Snead, is by far the one that sticks out to me, as a real NFL starter, but what I've seen from him, this year, has not backed up my gut feeling on him.

    If it's me making decisions, I'm not drafting a QB high in the 2010 draft, if it were held now. Maybe Bradford or Snead will do something to convince me they're legit by that time. But right now, I'd look elsewhere.

    But I'm not at all convinced that Quinn can't play. He's been pretty bad lately, but that's sort of to be expected. We'll have to see at the bye week.

  • I like Pike!

    So next draft we need a safety, qb, rt, rg in the first 4 rounds.

    whoopie we're screwed!

    @tobalaz said:

    I like Pike!

    So next draft we need a safety, qb, rt, rg in the first 4 rounds.

    whoopie we're screwed!

    I like him as well...

  • @shepwrite said:

    Browns need a lot, but when you need a quarterback, it shoots to #1.

    Trading down and getting a center, Veikune, and some average defenders doesn't look so good now with Sanchez 3-0 and looking like a veteran already. I honestly think ManKok would like that one back. They were seriously interested. They should've made the Broncos trade for Quinn.

    We need so much, you have to look at trading down if you don't love a quarterback.

    Come on Shep, did you see Sanchez's 2nd half? The guy was terrible. Sanchez wouldn't probably even be starting here.

    Mangini did what he did because as given clues to several times: HE HAD NO INTEREST IN WINNING THIS YEAR OR NEXT!!!! He clearly is on the Bill Walsh plan and he better be right.

  • From what I saw of Sanchez, he had some rough patches but he showed a lot of promise. Quinn shows NOTHING.

  • From what I saw of Sanchez, he had some rough patches but he showed a lot of promise. Quinn shows NOTHING.

    @adz1987 said:

    From what I saw of Sanchez, he had some rough patches but he showed a lot of promise. Quinn shows NOTHING.

    Rough patches? Please, he didn't belong starting in that 2nd half. The Jets have personal on offense, we can only wish we had.

  • @adz1987 said:

    From what I saw of Sanchez, he had some rough patches but he showed a lot of promise. Quinn shows NOTHING.

    Rough patches? Please, he didn't belong starting in that 2nd half. The Jets have personal on offense, we can only wish we had.

    @restinpeace said:

    Rough patches? Please, he didn't belong starting in that 2nd half. The Jets have personal on offense, we can only wish we had.

    Did you not also see his ability to scramble outside and make the throws, make big throws and even receive off of a Washington throw? This is promise and innovative play calling. Something the Browns do not have in the current coaching staff or either QB.

  • @restinpeace said:

    Rough patches? Please, he didn't belong starting in that 2nd half. The Jets have personal on offense, we can only wish we had.

    Did you not also see his ability to scramble outside and make the throws, make big throws and even receive off of a Washington throw? This is promise and innovative play calling. Something the Browns do not have in the current coaching staff or either QB.

    @adz1987 said:

    Did you not also see his ability to scramble outside and make the throws, make big throws and even receive off of a Washington throw? This is promise and innovative play calling. Something the Browns do not have in the current coaching staff or either QB.

    Come on man, so he scrambled outside and made a throw. Did you also look at him staring down recievers. Really the Titans should be ashamed for not picking him off more than once. Listen, if Sanchez never becomes a star QB and just "serviceable", the Browns had every right to pass on him.

    This fan base is so desperate, they will believe in anything.

  • Unless you have the coaching and front office behind building a winner no one can help. Mark Sanchez would be a failure in this organization.

    @bestplayer52 said:

    Unless you have the coaching and front office behind building a winner no one can help. Mark Sanchez would be a failure in this organization.

    So would the Mannings, Brady, McNabb & just about every HOF'er in Canton.

  • Sam bradford is a senior.