Mike Waltz
-
????
-
????
Tim Walz should do the same, right Woody?
Him goin around saying he wants to beat up Trump supporters. Always gotta be about violence with you people.
-
Changed my mind on this after hearing the details about "taking the conversation on particulars to the high side" meaning secure comms.
Needs to fall on his sword and resign.
He would have to resign first lol,...wouldn't be able to resign after he fell on his sword.
-
Changed my mind on this after hearing the details about "taking the conversation on particulars to the high side" meaning secure comms.
Needs to fall on his sword and resign.
I haven't seen where it is proven to be true that Waltz actually did it -
I wonder if his account was hacked, or there was another leak using Waltz's account by
an IT insider or something. If it really was his mistake, it's so stupid it should be investigated. Maybe he was drinking.... ?
-
-
-
-
so, apparently, they know? who the Waltz staffer is, because she/he had Goldberg's number on their phone?
Fire the staffer, I think, unless it happened automatically if goldberg called the staffer.
Sure does sound like a set up.
Has the Staffer Who Put Jeffrey Goldberg on the Signal Chat Been Exposed?
-
"Fall on your sword" is an idiom meaning to take responsibility for a failure or mistake, often in a public manner, and to accept the consequences
Exactly. Most likely derived from the Japanese samurai ritual of harakiri as punishment for something.
He should resign and then fall on his sword.
-
so, apparently, they know? who the Waltz staffer is, because she/he had Goldberg's number on their phone?
Fire the staffer, I think, unless it happened automatically if goldberg called the staffer.
Sure does sound like a set up.
Has the Staffer Who Put Jeffrey Goldberg on the Signal Chat Been Exposed?
so, apparently, they know? who the Waltz staffer is, because she/he had Goldberg's number on their phone?
Fire the staffer, I think, unless it happened automatically if goldberg called the staffer.
Sure does sound like a set up.
Has the Staffer Who Put Jeffrey Goldberg on the Signal Chat Been Exposed?
Just listened to an interview from radio -goldberg was put on the spot to prove Hegseth wrong and release the rest of his source. He reluctantly went on avoiding the obvious reason, and IMO shown himself as another 2 bit journalist hack wanting to keep this "scandal " alive... Goldberg comes off as they all did or still do, absolutely no credibility.
-
so, apparently, they know? who the Waltz staffer is, because she/he had Goldberg's number on their phone?
Fire the staffer, I think, unless it happened automatically if goldberg called the staffer.
Sure does sound like a set up.
Has the Staffer Who Put Jeffrey Goldberg on the Signal Chat Been Exposed?
Just listened to an interview from radio -goldberg was put on the spot to prove Hegseth wrong and release the rest of his source. He reluctantly went on avoiding the obvious reason, and IMO shown himself as another 2 bit journalist hack wanting to keep this "scandal " alive... Goldberg comes off as they all did or still do, absolutely no credibility.
Just listened to an interview from radio -goldberg was put on the spot to prove Hegseth wrong and release the rest of his source. He reluctantly went on avoiding the obvious reason, and IMO shown himself as another 2 bit journalist hack wanting to keep this "scandal " alive... Goldberg comes off as they all did or still do, absolutely no credibility.
Which translates to one big nothing burger as usual...
-
so, apparently, they know? who the Waltz staffer is, because she/he had Goldberg's number on their phone?
Fire the staffer, I think, unless it happened automatically if goldberg called the staffer.
Sure does sound like a set up.
Has the Staffer Who Put Jeffrey Goldberg on the Signal Chat Been Exposed?
Just listened to an interview from radio -goldberg was put on the spot to prove Hegseth wrong and release the rest of his source. He reluctantly went on avoiding the obvious reason, and IMO shown himself as another 2 bit journalist hack wanting to keep this "scandal " alive... Goldberg comes off as they all did or still do, absolutely no credibility.
Just listened to an interview from radio -goldberg was put on the spot to prove Hegseth wrong and release the rest of his source. He reluctantly went on avoiding the obvious reason, and IMO shown himself as another 2 bit journalist hack wanting to keep this "scandal " alive... Goldberg comes off as they all did or still do, absolutely no credibility.
-
1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)”
“1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)”
“1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package)”
“1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier ‘Trigger Based’ targets)”
“1536 F-18 2nd Strike Starts – also, first sea-based Tomahawks launched.”
-
the information is so UNimportant, the strikes were extremely successful, no planes no lives were lost, and targets destroyed.
The Atlantic Releases Full Signal Message Chain, and It's Underwhelming
-
Ted Cruz Weighs In on 'Signalgate' With a Key Reminder
-
-
hackers got the info and put it online.
find them, arrest them.
Reporters say they found Waltz, Gabbard, Hegseth private contact info online
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login