Browns Sign Joe Flacco to a one year deal
-
With this news, I think there are two options I'd go with:
1. draft Hunter, but he may actually be taken by Tenn. at one, unless they also trade down.
2. Trade down. I'm not sold on taking Carter at 2 - it's a very strong Edge draft. So,
trade down a bit, and as much as I want them to draft Tyler Warren, I also want them to draft Josh Simmons, LT. I would love Warren at maybe ten, and trade back up into the first round and get Simmons, who may not be there in the second at all. With a trade down, we could pick up an extra third round pick - giving us three. Depending on what we could get in a trade down, maybe an extra pick next year, which would help the Browns trade up to get the qb they want.
Draft a qb with a third round pick, go defense the rest of the way.
I just don't know, it's complicated this year. lol
With this news, I think there are two options I'd go with:
1. draft Hunter, but he may actually be taken by Tenn. at one, unless they also trade down.
2. Trade down. I'm not sold on taking Carter at 2 - it's a very strong Edge draft. So,
trade down a bit, and as much as I want them to draft Tyler Warren, I also want them to draft Josh Simmons, LT. I would love Warren at maybe ten, and trade back up into the first round and get Simmons, who may not be there in the second at all. With a trade down, we could pick up an extra third round pick - giving us three. Depending on what we could get in a trade down, maybe an extra pick next year, which would help the Browns trade up to get the qb they want.
Draft a qb with a third round pick, go defense the rest of the way.
I just don't know, it's complicated this year. lol
Absolutely no way Hunter goes 1. If for some insane reason he does you take Ward at 2
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
I just see his dad making noise haha. A circus.
Sitting absolutely makes sense, just hardly happens these days
Certainly could be a circus because of sitting behind Flacco.
-
I think this is the best of the remaining veteran options. Cousins doesn't excite me at all, & Flacco is familiar with the coaching staff & players.
Let's ink Chubb by noon.
Cousins doesn't excite me at all
You know The Browns only paid Flacco 4 million, That is back up money and i believe a huge bluff directed towards the falcons (as in we are not gonna give you what you want for Cousins) so I would AssuMe that the price will come way down after the draft or even after the 1st round, So do not be surprised if Cousins is starting for us week 0ne
-
So it's looks like we're taking Travis Hunter at #2, but will we take a QB at #33?
Dart, Milroe, and Tyler Shough all visited the Browns this week. All three will need time to develop and will not be week 1 or first half of the season starters. Dart is probably gone by #33, so unless we trade up it would be Milroe or Shough?
I wouldn't mind - #2 Travis Hunter, #33 Dart/Milroe/Shough, #67 Quinshon Judkins - I would love to have Chubb back but we need some RB depth even if we re-sign him, he just may never be the same and we need a running game.
Flacco with Dart/Milroe/Shough developing behind him - WR1 Hunter, WR2 Jeudy, WR3 Tillman, TE Njoku, RB Chubb/Judkins/Ford with a hopefully revamped and healthy o-line.
-
Cousins doesn't excite me at all
You know The Browns only paid Flacco 4 million, That is back up money and i believe a huge bluff directed towards the falcons (as in we are not gonna give you what you want for Cousins) so I would AssuMe that the price will come way down after the draft or even after the 1st round, So do not be surprised if Cousins is starting for us week 0ne
You know The Browns only paid Flacco 4 million, That is back up money and i believe a huge bluff directed towards the falcons (as in we are not gonna give you what you want for Cousins) so I would AssuMe that the price will come way down after the draft or even after the 1st round, So do not be surprised if Cousins is starting for us week 0ne
Wouldn't they have to cut or trade either Pickett or Flacco if Cousins is brought in?
We know they can't cut DW due to cap purposes. He will most likely be on IR, so that doesn't count towards the 53 man roster.
Pickett, Flacco, unknown rookie ( we think). That's how I see it anyway.
-
You know The Browns only paid Flacco 4 million, That is back up money and i believe a huge bluff directed towards the falcons (as in we are not gonna give you what you want for Cousins) so I would AssuMe that the price will come way down after the draft or even after the 1st round, So do not be surprised if Cousins is starting for us week 0ne
Wouldn't they have to cut or trade either Pickett or Flacco if Cousins is brought in?
We know they can't cut DW due to cap purposes. He will most likely be on IR, so that doesn't count towards the 53 man roster.
Pickett, Flacco, unknown rookie ( we think). That's how I see it anyway.
Wouldn't they have to cut or trade either Pickett or Flacco if Cousins is brought in?
We know they can't cut DW due to cap purposes. He will most likely be on IR, so that doesn't count towards the 53 man roster.
Pickett, Flacco, unknown rookie ( we think). That's how I see it anyway.
we can carry 4
-
Wouldn't they have to cut or trade either Pickett or Flacco if Cousins is brought in?
We know they can't cut DW due to cap purposes. He will most likely be on IR, so that doesn't count towards the 53 man roster.
Pickett, Flacco, unknown rookie ( we think). That's how I see it anyway.
we can carry 4
-
Wouldn't they have to cut or trade either Pickett or Flacco if Cousins is brought in?
We know they can't cut DW due to cap purposes. He will most likely be on IR, so that doesn't count towards the 53 man roster.
Pickett, Flacco, unknown rookie ( we think). That's how I see it anyway.
we can carry 4
-
-
cut Flacco ? or pickett
Watson will be on a designation of some kind all year. So they can carry 3.
-
-
Sweet. Run it back.
Is this what excited Garrett? Lol.
I was thinking about this the other day ironically... "Why did Garrett sign back so willingly"... It can't be because of Flacco naturally.... There has to be a secret trade and sign deal set up with someone,,, It's about the only thing that makes it all make sense... ..
Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~ -
Hooray... Let the Arch Manning Sweepstakes begin!
Well with Flacco we just screwed ourselves out of the tanking run for Longhorn.??
-
Good signing. I was not happy when we let him go last year. I think we would have won several more games than we did if we had Flacco.
Whatever QB we draft can sit and learn from Joe instead of being thrown in as a rookie (hopefully).
Good signing. I was not happy when we let him go last year. I think we would have won several more games than we did if we had Flacco.
Whatever QB we draft can sit and learn from Joe instead of being thrown in as a rookie (hopefully).
McShay was running through a scenario today where the Browns draft Hunter at #2 and then trade up into the middle of the first to get his teammate Sanders.
That would be a bold move, Cotton.
-
Had best invest heavily in fixing the Oline and running game now. But it's nice to see old Joe.
-
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login