Skip to content

Unofficial 2025 Pre-Training Camp Roster & Depth Charts

The Browns Board
74 7 9.0k
  • We have more WRs than l thought we did. Obviously some will be camp fodder. I’m totally rooting for the Redhawk Cade McDonald. 

  • My biggest unknown for this year among the active players is Mike Hall, jr. a 2024 2nd rounder. Will he get quality playing time next to our new MG rookie? Those more familiar with his play at OSU can fill us in.

  • We have more WRs than l thought we did. Obviously some will be camp fodder. I’m totally rooting for the Redhawk Cade McDonald. 

    @ibleedbrown said:

    We have more WRs than l thought we did. Obviously some will be camp fodder. I’m totally rooting for the Redhawk Cade McDonald. 

    It's because we have 4 QB's to evaluate.  They had to bring in extra WR's because they are going to have extra 7 on 7 drills for QB evaluation.

  • One guy that I think could surprise a lot of people is former Oklahoma WR Michael Woods II.  He's just had trouble staying healthy.  Whenever he gets on the field - he makes plays.  Decent size at 6-1 and 204 lbs. If he gets caught - you never saw this...

  • My biggest unknown for this year among the active players is Mike Hall, jr. a 2024 2nd rounder. Will he get quality playing time next to our new MG rookie? Those more familiar with his play at OSU can fill us in.

    @texasag1969 said:

    My biggest unknown for this year among the active players is Mike Hall, jr. a 2024 2nd rounder. Will he get quality playing time next to our new MG rookie? Those more familiar with his play at OSU can fill us in.

    If he can stay out of trouble, he should see a lot of playing time I would think. 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    My biggest unknown for this year among the active players is Mike Hall, jr. a 2024 2nd rounder. Will he get quality playing time next to our new MG rookie? Those more familiar with his play at OSU can fill us in.

    If he can stay out of trouble, he should see a lot of playing time I would think. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    If he can stay out of trouble, he should see a lot of playing time I would think. 

    Hopefully, he's learned from that.  I'm more concerned with his knee injury at the end of the season that took place in 2025.  Not that I look to Mary Kay Yeahbut for my Browns news; but I tried to find something about it.

  • Now for some potential depth charts I'll cut and paste from other sites. Reader Beware: some of these less up-to-date than others  but they all include this year's draftees so it's not too bad.  For the ones that put Watson in there as starter with a Q after his name - WHY? Anyway take at these to start to get an idea where we're strong, vulnerable or somewhere in between:

    https://www.ourlads.com/nfldepthcharts/depthchart/CLE

    image.png.0066d2ebe097740bba2eaefb357db1a8.png

    image.png.1eeef83078eb4ad57b53b19f0639a0e9.png

    image.png.97c32a4d10f668eb4d95ffc4d46032f6.png

    image.png.7d94f43f3eeb912c4b803f508bf8fb2e.png

  • Here's another Depth Chart from ESPN

    https://www.espn.com/nfl/team/depth/_/name/cle

    image.png.8794f6c92e06f40c3ead24db4365c915.png

    image.png.2a7758df723aee70d9bddb0dee1bcba4.png

    image.png.b3e63055266682da52a8235c3b332c1c.png

  • @dutch-oven said:

    If he can stay out of trouble, he should see a lot of playing time I would think. 

    Hopefully, he's learned from that.  I'm more concerned with his knee injury at the end of the season that took place in 2025.  Not that I look to Mary Kay Yeahbut for my Browns news; but I tried to find something about it.

    @flugel said:

    Hopefully, he's learned from that.  I'm more concerned with his knee injury at the end of the season that took place in 2025.  Not that I look to Mary Kay Yeahbut for my Browns news; but I tried to find something about it.

    I see mary k celebrates christmas all year long

  • @flugel said:

    Here's a 3rd Depth Chart from another site:

    https://www.profootballnetwork.com/nfl/teams/cleveland-browns/depth-chart

    image.thumb.png.74337fefa94ae7ac0b7a7b65a9f79fc3.png

    image.thumb.png.8f6764081198abdd17af7b371170f3ae.png

    image.thumb.png.d8a00e2264941c02075582061ea9327d.png

    As hard as it is to get past this depth chart still listing Watson 1st at QB despite a torn + re-torn achilles tendon; this has some gutsy/interesting ideas for the 1st offense.  In particular, an undrafted and apparently well crafted rookie LT out of Illinois by the name of Julian Pearl. I also think 3rd year vet Michael Woods II will be quite productive as the WR3 whatever percentage of the time the Browns aren't running Double Tight with Njoku and Fannin. As someone that bellyached before, during and after the draft with great concern about a perceived lack of attention to our OT positions - it feels GREAT to exhale again folks. Let's take a quick look at the Fighting Illini addition:

    image.thumb.png.64fa1d8864797c632245c5f930204a65.png

    image.png.a65972725fcb2c19e6e5fb4a22e40abe.png

    image.png.c24b46c9dd6da5bb7a015d353e28ec33.png

    I think many of us are confident that DT Mason Graham, RB Quinshon Judkins and LB Carson Schwesinger will earn their way into the starting line-up even though the depth chart above penciled in veterans to begin the year as the starter.  I'm looking forward to watching it all unfold.

  • @flugel said:

    Here's a 3rd Depth Chart from another site:

    https://www.profootballnetwork.com/nfl/teams/cleveland-browns/depth-chart

    image.thumb.png.74337fefa94ae7ac0b7a7b65a9f79fc3.png

    image.thumb.png.8f6764081198abdd17af7b371170f3ae.png

    image.thumb.png.d8a00e2264941c02075582061ea9327d.png

    As hard as it is to get past this depth chart still listing Watson 1st at QB despite a torn + re-torn achilles tendon; this has some gutsy/interesting ideas for the 1st offense.  In particular, an undrafted and apparently well crafted rookie LT out of Illinois by the name of Julian Pearl. I also think 3rd year vet Michael Woods II will be quite productive as the WR3 whatever percentage of the time the Browns aren't running Double Tight with Njoku and Fannin. As someone that bellyached before, during and after the draft with great concern about a perceived lack of attention to our OT positions - it feels GREAT to exhale again folks. Let's take a quick look at the Fighting Illini addition:

    image.thumb.png.64fa1d8864797c632245c5f930204a65.png

    image.png.a65972725fcb2c19e6e5fb4a22e40abe.png

    image.png.c24b46c9dd6da5bb7a015d353e28ec33.png

    I think many of us are confident that DT Mason Graham, RB Quinshon Judkins and LB Carson Schwesinger will earn their way into the starting line-up even though the depth chart above penciled in veterans to begin the year as the starter.  I'm looking forward to watching it all unfold.

    @flugel said:

    As hard as it is to get past this depth chart still listing Watson 1st at QB despite a torn + re-torn achilles tendon; this has some gutsy/interesting ideas for the 1st offense.  In particular, an undrafted and apparently well crafted rookie LT out of Illinois by the name of Julian Pearl. I also think 3rd year vet Michael Woods II will be quite productive as the WR3 whatever percentage of the time the Browns aren't running Double Tight with Njoku and Fannin. As someone that bellyached before, during and after the draft with great concern about a perceived lack of attention to our OT positions - it feels GREAT to exhale again folks. Let's take a quick look at the Fighting Illini addition:

    image.thumb.png.64fa1d8864797c632245c5f930204a65.png

    image.png.a65972725fcb2c19e6e5fb4a22e40abe.png

    image.png.c24b46c9dd6da5bb7a015d353e28ec33.png

    I think many of us are confident that DT Mason Graham, RB Quinshon Judkins and LB Carson Schwesinger will earn their way into the starting line-up even though the depth chart above penciled in veterans to begin the year as the starter.  I'm looking forward to watching it all unfold.

    So, after the '24 draft he signed with the Ravens, but didn't survive roster cuts.  2 months later the Vikings signed him to their PS.  They released him a month later.  2 weeks after that, with our OL crumbling, we signed him to our PS.  And now, like last year, he's on a 90 man roster (ours).  NFL.com projected him as an average backup.  With the condition of our OL, that's probably good enough to make the team at this point.

  • @flugel said:

    As hard as it is to get past this depth chart still listing Watson 1st at QB despite a torn + re-torn achilles tendon; this has some gutsy/interesting ideas for the 1st offense.  In particular, an undrafted and apparently well crafted rookie LT out of Illinois by the name of Julian Pearl. I also think 3rd year vet Michael Woods II will be quite productive as the WR3 whatever percentage of the time the Browns aren't running Double Tight with Njoku and Fannin. As someone that bellyached before, during and after the draft with great concern about a perceived lack of attention to our OT positions - it feels GREAT to exhale again folks. Let's take a quick look at the Fighting Illini addition:

    image.thumb.png.64fa1d8864797c632245c5f930204a65.png

    image.png.a65972725fcb2c19e6e5fb4a22e40abe.png

    image.png.c24b46c9dd6da5bb7a015d353e28ec33.png

    I think many of us are confident that DT Mason Graham, RB Quinshon Judkins and LB Carson Schwesinger will earn their way into the starting line-up even though the depth chart above penciled in veterans to begin the year as the starter.  I'm looking forward to watching it all unfold.

    So, after the '24 draft he signed with the Ravens, but didn't survive roster cuts.  2 months later the Vikings signed him to their PS.  They released him a month later.  2 weeks after that, with our OL crumbling, we signed him to our PS.  And now, like last year, he's on a 90 man roster (ours).  NFL.com projected him as an average backup.  With the condition of our OL, that's probably good enough to make the team at this point.

    @orion said:

    So, after the '24 draft he signed with the Ravens, but didn't survive roster cuts.  2 months later the Vikings signed him to their PS.  They released him a month later.  2 weeks after that, with our OL crumbling, we signed him to our PS.  And now, like last year, he's on a 90 man roster (ours).  NFL.com projected him as an average backup.  With the condition of our OL, that's probably good enough to make the team at this point.

    First and foremost, thank you for posting this Orion.  Not once did I put together that 2023 being his senior year makes 2025 TWO years later; so there is THAT! 

    In spite of your points above, this can still become a positive here on a team that has had success with undrafted tackles such as Tony (T-Bone) Jones and Orlando Brown (Zeus).  Like ALL rookies last year that weren't drafted - his job was to get experience and find a niche.  The Ravens had a RB that rushed for 1925 yards behind a veteran OL last year while their QB was a finalist for MVP.  Meanwhile their starting LT Ronnie Stanley was a 1st round draft choice that has made 2 Pro Bowls so that not becoming his immediate niche is understandable.  Next, Minnesota lost their former 1st round draft pick and 4 year vet at LT Christian Darrisaw to IR late October.  That day 6 year vet David Quessenberry finished the game; and immediately thereafter the Vikings traded with the Jaguars for LT Cam Robinson. Like Baltimore, Minnesota was another team headed for the playoffs where they needed an experienced LT making it understandable why Minnesota wasn't the right place at the right time to be Pearl's niche.

    Maybe Pearl is just a dime a dozen kind of guy that isn't good enough; but the Browns just had history repeat itself with 2 Offensive Tackles ending on IR (1 a 1st round draft pick that never showed a passion for the opportunity the Browns gave him beyond the rookie year and the other that never cared about coming to training camp in shape). This is an opportunity for someone willing to bring a passion and work ethic that Wills and Jones didn't bring.  So here comes Pearl to the practice squad in December of 2024 with the Browns wanting him back here in 2025 ready for a bigger role at a position the Browns didn't address in the draft.  Ideally, you want a guy you selected in round 1 to be passionate enough to want a 2nd contract for; but Wills never brought the will.  The scary thing is Dawand Jones is the one that actually has 1st round talent; but he can't keep showing up to training camp weighing almost 400 lbs with a bad knee.  In the end, I hope Cleveland is Pearl's right place at the right time if Dawand Jones isn't interested. As I said about the last depth chart, this has some gutsy/interesting ideas for the 1st offense.  If that intuition about Pearl is wrong (very possible) - they did bring veteran OT Cornelius Lucas here.

  • @orion said:

    So, after the '24 draft he signed with the Ravens, but didn't survive roster cuts.  2 months later the Vikings signed him to their PS.  They released him a month later.  2 weeks after that, with our OL crumbling, we signed him to our PS.  And now, like last year, he's on a 90 man roster (ours).  NFL.com projected him as an average backup.  With the condition of our OL, that's probably good enough to make the team at this point.

    First and foremost, thank you for posting this Orion.  Not once did I put together that 2023 being his senior year makes 2025 TWO years later; so there is THAT! 

    In spite of your points above, this can still become a positive here on a team that has had success with undrafted tackles such as Tony (T-Bone) Jones and Orlando Brown (Zeus).  Like ALL rookies last year that weren't drafted - his job was to get experience and find a niche.  The Ravens had a RB that rushed for 1925 yards behind a veteran OL last year while their QB was a finalist for MVP.  Meanwhile their starting LT Ronnie Stanley was a 1st round draft choice that has made 2 Pro Bowls so that not becoming his immediate niche is understandable.  Next, Minnesota lost their former 1st round draft pick and 4 year vet at LT Christian Darrisaw to IR late October.  That day 6 year vet David Quessenberry finished the game; and immediately thereafter the Vikings traded with the Jaguars for LT Cam Robinson. Like Baltimore, Minnesota was another team headed for the playoffs where they needed an experienced LT making it understandable why Minnesota wasn't the right place at the right time to be Pearl's niche.

    Maybe Pearl is just a dime a dozen kind of guy that isn't good enough; but the Browns just had history repeat itself with 2 Offensive Tackles ending on IR (1 a 1st round draft pick that never showed a passion for the opportunity the Browns gave him beyond the rookie year and the other that never cared about coming to training camp in shape). This is an opportunity for someone willing to bring a passion and work ethic that Wills and Jones didn't bring.  So here comes Pearl to the practice squad in December of 2024 with the Browns wanting him back here in 2025 ready for a bigger role at a position the Browns didn't address in the draft.  Ideally, you want a guy you selected in round 1 to be passionate enough to want a 2nd contract for; but Wills never brought the will.  The scary thing is Dawand Jones is the one that actually has 1st round talent; but he can't keep showing up to training camp weighing almost 400 lbs with a bad knee.  In the end, I hope Cleveland is Pearl's right place at the right time if Dawand Jones isn't interested. As I said about the last depth chart, this has some gutsy/interesting ideas for the 1st offense.  If that intuition about Pearl is wrong (very possible) - they did bring veteran OT Cornelius Lucas here.

    @flugel said:

    Not once did I put together that 2023 being his senior year makes 2025 TWO years later

    ...he was a player that they had on their PS for the latter part of last season and obviously liked enough to get him into our offseason program.  I think projecting him as the starting LT is a bit of a stretch though. ( not you, the above depth chart )

  • Schwesinger and Graham could be Day One starters and pillars of the defense for the next decade if all goes according to plan.

    Hopefully, Schwesinger can replicate the production he had at UCLA, because his numbers were extraordinary

  • sydS syd

    Schwesinger and Graham could be Day One starters and pillars of the defense for the next decade if all goes according to plan.

    Hopefully, Schwesinger can replicate the production he had at UCLA, because his numbers were extraordinary

    @syd said:

    Schwesinger and Graham could be Day One starters and pillars of the defense for the next decade if all goes according to plan.

    Hopefully, Schwesinger can replicate the production he had at UCLA, because his numbers were extraordinary

    Indeed!  It's also conceivable Judkins and Fannin will get some reps with the 1st Offense in week one. It'll be interesting...

  • sydS syd

    Schwesinger and Graham could be Day One starters and pillars of the defense for the next decade if all goes according to plan.

    Hopefully, Schwesinger can replicate the production he had at UCLA, because his numbers were extraordinary

    @syd said:

    Schwesinger and Graham could be Day One starters and pillars

    Ya know, take away the two QB's from the draft and you're left with 5 players with the talent to have a positive impact from the get-go.  Fannin opens up that whole 2 TE thing that Stef loves so much.  

  • @syd said:

    Schwesinger and Graham could be Day One starters and pillars

    Ya know, take away the two QB's from the draft and you're left with 5 players with the talent to have a positive impact from the get-go.  Fannin opens up that whole 2 TE thing that Stef loves so much.  

    @orion said:

    Ya know, take away the two QB's from the draft and you're left with 5 players with the talent to have a positive impact from the get-go.  Fannin opens up that whole 2 TE thing that Stef loves so much.  

    I really, really like the five position players the Browns drafted, I agree, I think they all will contribute for years to come.

    Gabriel IMO was drafted too high, Sanders muddied up the QB position unnecessarily. 

  • @orion said:

    Ya know, take away the two QB's from the draft and you're left with 5 players with the talent to have a positive impact from the get-go.  Fannin opens up that whole 2 TE thing that Stef loves so much.  

    I really, really like the five position players the Browns drafted, I agree, I think they all will contribute for years to come.

    Gabriel IMO was drafted too high, Sanders muddied up the QB position unnecessarily. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    Sanders muddied up the QB position unnecessarily. 

    In order for that to be true, Sanders has to be a flop.  All we have to go on right now is that a Browns 'insider' said that Sanders was the best QB at rookie mini camp.

    edit:  Wk 14  Sanders leads Browns over Ward's Titans 30-17.  

  • @dutch-oven said:

    Sanders muddied up the QB position unnecessarily. 

    In order for that to be true, Sanders has to be a flop.  All we have to go on right now is that a Browns 'insider' said that Sanders was the best QB at rookie mini camp.

    edit:  Wk 14  Sanders leads Browns over Ward's Titans 30-17.  

    @orion said:

    In order for that to be true, Sanders has to be a flop.  All we have to go on right now is that a Browns 'insider' said that Sanders was the best QB at rookie mini camp.

    edit:  Wk 14  Sanders leads Browns over Ward's Titans 30-17.  

    He apparently beat out a guy in Gabriel that probably got drafted 2 or 3 rounds too soon. 

    I would definitely expect Sanders to beat him out.