PBS
-
i do not remember a Cleveland PBS station broadcasting locally before 1972,
that includes the couple UHF/ VHF stations as well, am I wrong?
-
i do not remember a Cleveland PBS station broadcasting locally before 1972,
that includes the couple UHF/ VHF stations as well, am I wrong?
i do not remember a Cleveland PBS station broadcasting locally before 1972,
that includes the couple UHF/ VHF stations as well, am I wrong?
No , That sounds right to me...
-
Radio too. And online. It’s a literal media empire with a few hundred stations.
I get that it means little to you, but that’s a powerful thing to have at your disposal if you are a literal government.
Where is your disconnect with the indoctrination part? You just stated you know how powerful a tool it can be, now finish it off because your gov't was abusing it.
Where is your disconnect with the indoctrination part? You just stated you know how powerful a tool it can be, now finish it off because your gov't was abusing it.
I suppose the disconnect is that whatever this indoctrination is that you’re so concerned over is due to some of its programming, and the programming can change. The Trump team was already exerting influence to do that.
What kind of indoctrination is happening on Antiques Roadshow? Indoctrinating people in to the value of antiques? Is that a big concern for you?
-
"here's a sad story about one in 14 million illegals, so we should let all of them stay"
"here's one show that isn't leftwing political, so we should ignore all the leftwing slants when it counts with so many other shows on pbs because I love Big Bird" and the Cookie Monster."
********************
oh, my.....
-
"here's a sad story about one in 14 million illegals, so we should let all of them stay"
"here's one show that isn't leftwing political, so we should ignore all the leftwing slants when it counts with so many other shows on pbs because I love Big Bird" and the Cookie Monster."
********************
oh, my.....
"here's a sad story about one in 14 million illegals, so we should let all of them stay"
"here's one show that isn't leftwing political, so we should ignore all the leftwing slants when it counts with so many other shows on pbs because I love Big Bird" and the Cookie Monster."
********************
oh, my.....
Who is your favorite Sesame Street character? I’m going with Oscar.
-
Meanwhile....
https://www.foxnews.com/media/npr-whistleblower-says-embrace-fringe-progressivism-led-defunding
NPR whistleblower says embrace of 'fringe progressivism' led to defunding
Uri Berliner resigned from NPR last year after calling out outlet's liberal lean
-
As of this reporting, Sesame Street has not directly responded to the criticism but continues to stand by its message of creating a welcoming environment for all families. Sources: Sesame Street faces backlash over Pride Month message Sesame Street faces backlash after issuing celebratory Pride Month post: 'Woke
-
featuredheadlines.com
Jul 10, 2025WOKE Shift? Kids Show Sparks Nationwide Outrage Sesame Street ignites a firestorm among parents as its Pride Month celebration featuring puppet characters arranged as a rainbow flag fuels accusations of "grooming" children with sexual and political content. Key Takeaways -
"Sesame Street" has "gone full-on woke" teaching kids how to "dismantle racism" in its new program, "The ABC's of Racial Literacy," nationally syndicated radio host Todd Starnes said Wednesday.
-
Apr 18, 2025Both NPR and PBS have abandoned any pretense of neutrality or balance, regularly pushing left-wing ideology and woke sensibilities in their news coverage and other programming.
-
NPR CEO Foolishly Asks for Examples of Bias, Gets Hit with Dozens of Jaw-Dropping Times They Went All in for LibsJust a couple examples:
-
I’m a little disappointed in us right now. I’m aware this is probably an unpopular opinion, but l’m a fan of PBS.
I’m a literal sponsor of PBS. That has more to do with the program “antiques roadshow” than anything political.
I’m also aware that the programming for NPR had grown left leaning, and it upsets me that instead of reforming they instead decided to cut its funding.
I grew up with Sesame Street. I think a lot of us did. I’m upset with our lack of effort here. The Trump team got what they wanted earlier by skewering the CEO on PBS but they didn’t allow time to see the results.
This is a bad thing for America. It forces PBS to seek revenue from other outlets, which means they have no choice but to open themselves up to outside influences. Adapt or die.
My concern is that they’ll be able to find those outlets and it won’t be in our best interests.
Think about it. Who has the money to lift up PBS? Bezos? Musk? Zuckerberg? Some Saudi Arabian prince?
They have all basically been invited to buy a major news outlet because we didn’t have the stones to even try to reform it.
I’m a little disappointed in us right now. I’m aware this is probably an unpopular opinion, but l’m a fan of PBS.
I’m a literal sponsor of PBS. That has more to do with the program “antiques roadshow” than anything political.
I’m also aware that the programming for NPR had grown left leaning, and it upsets me that instead of reforming they instead decided to cut its funding.
I grew up with Sesame Street. I think a lot of us did. I’m upset with our lack of effort here. The Trump team got what they wanted earlier by skewering the CEO on PBS but they didn’t allow time to see the results.
This is a bad thing for America. It forces PBS to seek revenue from other outlets, which means they have no choice but to open themselves up to outside influences. Adapt or die.
My concern is that they’ll be able to find those outlets and it won’t be in our best interests.
Think about it. Who has the money to lift up PBS? Bezos? Musk? Zuckerberg? Some Saudi Arabian prince?
They have all basically been invited to buy a major news outlet because we didn’t have the stones to even try to reform it.
I disagree completely. I would be on your side if it was still a show where kids were singing about tadpoles in a river and learning phonics, grammar, and counting. But instead, it somehow progressed to this.
Encouraging kids to be the guinea pigs for a vaccine that they never needed is morally indefensible. PBS met the fate it deserved.
-
I’m a little disappointed in us right now. I’m aware this is probably an unpopular opinion, but l’m a fan of PBS.
I’m a literal sponsor of PBS. That has more to do with the program “antiques roadshow” than anything political.
I’m also aware that the programming for NPR had grown left leaning, and it upsets me that instead of reforming they instead decided to cut its funding.
I grew up with Sesame Street. I think a lot of us did. I’m upset with our lack of effort here. The Trump team got what they wanted earlier by skewering the CEO on PBS but they didn’t allow time to see the results.
This is a bad thing for America. It forces PBS to seek revenue from other outlets, which means they have no choice but to open themselves up to outside influences. Adapt or die.
My concern is that they’ll be able to find those outlets and it won’t be in our best interests.
Think about it. Who has the money to lift up PBS? Bezos? Musk? Zuckerberg? Some Saudi Arabian prince?
They have all basically been invited to buy a major news outlet because we didn’t have the stones to even try to reform it.
I disagree completely. I would be on your side if it was still a show where kids were singing about tadpoles in a river and learning phonics, grammar, and counting. But instead, it somehow progressed to this.
Encouraging kids to be the guinea pigs for a vaccine that they never needed is morally indefensible. PBS met the fate it deserved.
I disagree completely. I would be on your side if it was still a show where kids were singing about tadpoles in a river and learning phonics, grammar, and counting. But instead, it somehow progressed to this.
Encouraging kids to be the guinea pigs for a vaccine that they never needed is morally indefensible. PBS met the fate it deserved.
I hear the concerns over its programming, l really do. That programming evolved over time and it can evolve again.
I can’t say it anymore clearly than this: if you invest in something and build it up from nothing for 50+ years, normal people don’t just walk away from that. They change it or they sell it. Bottom line is they get something out of that 50+ year investment.
I guess with it being “publicly owned” they can’t really sell it, so reformatting it would be the only real option if you’re going to keep your hooks in your investment.
But instead we simply let it go and created a media empire for anyone else who wants one.
It’ll be fine l figure, but it’s liable to devolve into something you dislike even more. Cue the anonymous Chinese investors.
-
-
I disagree completely. I would be on your side if it was still a show where kids were singing about tadpoles in a river and learning phonics, grammar, and counting. But instead, it somehow progressed to this.
Encouraging kids to be the guinea pigs for a vaccine that they never needed is morally indefensible. PBS met the fate it deserved.
I hear the concerns over its programming, l really do. That programming evolved over time and it can evolve again.
I can’t say it anymore clearly than this: if you invest in something and build it up from nothing for 50+ years, normal people don’t just walk away from that. They change it or they sell it. Bottom line is they get something out of that 50+ year investment.
I guess with it being “publicly owned” they can’t really sell it, so reformatting it would be the only real option if you’re going to keep your hooks in your investment.
But instead we simply let it go and created a media empire for anyone else who wants one.
It’ll be fine l figure, but it’s liable to devolve into something you dislike even more. Cue the anonymous Chinese investors.
I can’t say it anymore clearly than this: if you invest in something and build it up from nothing for 50+ years, normal people don’t just walk away from that. They change it or they sell it. Bottom line is they get something out of that 50+ year investment.
I guess with it being “publicly owned” they can’t really sell it, so reformatting it would be the only real option if you’re going to keep your hooks in your investment.
Sunk cost fallacy. If I could bring myself to let go of the Browns like I did PBS and NPR, I'd probably be a much happier person on Sundays.
-
I’m a little disappointed in us right now. I’m aware this is probably an unpopular opinion, but l’m a fan of PBS.
I’m a literal sponsor of PBS. That has more to do with the program “antiques roadshow” than anything political.
I’m also aware that the programming for NPR had grown left leaning, and it upsets me that instead of reforming they instead decided to cut its funding.
I grew up with Sesame Street. I think a lot of us did. I’m upset with our lack of effort here. The Trump team got what they wanted earlier by skewering the CEO on PBS but they didn’t allow time to see the results.
This is a bad thing for America. It forces PBS to seek revenue from other outlets, which means they have no choice but to open themselves up to outside influences. Adapt or die.
My concern is that they’ll be able to find those outlets and it won’t be in our best interests.
Think about it. Who has the money to lift up PBS? Bezos? Musk? Zuckerberg? Some Saudi Arabian prince?
They have all basically been invited to buy a major news outlet because we didn’t have the stones to even try to reform it.
I disagree completely. I would be on your side if it was still a show where kids were singing about tadpoles in a river and learning phonics, grammar, and counting. But instead, it somehow progressed to this.
Encouraging kids to be the guinea pigs for a vaccine that they never needed is morally indefensible. PBS met the fate it deserved.
I disagree completely. I would be on your side if it was still a show where kids were singing about tadpoles in a river and learning phonics, grammar, and counting. But instead, it somehow progressed to this
And about how things are made, like paper.
-
i do not remember a Cleveland PBS station broadcasting locally before 1972,
that includes the couple UHF/ VHF stations as well, am I wrong?
i do not remember a Cleveland PBS station broadcasting locally before 1972,
that includes the couple UHF/ VHF stations as well, am I wrong?
WVIZ started broadcasting in 1965.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login