This is the "democrat party" - obsessed with lies, manipulation and corruption
-
The dem party is now a total loss. It doesn't even exist any more.
DC police accused of changing crime stats just weeks before Trump federalized city
Claims of changing crime data within the department are currently under investigation
-
-
This is textbook grassroots laundering: elite money rerouted through branding-friendly political vehicles to simulate popular support while concealing the source.
Zohran Mamdani’s “grassroots revolution” was a lie. Campaign finance records reveal his supposedly working-class movement was actually powered by a $2 million elite PAC operation funded by Silicon Valley billionaires, Hollywood celebrities, and out-of-state tech entrepreneurs—spending more than his entire direct campaign raised from actual voters.
The deception becomes even more stark when examined against Mamdani’s recent public statements. Just days after winning the Democratic primary, Mamdani told NBC that “I don’t think that we should have billionaires,” claiming such wealth concentration represents “so much money in a moment of such inequality.” Yet his own political rise was powered by the very billionaire class he publicly condemns—including Silicon Valley “godfather” Ronald Conway, GitHub co-founder Tom Preston-Werner, and Hollywood elite like Steven Spielberg.
Behind the Working Families Party National PAC’s $762,068.60 operation lies a funding structure that contradicts every aspect of Mamdani’s grassroots messaging. The largest single contribution came on June 13, 2025, when Leaders We Deserve PAC transferred exactly $300,000—accounting for over 39% of the PAC’s entire war chest.
Leaders We Deserve PAC’s spending patterns reveal a sophisticated consultant enrichment operation. According to independent analysis by Charles Gaba, founder of Blue24.org, which reviewed FEC filings, the PAC raised nearly $11.9 million during the 2023–2024 cycle but spent only 28% on Democratic candidates and committees, with just 19% going directly to candidates. Independent verification through OpenSecrets confirms these figures, showing 72% of funds flowed to consultants rather than supporting actual candidates.
This violates established industry standards. According to a joint 2021 report by Campaign Legal Center and Issue One, effective political fundraising operations typically spend 70% on politics rather than overhead. Their research shows that PACs spending less than 50% on political activities are considered problematic, while those spending less than 25% are flagged as highly problematic. Leaders We Deserve PAC—spending only 28% on candidates—falls well below even the “highly problematic” threshold established by these leading campaign finance watchdogs.
Expert consensus indicates that 70%+ overhead rates significantly exceed the worst documented cases and would likely trigger regulatory scrutiny if investigated.
Charles Gaba, writing for Blue24, concluded: “The biggest takeaway is that only 28% of what they raised actually went to Democratic candidates, party committees or other PACs. This is actually in line with the other PACs I’ve analyzed…which is kind of the problem.” Leaders We Deserve PAC was funded by elite donors including Phoebe Gates (daughter of Bill Gates) who contributed $75,000, Steven Spielberg & Kate Capshaw who gave $25,000, and Ronald Conway, the Silicon Valley “godfather” who invested early in Google and Facebook, contributing $300,000.
The contradiction becomes stark when you trace the money flow: while Mamdani built his campaign around rejecting elite influence, his largest PAC support came from a group that spent only 19% of its war chest on actual candidates and over $8.6 million enriching consultants. This is textbook grassroots laundering: elite money rerouted through branding-friendly political vehicles to simulate popular support while concealing the source.
Beyond the consultant-enriched funding pipeline, WFP National PAC received additional funding that reinforces the elite nature of the operation. Celebrity donors included Ben Cohen (Ben & Jerry’s co-founder) who contributed $10,000, Cynthia Nixon who contributed $10,000, Susan Sarandon who contributed $6,000, and Morgan Spector (actor) who contributed $5,000.
The PAC also received substantial contributions from out-of-state organizations: Clean and Prosperous America (Tumwater, WA) contributed $25,000 and Emgage Federal PAC (Florida-based) contributed $25,000. New York-based organizations also provided significant funding, including Alliance For Quality Education (Albany, NY) which contributed $17,000.
High-dollar individual contributors included Nancy Goroff with $25,000, Maggie Williams with $30,000, and Hazel Hutchins with $24,000, demonstrating the concentration of wealthy donors supporting the operation.
Adding to questions about organizational independence, Working Families Party PAC contributed $100,000 to WFP National PAC, creating a direct pipeline from one WFP entity to another. While technically separate entities, both PACs share overlapping personnel, donors, and branding—raising the legal question of whether their coordination complies with New York City’s independent expenditure rules.
According to NYC Campaign Finance Board filings, WFP National PAC is led by Joe Dinkin, who also serves as National Deputy Director of the Working Families Party, while its treasurer is Mike Boland, who holds the position of Chief of Staff to the national Working Families Party. The PAC’s mission statement explicitly states it exists “to support candidates endorsed by the Working Families Party,” and its spending reflects this alignment: every dollar in direct support went to candidates on the WFP’s official 2025 ranked-choice endorsement slate, while nearly $540,000 was spent attacking Andrew Cuomo—the only major candidate not endorsed by WFP.
This organizational structure raises questions about whether such institutional alignment complies with NYC Campaign Finance Rule § 5-03(e), which requires independence between campaigns and expenditure committees. The systematic coordination between party endorsements and PAC spending patterns suggests the independence may be more structural than operational.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login