Skip to content

Time for Hawaii 5-9 to start!!

The Browns Board
71 18 1.2k 1
  • @orion said:

    image.thumb.png.bbc5da6da671dcc66b17d49378ec4bb3.png

    Kosar says, If you want to screw up another QB, then go ahead and play him now.

    I say, either at Pittsburgh, or more probably at home against Miami.

    Supposedly, the players like Flacco and don't want him pulled until it has to be done.  

    It's not 1985 any more; but Kosar played in 12 of 16 games and started 10 of them.  That year, the Browns went 8-8 which was good enough for 1st place in the AFC Central.  It also gave him the experience volume necessary for a 12-4 record to follow the next year under new OC - Lindy Infante. Aside from that, Kosar only started 2 years at the college level in comparison with Gabriel starting for 6 years in the blend of 3 different college programs at UCF, Oklahoma and Oregon.  Bo Nix is also a guy with a blended wealth of starting experience at 2 different college football programs that shortened the length of growing pains. 

    Just a few question in pertinence to the here and now.  Has Gabriel seen Joe Flacco hold onto the ball too long?; Has he seen Joe Flacco make bad decisions?;  Has he seen Joe Flacco playing like a lost rookie QB as recently as start #4 this season?; Has he seen the disaster on the edges of our pass pro better than Flacco did?  Okay, so Joe showed him how not to play QB.  

    He's not gonna get his growing pains until he plays the position where they are inevitable.  For example, Troy Aikman had one of the worst rookie years ever before he QB'd the Cowboys to 3 Super Bowl wins during his HOF career that unfolded. Yes, silly fans in Dallas were complaining Steve Walsh was their best QB at Aikman's very 1st incompletion.  Some of those knuckleheads probably even though Joe Walsh in another entertainment industry would be a better QB. It's the nature of the beast.  That said, I think we're also seeing the beginning of a new trend of successful young QBs that played in 2-3 different college football programs like Jayden Daniels, Bo Nix & even Jalen Hurts.  Come to think of it, Baker had a pretty good rookie season after playing at 2 different college programs (Texas Tech & Oklahoma).  

    @flugel said:

    but Kosar played in 12 of 16 games and started 10 of them.  That year

    Kosar had a great running game to take pressure away from the passing gamer.  Gabriel does not have that.  Perhaps the new LT helps...but he may not even play this weekend as he only just arrived on the scene.  Plus, they have to fly to Europe, which eats into practice time.  But it's not like he was a 1st round pick.  He was really drafted to be the backup QB of the future.  He's got a lot of college experience, so, go ahead and throw him in there.  What have you really got to lose by throwing him into a poor offensive side of the ball?  If he gets psychologically ruined as Kosar predicts, what have you really lost?  

  • @flugel said:

    but Kosar played in 12 of 16 games and started 10 of them.  That year

    Kosar had a great running game to take pressure away from the passing gamer.  Gabriel does not have that.  Perhaps the new LT helps...but he may not even play this weekend as he only just arrived on the scene.  Plus, they have to fly to Europe, which eats into practice time.  But it's not like he was a 1st round pick.  He was really drafted to be the backup QB of the future.  He's got a lot of college experience, so, go ahead and throw him in there.  What have you really got to lose by throwing him into a poor offensive side of the ball?  If he gets psychologically ruined as Kosar predicts, what have you really lost?  

    @orion said:

    Kosar had a great running game to take pressure away from the passing gamer.  Gabriel does not have that.  Perhaps the new LT helps...but he may not even play this weekend as he only just arrived on the scene.  Plus, they have to fly to Europe, which eats into practice time.  But it's not like he was a 1st round pick.  He was really drafted to be the backup QB of the future.  He's got a lot of college experience, so, go ahead and throw him in there.  What have you really got to lose by throwing him into a poor offensive side of the ball?  If he gets psychologically ruined as Kosar predicts, what have you really lost?  

    A top 100 pick in draft capital and longterm quality backup. 

  • I'm not sure why anyone has negative musings about this happening.

    Joe was actively losing games for this team- it's time to see if the Browns need to draft a QB in '26 or not. This isn't rushing in a rookie because of pressure, it's objectively benching a bad football player. Never, ever going to be a 'perfect' time to start a rookie QB. 

  • Joe gave the team zero incentive to keep fielding him. On film review he had happy feet and was not seeing the field or reading the defense properly just like a rookie with the disadvantage of being immobile. The kicker is Shadeur is still QB3. 

  • @flugel said:

    but Kosar played in 12 of 16 games and started 10 of them.  That year

    Kosar had a great running game to take pressure away from the passing gamer.  Gabriel does not have that.  Perhaps the new LT helps...but he may not even play this weekend as he only just arrived on the scene.  Plus, they have to fly to Europe, which eats into practice time.  But it's not like he was a 1st round pick.  He was really drafted to be the backup QB of the future.  He's got a lot of college experience, so, go ahead and throw him in there.  What have you really got to lose by throwing him into a poor offensive side of the ball?  If he gets psychologically ruined as Kosar predicts, what have you really lost?  

    @orion said:

    Kosar had a great running game to take pressure away from the passing gamer.  Gabriel does not have that.  Perhaps the new LT helps...but he may not even play this weekend as he only just arrived on the scene.  Plus, they have to fly to Europe, which eats into practice time.  But it's not like he was a 1st round pick.  He was really drafted to be the backup QB of the future.  He's got a lot of college experience, so, go ahead and throw him in there.  What have you really got to lose by throwing him into a poor offensive side of the ball?  If he gets psychologically ruined as Kosar predicts, what have you really lost?  

    This could be a good conversation (whether you agree with what I'm saying or not) if you can get past Bernie's 1985 mentality for QBs being drafted today in 2024 & 2025 and read what I was showing you about Jayden Daniels and Bo Nix. If learning from a stale veteran was beneficial - don't you think a SB Champion Coach like Sean Payton would have kept Russell Wilson in Denver for another year so Bo Nix could learn from him? No, Wilson went on to get stale in Pittsburgh last year before he remained stale for the Giants this year.  Jaxson Dart didn't even need great stats to give that offense a spark. Again, Bernie only had 2 years of experience starting in college so that is a big part of why he said he wished he could have had a little longer to watch a starting NFL QB go through a week of game preparation longer than he had.  The reason that all got expedited was also because Danielson got injured.

    Anyway, your point about the running game helped Bernie is true - so I'm relieved to see the spark our 220 lb rookie RB Judkins has given this running game. He's actually a blend of Mack & Byner with a little more quickness/footspeed.  Byner ran a 4.65 coming out of East Carolina which is why Byner was a 10th round pick. I shared Judkins' stats (below) despite no training camp or preseason games to warm up with.  We can agree he provides the strongest prong of attack as a rookie. If this team has aspirations to use use a 1st round pick on a QB just 1 year after it drafted not 1 but 2 QBs - I'd at least like to see what 1 or both has before we race to conclusions that next year's QB class has the football savior just waiting on our 1st round door step.  Or, we can keep the offense parked with Flacco on a team that's already lost confidence in him.  While Flacco still has a strong arm - his processer isn't keeping up with the speed of the game and/or this FO's lack of commitment to excellence at OT on the edges lacking pass pro. The Deer in headlights hasn't gone away anytime it isn't a timing pattern of just plant and throw to a specified area from a specified drop.  The deep passes from a rollout are also timing patterns following similar criteria.  

    image.png.5be7c96fe89e2ca69883769afbe48c86.png

  • We have a bad “picker” when it comes to the QB position.  It would behoove us to work from a spot with as much information as possible for making personnel decisions next season.  Although 1. This front office and coaching staff have their @sses on the line they are thinking here and now 2. Regardless of the Gabriel selection I believe around April 2025 we were in the market for a QB at the top of the draft in 2026. If we weren’t we would have operated in the Browns fashion moved way up well before where he was selected and taken “our” qb  

  • @orion said:

    Kosar had a great running game to take pressure away from the passing gamer.  Gabriel does not have that.  Perhaps the new LT helps...but he may not even play this weekend as he only just arrived on the scene.  Plus, they have to fly to Europe, which eats into practice time.  But it's not like he was a 1st round pick.  He was really drafted to be the backup QB of the future.  He's got a lot of college experience, so, go ahead and throw him in there.  What have you really got to lose by throwing him into a poor offensive side of the ball?  If he gets psychologically ruined as Kosar predicts, what have you really lost?  

    This could be a good conversation (whether you agree with what I'm saying or not) if you can get past Bernie's 1985 mentality for QBs being drafted today in 2024 & 2025 and read what I was showing you about Jayden Daniels and Bo Nix. If learning from a stale veteran was beneficial - don't you think a SB Champion Coach like Sean Payton would have kept Russell Wilson in Denver for another year so Bo Nix could learn from him? No, Wilson went on to get stale in Pittsburgh last year before he remained stale for the Giants this year.  Jaxson Dart didn't even need great stats to give that offense a spark. Again, Bernie only had 2 years of experience starting in college so that is a big part of why he said he wished he could have had a little longer to watch a starting NFL QB go through a week of game preparation longer than he had.  The reason that all got expedited was also because Danielson got injured.

    Anyway, your point about the running game helped Bernie is true - so I'm relieved to see the spark our 220 lb rookie RB Judkins has given this running game. He's actually a blend of Mack & Byner with a little more quickness/footspeed.  Byner ran a 4.65 coming out of East Carolina which is why Byner was a 10th round pick. I shared Judkins' stats (below) despite no training camp or preseason games to warm up with.  We can agree he provides the strongest prong of attack as a rookie. If this team has aspirations to use use a 1st round pick on a QB just 1 year after it drafted not 1 but 2 QBs - I'd at least like to see what 1 or both has before we race to conclusions that next year's QB class has the football savior just waiting on our 1st round door step.  Or, we can keep the offense parked with Flacco on a team that's already lost confidence in him.  While Flacco still has a strong arm - his processer isn't keeping up with the speed of the game and/or this FO's lack of commitment to excellence at OT on the edges lacking pass pro. The Deer in headlights hasn't gone away anytime it isn't a timing pattern of just plant and throw to a specified area from a specified drop.  The deep passes from a rollout are also timing patterns following similar criteria.  

    image.png.5be7c96fe89e2ca69883769afbe48c86.png

    @flugel said:

    whether you agree with what I'm saying or not

    🙂  

    Judkins is a RB.  There's really no reason a RB can't come out of college and be inserted as the starting RB in the NFL.   I don't mean to sound mentally negative to the position...but...it's not rocket science.  - when I give you the ball, you run between those 2 guys -   But I was one that was concerned by playing Judkins in game one because he missed everything...TC, PreSeason...he didn't even show up until Wednesday of game week.  I was concerned about pulled muscles and such from not getting into 'game shape'.    I'm quite happy that he's been ok!

    I agree that Flacco has not been good (I posted a graphic depicting so), happy feet, and all that.  But why does the savvy veteran have happy feet?  (rhetorical, we know the answer)  If this was our rookie 1st round pick, QB of the future, waiting in the wings, I'd really prefer waiting until the home game against Miami.  But we're talking about a 3rd round pick smurf (sorry Mr. Gabriel, don't take it personal 🙂 ).  So I don't, as much, give a $#!+.   I've seen Sanders in the final preseason game against the Rams...running around, going backwards, holding the ball away from his body in the process.  He's got a lot to learn...despite him thinking that he's ready to start.  

    With Gabriel having such a long college career, perhaps he's as ready as he's ever going to be.  Only the coaches know if they feel that way or not.  I truly wish the smurf well. 🙂 

  • Well at least he gets two WRs off the PS that's he's familiar with, Corley and Larvadain.

  • @flugel said:

    whether you agree with what I'm saying or not

    🙂  

    Judkins is a RB.  There's really no reason a RB can't come out of college and be inserted as the starting RB in the NFL.   I don't mean to sound mentally negative to the position...but...it's not rocket science.  - when I give you the ball, you run between those 2 guys -   But I was one that was concerned by playing Judkins in game one because he missed everything...TC, PreSeason...he didn't even show up until Wednesday of game week.  I was concerned about pulled muscles and such from not getting into 'game shape'.    I'm quite happy that he's been ok!

    I agree that Flacco has not been good (I posted a graphic depicting so), happy feet, and all that.  But why does the savvy veteran have happy feet?  (rhetorical, we know the answer)  If this was our rookie 1st round pick, QB of the future, waiting in the wings, I'd really prefer waiting until the home game against Miami.  But we're talking about a 3rd round pick smurf (sorry Mr. Gabriel, don't take it personal 🙂 ).  So I don't, as much, give a $#!+.   I've seen Sanders in the final preseason game against the Rams...running around, going backwards, holding the ball away from his body in the process.  He's got a lot to learn...despite him thinking that he's ready to start.  

    With Gabriel having such a long college career, perhaps he's as ready as he's ever going to be.  Only the coaches know if they feel that way or not.  I truly wish the smurf well. 🙂 

    @orion said:

    🙂  

    Judkins is a RB.  There's really no reason a RB can't come out of college and be inserted as the starting RB in the NFL.   I don't mean to sound mentally negative to the position...but...it's not rocket science.  - when I give you the ball, you run between those 2 guys -   But I was one that was concerned by playing Judkins in game one because he missed everything...TC, PreSeason...he didn't even show up until Wednesday of game week.  I was concerned about pulled muscles and such from not getting into 'game shape'.    I'm quite happy that he's been ok!

    I agree that Flacco has not been good (I posted a graphic depicting so), happy feet, and all that.  But why does the savvy veteran have happy feet?  (rhetorical, we know the answer)  If this was our rookie 1st round pick, QB of the future, waiting in the wings, I'd really prefer waiting until the home game against Miami.  But we're talking about a 3rd round pick smurf (sorry Mr. Gabriel, don't take it personal 🙂 ).  So I don't, as much, give a $#!+.   I've seen Sanders in the final preseason game against the Rams...running around, going backwards, holding the ball away from his body in the process.  He's got a lot to learn...despite him thinking that he's ready to start.  

    With Gabriel having such a long college career, perhaps he's as ready as he's ever going to be.  Only the coaches know if they feel that way or not.  I truly wish the smurf well. 🙂 

     My last experience playing RB was as a slot/option back my senior year of high school.   Its been a minute...

     That said, blocking up front doesnt go completely as scheduled quite a bit.  You don't always get clean leads and holes, RBs have to read as much as anyone on the field not playing QB. 

     There's a reason lesser athletes excel at RB while great athletes can struggle - the mentals and the subtle nuances to the position. 

     You are right, it's the position most commonly where rookies can get snaps.  

     But just saying "hold the rock, run here" is something of a massive stretch. 

  • Yep.

    Gabriel named starter.

    Have to give the Browns credit. Mostly, the offensive coordinator had to 

    have a serious talk with Stupanski.

    https://www.foxnews.com/sports/browns-name-dillon-gabriel-starting-quarterback-week-5

    Browns name Dillon Gabriel starting quarterback for Week 5

    Shedeur Sanders will still be on the bench

  • @orion said:

    🙂  

    Judkins is a RB.  There's really no reason a RB can't come out of college and be inserted as the starting RB in the NFL.   I don't mean to sound mentally negative to the position...but...it's not rocket science.  - when I give you the ball, you run between those 2 guys -   But I was one that was concerned by playing Judkins in game one because he missed everything...TC, PreSeason...he didn't even show up until Wednesday of game week.  I was concerned about pulled muscles and such from not getting into 'game shape'.    I'm quite happy that he's been ok!

    I agree that Flacco has not been good (I posted a graphic depicting so), happy feet, and all that.  But why does the savvy veteran have happy feet?  (rhetorical, we know the answer)  If this was our rookie 1st round pick, QB of the future, waiting in the wings, I'd really prefer waiting until the home game against Miami.  But we're talking about a 3rd round pick smurf (sorry Mr. Gabriel, don't take it personal 🙂 ).  So I don't, as much, give a $#!+.   I've seen Sanders in the final preseason game against the Rams...running around, going backwards, holding the ball away from his body in the process.  He's got a lot to learn...despite him thinking that he's ready to start.  

    With Gabriel having such a long college career, perhaps he's as ready as he's ever going to be.  Only the coaches know if they feel that way or not.  I truly wish the smurf well. 🙂 

     My last experience playing RB was as a slot/option back my senior year of high school.   Its been a minute...

     That said, blocking up front doesnt go completely as scheduled quite a bit.  You don't always get clean leads and holes, RBs have to read as much as anyone on the field not playing QB. 

     There's a reason lesser athletes excel at RB while great athletes can struggle - the mentals and the subtle nuances to the position. 

     You are right, it's the position most commonly where rookies can get snaps.  

     But just saying "hold the rock, run here" is something of a massive stretch. 

    @tiamat63 said:

     But just saying "hold the rock, run here" is something of a massive stretch.

    I don't think so.  RB's have been playing the position for a long time before getting drafted...especially higher in the draft.  Unless you're Jerome Ford, you know that if the hole is not there you're supposed to use your vision to find a better option.  And if there is none, then you smash the hole and get a yard or two.  It's not rocket science.  Now, if you want to talk passing situations and the blocking responsibilities, then sure, don't put him in there to pass block until he knows what the heck he's supposed to do...but he better know how to run the ball right out of the box or you've made a bad draft pick.

  • Yep.

    Gabriel named starter.

    Have to give the Browns credit. Mostly, the offensive coordinator had to 

    have a serious talk with Stupanski.

    https://www.foxnews.com/sports/browns-name-dillon-gabriel-starting-quarterback-week-5

    Browns name Dillon Gabriel starting quarterback for Week 5

    Shedeur Sanders will still be on the bench

    @calfoxwc said:

    Browns name Dillon Gabriel starting quarterback for Week 5

    Shedeur Sanders will still be on the bench

    Right now that's where Sanders belongs.  Emergency QB.

  • @flugel said:

    whether you agree with what I'm saying or not

    🙂  

    Judkins is a RB.  There's really no reason a RB can't come out of college and be inserted as the starting RB in the NFL.   I don't mean to sound mentally negative to the position...but...it's not rocket science.  - when I give you the ball, you run between those 2 guys -   But I was one that was concerned by playing Judkins in game one because he missed everything...TC, PreSeason...he didn't even show up until Wednesday of game week.  I was concerned about pulled muscles and such from not getting into 'game shape'.    I'm quite happy that he's been ok!

    I agree that Flacco has not been good (I posted a graphic depicting so), happy feet, and all that.  But why does the savvy veteran have happy feet?  (rhetorical, we know the answer)  If this was our rookie 1st round pick, QB of the future, waiting in the wings, I'd really prefer waiting until the home game against Miami.  But we're talking about a 3rd round pick smurf (sorry Mr. Gabriel, don't take it personal 🙂 ).  So I don't, as much, give a $#!+.   I've seen Sanders in the final preseason game against the Rams...running around, going backwards, holding the ball away from his body in the process.  He's got a lot to learn...despite him thinking that he's ready to start.  

    With Gabriel having such a long college career, perhaps he's as ready as he's ever going to be.  Only the coaches know if they feel that way or not.  I truly wish the smurf well. 🙂 

    @orion said:

    🙂  

    Judkins is a RB.  There's really no reason a RB can't come out of college and be inserted as the starting RB in the NFL.   I don't mean to sound mentally negative to the position...but...it's not rocket science.  - when I give you the ball, you run between those 2 guys -   But I was one that was concerned by playing Judkins in game one because he missed everything...TC, PreSeason...he didn't even show up until Wednesday of game week.  I was concerned about pulled muscles and such from not getting into 'game shape'.    I'm quite happy that he's been ok!

    I agree that Flacco has not been good (I posted a graphic depicting so), happy feet, and all that.  But why does the savvy veteran have happy feet?  (rhetorical, we know the answer)  If this was our rookie 1st round pick, QB of the future, waiting in the wings, I'd really prefer waiting until the home game against Miami.  But we're talking about a 3rd round pick smurf (sorry Mr. Gabriel, don't take it personal 🙂 ).  So I don't, as much, give a $#!+.   I've seen Sanders in the final preseason game against the Rams...running around, going backwards, holding the ball away from his body in the process.  He's got a lot to learn...despite him thinking that he's ready to start.  

    With Gabriel having such a long college career, perhaps he's as ready as he's ever going to be.  Only the coaches know if they feel that way or not.  I truly wish the smurf well. 🙂 

    Very good points.  I brought up Judkins because you reminded me what a tremendous help Mack & Byner were to Bernie in the rookie year.   They certainly helped moved the chains with 1 prong of attack to take a lot of pressure off Bernie. Access to a talented/efficient RB or running game looks similar for Gabriel to that of Bernie in 85.  Not quite 2000 yards of rushing worth; but certainly enough to move the chains and keep drives alive. 

    I responded to the your point Kosar made about a week ago just the other day.   I think I mentioned there was a discussion during training camp when Kosar said the same thing on a video shared in a thread during training camp.  I actually posted it's a great idea to make the rookie(s) wait thinking Flacco wasn't going to struggle to re-learn the things he was efficient with just 2 years ago.  He's not even close to being that same guy this year; and apparently he wasn't in Indy last year.

    When teams are managed as poorly as this one has been (prior to a strong rookie class this year) - what in the world were they thinking drafting 2 QBs in this draft for knowing they have 2 1st round picks next year?  Keep in mind there's a team in LA that can draft a guy like WR Puka Nacua in the 5th round.  The Browns threw away the rest of their draft to trade into round 5 for Sanders.  I agree his last outing was a bad one so does that mean he's never going to be capable of being the guy we saw in the 1st pre-season game?  I don't know but why would they draft another QB just 2 rounds later if they trusted their intuition about Gabriel in the 1st place?  I don't want to waste 1 more minute on Flacco even though I expect some growing pains with Gabriel.  That said, if he's practicing with the projected starters for this game plan against a blitz happy Defensive Coordinator - he's got 2 TEs, 1-2 RBs and a speedy Isaiah Bond that can beat the blitz.  Am I just wishful thinking?  We're gonna find out early Sunday Morning...

  • @calfoxwc said:

    Browns name Dillon Gabriel starting quarterback for Week 5

    Shedeur Sanders will still be on the bench

    Right now that's where Sanders belongs.  Emergency QB.

    @orion said:

    Right now that's where Sanders belongs.  Emergency QB.

    Precisely - Like "911 can you hold?" kind of emergency...  1 thing at a time.

  • @orion said:

    🙂  

    Judkins is a RB.  There's really no reason a RB can't come out of college and be inserted as the starting RB in the NFL.   I don't mean to sound mentally negative to the position...but...it's not rocket science.  - when I give you the ball, you run between those 2 guys -   But I was one that was concerned by playing Judkins in game one because he missed everything...TC, PreSeason...he didn't even show up until Wednesday of game week.  I was concerned about pulled muscles and such from not getting into 'game shape'.    I'm quite happy that he's been ok!

    I agree that Flacco has not been good (I posted a graphic depicting so), happy feet, and all that.  But why does the savvy veteran have happy feet?  (rhetorical, we know the answer)  If this was our rookie 1st round pick, QB of the future, waiting in the wings, I'd really prefer waiting until the home game against Miami.  But we're talking about a 3rd round pick smurf (sorry Mr. Gabriel, don't take it personal 🙂 ).  So I don't, as much, give a $#!+.   I've seen Sanders in the final preseason game against the Rams...running around, going backwards, holding the ball away from his body in the process.  He's got a lot to learn...despite him thinking that he's ready to start.  

    With Gabriel having such a long college career, perhaps he's as ready as he's ever going to be.  Only the coaches know if they feel that way or not.  I truly wish the smurf well. 🙂 

    Very good points.  I brought up Judkins because you reminded me what a tremendous help Mack & Byner were to Bernie in the rookie year.   They certainly helped moved the chains with 1 prong of attack to take a lot of pressure off Bernie. Access to a talented/efficient RB or running game looks similar for Gabriel to that of Bernie in 85.  Not quite 2000 yards of rushing worth; but certainly enough to move the chains and keep drives alive. 

    I responded to the your point Kosar made about a week ago just the other day.   I think I mentioned there was a discussion during training camp when Kosar said the same thing on a video shared in a thread during training camp.  I actually posted it's a great idea to make the rookie(s) wait thinking Flacco wasn't going to struggle to re-learn the things he was efficient with just 2 years ago.  He's not even close to being that same guy this year; and apparently he wasn't in Indy last year.

    When teams are managed as poorly as this one has been (prior to a strong rookie class this year) - what in the world were they thinking drafting 2 QBs in this draft for knowing they have 2 1st round picks next year?  Keep in mind there's a team in LA that can draft a guy like WR Puka Nacua in the 5th round.  The Browns threw away the rest of their draft to trade into round 5 for Sanders.  I agree his last outing was a bad one so does that mean he's never going to be capable of being the guy we saw in the 1st pre-season game?  I don't know but why would they draft another QB just 2 rounds later if they trusted their intuition about Gabriel in the 1st place?  I don't want to waste 1 more minute on Flacco even though I expect some growing pains with Gabriel.  That said, if he's practicing with the projected starters for this game plan against a blitz happy Defensive Coordinator - he's got 2 TEs, 1-2 RBs and a speedy Isaiah Bond that can beat the blitz.  Am I just wishful thinking?  We're gonna find out early Sunday Morning...

    @flugel said:

    why would they draft another QB just 2 rounds later

    Because he was there and wasn't supposed to be.  And we needed a QB in the worst way.  They took a flier and a 6th round pick on him.  I was/am ok with that thinking.  It's an important position.  

    I can envision us drafting a QB towards the top of round 1 and going into TC with that guy, Gabriel & Sanders.  And not really care what Gabriel & Sanders think about it.  They're under contract.  This is, of course, considering that Gabriel showed that he would make a good backup and Sanders showed enough to continue to develop him.  I should think that Sanders might have some sort of trade value should you want to go that route.  But school is not out on him.  We've got 3/4 of a season to go through.  Things that we couldn't imagine can happen....or not...

  • @flugel said:

    why would they draft another QB just 2 rounds later

    Because he was there and wasn't supposed to be.  And we needed a QB in the worst way.  They took a flier and a 6th round pick on him.  I was/am ok with that thinking.  It's an important position.  

    I can envision us drafting a QB towards the top of round 1 and going into TC with that guy, Gabriel & Sanders.  And not really care what Gabriel & Sanders think about it.  They're under contract.  This is, of course, considering that Gabriel showed that he would make a good backup and Sanders showed enough to continue to develop him.  I should think that Sanders might have some sort of trade value should you want to go that route.  But school is not out on him.  We've got 3/4 of a season to go through.  Things that we couldn't imagine can happen....or not...

    @orion said:

    Because he was there and wasn't supposed to be.  And we needed a QB in the worst way.  They took a flier and a 6th round pick on him.  I was/am ok with that thinking.  It's an important position.  

    I can envision us drafting a QB towards the top of round 1 and going into TC with that guy, Gabriel & Sanders.  And not really care what Gabriel & Sanders think about it.  They're under contract.  This is, of course, considering that Gabriel showed that he would make a good backup and Sanders showed enough to continue to develop him.  I should think that Sanders might have some sort of trade value should you want to go that route.  But school is not out on him.  We've got 3/4 of a season to go through.  Things that we couldn't imagine can happen....or not...

    Sanders is a doofus. The guy  is immature 

    https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/46450557/shedeur-sanders-pantomimes-answers-browns-qb-questions

  • @flugel said:

    why would they draft another QB just 2 rounds later

    Because he was there and wasn't supposed to be.  And we needed a QB in the worst way.  They took a flier and a 6th round pick on him.  I was/am ok with that thinking.  It's an important position.  

    I can envision us drafting a QB towards the top of round 1 and going into TC with that guy, Gabriel & Sanders.  And not really care what Gabriel & Sanders think about it.  They're under contract.  This is, of course, considering that Gabriel showed that he would make a good backup and Sanders showed enough to continue to develop him.  I should think that Sanders might have some sort of trade value should you want to go that route.  But school is not out on him.  We've got 3/4 of a season to go through.  Things that we couldn't imagine can happen....or not...

    @orion said:

    Because he was there and wasn't supposed to be.  And we needed a QB in the worst way.  They took a flier and a 6th round pick on him.  I was/am ok with that thinking.  It's an important position.  

    I can envision us drafting a QB towards the top of round 1 and going into TC with that guy, Gabriel & Sanders.  And not really care what Gabriel & Sanders think about it.  They're under contract.  This is, of course, considering that Gabriel showed that he would make a good backup and Sanders showed enough to continue to develop him.  I should think that Sanders might have some sort of trade value should you want to go that route.  But school is not out on him.  We've got 3/4 of a season to go through.  Things that we couldn't imagine can happen....or not...

    We HAVE seen something similar except the Browns traded up to #3 overall in 1970 to draft Purdue's Mike Phipps.  In 1972, the Browns drafted Brian Sipe in round 13 who was on the taxi-squad (that era's version of practice squad) without suiting up for games his 1st 2 years.  When it all played out - Mike Phipps wasn't the solution while Sipe was good enough to stick around until he was the only League MVP we've seen here at QB in the Super Bowl era.  Brian Sipe & Bernie Kosar are my favorite 2 QBs I've seen play for the Browns.  Sipe wasn't supposed to have NFL arm strength so maybe Gabriel can overcome his non-prototypical height many think he can't.  

  • @orion said:

    image.thumb.png.bbc5da6da671dcc66b17d49378ec4bb3.png

    Kosar says, If you want to screw up another QB, then go ahead and play him now.

    I say, either at Pittsburgh, or more probably at home against Miami.

    Supposedly, the players like Flacco and don't want him pulled until it has to be done.  

    It's not 1985 any more; but Kosar played in 12 of 16 games and started 10 of them.  That year, the Browns went 8-8 which was good enough for 1st place in the AFC Central.  It also gave him the experience volume necessary for a 12-4 record to follow the next year under new OC - Lindy Infante. Aside from that, Kosar only started 2 years at the college level in comparison with Gabriel starting for 6 years in the blend of 3 different college programs at UCF, Oklahoma and Oregon.  Bo Nix is also a guy with a blended wealth of starting experience at 2 different college football programs that shortened the length of growing pains. 

    Just a few question in pertinence to the here and now.  Has Gabriel seen Joe Flacco hold onto the ball too long?; Has he seen Joe Flacco make bad decisions?;  Has he seen Joe Flacco playing like a lost rookie QB as recently as start #4 this season?; Has he seen the disaster on the edges of our pass pro better than Flacco did?  Okay, so Joe showed him how not to play QB.  

    He's not gonna get his growing pains until he plays the position where they are inevitable.  For example, Troy Aikman had one of the worst rookie years ever before he QB'd the Cowboys to 3 Super Bowl wins during his HOF career that unfolded. Yes, silly fans in Dallas were complaining Steve Walsh was their best QB at Aikman's very 1st incompletion.  Some of those knuckleheads probably even though Joe Walsh in another entertainment industry would be a better QB. It's the nature of the beast.  That said, I think we're also seeing the beginning of a new trend of successful young QBs that played in 2-3 different college football programs like Jayden Daniels, Bo Nix & even Jalen Hurts.  Come to think of it, Baker had a pretty good rookie season after playing at 2 different college programs (Texas Tech & Oklahoma).  

    @flugel said:

    Some of those knuckleheads probably even though Joe Walsh in another entertainment industry would be a better QB.

    Not a bad performance for being so late in his career.

  • Joe Walsh is great!  HIGHLY suggest listening to his song:  The Band Played On

    image.png.6137f9f236e6fd22b5da958f1f2ce0d3.png

    Lets see....Robert Griffin said this.  That confirms that Stef is doing it right.