Can conservatives read charts?
-
Sep 25, 2025Conversely, "left-wing violence has risen in the last 10 years" particularly since "Trump's rise to political prominence," the study says, and has generally targeted government and law enforcement.
So you really don't read anything you post, huh? Just, the headline...
Or maybe you can't read the charts in that article either
Yes, I did so. It is from NBC, and notoriously, it just shows that right wing violence plunged in 2025.
haha, I knew you'd jump on it.
Here is the truth:
Have a nice birdgirl day !
-
The assassination of a Minnesota Dem politician and her husband, and the attempted assassination of another political couple, with a larger hit list of Dems was less than 4 months ago and it's already completely removed from your minds.
If you can't even remember that, why bother engaging you in other instances? Where you'll either not think it happened or think it doesn't actually count as right wing.
You're the same people now shouting that every shooting is done by a trans person, regardless of facts. Some of you still posting that past shootings were done by trans folks when we objectively know that isn't true.
While you simultaneously want to claim "disrupting traffic" should be considered left wing violence (an insane and incredibly biased take).
Why engage if you don't even exist in the same realty?
Chart says the last 30 yrs and to my point, them being right wing, and that can be debated, was supposed to be the factor as left wing violence actually is a factor of being on the left.
You could say your examples liked heavy metal, so anyone that listens to heavy metal commits violent acts. Sure they acted on their political belief I suppose, it's not something the right pushes for or incites. That's why we call them mental one offs.
You're ignoring the ideology the left is peddling that is causing violence.
While you simultaneously want to claim "disrupting traffic" should be considered left wing violence (an insane and incredibly biased take
Stick to the facts and stop trying to add something I never mentioned.
If you can't even remember that, why bother engaging you in other instances? Where you'll either not think it happened or think it doesn't actually count as right wing.
Again, the chart says the last 30 years right wing violence was at the top yet you only cited a couple recent incidents.
And either side will have nuts that act on their beliefs but I'm talking to the reality that the left is inciting violence and they are creating that ideology.
Chart says the last 30 yrs and to my point, them being right wing, and that can be debated, was supposed to be the factor as left wing violence actually is a factor of being on the left.
You could say your examples liked heavy metal, so anyone that listens to heavy metal commits violent acts. Sure they acted on their political belief I suppose, it's not something the right pushes for or incites. That's why we call them mental one offs.
You're ignoring the ideology the left is peddling that is causing violence.
Stick to the facts and stop trying to add something I never mentioned.
Again, the chart says the last 30 years right wing violence was at the top yet you only cited a couple recent incidents.
And either side will have nuts that act on their beliefs but I'm talking to the reality that the left is inciting violence and they are creating that ideology.
An evangelical pro life Christian preacher that bites conservative can murder a Dem politician and your response is "well we don't really know his political affiliation". Give me a break. Christ. Your double standard / hypocrisy on this subject is insane.
Gorka brought it up, not you. And you're dying on the same hill he is right now.
I cited the most recent one to make a point. I'm not researching 30 years of attacks on abortion clinics, etc. You can't even agree that the Minnesota attach was right wing violence. If you can't even acknowledge that reality why would I dig into years of data for you to stick your head in the sand across all of it?
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Yes, I did so. It is from NBC, and notoriously, it just shows that right wing violence plunged in 2025.
haha, I knew you'd jump on it.
Here is the truth:
Have a nice birdgirl day !
Yes, I did so. It is from NBC, and notoriously, it just shows that right wing violence plunged in 2025.
haha, I knew you'd jump on it.
Here is the truth:
Have a nice birdgirl day !
Jump on it? Cal you're a fucking moron.
Simple question - has the right or left committed more acts of violence over the last 10, 20, 30 years?
I'll give you a hint. The answer is in the article you linked and totally read. I
I'll even put the charts here for more help ...
Come on now cal. Simple question
-
Timothy McVeigh comes to mind for me. Blowing up a federal building with a day care in it is nasty stuff.
Timothy McVeigh comes to mind for me. Blowing up a federal building with a day care in it is nasty stuff.
He wasn't acting in a conservative manner though. Nothing political at the time was inciting him.
He didn't target Democrats as part of a victim mentality.
He was anti gov't and met Tim in the military.
They were nuts that acted on their own mentality.
-
Chart says the last 30 yrs and to my point, them being right wing, and that can be debated, was supposed to be the factor as left wing violence actually is a factor of being on the left.
You could say your examples liked heavy metal, so anyone that listens to heavy metal commits violent acts. Sure they acted on their political belief I suppose, it's not something the right pushes for or incites. That's why we call them mental one offs.
You're ignoring the ideology the left is peddling that is causing violence.
Stick to the facts and stop trying to add something I never mentioned.
Again, the chart says the last 30 years right wing violence was at the top yet you only cited a couple recent incidents.
And either side will have nuts that act on their beliefs but I'm talking to the reality that the left is inciting violence and they are creating that ideology.
An evangelical pro life Christian preacher that bites conservative can murder a Dem politician and your response is "well we don't really know his political affiliation". Give me a break. Christ. Your double standard / hypocrisy on this subject is insane.
Gorka brought it up, not you. And you're dying on the same hill he is right now.
I cited the most recent one to make a point. I'm not researching 30 years of attacks on abortion clinics, etc. You can't even agree that the Minnesota attach was right wing violence. If you can't even acknowledge that reality why would I dig into years of data for you to stick your head in the sand across all of it?
An evangelical pro life Christian preacher that bites conservative can murder a Dem politician and your response is "well we don't really know his political affiliation". Give me a break. Christ. Your double standard / hypocrisy on this subject is insane.
Gorka brought it up, not you. And you're dying on the same hill he is right now.
I cited the most recent one to make a point. I'm not researching 30 years of attacks on abortion clinics, etc. You can't even agree that the Minnesota attach was right wing violence. If you can't even acknowledge that reality why would I dig into years of data for you to stick your head in the sand across all of it?
You can't acknowledge that there is no right wing movement or ideology that incites violence like the left.
-
An evangelical pro life Christian preacher that bites conservative can murder a Dem politician and your response is "well we don't really know his political affiliation". Give me a break. Christ. Your double standard / hypocrisy on this subject is insane.
Gorka brought it up, not you. And you're dying on the same hill he is right now.
I cited the most recent one to make a point. I'm not researching 30 years of attacks on abortion clinics, etc. You can't even agree that the Minnesota attach was right wing violence. If you can't even acknowledge that reality why would I dig into years of data for you to stick your head in the sand across all of it?
You can't acknowledge that there is no right wing movement or ideology that incites violence like the left.
-
Timothy McVeigh comes to mind for me. Blowing up a federal building with a day care in it is nasty stuff.
He wasn't acting in a conservative manner though. Nothing political at the time was inciting him.
He didn't target Democrats as part of a victim mentality.
He was anti gov't and met Tim in the military.
They were nuts that acted on their own mentality.
He wasn't acting in a conservative manner though. Nothing political at the time was inciting him.
He didn't target Democrats as part of a victim mentality.
He was anti gov't and met Tim in the military.
They were nuts that acted on their own mentality.
You’re free to come up with your own scoring system, but McVeigh was a pro-gun guy with some white supremacy flavor mixed in so if you had to pick a box to plunk him in, the rest of us are going to put him in the right wing box. Cut and paste coming up:
Timothy McVeigh's ideologies were a mix of anti-government, extremist, and white supremacist beliefs that culminated in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. He was motivated by a deep distrust of the federal government, which he saw as a tyrannical and oppressive force.Anti-government and anti-authority viewsMcVeigh's primary motivation was his fervent anti-government stance. His hatred for the federal government intensified due to two key events:- Ruby Ridge (1992): A deadly standoff in Idaho between federal agents and the Weaver family, which McVeigh saw as an act of government aggression against its own citizens.
- Waco Siege (1993): The raid on a Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas, which resulted in a fire that killed 76 people, including women and children. McVeigh visited Waco during the siege and was radicalized by the incident, believing it to be evidence of government overreach.
Obsession with gun rightsMcVeigh was an ardent supporter of gun rights, which he also connected to his anti-government beliefs. He viewed the government's efforts to regulate firearms, such as the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban, as an infringement on personal liberties and a step toward totalitarian control.White supremacist literatureMcVeigh was heavily influenced by the neo-Nazi and white supremacist novel The Turner Diaries.- The novel describes a fictional revolution in which a federal building is blown up with a truck bomb to incite a larger race war.
- Authorities found pages from the book, including those detailing the bombing of a federal building, in McVeigh's car after his arrest.
- The book, widely regarded as a "blueprint for revolution" and the "bible of the racist right," was a direct inspiration for the Oklahoma City attack.
Belief in violence and accelerationismMcVeigh believed that violence was a necessary and justified tactic against a government he perceived as tyrannical. His actions are often viewed as a form of accelerationism, a white supremacist ideology that seeks to spark a race war by hastening the collapse of existing government systems through violent acts.Sense of martyrdomMcVeigh saw himself as a "patriot" fighting against government overreach, likening his actions to the American Revolution. He viewed the victims of the bombing as "collateral damage" in a war against what he called the "Evil Empire". He showed no remorse for his actions and believed the bombing was a righteous act of resistance. -
He wasn't acting in a conservative manner though. Nothing political at the time was inciting him.
He didn't target Democrats as part of a victim mentality.
He was anti gov't and met Tim in the military.
They were nuts that acted on their own mentality.
You’re free to come up with your own scoring system, but McVeigh was a pro-gun guy with some white supremacy flavor mixed in so if you had to pick a box to plunk him in, the rest of us are going to put him in the right wing box. Cut and paste coming up:
Timothy McVeigh's ideologies were a mix of anti-government, extremist, and white supremacist beliefs that culminated in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. He was motivated by a deep distrust of the federal government, which he saw as a tyrannical and oppressive force.Anti-government and anti-authority viewsMcVeigh's primary motivation was his fervent anti-government stance. His hatred for the federal government intensified due to two key events:- Ruby Ridge (1992): A deadly standoff in Idaho between federal agents and the Weaver family, which McVeigh saw as an act of government aggression against its own citizens.
- Waco Siege (1993): The raid on a Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas, which resulted in a fire that killed 76 people, including women and children. McVeigh visited Waco during the siege and was radicalized by the incident, believing it to be evidence of government overreach.
Obsession with gun rightsMcVeigh was an ardent supporter of gun rights, which he also connected to his anti-government beliefs. He viewed the government's efforts to regulate firearms, such as the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban, as an infringement on personal liberties and a step toward totalitarian control.White supremacist literatureMcVeigh was heavily influenced by the neo-Nazi and white supremacist novel The Turner Diaries.- The novel describes a fictional revolution in which a federal building is blown up with a truck bomb to incite a larger race war.
- Authorities found pages from the book, including those detailing the bombing of a federal building, in McVeigh's car after his arrest.
- The book, widely regarded as a "blueprint for revolution" and the "bible of the racist right," was a direct inspiration for the Oklahoma City attack.
Belief in violence and accelerationismMcVeigh believed that violence was a necessary and justified tactic against a government he perceived as tyrannical. His actions are often viewed as a form of accelerationism, a white supremacist ideology that seeks to spark a race war by hastening the collapse of existing government systems through violent acts.Sense of martyrdomMcVeigh saw himself as a "patriot" fighting against government overreach, likening his actions to the American Revolution. He viewed the victims of the bombing as "collateral damage" in a war against what he called the "Evil Empire". He showed no remorse for his actions and believed the bombing was a righteous act of resistance.You’re free to come up with your own scoring system, but McVeigh was a pro-gun guy with some white supremacy flavor mixed in so if you had to pick a box to plunk him in, the rest of us are going to put him in the right wing box. Cut and paste coming up:
From the guy who doesn't like labels?
He's wasn't acting on right wing ideologies.
He was equal anti gov't. You literally posted it. It doesn't say right or left, wtf you guys can never have a genuine discussion.
You stormed the Capitol... What are you talking about?
There was a plot to kidnap Michigan's governor
That was a mostly peaceful protest.
-
-
You’re free to come up with your own scoring system, but McVeigh was a pro-gun guy with some white supremacy flavor mixed in so if you had to pick a box to plunk him in, the rest of us are going to put him in the right wing box. Cut and paste coming up:
From the guy who doesn't like labels?
He's wasn't acting on right wing ideologies.
He was equal anti gov't. You literally posted it. It doesn't say right or left, wtf you guys can never have a genuine discussion.
You stormed the Capitol... What are you talking about?
There was a plot to kidnap Michigan's governor
That was a mostly peaceful protest.
From the guy who doesn't like labels?
He's wasn't acting on right wing ideologies.
He was equal anti gov't. You literally posted it. It doesn't say right or left, wtf you guys can never have a genuine discussion.
Like l said, you’re free to create your own scoring system. Who knows, maybe it will catch on? Until then, McVeigh gets lumped in to the right wing category. Pro gun and white supremacy leans him into that box.
-
From the guy who doesn't like labels?
He's wasn't acting on right wing ideologies.
He was equal anti gov't. You literally posted it. It doesn't say right or left, wtf you guys can never have a genuine discussion.
Like l said, you’re free to create your own scoring system. Who knows, maybe it will catch on? Until then, McVeigh gets lumped in to the right wing category. Pro gun and white supremacy leans him into that box.
Like l said, you’re free to create your own scoring system. Who knows, maybe it will catch on? Until then, McVeigh gets lumped in to the right wing category. Pro gun and white supremacy leans him into that box.
You're free to live in fantasy land.
-
-
Like l said, you’re free to create your own scoring system. Who knows, maybe it will catch on? Until then, McVeigh gets lumped in to the right wing category. Pro gun and white supremacy leans him into that box.
You're free to live in fantasy land.
You're free to live in fantasy land.
Sure man. Right wingers are totally anti-gun rights and have never been accused of being racist.
You’re just being ridiculous at this point.
-
The assassination of a Minnesota Dem politician and her husband, and the attempted assassination of another political couple, with a larger hit list of Dems was less than 4 months ago and it's already completely removed from your minds.
If you can't even remember that, why bother engaging you in other instances? Where you'll either not think it happened or think it doesn't actually count as right wing.
You're the same people now shouting that every shooting is done by a trans person, regardless of facts. Some of you still posting that past shootings were done by trans folks when we objectively know that isn't true.
While you simultaneously want to claim "disrupting traffic" should be considered left wing violence (an insane and incredibly biased take).
Why engage if you don't even exist in the same realty?
The assassination of a Minnesota Dem politician and her husband, and the attempted assassination of another political couple, with a larger hit list of Dems was less than 4 months ago and it's already completely removed from your minds.
Not mine, it was tragedy carried by someone who was appointed to his position by Tampon Tim. ?
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
The assassination of a Minnesota Dem politician and her husband, and the attempted assassination of another political couple, with a larger hit list of Dems was less than 4 months ago and it's already completely removed from your minds.
Not mine, it was tragedy carried by someone who was appointed to his position by Tampon Tim. ?
Not mine, it was tragedy carried by someone who was appointed to his position by Tampon Tim. ?
McVeigh was very strange. Had grievances against the gov,
goodspeedgratiotcountyhistorical.blog
Mar 19, 2025In one farm tragedy, J. W. McVeigh lost his farm home in New Haven Township when the Ithaca Fire Department lacked sufficient water to extinguish the fire. In one week, the McVeigh farm was one of three homes destroyed by fire in Gratiot County. A series of rural-urban Acquaintance Night meetings attempted toand was radicalized in other ways springing from that. -
The assassination of a Minnesota Dem politician and her husband, and the attempted assassination of another political couple, with a larger hit list of Dems was less than 4 months ago and it's already completely removed from your minds.
Not mine, it was tragedy carried by someone who was appointed to his position by Tampon Tim. ?
Not mine, it was tragedy carried by someone who was appointed to his position by Tampon Tim. ?
Oh God you still think that... You dumbasses are too damn gullible
Between this and the constant stream of right wing propaganda/slop that Jax is fed it's clear there's no saving any of you. I'm not going to beat out the echo chamber you all reside in.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Looking at the charts in the article cal posted, has the right or left committed more acts of violence over the last few decades?
-
Sure man. Right wingers are totally anti-gun rights and have never been accused of being racist.
You’re just being ridiculous at this point.
Now you're going full retard.
-
Sure man. Right wingers are totally anti-gun rights and have never been accused of being racist.
You’re just being ridiculous at this point.
Now you're going full retard.
Now you're going full retard.
I was making fun of you Jax. You kinda deserved it ya goof.
-
I was making fun of you Jax. You kinda deserved it ya goof.
No shit retard.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login