Lums was right
-
Hook
Line
Sinker
You guys are taking his bait. Stan hates losing as much as the rest of us.
Hook
Line
Sinker
You guys are taking his bait.
Absolutely.
Stan hates losing as much as the rest of us.
I dunno. Dude seems a tad touched...
-
Hook
Line
Sinker
You guys are taking his bait. Stan hates losing as much as the rest of us.
Hook
Line
Sinker
You guys are taking his bait. Stan hates losing as much as the rest of us.
Exactly.....it's all about getting a reaction...
And it's apparently working...
-
I just got one thing to say.....
Brady Quinn is FARKING GAY! DA is THE MOTHERFARKIN MAN!
-
I came to laugh at the losers over here but now i feel kind of dirty. Its like the time i was walking through the portland zoo and saw the monkey playing with himself. This might be the most pathetic place on the interweb.
LUMBERGH! WHAT THE FRUCK ARE YOU STILL DOING HERE?!?
oh yeah I forgot. You stayed here just long enough to say TOLD YOU SO!
your work is done. you may leave here now. Instead of waiting to read your next post the 16 remaining members should be home taking the Brady posters off the walls of their mother's basements now.
-
@shepwrite said:
Wait... there's an I told you so in here? From whom? Someone who thinks DA is good?He. Was. The. Lowest. Rated. Passer. In. The. NFL.
Then he had a 56 passer rating in the preseason. Then he had a 33 last Sunday. What's next, Jamarcus Russell territory?
The only "I told you so" would come from people who have said both of our QBs suck. That's it.
Brady. Sucks.
Told you so.
-
@shepwrite said:
Wait... there's an I told you so in here? From whom? Someone who thinks DA is good?He. Was. The. Lowest. Rated. Passer. In. The. NFL.
Then he had a 56 passer rating in the preseason. Then he had a 33 last Sunday. What's next, Jamarcus Russell territory?
The only "I told you so" would come from people who have said both of our QBs suck. That's it.
Brady. Sucks.
Told you so.
Brady. Sucks.
Told you so.
So far..yes he certainly has...
My question to the people gloating about this is....how do you explain the 3 int, no TD and 30 Qb rating last week from Anderson? Or how do you explain the fact that Quinn sucks that bad and yet he outplayed Anderson in the preseason?
Quinn sucks....Anderson sucks as well. We don't have a QB. I only hope one of these two stiffs plays well enough so that we don't have to draft a QB in the first round again.
-
@inspecta said:
The DA fags will quietly gloss over the fact that DA looked like the same old DA on Sunday because right now they're too busy dancing in the streetsYou mean dancing in the streets like an Afganni shooting thier guns in the air?
Surely no one here would do such a thing when the TEAM is 0-3...
-
@inspecta said:
The DA fags will quietly gloss over the fact that DA looked like the same old DA on Sunday because right now they're too busy dancing in the streets that we get to see the turnover machine in action on Sunday, and of course because Quinn was benched.And in the end that's what it comes down to for those guys. It sure as hell ain't about seeing the Browns win, its about seeing the horse they backed starting on Sunday, what happens during those 60 minutes on the field is just an amusing sideshow.
It's some really sick shit, but just about everybody on this site recognizes them for what they are so let them ramble on about this and that. After all guys, with the Browns 0-3 and not going anywhere I think on some sort of delusional level they take a morbid amount of joy watching Quinn get benched. They sure as hell don't have anything on the field to root for, so at least they can say they rooted for a "winner" even if it is an oaf of a QB.
I could handle a 4-12 (or worse season) seeing Quinn start because that will prove either he doesn't or he does have it.
I can't handle the same from Anderson. Since Anderson is better, my expectations have now risen to 9-7, at least. It's all about wins from the guy the gives us a better chance win. No pussy excuses about how the teams sucks, bray-bray is dropping balls, the line sucks, no running game, etc. Anderson is supposed to be better - let's see it. He went 10-5 two years ago all by himself, so I expect at least 9-7 is fair. No 'well Anderson had a good day, but he doesn't play defense'. Too damn bad, a loss is a loss.
Can anyone explain to me how 'playing the guy who gives us the best chance to win' doesn't apply to every other position? Notably RB?
-
@inspecta said:
The DA fags will quietly gloss over the fact that DA looked like the same old DA on Sunday because right now they're too busy dancing in the streets that we get to see the turnover machine in action on Sunday, and of course because Quinn was benched.And in the end that's what it comes down to for those guys. It sure as hell ain't about seeing the Browns win, its about seeing the horse they backed starting on Sunday, what happens during those 60 minutes on the field is just an amusing sideshow.
It's some really sick shit, but just about everybody on this site recognizes them for what they are so let them ramble on about this and that. After all guys, with the Browns 0-3 and not going anywhere I think on some sort of delusional level they take a morbid amount of joy watching Quinn get benched. They sure as hell don't have anything on the field to root for, so at least they can say they rooted for a "winner" even if it is an oaf of a QB.
I could handle a 4-12 (or worse season) seeing Quinn start because that will prove either he doesn't or he does have it.
I can't handle the same from Anderson. Since Anderson is better, my expectations have now risen to 9-7, at least. It's all about wins from the guy the gives us a better chance win. No pussy excuses about how the teams sucks, bray-bray is dropping balls, the line sucks, no running game, etc. Anderson is supposed to be better - let's see it. He went 10-5 two years ago all by himself, so I expect at least 9-7 is fair. No 'well Anderson had a good day, but he doesn't play defense'. Too damn bad, a loss is a loss.
Can anyone explain to me how 'playing the guy who gives us the best chance to win' doesn't apply to every other position? Notably RB?
Can anyone explain to me how 'playing the guy who gives us the best chance to win' doesn't apply to every other position? Notably RB?
speaking of running backs Adrian Peterson was there for the taking but nooooooooooooooo...
peterson would be the franchise. He would have brought the browns back. I SAID TAKE HIM but no
it was clear that choosing an offensive tackle to be the franchise was the wise move.
Again:
Told you so.
But now im done with the told you so stuff.
Next Im going to name the one thing that could actually get this team a winning season THIS year: narrow the fooking SPLITS on the line. Ridiculously wide. splits that look nothing like any other offense in the league. The browns linemen spend their whole time trying to react to their gaps and lose leverage right away, never fire off the ball. NO WONDER THEY CANT RUN THE BALL.
-
Sorry, had Quinn lit-up the place with an awesome display of QB'ing, I may be writing about the Brady Nation, but around here we have to give credit where credit is due and I have to say that DA is our better QB.
Thanks for keeping the hope Lums.
Sorry, had Quinn lit-up the place with an awesome display of QB'ing, I may be writing about the Brady Nation, but around here we have to give credit where credit is due and I have to say that DA is our better QB.
Thanks for keeping the hope Lums.
LOL! Knock it off Jerry Springer! Isn't he a basterd folks?
- Tom F.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login